Rupee set to deepen losses as India braces for higher US tariffs
The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated the rupee will open in the 87.11-87.13 range versus the U.S. dollar, its weakest level in four months. It had closed at 86.8150 on Tuesday.
India is preparing to face higher U.S. tariffs, likely between 20% and 25%, on some of its exports, as it holds off on fresh trade concessions ahead of Washington's August 1 deadline, Reuters reported post market-hours on Tuesday.
Speaking to reporters, Trump pointed to similar level of tariffs but said that the deal has not been finalised yet.
New Delhi plans to resume the trade negotiations when a U.S. delegation visits next month, aiming to finalise a comprehensive bilateral deal by September or October, a government official told Reuters.
Trump's remark will cause a "knee-jerk reaction," with traders likely reading it as a negative cue, a trader at a state-run bank said, adding that while India was expected to crack one of the first deals, it now appears to be a laggard.
Regional peers like Indonesia and Vietnam and the U.S.'s bigger trading partners like Japan and the European Union have already finalised trade deals with Washington in July.
It's "quite likely" the Reserve Bank of India may step in to support the rupee if the early losses extend, the trader said.
On the day, the dollar index was a tad lower at 98.7, while most Asian currencies nudged higher. The Federal Reserve's monetary policy decision is due during U.S. market hours later in the day.
KEY INDICATORS:
** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 87.27; onshore one-month forward premium at 13.25 paise
** Dollar index down 0.1% at 98.75
** Brent crude futures rises 0.2% to $72.6 per barrel
** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.33%
** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $689 mln worth of Indian shares on July 28
** NSDL data shows foreign investors sold a net $66.4 mln worth of Indian bonds on July 28
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
White House to end US tariff exemption for all low-value overseas packages
The United States is suspending a 'de minimis' exemption that allowed low-value commercial shipments to be shipped to the United States without facing tariffs, the White House said on Wednesday. Under an executive order signed by Donald Trump on Wednesday, packages valued at or under $800 sent to the US outside of the international postal network will now face 'all applicable duties' starting on 29 August, the White House said. The US president earlier targeted packages from China and Hong Kong, and the White House said the recently signed tax and spending bill repealed the legal basis for the de minimis exemption worldwide starting on 1 July 2027. 'Trump is acting more quickly to suspend the de minimis exemption than the OBBBA requires, to deal with national emergencies and save American lives and businesses now,' the White House said in a fact sheet, referring to the bill known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Goods shipped through the postal system will face one of two tariffs: either an 'ad valorem duty' equal to the effective tariff rate of the package's country of origin or, for six months, a specific tariff of $80 to $200 depending on the country of origin's tariff rate.
The Sun
5 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump was absolutely right to trash UK's energy policy – here's how your bills will FALL if Miliband listens
I CAN only imagine that Ed Miliband has been locked in a cupboard for the past four days, lest he spoil Sir Keir Starmer's somewhat forced friendship with Donald Trump. How else to explain his remarkable silence in the face of the US President trashing Britain's energy policy on his golfing trip to Turnberry? 4 4 Trump made several statements which would normally be a red rag to Miliband. He called wind energy a 'con job' and complained that turbines are spoiling the view from his golf course. The following day he doubled down by attacking the Government's policy of denying licences for new gas and oil extraction. Reversing the policy, he asserted on his Truth Social account, would mean 'a vast fortune to be made for the UK' and would lower bills for UK energy consumers. But where was Ed to tell us that wind and solar energy is going to help save us £300 a year on our bills? Low wind speeds Nor did Starmer enter the fray. He sat next to Trump expressionless as the President tore into UK policy on Net Zero and other policies, too. It is too much to hope Starmer and Miliband might have come round to thinking Trump may actually have a point? Trump might not always be the best-informed person on UK politics but on this he is absolutely right. The Scottish government has compromised one of its greatest assets — its landscape — by embracing wind power so enthusiastically, onshore and offshore. But it is simply not providing us with affordable, reliable energy. Subsidised investment in wind turbines has run well ahead of what the national grid can cope with. Last year, UK energy consumers were forced to cough up £1.5BILLION in 'constraint payments' to compensate wind farm owners when they have to turn off their turbines when they are generating too much power to be fed into the grid. At other times — often in winter when the demand for power is greatest — the output from wind turbines falls to less than one per cent of UK energy demand. Three years ago, Miliband and others started trying to tell us that wind energy was 'nine times cheaper than electricity generated by gas'. It wasn't true then. The comparison was arrived at by comparing the long-term, guaranteed prices offered to wind farms with the rates which have to be paid to the owners of gas plants to turn them on for a few hours to fill in gaps when the wind isn't blowing. 