
Iran Retaliates against Israel with Barrage of Ballistic Missiles
Heidi Levine/For The Washington Post
First responders at the scene of a residential building in Ramat Gan, Israel, that was heavily damaged by Iran's barrage of ballistic missiles Friday.
Iran unleashed a barrage of ballistic missiles at Israel late Friday as it retaliated for the waves of Israeli strikes that killed top military leaders and nuclear scientists, and damaged a key uranium enrichment site.
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, announced the start of the retaliatory attack in a recorded message carried by state television. 'We will not allow them to get away with this great crime they committed,' he said. 'The Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic will deal heavy blows to this enemy.'
Most of the missiles were intercepted or fell short, the Israel Defense Forces said Friday, but at least one appeared to have slammed into central Tel Aviv in an area where a major military base is located.
'Iran has crossed red lines by daring to fire missiles at civilian population centers in Israel,' Defense Minister Israel Katz said. 'We will continue to defend the citizens of Israel and will ensure that the Ayatollah regime pays a very heavy price for its criminal actions.'
Israeli leaders have portrayed the campaign as a preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear program. For years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has argued that only military force would denuclearize Iran.
But after a year of crippling military and strategic setbacks, including the loss of key allies in Lebanon and Syria, Iran has a limited arsenal with which to fight back. And it's unclear how Tehran plans to match Israel's escalation, which could last days or weeks, according to Israeli officials.
Iran and Israel, longtime rivals, began openly trading blows last year as part of the regional spillover from the war in Gaza. But the attacks – including an Israeli strike on the Iranian Consulate in Damascus, Syria – were more narrowly calibrated to avoid spiraling into a wider conflict.
Now, Tehran is much more isolated, with its partner, Hezbollah, decimated in Lebanon and the regime it propped up in Syria gone. In October, Iran fired nearly 200 ballistic missiles at Israel after a covert Israeli operation killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran. But on Friday, the IDF said fewer than 100 missiles were launched from Iran, although around 40 people were injured in the strike, according to medics and emergency services in Israel.
In Iran, the Israeli strikes 'crossed all red lines,' Ali Larijani, a prominent Iranian politician and adviser to the supreme leader, said in an interview with state television. Larijani spoke by phone, pledging: 'There are no limits left to respond to this crime, and the hand of divine vengeance will grip the brutal terrorist regime and its supporters.'
Previous Israeli strikes targeted Iranian military sites and hardware, many of them far from major cities, but Friday's raids included attacks on military leaders at their homes in residential areas.
'This was in the center of Tehran, entire apartment buildings collapsed. So this was not the kind of restrained engagement we saw last year,' said Nicole Grajewski, an Iran researcher and nuclear policy fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Rescue teams in Tehran dug through the rubble for hours Friday at strike sites where senior military officials and nuclear scientists were targeted. At least 78 people were killed in the Israeli strikes across Iran on Friday, according to Iran's ambassador to the United Nations. It was not clear if that toll included both civilians and military forces.
Among the senior officers killed were Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, head of the IRGC Aerospace Forces; Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, the army chief of staff who reported directly to the supreme leader; and Maj. Gen. Gholam Ali Rashid, who was responsible for coordinating operations among Iran's military forces, according to Iranian broadcasters.
Grajewski said the conflict could expand if Iran determines there was U.S. involvement in the attacks. 'It would give Iran more targets,' she said.
In anticipation of the Israeli strikes, the Trump administration drew down the number of personnel it had in the region, scaling back diplomatic operations in Iraq, as the Pentagon authorized military families to withdraw from other places in the Middle East.
Patriot and THAAD missile defense batteries, operated by U.S. military personnel and originally deployed under the Biden administration, participated in Israeli air defense Friday evening, according to U.S. defense officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive subject. That represented a more limited participation in Israel's defense than last year, when American air and sea assets helped shoot down incoming Iranian missiles during two retaliatory Iranian attacks.
Among Israel's targets Friday were enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, as well as a nuclear facility in Isfahan, according to Israeli officials and the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog.
The agency's director general, Rafael Mariano Grossi, told the U.N. Security Council that damage to Natanz had caused 'radioactive and chemical contamination at the site.' The potential impact on other facilities was unclear. There were reports of military activity around Fordow, but there was no confirmation it was hit.
Iran had been in talks with the Trump administration to negotiate a new nuclear deal, after the U.S. president withdrew in his first term from a comprehensive agreement Tehran struck with world powers, including the United States under President Barack Obama.
Iran's foreign minister and President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, were supposed to meet Sunday in Oman for another round of negotiations. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left.'
