
California passes major overhaul of CEQA, hoping to kickstart housing production
Reforming the state's landmark environmental law, the California Environmental Quality Act, has been discussed for years, but has proven to be particularly challenging because the law has staunch supporters among powerful environmental and labor groups. Despite many attempts by the Legislature to speed up housing construction, California home production remains stubbornly slow, something that has dogged Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Facing the last two years of his governorship, Newsom threw his weight behind two major CEQA overhaul proposals in the Legislature and made his signature on the budget this year contingent on the passage of some of those provisions. That put immense pressure on Democrats in the Legislature to pass the bills to ensure the state will have a budget in effect on Tuesday when the 2025-26 fiscal year begins.
The bills grant broad exemptions to CEQA for homes and other buildings in already developed areas. The lawmakers who crafted the original proposals argue that the law is regularly abused by people trying to block development and that building more in densely populated areas where people live and work is good for the environment.
Cities and counties are already required to plan to build housing to meet their population's needs and conduct environmental assessments as part of that work. The legislation passed Monday will exempt housing in already developed areas in compliance with those housing plans from being subject to an additional environmental review. The bills also exempt from CEQA various individual types of projects, including childcare centers in nonresidential areas, farmworker housing, wildfire risk reduction projects, food banks in industrial areas, advanced manufacturing sites and health clinics less than 50,000 square feet.
Republicans and Democrats alike raised concerns about the governor's move to push the policies through as part of the budget, arguing that the process was rushed and didn't allow for enough deliberation on controversial provisions of the bills.
Initial versions of the bills drew swift backlash, especially from labor unions, last week. Many of labor unions' concerns were assuaged with amendments taken to one of the bills, but opposition from environmental groups has persisted.
Many environmental groups opposed one of the bills, SB131, particularly because they said it will not protect habitats for endangered species and allow advanced manufacturing projects to proceed without environmental review. Natalie Brown of the Planning and Conservation League called it 'the worst anti-environmental bill in decades' during a Monday committee hearing.
'We're in a nature crisis, we're seeing unprecedented loss of wildlife, and that's to be made worse with this bill,' said Laura Deehan with the group Environment California. 'We're also very concerned about opening the floodgates for new development that could be really polluting … We also think it was ridiculous to do this type of action behind closed doors in a budget bill.'
But supporters of the bills say CEQA needs to be reined in. Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, pointed to lawsuits against a food bank in Alameda and a housing development in San Francisco that were both blocked because people sued under CEQA to preserve parking lots. He said the bills passed Monday will make it 'easier and faster to build new housing.'
'If California is ever going to truly tackle our crisis of affordability, we need to build an abundance of housing, child care centers, transportation, water infrastructure, broadband, and all of the things that make life better and more affordable for people,' Wiener said.
The bills passed Monday also contain funding for homeless aid, which Newsom had at first tried to prevent, saying cities and counties had already gotten enough money from the state and needed to start making progress in decreasing their homeless populations. The bill includes half a billion dollars for the state's homeless aid program.
Bill Fulton, a planning expert and former Ventura mayor who has advocated for CEQA reform, said that the changes passed Monday are significant but are not a panacea.
'I don't think this alone is going to create a housing boom,' he said. 'I think this, together with other things, will gradually increase the amount of housing approved.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
7 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Thrilled' California Developers Cheer Rollback of State's Environmental Law
California developers are celebrating the rollback of a landmark environmental law that they say will help clear the way for new housing in a state that has suffered a severe shortage for decades. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday signed two bills hollowing out the California Environmental Quality Act, which was enacted to protect the environment but puts developers through a lengthy environmental review.

