logo
The Donald laps it up as Nato leaders compete to shower him with sycophancy

The Donald laps it up as Nato leaders compete to shower him with sycophancy

The Guardian6 days ago
Sometimes it pays to be a narcissist. To bend reality to your own worldview. To live almost entirely in the present. Where contradicting yourself is not a problem because two opposing statements can both be true. On the way to Nato you can question article 5. On the way back you can give all the other Nato leaders a patronising pat on the head. And everyone is grateful for it.
There again it also helps if you are the most powerful man in the world. Donald Trump is not just tolerated, he is actively indulged. Prime ministers from other countries go out of their way to compete with one another in outright sycophancy. Flattery that started off as contrived now sounds dangerously sincere. Almost as if they genuinely believe it. Thank you Agent Orange for all you have done. We don't know where we would be without you.
And The Donald just laps it up. Feeds on it. At the recent Nato summit he looked like a pig in shit. Living his best life. Whatever sunbed regime he's on, it's working for him. If he lost any sleep over his decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, it doesn't show. Just repeat after Donald. The mission was a complete and utter success and Iran's programme has been put back decades. If the Pentagon says otherwise, it's just fake news. Yet again, reality can be what you want it to be.
Even when Trump temporarily loses it, he wins. Swearing is generally a no no for any leader. A sign that you've lost control. But when Donald said Israel and Iran didn't know what the fuck they were doing, he came out of it smelling of roses. Praised for his authenticity. Applauded for saying what the rest of the world is thinking. The Donald can do no wrong. He looks relaxed. God stand up for narcissists.
Keir Starmer is no narcissist. And breathe a sigh of relief for that. The UK tried the narcissist route with Boris Johnson and that didn't end well. Maybe we just aren't a powerful enough country to get away with a sociopath in charge. Or, heaven forbid, maybe it was a matter of timing. Boris was the right man at the wrong time. That's a horrible thought. Most of us would quite happily settle for a period of fairly boring politics. Where the government is serving the country rather than the ego of the person in charge. Where even when they are getting things wrong, they are at least trying to do the right thing.
But that level of decency comes with a cost. Your psyche does not reward itself with a free pass. You worry about the consequences of your actions. Your toadying to The Donald. You worry about the people dying in Ukraine, Gaza, Israel and Iran. You worry when your domestic policies look like they are falling apart. Wish you had spent more time reassuring backbenchers. Had explained better the trade-offs you were making. Had not been so quick to take a quick cash-saving win by removing benefits from people who can't wash themselves before going to work.
Keir has tried to keep a lid on all this as leaders always do. Pretend that he's fully in charge of the situation. That everything is going according to plan. But always the tell-tale signs leak out. Starmer's eyes betray him. They have a deadness to them, the life squeezed out. His face pasty and pallid. A man desperate for a breather, a moment to relax away from the treadmill.
Yet always there is one thing more. Another summit, another speech, another bilat, another crisis at home. This wasn't how he imagined his first year in Downing Street. The pressure and the pace is relentless. The treadmill going ever faster and there's no getting off. He aches in the places that he used to play.
Just hours after returning from The Hague, Keir was giving a keynote speech to the British Chambers of Commerce. It was one that he and they will quickly forget. A routine, box-ticking affair. An annual date, along with the CBI, in any prime minister's diary. It wasn't meant to be this way, mind. Starmer knows better than anyone that Labour has to work twice as hard to show that it is the party of business. But this time he couldn't fake it to make it. He's no visionary. He can't access people's hearts. Only their reason. And that only intermittently.
Keir began by thanking the BCC for all it had done for the country. He knew it had been a tough year and he had asked a lot of business, but the good times were round the corner. Possibly. There was the new infrastructure strategy. Now there was also a new trade strategy which sounded very much like the old one. Which was to keep on doing the trade deals we can, as with the partial deals with the EU, US and India, and try to do some new smaller deals with other nations. The applause from the audience was barely audible. They didn't sound desperately impressed. They can tell when a speaker is out on his feet and is phoning it in.
Just over an hour later and Starmer was in the Commons for a statement on the G7 and Nato summits. Here he was much more like his chipper self. Not so much in his opening remarks about how the west was making a dangerous world safer, but in his reply to Kemi Badenoch.
The Tory leader just gets worse and worse. Half-witted, sulky and tone deaf. Kemikaze seemed to think the UK should no longer bother to send its prime minister to these international meetings. That Keir had only gone for the craic and to avoid her at prime minister's questions. As if. Facing Kemi over the dispatch box was his half an hour of R&R in the week.
Starmer dismissed her with barely concealed contempt as neither serious nor credible. An am-dram politician. Even the Tories were aghast. Mark Pritchard openly criticised his leader. He spoke for many on his own benches.
Kemi had achieved the seemingly impossible. She had revivified a tired prime minister and united both Labour and opposition MPs against her. There is only one politician who looks a genuine leader in the Commons and it is still Starmer. He may have his hands full with a rebellion over the welfare bill, but as long as Kemi remains the leader of the opposition, he has nothing to fear from the Tories.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer
Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer

The Sun

time14 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer

Red dread JUBILANT left wing MPs yesterday gloried in the humiliation of their own Prime Minister after smashing his welfare reforms. Emboldened by their victory, they queued up on the airwaves to demand skint Britain be hit with big tax rises and more spending. 1 Socialist darling Angela Rayner - credited with forcing Keir Starmer to duck the vital challenge of slashing Britain's soaring benefits bill - insists Labour is now 'in a better place.' Hardly. In a warning of the new reality facing voters, the cover of Lefty bible the New Statesman screams: 'Just Raise Tax!' And one Labour MP, hailing a 16 per cent increase in Universal Credit handouts, tweeted: 'That'll put money in people's pockets.' Yes, but only by taxing people who worked hard to earn it so you can hand it over to those who don't! Such is the new soft Left fantasy which suddenly holds such a grip on a weakened Prime Minister. Inevitably, their overwhelming new demand is for a punishing wealth tax to soak the rich. The fact it never works - nine of 12 countries which tried to impose one later scrapped it - simply doesn't compute with their rotten, class-obsessed, wishful thinking. Millionaires are already leaving Britain in droves believing Labour hates them for making money. Sky high taxes always kills growth which only a few months ago Starmer and his Chancellor insisted was their number one priority. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs Sir Keir must find it within himself to stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government. Their toxic mix of more taxes, bigger Government, massive spending and weaker borders is a recipe for disaster. If the PM bows to their economic illiteracy, we'll all be much poorer. Trim the fat AFTER Labour's abject failure to curb welfare spending, what hope of them successfully delivering a massive overhaul of the NHS? The good news is that Health Secretary Wes Streeting is up for the fight. Fat jabs have given him a real chance of ending the obesity crisis - and saving billions. Streeting's main mission must be to ensure every penny of tax-payers money goes into patient care. That means Downing Street backing him in facing down ludicrous pay demands from the Marxist medics threatening strikes. But he also needs to resist easy Nanny State solutions to health issues which threaten to take over people's lives or remove freedom and choice. Instead, Wes should make fixing falling productivity in our bloated heath service his top priority.

Ex-Royal Navy boss sacked and stripped of admiral's rank over secret affair with subordinate
Ex-Royal Navy boss sacked and stripped of admiral's rank over secret affair with subordinate

The Sun

time14 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Ex-Royal Navy boss sacked and stripped of admiral's rank over secret affair with subordinate

THE former head of the Royal Navy has been sacked and stripped of his admiral rank over a secret affair with a subordinate. Ex-First Sea Lord Sir Ben Key, 59, is the most senior officer in the Navy's 500-year history to face the dishonour. 1 The Sun revealed in May he had been suspended and banned from resigning while a probe ran its course. The married dad of three had vowed to stamp out 'intolerable behaviour' in the Navy, regardless of rank. The MoD said: 'Following a full investigation, Admiral Sir Ben Key's behaviour has been found to have fallen far short of values and standards expected. This has resulted in termination of service and his commission.' Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the head of the Armed Forces, said: 'We investigate all allegations of inappropriate behaviour and will take robust action against anyone found to have fallen short.' Sir Ben could now be stripped of his knighthood and CBE. Pals say wife Elly is standing by him. He did not face court martial as the affair was not a criminal offence. He was accused of breaking Navy rules which ban sexual relationships between commanders and lower ranks. The Armed Forces are also barred from actions which risk or wreck comrades' marriages. His lover has not been identified, but sources claimed she was a senior officer married to a sailor, who lodged a complaint. Britain's 'Q' boffins unveil underwater drone to take on Putin's cable-cutters Sir Ben, who had a stellar 41-year Navy career, said: 'I deeply regret my conduct in spring last year, which fell well below the standard I set for myself and that which I set for the Royal Navy. 'I am very sorry to those I have hurt, and I apologise to everyone who serves with the Royal Navy. 'I am very grateful for the support of my wife, family and friends during a very difficult time.' Exclusive by Robin Perrie A NAVY commander swerved jail after head-butting a Marine Sergeant Major at a nuclear base. Lt Cdr Gary Fletcher, 34, behaved like a 'taproom bruiser' when brawling with Hamish Robb after a boxing event at HMNB Clyde, known as Faslane. The military court at Catterick, North Yorks, heard the pair thrashed around on the floor as RSM Robb tried to restrain the 'agitated' senior officer. Fletcher had been boozing to cope with a break-up, it was said. He admitted battery and behaviour likely to discredit His Majesty's forces. He was sentenced to two years loss of seniority, his salary docked, and promotion banned.

Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House
Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House

WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) - Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday struggled to pass President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill as a handful of hardliners withheld their support over concerns about its cost. As lawmakers shuttled in and out of closed-door meetings, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was trying to convince the holdouts to back Trump's signature bill. "We are working through everybody's issues and making sure that we can secure this vote. I feel very positive about the progress," he told reporters. With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks, and skeptics from the party's right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill. 'He knows I'm a 'no.' He knows that I don't believe there are the votes to pass this rule the way it is,' Republican Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, leader of the hardline Freedom Caucus, told reporters. Trump, who is pressing lawmakers to get him the bill to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, met with some of the dissenters at the White House. But with the outcome uncertain, Republican leaders delayed a procedural vote for hours as they worked to shore up support. Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 House Republican, said they would wait until several lawmakers who had been delayed by storms arrived from out of town. "We need their votes, and they're going to be here shortly," he told reporters. Republicans in Congress have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. Similar divides exist in the House, which passed an earlier version of the bill in May that carried a lower price tag. The loudest objections come from hardline conservatives angry that it does not sufficiently cut spending. "What the Senate did was unconscionable," said Republican Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina, one of two hardliners who voted against the bill in an overnight committee hearing. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programs, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. "This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy, it is punishment," Democratic Representative Jim McGovern said in debate on the House floor. The Medicaid cuts have also raised concerns among some Republicans, prompting the Senate to set aside more money for rural hospitals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store