Inside Iran, many residents were taking stock of the damage and preparing for the possibility of a drawn-out confrontation. The sheer scale of destruction from hours of relentless strikes that simultaneously hit multiple parts of the country appeared to initially frustrate the official Iranian response.
In Tehran, state television broadcast back-to-back coverage of the strikes' aftermath, with correspondents reporting from rubble-strewn streets. Outside a residential building in central Tehran, a television reporter said that a number of civilians had been pulled from the rubble, including children.
'The rescue teams are now lifting debris from one unit that hasn't been cleared yet,' he said, gesturing to a partially collapsed building facade. 'A few minutes ago, the bodies of two martyrs, a woman and a young kid, were taken out,' he said. A small crowd gathered behind him to watch the rescue teams work.
In the Saadat Abad neighborhood in northwestern Tehran, another strike targeted an apartment block that neighbors said housed some nuclear scientists. 'As you can see, the complex behind me has been badly hit. Three floors have collapsed,' a reporter said, adding that the force of the explosion triggered a fire and sent debris flying.
Other Iranians described terrifying scenes that stretched into early dawn Friday.
'It was scary at some points at night, of course. We live very close to one of the targets in Nobonyad. I think it was a military target,' said 32-year-old Saba, a housewife who lives in a neighborhood on Tehran's northern edge.
Neda, a swimming instructor from Tabriz, said the waves of attacks in her area seemed to grow louder as the day went on. Like Saba, Neda spoke on the condition that she be identified by only her first name because of fear of retribution.
Now, Neda said, her neighbors are scrambling to prepare for what's expected to be another night of heavy strikes.
'I heard from friends that there is already a kilometers-long petrol line,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Administration Considers Adding 36 Countries to Travel Ban List
Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a Cabinet meeting in March. The United States is considering restricting entry to citizens of an additional 36 countries in what would be a significant expansion of the travel ban announced by the Trump administration early this month, according to a State Department memo reviewed by The Washington Post. Among the new list of countries that could face visa bans or other restrictions are 25 African nations, including significant U.S. partners such as Egypt and Djibouti, plus countries in the Caribbean, Central Asia and several Pacific Island nations. A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on internal deliberations or communications. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Such a move would mark another escalation in the Trump administration's aggressive crackdown on immigration. The memo, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and sent Saturday to U.S. diplomats who work with the countries, said the governments of listed nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department. It set a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday for them to provide an initial action plan for meeting the requirements. The memo identified varied benchmarks that, in the administration's estimation, these countries were failing to meet. Some countries had 'no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,' or they suffered from 'widespread government fraud.' Others had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the United States, the memo said. Other reasons included the availability of citizenship by monetary investment without a requirement of residency and claims of 'antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States' by people from those countries. The memo also stated that if a country was willing to accept third-country nationals who were removed from the United States or enter a 'safe third country' agreement it could mitigate other concerns. It was not immediately clear when the proposed travel restrictions would be enforced if the demands were not met. The countries facing scrutiny in the memo: Angola; Antigua and Barbuda; Benin; Bhutan; Burkina Faso; Cabo Verde; Cambodia; Cameroon; Democratic Republic of Congo; Djibouti; Dominica; Ethiopia; Egypt; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Ivory Coast; Kyrgyzstan; Liberia; Malawi; Mauritania; Niger; Nigeria; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Sao Tome and Principe; Senegal; South Sudan; Syria; Tanzania; Tonga; Tuvalu; Uganda; Vanuatu; Zambia; and Zimbabwe. The list represents a significant expansion of a presidential proclamation issued June 4, when the United States fully restricted the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The United States also had partially restricted the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela under that order. Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration have described its efforts to issue blanket travel bans on selected nations as xenophobic and bigoted, pointing to President Donald Trump's efforts to block travel from Muslim-majority nations in his first term and the high number of African and Caribbean nations targeted during this term. Early in his first term, Trump attempted to restrict travel from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya. The initial version of the ban caused confusion and chaos at airports. It faced numerous legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld the third version of it in June 2018. While the travel ban was rescinded under the Biden administration, Trump repeatedly pledged to reinstate it on the campaign trail, stating it would be 'bigger than before.' On Inauguration Day, the White House issued an executive order calling on U.S. agencies, including the State Department, to look for 'countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.'


