
First comes redistricting. Next? Recruitment.
If President Donald Trump's push to redistrict in as many GOP-held states as possible comes to fruition in the coming months, a new challenge will emerge: recruiting candidates to run for the redrawn seats.
Drawing new red-leaning districts will give Republicans better odds in next year's midterms, but in order to maximize their chances, they need the right candidates.
It could be a mad dash. Texas Democrats continue to stymie the state's redistricting effort by decamping to blue states, delaying the process of recruiting candidates for the new districts. Ohio, which is legally required to redraw its districts this year, is not expected to pass any maps until the fall. And other Republican states considering redistricting, like Indiana, Missouri and Florida, have not taken any official steps thus far.
'Redistricting or not, candidate quality is always at the top of the list,' said Indiana-based GOP strategist Pete Seat. 'There are plenty of winnable districts across the country that have been lost … because candidates were crappy.'
So far — at least publicly — it's a bit of a waiting game for both parties. Republicans don't want to jump the gun and say they are recruiting in districts that are not yet finalized, while Democrats are holding out hope that their efforts and legal battles will hold up the redraws. Still, both parties claim to have plenty of candidates waiting in the wings.
House Majority PAC — a Democratic-backing super PAC aligned with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — has committed to spend $20 million fighting back against Texas redistricting, part of which is geared toward recruitment.
'We've heard from a lot of folks who would be excited to run or support folks running, because they want to stand against what Republicans are doing,' Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said during a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor last month. 'But until we see a map, I don't know what districts … and who might be running.'
The issue of recruitment is not unique to redistricting. Both parties have been working to refine their strategies all year. Democrats have been focused on candidates with military backgrounds, and Republicans are working to recruit Latinos, hoping their recent gains with that demographic can stick next year.
Plus, since Trump and the White House have been invested in redistricting, there's every chance they would be involved in vetting the candidates who run under new maps.
'President Trump ignited this whole potential arms race,' Seat said, adding that he expects Trump 'to be heavily involved in these races.'
Good Monday morning. Give me a shout: ahoward@politico.com or @andrewjfhoward.
Days until the AZ-07 general: 43
Days until the TN-07 primary: 57
Days until the 2025 election: 85
Days until the midterms: 449
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
CAMPAIGN INTEL
REDISTRICTING ROUNDUP — Vice President JD Vance went on the offensive for the White House-backed effort to redistrict across the U.S., accusing Democrats of being the problem and saying Republicans need to respond 'in some ways as aggressively,' during a Sunday appearance on Fox News. 'You finally see some backbone in the Republican Party to fight back,' Vance said.
… ''Special session after special session': Abbott says he'll continue until redrawn maps are passed,' by POLITICO's Nicole Markus. On Sunday, Abbott doubled down, saying, 'If they want to evade the arrest, they will stay outside of the state of Texas for literally years. They might as well start voting in California or voting in Illinois, wherever they may be.'
… Texas Democrats appearing alongside California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday vowed to press forward with their quorum-breaking effort to counter Republican-led redistricting in Texas, my colleagues Jeremy B. White and Lindsey Holden write from Sacramento.
… Texas House Democrats unveiled their legal counterattack Friday against Gov. Greg Abbott's bid to oust them from office, saying the governor's emergency bid is riddled with fatal flaws, my colleague Kyle Cheney reported Friday.
… 'Kelly Ayotte rules out redistricting for New Hampshire,' by POLITICO's Aaron Pellish.
… If Newsom succeeds in putting mid-decade redistricting to a statewide vote this November, it will become the most consequential decision on any American ballot in 2025 — and the clearest opportunity for voters to opine about Trump's agenda ahead of the 2026 midterms, POLITICO's Emily Schultheis writes.
… ''Mutually assured destruction': GOP Rep. Lawler calls for redistricting battles to end,' by PBS' Geoff Bennett and Kyle Midura.
2028 WATCH — On NBC's 'Meet the Press' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said, 'I can't rule anything out,' when asked about his 2028 prospects.
… During his visit to Iowa, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) 'faced criticisms for his 2020 social media post about the Iowa caucuses,' per the Iowa Capital Dispatch's Robin Opsahl. 'I'm a mature adult now,' Gallego replied. Despite the jeering about the caucuses, Gallego's visit was 'upbeat,' writes AP's Thomas Beaumont from an event Saturday.
… 'Democrats with an eye on 2028 reject some parts of liberal orthodoxy,' by The Washington Post's Naftali Bendavid.
… Asked about his own odds of running in 2028, two-time Democratic candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) told CNN's Dana Bash, 'I'm going to be 84 next month. I think that speaks for itself.'
… 'Who Is the Heir to the MAGA Movement? Trump Keeps His Options Open,' by The Wall Street Journal's Alex Leary, Meridith McGraw and Natalie Andrews. 'Behind the scenes, Trump has at times appeared to stoke competition between Vance and Rubio, teasing them about their well-known political ambitions.'
DEM MESSAGING — 'Union Leaders Get Tough With Democrats as Members Drift Toward Trump,' by The New York Times' Kellen Browning.
KENTUCKY SENATE — 'Some allies of Daniel Cameron have pitched Rep. Andy Barr's team on a super PAC to take down Nate Morris,' NOTUS' Reese Gorman reports.
