N.B. Power risked 'fatigue-related errors' at nuclear plant, regulator says
Social Sharing
Federal regulators say N.B. Power violated rules designed to ensure overnight shift workers at the Point Lepreau nuclear power plant get enough sleep to reduce the risk of safety mistakes.
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission said, in a notice of violation, that some workers did not get the required 72-hour "recovery period" after working three consecutive night shifts at the nuclear plant.
"CNSC staff contend that the N.B. Power staff working outside the bounds of [the regulations] were not provided a sufficient opportunity for sleep and recovery from sleep debt," said the nine-page notice issued in March.
"As such, these workers were at an increased risk of experiencing high levels of fatigue and committing fatigue-related errors."
The commission fined the utility $24,760.
N.B. Power did not provide a comment on the notice to CBC News by deadline.
WATCH | 'Mistakes can be made.' N.B. Power fined for Lepreau violation:
N.B. Power violated nuclear rules at Point Lepreau, regulator says
55 minutes ago
Duration 1:30
Green Party Leader David Coon said the revelation was alarming and suggested that the plant is short-staffed.
"You're talking about operators, emergency response personnel, security people who've been working three night-shifts straight and are then having to come back to work without having the chance to get some rest," he said.
"This is a nuclear reactor. You can't have people who are fatigued, who are tired, doing those jobs because as the regulator said … mistakes can be made and those mistakes could be very serious."
According to the March 20 violation notice, N.B. Power's operating licence for the nuclear plant requires it to implement a program so that workers in "safety-sensitive positions" can avoid fatigue.
That includes limits on hours of work and minimum recovery times.
The commission first noticed during an inspection in late 2022 that N.B. Power's shift-scheduling software allowed workers to be scheduled in violation of the regulations and that some workers had exceeded the limits.
N.B. Power told the commission it was adopting "interim corrective actions," including manual reviews of schedules, the notice said.
Follow-up inspections by the commission, in 2023 and 2024, "found continued non-compliance" with the rule requiring a 72-hour break between three or more night shifts.
There were 104 violations in 2023 and 150 in 2024, it says.
The commission wrote to N.B. Power on Jan. 7 asking it to take steps to avoid more violations. The utility responded Jan. 22 claiming that it had addressed the issues, including by requiring all staff in safety-sensitive positions to get training on the rules.
The commission followed up in February with a verification of N.B. Power staff training and found nearly 30 per cent of affected workers at Point Lepreau had not completed the training.
"This contradicted the statements made by N.B. Power in their response to the warning letter," the commission said.
The utility has taken further steps since February, including a software update that shows when the hours-of-work rules are not being followed.
The commission decided to fine N.B. Power to "help deter recurrence" of the violations, the notice said.
Coon said the $24,760 fine should be higher but said publicizing the violation should also compel the utility to be more diligent.
When the commission first spotted the scheduling problems in 2022, Point Lepreau was overseen by N.B. Power's vice-president nuclear, Brett Plummer.
CEO Lori Clark revealed in September 2023 that Plummer was leaving the position and that she was taking on the role herself.
"She said she would play the dual role of CEO and vice-president nuclear," Coon said Tuesday. "Perhaps that's not appropriate."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Government failed to follow procurement, security rules with ArriveCan contractor
Canada's auditor general says security rules were not followed when awarding contracts to the company behind the ArriveCan app. CTV's Colton Praill explains. Federal organizations failed to follow procurement and security rules when awarding contracts to a company behind the controversial ArriveCan app, the auditor general said Tuesday. Last year Karen Hogan published an audit of ArriveCan, finding the government did not deliver value to taxpayers and that three federal departments disregarded federal policies and controls in awarding contracts for the development of the app. GCStrategies was granted the largest share of those contracts. It lost its security status last year and last week the government banned it from federal contracts for seven years over its conduct. On Tuesday Hogan published a wider audit of 106 other contracts awarded to GCStrategies by 31 federal organizations between 2015 and 2024, and found in many of those cases procurement rules were also not followed. Hogan also found federal organizations and departments often provided little evidence to show the work they had paid for had actually been done. The maximum value of those contracts was more than $90 million but only about $65 million was paid out. The report says that, for half of the contracts requiring security clearances, federal organizations weren't able to show that those doing the work had the appropriate clearances before the contract was awarded. Federal organizations lacked documentation to show that they had confirmed security clearances for just over one in five of the contracts Hogan's office examined. The report also found that federal organizations failed to monitor contract work and performance. Many accepted poorly drafted timesheets or failed to collect them at all. Others couldn't show that the people doing the work had the required experience and qualifications. Hogan said that in more than 80 per cent of the contracts examined, organizations couldn't prove that the fees paid didn't exceed market rates. In just under half of the contracts, the report says, organizations had 'little to no evidence' to show that deliverables were received. Despite that, payments were still made. The report says most contracts were awarded without organizations assessing whether they should call for bids. Many organizations justified the need for the contracts by pointing to increased workloads or public servants' absences. In September, the House of Commons agreed unanimously to ask Hogan to look into contracts. Hogan said the audit findings echoed those from previous audits by her office. 'I said it back then, and I'll repeat it now: I have no reason to believe that this is unique to two vendors,' she said. 'And that's why I believe the government needs to take a step back and look at why this behaviour is happening.' Hogan noted she did not make any recommendations in the report, because she said, the rules don't need to be updated, they just need to be followed. 'It's already happening, to make sure that the rules that are in place are followed, well understood across departments,' Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound told reporters, following the Liberal cabinet meeting Tuesday. He said it is up to departments overseeing contracts 'to make sure that in each and every department, the rules are followed' and that proper documentation is submitted and reviewed. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Tuesday that the government needs to go to GC Strategies and 'get our money back.' He said all public servants who failed to follow procurement policies should be fired and that politicians should be held accountable too. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
CTV News
6 days ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: New legislation to reduce interprovincial trade barriers tabled
CTV National News: New legislation to reduce interprovincial trade barriers tabled Rachel Aiello breaks down what is in the federal government's 'One Canadian Economy' bill and what the opposition is saying about it.
