Amazon and Stellantis' Big Plan to Revolutionize In-Car Tech Is Dead
The latest car news, reviews, and features.
In January 2022, Amazon and Stellantis announced a multi-year partnership formed to develop a suite of software that was expected to end up in millions of cars starting in 2024. The agreement was proudly presented as a way for Stellantis to 'accelerate its shift to becoming a sustainable mobility tech company,' while presumably giving Amazon a significant advantage in its rivalry against Google. Fast-forward to 2025 and plans have changed. The partnership is ending, according to a new report, and Stellantis may knock on Google's door instead.
It's too early to tell why the partnership is winding down, according to Reuters . Parting ways 'will allow each team to focus on solutions that provide value to our shared customers and better align with our evolving strategies,' the companies jointly told the news agency. I'd give that statement a five-star rating in marketing-bullshit-ology. It answers the question in the vaguest and most non-committal way possible.
Joining forces with Amazon was a great idea on paper. Like many of its peers and rivals, Stellantis realized that it often makes more sense to focus on what it does best—developing cars—and outsource the tech part of the equation to a tech company. Software has become one of the main measuring sticks in the automotive industry, especially outside of niche and performance-oriented segments. Offering a cutting-edge digital experience is now a core requirement for a volume-oriented group that sells cars all over the world. Stellantis
One of the centerpieces of the partnership was a feature called SmartCockpit. It relied on artificial intelligence, Amazon's Alexa tech, and cloud solutions to link the car's infotainment system to the user's digital ecosystem. The software was notably supposed to include curated services and experiences available through an app store. Stellantis provided an example: In a Chrysler Pacifica, SmartCockpit would be able to offer a family trip planner that recommended media content, points of interest, and restaurants. Jeep models were supposed to get a digital off-road coach to help, say, a Wrangler owner navigate a difficult trail without violently introducing the engine's oil pan to a rock.
It goes without saying that an e-commerce marketplace and a payment service were part of SmartCockpit as well; this is Amazon, after all. And, Alexa connectivity would have allowed users to control their connected home devices, like lights, from behind the wheel. Of course, the ability to monetize the software was baked in early on, and this wasn't purely about the user experience. Stellantis would have paid Amazon for access to the software in each car equipped with it, along with various maintenance fees. In exchange, the carmaker would have received an incentive fee when a driver signed up for, say, a music subscription service through the car's infotainment screen.
Stellantis and Amazon will continue to work on various other projects, according to the report, though none were named. It doesn't sound like the retail giant will try to develop a SmartCockpit-like software with another company: Sources told Reuters most of the Digital Cabin staff have left the company or been re-assigned to a different department. Stellantis remains committed to the idea, however, and Reuters reports that executives are open to the idea of enlisting the help of Google's Android platform to bring the technology to the market.
Got tips? Send 'em to tips@thedrive.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Google search judge scrutinizes AI power in trial resolution
The federal judge who will decide how to limit Google's monopoly in search is considering its advantage in artificial intelligence too, and aiming to limit harm to the other players in the market with any resolution. On Friday in U.S. District Court in Washington, attorneys for Alphabet Inc.'s Google and the Justice Department answered Judge Amit Mehta's final questions in the government's monopoly case against the search giant. It will be up to Mehta to decide whether to break up the company and reshape the internet or impose more limited penalties. Mehta's first questions to the government focused on whether curbing Google's position in generative AI was a fitting way to address the company's dominance in search, He also mulled the possibility of Google being forced to share key data with rivals and banning it from paying to make its search engine the default on other devices. "Does the government believe that there is a market for a new search engine to emerge as we think of it today?" he asked. "Do you think somebody is going to come off the sidelines and build a new general search engine in light of what we are now seeing happen in the AI space?" "The short answer is yes, your honor," Justice Department lawyer David Dahlquist responded. "We do believe that these remedies that will be proposed will allow that opportunity to occur. The reason we are so focused on gen AI, and the reason you heard a lot of evidence about it, is because that is the new search access point." The questions focused on the Justice Department's proposal for forward-looking, long-term measures to resolve Google's conduct in the market, which Mehta ruled last year was an illegal monopoly of the online search market. Antitrust regulators have argued that Google's dominance in traditional search could extend to generative AI, which is becoming a key gateway for how users access information online. Exclusive agreements Central to the case are agreements with Apple Inc. and others in which Google pays billions of dollars annually to be the default search engine on the iPhone maker's devices. The DOJ is seeking a bar on those payments, which would also apply to Google's artificial intelligence products, including its flagship AI model, Gemini. Google's counterproposal would still allow for the company to split revenue with competing browsers. The company's lawyers have said that banning Google from competing for search distribution contracts only serves to help large rivals like Microsoft at the expense of consumers, browser companies and device makers. Mehta told the DOJ that if he were to cut off Google's payments to Apple, Mozilla and others to distribute its search engine, it would cause widespread market harm. "Every single distribution partner said, 'This would harm us.' Some have gone so far to suggest this would put them out of business," Mehta said. "Is that an acceptable outcome, to fix one market and harm others?" he asked, referring to the browser and device maker industries. "That's a fair question," Dahlquist replied. But "that is asking the court to put private interests ahead of the public interest." He added that the government does not "dispute the possibility