CODA — QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'I want him to win. I think every 20 years or so, we need a conspicuous, confined experiment with socialism so we can crack it up again,' George Will told Bill Maher, of New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
GOP senator on DC carjacking fears: ‘I don't buckle up'
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) on Wednesday expressed his fear of being carjacked in the nation's capital, as the Trump administration ramps up its federal takeover of local law enforcement. 'And by the way, I'm not joking when I say this, I drive around in Washington, D.C., in my Jeep, and yes, I do drive myself, and I don't buckle up. And the reason why I don't buckle up, and people can say whatever they want to, they can raise their eyebrows at me again, is because of carjacking,' Mullin said during an appearance on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'I don't want to be stuck in my vehicle when I need to exit in a hurry, because I got a seatbelt around me and that — and I wear my seatbelt all the time,' he told host Brian Kilmeade, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. 'But in Washington, D.C., I do not, because it is so prevalent of carjacking,' the Oklahoma Republican continued. 'And I don't want the same thing [to] happen to me what's happened to a lot of people that work on the hill.' President Trump announced earlier this week that his administration was taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and deployed hundreds of National Guard soldiers to the area to combat crime and violence in the city. The move, sparked after a former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer was attacked by teenagers during a carjacking — has received heavy blowback from Democrats and local officials. A provision in Washington's ' Home Rule Act ' allows the president to federalize the police force for up to 30 days — but any additional time requires Congressional approval. During a speech Wednesday from the Kennedy Center, Trump said he will seek a 'long-term' extension. 'Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress,' Trump said, when asked about whether he's talked to lawmakers about extending the takeover. He added that he expects meet with Congress 'very quickly' and snag GOP support. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) signaled in a post online Wednesday that he and fellow Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) were working with the Trump administration on a safety package for the district. 'Together, we will try to shepherd the DC Security Fund through Congress to give President Trump the resources he will need to improve the safety and quality of life in our nation's capital,' he wrote on social platform X. 'Every American should be behind this effort to make Washington, DC clean and safe so that it can truly become the shining city on the hill.' For such a move to advance, however, it would likely need support from some Senate Democrats. Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) made clear that his caucus would not back the measure. 'No f‑‑‑ing way,' he told podcast host Aaron Parnas. 'We'll fight him tooth and nail. … He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like either.' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has also pushed back on Trump's moves, calling them an 'authoritarian push' as data shows the crime rate declining in the nation's capital. The mayor has also used the national attention as a platform to reup the district's quest to gain statehood.

USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
South Sudan denies talks with Israel to resettle Palestinians from Gaza
The Associated Press, citing six sources, reported Israel was holding discussions with South Sudan to resettle Palestinians from Gaza. NAIROBI − South Sudan is not in talks with Israel to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza, South Sudan's foreign ministry said on August 13. The Associated Press, citing six people with knowledge of the matter, reported that Israel was holding discussions with South Sudan to resettle Palestinians from Gaza in the East African nation. "These claims are baseless and do not reflect the official position or policy of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan," South Sudan's foreign affairs ministry said in a statement. More: Hamas hostage videos silenced Israeli media's talk of Gaza aid crisis Israel's military has pounded Gaza City in recent days prior to its planned takeover of the shattered enclave which is home to more than 2 million Palestinians. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on aUGUST 13 reiterated a view − also enthusiastically floated by President Donald Trump − that Palestinians should simply leave Gaza. Many world leaders are horrified at the idea of displacing the Gaza population, which Palestinians say would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe), when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. In March, Somalia and its breakaway region of Somaliland also denied receiving any proposal from the United States or Israel to resettle Palestinians from Gaza, with Mogadishu saying it categorically rejected any such move. South Sudan's Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba visited Israel last month and met with Netanyahu, according to the foreign ministry in Juba. More: Israel approves plan to take control of Gaza City Last month South Sudan's government confirmed that eight migrants deported to the African nation by the Trump administration were currently in the care of the authorities in Juba after they lost a legal battle to halt their transfer. Since achieving independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has spent nearly half its life at war and is currently in the grip of a political crisis, after President Salva Kiir's government ordered the arrest of Vice President Riek Machar in March.

Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Secretary's willingness to tamper with past climate reports is dangerous
To the editor: U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright is intending to review and potentially alter the nation's next climate science report ('Energy secretary says Trump administration may alter past National Climate Assessments,' Aug. 7). He's already removed the climate assessments from the government websites. He has accused the previous reviews (even the ones made during the first Trump administration) as being 'politically biased.' Just wondering if Wright has actually looked outdoors recently or at least kept abreast of the weather reports. Has he not seen the spate of unprecedented tornadoes razing towns and communities? Or witnessed the deadly floods throughout the country? Or the wildfires from hell in the West? Or the unbearable heat waves hitting the Northeast? Or the approaching hurricanes that signal widespread death and destruction on the way? It is clear that Wright is on a leash, eager to do the bidding of his master — old 'Drill, Baby, Drill!' His stated intentions, as well as his removal of the climate assessments from years past from governmental websites, make him complicit in the disaster that is to come. Lanore Pearlman, Claremont ... To the editor: I see that Wright, previously the CEO of a company that did fracking, says that the government climate reports have been politically driven and are not accepted by 'a credible economist or scientist.' I am sure he is right that some economists do not wish to contemplate the possibility of climate change, but I would challenge him as to what the majority scientific opinion might be. Hundreds of scientists have studied the issue. Most published articles note that change is occurring. The evidence is everywhere: shrinking glaciers in every part of the globe, shrinking polar and Greenland ice sheets, the melting of the Russian tundra, bleaching coral reefs, longer, hotter summers, disruption of rain patterns, even the opening of the Northwest Passage. The actual debate appears to be whether human activity is causing it. In other words, conservatives do not believe we can stop the process. Erica Hahn, Monrovia ... To the editor: Wright's changes might misinform some, but if our extreme weather-related events continue at their enhanced pace, eventually the public will demand action. Those events are devastating and deadly to the affected population and the economic damage is astounding. I find it disingenuous and devious that the Energy secretary is considering changes to previous scientific-based reports. Going back to scrub past reports won't change the facts that our climate has changed and fossil fuel emissions are exacerbating this change. Jonathan Light, Laguna Niguel