Wall Street Journal
11 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Great Budget Baseline Con
The Senate on Monday began its 'vote-a-rama' on amendments to the tax bill, and it was scheduled to go deep in the night. But before we see the final product, it's worth rehearsing one more time one of the greatest distortions of this budget debate—to wit, that the Senate bill is a fiscal blowout because it will increase the federal deficit by $3.3 trillion over 10 years. That's the official Congressional Budget Office 'score' of the bill, but it's only true if you assume that Congress was going to tolerate a $4.5 trillion tax increase. That would be the result if the 2017 tax reform expired at the end of this year, as most of the individual tax provisions are scheduled to do. Congress was never going to allow that. Even Democrats support extending most of the 2017 individual cuts except the lower 37% top marginal rate. Senate Republicans correctly argue that the bill's cost should be measured against a more realistic baseline, which assumes that existing tax rates and policy continue. In any rational world, changes in the law would be scored against current policy. But in Washington they are scored against CBO's current-law 'baseline,' which assumes that the 2017 tax cuts will expire. Voila, $3.3 trillion in new deficits over 10 years.

Politico
12 minutes ago
- Politico
The new super PAC taking aim at Musk
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben LATEST: A federal judge this afternoon temporarily stopped the Trump administration from moving forward with its planned massive restructuring of the Department of Health and Human Services, NYT's CHRISTINA JEWETT and ZACH MONTAGUE report. In an opinion accompanying the order, Judge MELISSA R. DuBOSE of the U.S. District Court of Rhode Island said that HHS Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. lacked the authority to eliminate entire programs and reorient the agency's priorities. 'The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress,' DuBose wrote. NOT SO FAST: President DONALD TRUMP ally and former Department of Government Efficiency adviser JAMES FISHBACK today is launching a super PAC called FSD PAC, designed to blunt ELON MUSK's political ambitions. FSD PAC, a play on Tesla's 'full self-driving,' stands for Full Support for Donald. Its strategy is to be a bulwark against Musk's threats — real or perceived — and comes as multiple Republicans shrug off his latest social media spat with the president as little to worry about in a world where Trump so thoroughly commands the loyalty of the GOP base. The PAC will spend money in any race where Musk follows through on his plan to bankroll a third-party hopeful, or where he backs a Democrat or a Republican primary challenge against a Trump-endorsed incumbent. The goal: Ensure that Musk's deep pockets don't undermine Trump's grip on the GOP. 'There's real frustration in our movement with Elon and his antics,' said Fishback, who stepped away from DOGE last month after Musk lashed out at Trump. 'I'm a big believer in what he's doing in the private sector. But when it comes to politics, he's dead wrong on this.' Fishback, who is represented by Lex Politica, the same firm that represents Musk and his SuperPAC AmericaPAC, is putting $1 million of his own money into his PAC. FSD PAC's formation comes amid an intensifying standoff between the world's wealthiest man and the Republican party. Musk, the GOP's largest individual donor, has publicly threatened to start his own party, the 'America Party,' if Congress passes Trump's sweeping domestic policy package, known as the Big Beautiful Bill. The Senate passed that bill today and it could land on the president's desk this today said he wasn't concerned Republicans would be swayed by Musk or his money. 'I don't think he should be playing that game with me,' the president said.A Trump ally added that he was not too concerned about Musk's threats, noting his lackluster track record of political endorsements. 'A guy named Elon Musk tried to play kingmaker in the 2024 Republican primary by backing Ron DeSanctimonious,' said the person, who was granted anonymity to speak freely. Musk also spent millions trying to sway a Wisconsin Supreme Court race, including handing out million-dollar checks to two Wisconsin voters, but the Democrat-backed candidate won handily anyway. 'For it to have any impact, you'd have to have Republicans leaving the Republican Party of President Trump and joining a new party just so they can take a check from Elon,' said a Republican strategist granted anonymity to discuss internal thinking. 'I just don't see that happening.' And FSD is just one of several pro-Trump organizations ready to attack Republicans deemed disloyal. Just last week, another pro-Trump group, MAGA Kentucky, aired a TV ad against Rep. THOMAS MASSIE, one of only two House Republicans who voted against the president's marquee legislation. The 30-second spot targets Massie for voting against legislation that cuts taxes and funds border security, and puts him alongside Iranian leader AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI, Sen. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.) and Rep. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.) MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Of which baseball team was former President GEORGE W. BUSH a part owner? (Answer at bottom.) Agenda Setting FIRST IN WEST WING PLAYBOOK: The State Department has begun sending letters to staffers canceling details to other organizations, which can relocate employees to places like military academies, universities and state and local governments, our NAHAL TOOSI and Ben report. 'The Secretary has decided to reduce the number and variety of detail assignments outside the Department,' wrote LEW J. OLOWSKI, a senior official within the department's Bureau of Global Talent Management, in an email to employees landing in inboxes this week. 'You are asked to return to the Department of State and use your broad skills for immediate staffing needs.' At least 200 people have received the notice, according to one person familiar with the move. Many of those affected were just getting to their details, enrolling their children in local schools and signing new leases. 'These are State Department employees, and the decision was made to have these individuals return to their place of employment so their skills can be used to advance diplomatic priorities before filling vacancies at other organizations,' a senior State official said in a statement to POLITICO. TRY A MONTH: Weather forecasters will now have another month to tap Defense Department satellite data used for hurricane forecasting, extending a deadline that would have ended the National Weather Service's access to the information on Monday, POLITICO's E&E News' DANIEL CUSICK reports. The termination of data products from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program received swift condemnation from scientists who said it could hurt hurricane forecasting accuracy as the 2025 storm season ramps up. The administration now expects to decommission DMSP processing no later than July 31. EASE UP: In recent weeks, DOGE officials at the SEC have sought meetings with staff to explore relaxing what some companies have called burdensome and unnecessary regulations, Reuters' DOUGLAS GILLISON and CHRIS PRENTICE report. That includes reworking JOE BIDEN-era rules adopted last year on so-called Special Purpose Acquisition Companies and requirements that private investment advisers confidentially disclose more data so regulators can better spot systemic risk. One person familiar said DOGE's involvement in crafting new policy has frustrated some SEC officials, raising concerns over whether a White House initiative should be involved in the work of a department long considered independent. Musk Radar IT'S A DOGE EAT DOGE WORLD: Trump threatened today to sic DOGE on Musk and left the door open to deporting his former adviser, Irie reports. 'DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,' the president told reporters outside the White House before departing to the 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center in Florida. He added that DOGE should root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' from the billions of dollars in federal subsidies Musk's companies receive. It was the latest escalation in the president's feud with the billionaire, who since leaving his government role has criticized Trump's Republican megabill as 'insane,' threatened to unseat conservative lawmakers who supported the legislation and publicly speculated about creating a new political party. Asked if he was considering deporting Musk — who became a U.S. citizen in 2002 — to his native South Africa, Trump said, 'I don't know, we'll have to take a look.' In a post to Truth Social late last night, Trump wrote, 'without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' Musk exercised restraint in his response on X today. 'So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.' In the Courts ALL TOGETHER NOW: Sixteen states are suing the Trump administration for 'unconstitutionally' ending more than $1 billion in mental health-related grants created in the wake of mass school shootings, the states' attorneys general said today, WaPo's BEN BRASCH reports. When the Education Department began discontinuing the grants in April, it claimed that schools diversifying their pool of psychologists were misusing the funds. The lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle to declare the grant terminations as unlawful, reinstate the funding and prevent the department 'from imposing similar ideological conditions moving forward,' according to a news release from New York Attorney General LETITIA JAMES. What We're Reading Trump visits 'Alligator Alcatraz,' sending a political message (WaPo's Cat Zakrzewski, Lori Rozsa and Matt Viser) The Lawyer Who Became the Face of Trump's Deportation Agenda (Michael Linhorst for POLITICO Magazine) An Offhand Remark About Gold Bars, Secretly Recorded, Upended His Life (NYT's Lisa Friedman) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER In 1989, after working on the presidential campaign of his father, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, the younger Bush (sort of) brought together a group of investors to buy an 86 percent share of the Texas Rangers for $86 million, according to the Center for Public Integrity. Bush borrowed the money from a bank in Midland where he was once a director. Bush still had some sway, including signing off on the Rangers trading then-20-year-old SAMMY SOSA to the Chicago White Sox in 1989 — which he in 2000 called his biggest mistake as an adult.