4 4 But it is even less true now. For years, the price of wind energy seemed to fall and fall, but that was sharply reversed as soon as interest rates began to rise and the cost of raw materials shot up. Miliband is so desperate to get his turbines built that in the latest round of wind power auctions he has offered investors a guaranteed price of £113 per megawatt-hour of electricity they generate. That is half as much again as we are currently paying for electricity generated by gas. The UK's energy policy ignores another problem. As confirmed in the latest State of the Climate Policy published by the Met Office and Royal Meteorological Society earlier this month, Britain is steadily becoming less windy — a climatic trend which we tend to hear little about. Yesterday, investment trust Greencoat UK Wind warned that its turbines generated 14 per cent less power than it had predicted in the past six months thanks to low wind speeds. If Britain's Net Zero policy really is saving us money, then how come we have the highest electricity prices in the world, according to the International Energy Agency? In 2023, UK consumers paid an average of 36.4 pence for their electricity and 10.2 pence for their gas. US consumers paid the equivalent of 12.9 pence and four pence respectively. And, no, it is not because we are over-reliant on gas. Last year, we generated 29.2 per cent of our electricity from gas and 30 per cent from wind. In the US the corresponding figures were 42.5 per cent and 10.3 per cent. Trump might be exaggerating a little when he says there are 'vast fortunes' to be made in the North Sea. The industry has been in decline for the past two decades as fields are worked out. Driving up bills Nevertheless, the trade body Offshore Energies UK still estimates there are 7.5BILLION barrels-worth to be recovered off Britain's coast — about a fifth as much as has been extracted since the 1960s. Moreover, there are enough shale gas reserves beneath Britain to power the country, at the current rate of consumption, for 47 years, according to one estimate. Banning fracking, and refusing licences for new production, is certainly making us more reliant on imports — and on the 'fossil fuel dictators' Miliband keeps talking about. It is driving up bills, too. It costs money to transport oil and gas long distances, especially the latter in the form of liquefied natural gas, on which we have come to rely more and more since the Ukraine invasion. Sometimes it takes an outsider to tell you where you are going wrong. Enthusiasts for Net Zero policies will damn Trump for his remarks but, sorry, he was right to say what he did — even if he broke diplomatic conventions to do so.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump hits Brazil with 50% tariffs, excludes aircraft, OJ, energy
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped a 50% tariff on most Brazilian goods to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice. That came as a relief for many in Brasilia, who since Trump announced the tariff had been urging protections for major exporters caught in the crossfire. Shares of planemaker Embraer and pulpmaker Suzano rose. "We're not facing the worst-case scenario," Brazilian Treasury Secretary Rogerio Ceron told reporters. "It's a more benign outcome than it could have been." In a factsheet about Trump's executive order on Wednesday, the White House tied the tariffs to Brazil's prosecution of Bolsonaro, who is standing trial on charges of plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss. The executive order came as the U.S. also announced sanctions on a Brazilian Supreme Court justice overseeing Bolsonaro's trial, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. Still, Trump's executive order formalizing a 50% tariff excluded dozens of key Brazilian exports to the United States, including civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers. Among the top concerns in the government of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva were aircraft produced by Embraer ( opens new tab, which exports 45% of its commercial aircraft and 70% of its executive jets to the United States. Analysts had also warned of a serious potential impact on Suzano ( opens new tab, one the world's largest wood pulp producers. Embraer shares rose 11% in Sao Paulo and Suzano gained over 1% in afternoon trading. Former Brazilian trade secretary Welber Barral warned it was too soon to celebrate, however. He estimated that the list of Brazilian products exported to the U.S. comprises approximately 3,000 items, and only a fraction of these received exclusions. "There will be an impact," he said of the tariffs. Wednesday's executive order did not include exemptions for beef or coffee, two key exports to the United States, he noted. Brazilian meatpacking lobby Abiec, which represents beef producers including JBS and Marfrig ( opens new tab, did not immediately comment on Wednesday's executive order. On Tuesday, the group said the new tariffs would make sales to the U.S. "inviable." Despite language exempting "energy and energy products" from the tariffs, energy companies operating in Brazil suspended oil shipments to the United States, citing uncertainty, industry group IBP told Reuters.