Winnipeg Free Press
03-06-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
First ministers meeting produces unfamiliar but encouraging sense of optimism
Opinion What happened in Saskatoon this week hasn't been seen in Canadian politics for a long time. Other than the early days of crisis management around the COVID-19 pandemic, one probably has to go back to the 1990s to remember when a federal-provincial gathering ended on such an optimistic, even collaborative, note. No angry premiers storming out. No federal lectures about jurisdiction. And, most surprisingly, no perennial squabbling over federal transfer payments. Premier of Manitoba Wab Kinew, left to right, Prime Minister Mark Carney, Premier of Nova Scotia Tim Houston, Premier of Québec François Legault, Premier of New Brunswick Susan Holt, and Premier of the Northwest Territories R.J. Simpson during the First Minister's Meeting in Saskatoon on Monday, June 2, 2025. (Liam Richards / The Canadian Press files) Instead, what we got from Monday's first ministers meeting, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, was something bordering on unity: a clear, collective voice emerging on economic growth, diversification and reducing our overwhelming reliance on exports to the United States. The tone and substance of the meeting marked a striking departure from the norm. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, never one to sugar-coat, called it 'the best first ministers conference I've ever attended.' Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston echoed the sentiment, describing the tone as 'forward-looking and respectful.' Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew said the plan has the potential to help lower-income Canadians through better access to jobs and education. He also praised Canadians for coming together to help fight the wildfires in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Even Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — often the federal government's most combative critic —expressed something bordering on praise. 'I was encouraged by Prime Minister Carney's tone and his willingness to make Canada an energy superpower again,' Smith said after the meeting, adding that Carney's openness to pipeline infrastructure could signal a thaw in one of Confederation's chilliest relationships. This first ministers meeting was not only civil, it was productive. Let's pause for a moment on that. Smith, who has floated the idea of Alberta holding a referendum on separation from Canada and spent the better part of two years verbally sparring with Ottawa, was 'encouraged.' That word doesn't get tossed around lightly in federal-Alberta relations. This first ministers meeting was not only civil, it was productive. A shared agreement was struck on a pan-Canadian approach to economic growth that includes building internal trade, exploring new international markets and improving infrastructure to support the next generation of Canadian exports — from clean energy to oil and gas. Perhaps most significantly, all of this came without the usual baggage. The premiers, often quick to complain that federal health transfers aren't sufficient, didn't dwell on the matter this time. Nor did the federal government offer any veiled constitutional reminders about jurisdictions or fiscal restraint. Instead, the agenda was refreshingly forward-looking. Canada's heavy dependence on the U.S. as a trading partner has long been a sore spot for economists and policy-makers alike. The desire to diversify is not new. But what's new is the broad agreement among provinces and the feds that now is the time to do something about it, together. The former Bank of Canada governor may be green in political years, but it's clear he's brought with him a measured, professional tone that provinces seem to appreciate. Carney, in one of his first major tests as prime minister, showed calm conviction. The former Bank of Canada governor may be green in political years, but it's clear he's brought with him a measured, professional tone that provinces seem to appreciate. Not grandstanding. Not lecturing. Just listening, and leading. Even on the thorny issue of pipelines, Carney appears to have found a middle path. While not promising specific projects, he indicated an openness to the idea that oil and gas infrastructure, if done responsibly and with environmental safeguards, could play a role in Canada's economic growth. What was missing from the conference was representation from Indigenous leaders. They still do not have a seat at the federal-provincial table, which is wrong. There are treaty and other constitutional obligations regarding Indigenous people that need to be considered when fast-tracking large-scale projects, including affected lands and waterways located on treaty territory. Indigenous leaders have a right to be at the table to discuss those issues. Still, Monday's gathering showed that when leaders stop shouting past each other, progress is possible. It helps, too, that the economic stakes are high. Canada is entering a pivotal period where global trade dynamics are shifting: wars in Europe and the Middle East, increased protectionism in the U.S. and the green transition accelerating in Asia and Europe. If Canada doesn't adapt, it risks being left behind. This was a first ministers meeting that set a new tone… and potentially a new standard… for how this country could move forward, together. There will still be battles ahead, of course. Not every premier sees eye to eye on carbon pricing, energy transition or the pace of decarbonization. Some, like Quebec's François Legault, are still wary of federal overreach. And it's unlikely Smith's rhetoric on sovereignty has been permanently shelved. But the fact that the premiers and the prime minister emerged from a daylong meeting with a shared sense of purpose — and not just a vague commitment to 'work together' — is something rare enough to celebrate. Maybe it's the Carney effect. Maybe it's the Trump threat. Or, perhaps, it's just economic pragmatism finally prevailing over political theatre. Either way, this was a first ministers meeting that set a new tone — and potentially a new standard — for how this country could move forward, together. Let's hope it lasts. Tom BrodbeckColumnist Tom Brodbeck is a columnist with the Free Press and has over 30 years experience in print media. He joined the Free Press in 2019. Born and raised in Montreal, Tom graduated from the University of Manitoba in 1993 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and commerce. Read more about Tom. Tom provides commentary and analysis on political and related issues at the municipal, provincial and federal level. His columns are built on research and coverage of local events. The Free Press's editing team reviews Tom's columns before they are posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