Yomiuri Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Democrats Engage in ‘Treacherous' Fight with Trump on Immigration, Protests
Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post Rep. Pete Aguilar (California) and other Democrats speak on the steps of the U.S. House on June 12 after the forcible removal of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) from a news conference earlier in the day featuring Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem. Democrats are trying to strike a careful balance as tensions escalate with President Donald Trump over immigration and street protests, issues on which Republicans have held a political advantage in recent years. Party leaders are anxious to tamp down scenes of unrest – dismayed at photos of Mexican flags being waved around burning cars that seem ready-made for attack ads – but also eager to tap into growing outrage over the Trump administration's deportation raids, deployment of the military on U.S. soil, and threats to arrest demonstrators and elected officials. Now the party faces another test: the nationwide protests planned for Saturday. The gatherings in major cities, planned long before the showdown in California, could be the largest mass demonstration yet against Trump's second term at a moment that Democrats see as full of pitfalls but also opportunity. 'Every time a troublemaker sets a car on fire, he wins,' Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha said of Trump. 'Every time somebody takes to the street of an American city and peacefully protests, we're winning because we're bringing attention to a government that's starting to look more and more authoritarian.' Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) confronted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem at a news conference Thursday and was pinned down and handcuffed by FBI and Secret Service police, creating a viral moment that his Democratic colleagues quickly amplified. And California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) railed against Trump's decision to send the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles earlier in the week and compared the president's threats to arrest him to those of 'authoritarian regimes.' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) delivered an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Thursday condemning Padilla's treatment during Noem's news conference. In the same address, Schatz urged protesters: 'Be very disciplined this weekend. Be very peaceful this weekend.' The center-left think tank Third Way promoted a clip of Schatz on social media. Democrats have struggled in consecutive elections to navigate internal divisions over immigration and public safety and respond to Republican attacks portraying them as weak, paying a price at the ballot box for far-left slogans such as 'Abolish ICE' and 'Defund the police.' But some believe that Trump has overplayed his edge with his actions in California and beyond, giving them an opening to turn public opinion in their favor. The clashes in Los Angeles offer both parties some reasons for optimism. Polls show Americans narrowly oppose the protests of immigration enforcement there. The country is also closely divided on Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard and the Marines, which Newsom and other Democratic leaders said inflamed a situation that was under control. Some polls show Americans narrowly oppose it. 'It's a politically treacherous moment for everyone involved,' Democratic strategist David Axelrod said. Over the past week, images of burning cars helped fuel Republicans' portrayal of Democratic-led cities as unruly disasters, even as the unrest in Los Angeles was confined mostly to a few blocks. Initially, it was an unwelcome change of topic for Democrats, who had been watching with glee as Trump and billionaire donor Elon Musk engaged in a petty feud and as Republicans fought over Trump's tax bill on Capitol Hill. 'This anarchy will not stand,' Trump said Tuesday, referring to the Los Angeles protests. 'We will not allow federal agents to be attacked, and we will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' Democratic elected officials have called Trump's Los Angeles response a 'distraction,' eager to get back to hammering the Republicans over rising costs, proposed cuts to Medicaid and other slashes to the social safety net in the legislation. But as Trump has escalated his tactics and rhetoric – widening deportations, sending more forces to California and casually threatening 'very heavy force' against those who protest his military parade in D.C. – many Democrats have embraced a fight. Some hope the aggressiveness of his crackdown policies gives them a chance to chip away at the GOP's advantage on immigration. Trump's approval ratings on immigration continue to be higher than his marks on issues such as the economy, but they have dropped over the course of his second term, turning net-negative in multiple recent polls. Some of the Democratic Party's most prominent voices have challenged Trump in stark terms, reflecting the pressure from the base to push back hard on him. Newsom, a potential White House hopeful who conspicuously reached out to MAGA leaders this year, attacked Trump's deportations this past week. He highlighted Trump's Thursday social media post acknowledging that farmers, a key Republican constituency, are complaining that his immigration crackdown is 'taking very good, long time workers away from them.' 'Turns out, chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy,' Newsom wrote. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch (D-Massachusetts) used especially strong language at a House Oversight Committee hearing on immigration on Thursday. He compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents' detention of one international student, who was grabbed off the street, to a 'Gestapo operation.' 'My dad served in the Second World War. He fought the Nazis in northern Africa, he fought the Nazis on the Italian Peninsula,' Lynch said in his opening statement, almost yelling at times. 'And I think he's looking down right now and he's happy that I'm fighting today's Nazis.' Testifying at the hearing was Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D), a potential 2028 presidential candidate who has sought to go on the offensive on immigration. Pritzker devoted much of his speech at a Michigan Democratic Party dinner last weekend to the subject. But Democrats spent much of the eight-hour hearing on the defensive, as Republicans grilled Pritzker and two other blue-state governors – Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York – for hours about their states' handling of undocumented immigrants and made clear that the GOP continues to view immigration as a winning issue. The Republicans put up posters with mug shots of undocumented immigrants charged with violent crimes and, in their questioning, frequently mentioned specific cases. 