
Delhi Fee hike row: 30 students ‘expelled' by pvt Dwarka school, parents priotest
Tensions erupted outside Delhi Public School, Dwarka on Tuesday as dozens of parents staged a protest, accusing the school of expelling around 30 students whose families had refused to pay a fee hike recently deemed 'unauthorised' by the Delhi high court. Parents alleged the school deployed additional security guards and set up barricades to block entry, while some claimed that children who managed to get in were pulled out of class, made to sit in the sun, or sent home without notice.
The protest is the latest flashpoint in a months-long standoff between the school and families, many of whom have refused to pay a revised fee that lacks approval from the Directorate of Education (DoE).
On Tuesday, several parents said they were shocked to receive an email on May 9 informing them that their children's names had been struck off the rolls 'with immediate effect' under Rule 35 of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973. Students, they said, were being randomly targeted and treated harshly.
To be sure, on April 16, the Delhi high court had strongly rebuked the school for what it called the 'shabby and inhuman' treatment of students whose parents had not paid the increased fees. Justice Sachin Datta, citing an inspection report by the district magistrate, remarked that 'the school deserves to be shut down' and warned that inability to pay fees does not entitle schools to subject students to 'such indignity.' The court had directed the school to immediately stop confining students to the library or denying them access to classes and facilities. It also instructed the DoE to conduct regular inspections to ensure compliance.
Despite this, parents say the harassment has continued.
'Somehow, we managed to get our son into the school on Tuesday, but he was immediately asked to leave the class. When he refused, the class teacher physically removed him,' said Divya Mattey, whose child's name had been struck off. 'He was then made to sit in the school bus and dropped off two hours later while we were still protesting outside. No one informed us,' he added.
Another parent, Pinky Pandey, alleged the school stopped accepting the 'authorised fee' as approved by the DoE from April onwards and later accused parents of non-payment. 'We submitted cheques for April and May, but the school never deposited them. Then they claimed we didn't pay and struck our children off the rolls,' she said. 'My daughter was made to sit in a bus and we had no idea where she was for hours.'
Some parents said they fear their children could be the next to face punitive action. 'My son's fees were not accepted either, but we haven't received a termination email yet,' said Chandan Kumar, another parent. 'We're living in fear. There were bouncers outside the school. Parents and children were pushed around. Is this how an educational institution should behave?'
Following the chaos, a DoE team reportedly visited the school, but no resolution was offered. Parents who interacted with officials said they were instead asked why they had not paid through the school's designated payment app. 'The app doesn't allow us to edit the amount—we'd have to pay the full hiked fee. So we used cheques to pay the approved fee. But the school used that as a pretext to say we haven't paid at all,' a parent said, requesting anonymity.
Tuesday's incident has reignited scrutiny of private schools arbitrarily raising fees without prior approval from authorities—a long-standing issue that the Delhi government claims it is addressing through legislative reform. One of the key provisions of the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, is the introduction of stiff penalties for non-compliance. Under the proposed law, schools found violating fee regulations can be fined between ₹1 lakh and ₹10 lakh.
The Delhi government, however, has made it clear repeatedly that repeat offenders could lose government recognition entirely. 'For too long, private schools raised fees at will. This bill ends that. No one will be allowed to act arbitrarily anymore,' Delhi chief minister Rekha Gupta had said on April 29.
Following the April 16 court hearing, Gupta also promised 'swift and strict' action against private schools that expel or harass students over fee disputes. That statement came on the heels of protests at Queen Mary's School in Model Town, where students accused the administration of threatening expulsion for non-payment of revised fees.
When contacted for comment on Tuesday's incident, DPS Dwarka principal Priya Narayanan did not respond to calls or messages. Manish Jain, deputy director of education (private school branch), was also unreachable.