of some private impact." Mehta asked if it would work to create any exceptions to the payment ban, a possibility Dahlquist rejected, saying that even Apple's Eddy Cue wasn't fully opposed to the government's proposals. Apple stands to lose tens of billions of dollars in annual payments from Google if the DOJ's proposals are to be adopted and revenue sharing is paused for the next 10 years. "I think you're right that Mr. Cue wants more choice and he may be willing to be paid less money" for more choice, Mehta responded. "I just don't know whether he wants to live in a world where he can't get paid anything for no choice." The company's lead lawyer John Schmidtlein objected to any payment ban. "Banning the payments here would not be addressing the unlawful conduct," he said. "It would not be connected to the violation in this case." Existential threat AI chatbots are already seen as an existential threat to traditional search engines, as they can address users' questions directly with AI-drafted responses - replacing the need to present people with a long list of search results pointing across the web. Google has argued that the government's proposals are too extreme, saying they would hurt American consumers and the economy, as well as weaken U.S. technological leadership. Google argues that it is the market leader in search because of more than 20 years of innovation. It says people use its service because it is the best. Schmidtlein asserted on Friday that the court should focus on addressing the specific conduct found to be illegal, rather than imposing extensive remedies - including on Google's generative AI products - that he said could fundamentally restructure the market. But Mehta also appeared skeptical of the tech giant's argument for more limited remedies, indicating he is seriously considering including AI-related measures in his decision. "It seems to me that to simply say, 'look, just open up the avenues of distribution,' without providing any further remedies that are forward-looking and that would allow competitors to actually be rivals here, sells the remedy portion of this short," Mehta commented. Schmidtlein countered that gen AI products are not in the relevant market for search. "There is no evidence that gen AI products have been harmed by any of the conduct issue in this case," he said. "They couldn't have been, they weren't around, right?" Perplexity, OpenAI As the trial unfolded in April and May, some representatives from AI companies told the court they are already being stymied by Google. Perplexity's Dmitry Shevelenko testified that Google's contract with Lenovo Group Ltd.'s Motorola blocked the smartphone maker from setting Perplexity as the default assistant on its new devices. Motorola "can't get out of their Google obligations and so they are unable to change the default assistant on the device," the Perplexity executive said. Representatives of two prominent AI startups - OpenAI and Perplexity AI - also testified their companies would be interested in buying Chrome if Google were forced to divest it. Much of the discussion in the first part of the day focused on what data, and how much of it Google would be forced to syndicate to rivals so they can build their own search engines. Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai testified in April that the Justice Department's proposal to share search data with rivals constituted a "de facto" divestiture of the company's search engine. On Friday, Mehta told government lawyer Dahlquist that he is "not looking to kneecap Google" but to instead bolster potential competitors. "We are trying to kickstart competitors, we are not trying to put them on equal footing on day one." ___ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
據報 Google Lens 即將可於 YouTube Shorts 中使用
平時在看短片時看到感興趣的東西，小編的做法是立刻暫停再 screen cap，方便記下外貌又或者型號，再用 Google Lens將物品搜尋出來。不過大家在未來就不用再截圖才用 Google Lens 搜尋。據報 YouTube Shorts 正測試加入 Google Lens 的功能，令用戶可以更輕鬆地搜尋影片中的內容以獲取更多相關資訊。 這項功能預計本週開始向所有 Shorts 用戶推送，當啟用後用戶可在暫停影片時，從上方選單中選擇 Google Lens，然後點擊或圈起影片中需要的元素再去搜尋。搜尋結果與視覺比對結果會直接在 Shorts 畫面上以疊加的方式去顯示，令用戶更清楚是否有正確搜尋出來。 在宣布 Lens 會推出測試版的 YouTube 說明頁面中的公告指出，由於Lens in Shorts正處於測試階段，用戶不會在搜尋結果中看到廣告。此外，公告亦提到「Lens 體驗不適用於含有 YouTube 購物聯盟連結或付費產品推廣的 Shorts」。雖然這次的測試版暫時不見商業化元素，但相信未來幾可肯定會有廣告上的合作關連，畢竟YouTube 的廣告收入相當龐大，Google 絕不會看漏這條財路吧。 更多內容： Engadget YouTube 說明頁面 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！ 🎉📱 Tech Facebook： 🎉📱 Tech Instagram： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道： 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道：
Car and Driver
3 hours ago
- Car and Driver
Well . . . The Dodge Durango SRT Hellcat Is Back Again for 2026
Dodge revealed details for the 2026 Durango lineup, quashing rumors that the current generation would end after 2025. In addition to carrying over the current generation for at least one more year, Dodge also announced the return of the V-8-powered R/T and SRT Hellcat Durangos. Pricing for the GT and R/T models is unchanged from 2025, starting at $40,490 and $51,990, respectively, while pricing for the SRT Hellcat won't be revealed until later this year. Dodge did it again. When it launched in 2021, the 710-hp Durango SRT Hellcat was only supposed to stick around for one model year. After taking a year off, Dodge's executives must've realized their stack of money bags was quickly dwindling, so they pivoted and brought the Durango Hellcat back for 2023. Then again, for a final year of production in 2024. And, as money is a hell of an enticement, once more with a slew of final editions for 2025. If you haven't caught on to the theme yet, the Durango is back for a final, final, final, final edition for 2026. Stellantis Okay, so Dodge isn't actually mentioning anything about final editions this go-around of the Durango SRT Hellcat, which could mean they're planning for more than one year of production. The brand is promising to release more details about the seven-seater Hellcat in the third quarter of this year. Along with the high-powered model, Dodge released details on the rest of the 2026 Durango lineup, which includes the V-6 GT model and the V-8 R/T trim. The GT carries over to 2026 unchanged, down to the price, which starts at $40,490. The R/T model adds two new wheel options and brings back the $5990 Tow 'N Go package as a stand-alone option. There's also a new $3495 Blacktop Redline package that adds 20-by-8.0-inch Black Noise wheels, blacked-out badging, and special SRT spoilers for the front and rear. The R/T trim starts at $51,990, the same as last year. Order books for the GT and R/T are scheduled to open in June, with cars arriving in dealerships sometime in the third quarter of this year. Jack Fitzgerald Associate News Editor Jack Fitzgerald's love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn't afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. Read full bio