'For today's Democrat Party, it seems unlimited illegal immigration and that agenda is being pushed at every level of government,' said Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky), chairman of the committee, said in the hearing. The governors sought to blunt Republican attacks by stressing that they support border security and the deportation of violent criminals. Democratic lawmakers displayed posters of headlines about U.S. citizen children deported by the Trump administration. Some in the party see a welcome shift in the politics of immigration – an issue that Congress has for years been unable to tackle in a comprehensive way. 'A year ago, this was not a comfortable conversation among Democrats,' said Cecilia Muñoz, who served as an immigration adviser and director of the White House Domestic Policy Council under Barack Obama. 'And, I think, that is changing.' When it comes to protests over immigration and other issues, many in the party are taking a cautious approach, wary of even isolated violence or rallying cries becoming a liability in future elections. The 2020 racial justice demonstrations that erupted after a White police officer killed George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, left many Democrats playing defense two years later, disavowing calls to strip funding from local police departments. Many are appealing to angry protesters to stay peaceful, warning that any violence will play into Trump's hands. Some lawmakers, such as Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland), are joining Saturday's 'No Kings' protests, which organizers designed to reject what they see as the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. Others encouraged Americans to show up – with civility, they emphasized. 'I'm in this body because of civil rights activists who peacefully protested, suffrage leaders that peacefully protested, labor leaders that peacefully protested when presidents were doing things wrong,' said Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey). 'This is one of those times I'm hoping more people will be speaking up in a peaceful way.' Some issued blunter warnings as the situation in California escalated. 'My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement,' Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) wrote on social media. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has encouraged city residents to 'rise up' against Trump's crackdown on immigration, said he will 'absolutely' be in the streets protesting the enforcement raids. Democrats have been especially unnerved by the administration's charges and threat of charges against liberal politicians. Last month, the Justice Department charged the Democratic mayor of Newark with trespassing over his attempt to visit a local immigration detention center; they quickly dropped the case, only to announce new charges against a congresswoman who was also there. This past week, Trump floated arresting Newsom. And on Thursday, federal agents wrestled Padilla to the ground and forced him out of the room. Padilla said he was handcuffed but not arrested or detained; DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said Secret Service agents 'thought he was an attacker.' Republican leaders mostly blamed Padilla, with House Speaker Mike Johnson (Louisiana) calling the senator's actions 'wildly inappropriate.' Democrats, he said, are 'defending lawbreakers, and now they are acting like lawbreakers themselves.' But Democratic officials were incensed. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said it 'sent a violent message to all of America.' Pritzker said in the Oversight Committee hearing that he 'cannot believe the disrespect that was shown to a United States senator.' A crowd of House Democrats marched to the office of Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) in protest, but he wasn't there.


The Mainichi
7 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Putin and Trump discussed Middle East tensions, Ukraine war in phone call
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump held a lengthy call Saturday to discuss the escalating situation in the Middle East and Russia's war in Ukraine. Trump in a posting on his Truth Social platform said they spent the bulk of their conversation focused on Israel's ongoing blistering attacks aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear program and Iran's retaliatory strikes. But Trump said that he also pressed Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine. "He feels, as do I, this war in Israel-Iran should end, to which I explained, his war should also end," said Trump, who added the conversation went about an hour. Putin foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said Putin briefed Trump on his recent talks with the leaders of Iran and Israel and reiterated Russia's proposal to seek mutually acceptable solutions on the Iranian nuclear issue. "Vladimir Putin, having condemned the military operation against Iran, expressed serious concern about the possible escalation of the conflict," Ushakov told reporters. He added that Putin raised concerns that escalating conflict between Israel and Iran threatened "unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East." Putin also emphasized Russia's readiness to carry out possible mediation efforts, and noted that Russia had proposed steps "aimed at finding mutually acceptable agreements" during U.S.-Iran negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program. The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to U.S. intelligence findings. "Russia's principled approach and interest in the settlement remain unchanged," Ushakov said. Trump described the regional situation as "very alarming," Ushakov said, but acknowledged the "effectiveness" of Israel's strikes on targets in Iran. The leaders did not rule out a possible return to negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program, according to Ushakov. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff had been set to travel on Sunday to Oman for a sixth round of talks with Iranian officials aimed at curbing Tehran's nuclear program -- a meeting that was set before Israel launched strikes on Friday. But Oman's foreign minister, Badr al-Busaidi, said on Saturday that the meeting would not take place as planned. Putin and Trump also discussed the ongoing exchange of war prisoners between Russia and Ukraine. The two sides traded more prisoners on Saturday under an arrangement brokered during talks between the two sides in Istanbul earlier this month. "Our president noted that an exchange of prisoners of war is taking place, including seriously wounded and prisoners of war under 25 years of age," Ushakov said, along with expressing readiness to continue negotiations with the Ukrainians.