As the standoff drags on, parents say they are determined to fight back. 'We're not just fighting for our children but for the principle that education should not be held hostage to arbitrary and unauthorised demands,' said Kumar. 'We're ready to take this all the way.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Not in line with rationalisation': Interim stay on transfer of one govt school teacher by HC
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted an interim stay on the transfer order of a govt primary school teacher. The court directed the authorities to decide on the teacher's representation within seven days. This comes at a time when protests against the state govt's rationalisation policy are ongoing and several teachers have also moved HC against rationalisation orders, There will be a separate hearing for the other petitions. The petition was filed against the transfer order dated 2 June 2025, which moved the petitioner from Government Abhyas Primary School, Mahasamund, to Government Primary School, Fooljhar, in Bagbahara block. The petitioner's counsel argued that the transfer order was not in line with the rationalisation transfer policy and should therefore be set aside. The counsel also stated that the petitioner filed a representation with the competent authority, which was not yet considered. The court was urged to direct the authority to decide the representation within a specific timeframe. State counsel informed the court that the petitioner's representation would be considered and decided in accordance with the law within seven days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unglaublich: Der Rechner zeigt sofort den Wert Ihres Hauses an [schauen Sie sich das an] Hauswert Undo After hearing both sides, Justice Arvind Kumar Verma directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation by 10 June 2025, if it was not already decided. Until then, the transfer order of 2 June 2025 will remain in abeyance. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation and direction to the authorities. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !


The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Justice Janarthanam's moments of glory
Justice M.S. Janarthanam had, at least, experienced a few moments of glory in the last 20-odd years. After the Supreme Court, in July 2010, provided one year to Tamil Nadu to come out with justification along with quantifiable data for the continuance of the 69% reservation for Backward Classes (BC), Most Backward Classes (MBC) and Scheduled Castes (SCs)/Scheduled Tribes (STs), Justice Janarthanam, as the head of the State BC Commission, had authored a report in support of the quota scheme, as provided in the Tamil Nadu Act 45 of 1994. Exactly a year later, the then AIADMK regime, at a Cabinet meeting, adopted the findings of the report and decided that 'there cannot at all be any doubt regards the fixity of reservation of 50 per cent to Backward Classes, 18 per cent to Scheduled Castes and one per cent to Scheduled Tribes.' On the matter of 'creamy layer' among the BC and MBCs, his take was that though the 1994 law had been in existence for well over 17 years, the Lakshman Rekha line had not been crossed, warranting the application of 'creamy layer' exclusion.' This opinion was also accepted by the government. It continues to be in force. Nearly 20 years ago, when the demand was made for creating special reservation for Arunthathiyars within quota of reservation for SCs, the government had turned to Justice Janarthanam to consider it. In November 2008, he, as the head of a committee, submitted a report to the then DMK government that the representation of the Arunthathiyars in Groups A, B and C services under the State 'has been found grotesquely inadequate.' Consequently, a three percent quota came into force. for the Aruthathiyars. This has withstood the test of judicial scrutiny, says G. Santhanam, who served as Secretary of the BC, MBC and Minorities Welfare Department about 15 years ago. In 2012, he gave an opinion to the government for providing a 10.5% quota to Vanniyars within the 20%.. Though this was acted upon by the previous AIADMK regime nine years later, the Supreme Court, in April 2022, quashed the move.


NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Children Deserve Compassion...": Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta On School Hiring Bouncers
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta condemned school hiring bouncers to intimidate parents and students, emphasizing children deserve compassion, not coercion. New Delhi: Amid "alarming" reports of schools employing bouncers to intimidate parents and students, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Friday asserted that children deserve compassion and not coercion. "There have been alarming reports of schools employing bouncers to intimidate parents and students. Education is a right, not a business." "Our children deserve compassion, not coercion. Schools must remain spaces of learning, values and nation-building," she said. The Delhi government has already announced that it will bring an ordinance to implement the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, to control arbitrary fee hikes by private schools. The chief minister's post on X came a day after the Delhi High Court called out Delhi Public School, Dwarka, for using "bouncers" to block the entry of students in its premises over a fee dispute. Noting such a practice had no place in an institution of learning, Justice Sachin Datta said public shaming and intimidation of a student due to financial default not only constitute mental harassment but also undermine the psychological well-being and self-worth of a child.