Astronaut Jim Lovell: Lessons In Perseverance And Resilience
As reporter Russell Lewis of National Public Radio noted in his remembrance of Lovell's passing, perseverance was his special strength. Lovell did not get into the Naval Academy on his first try. He was later accepted and became a combat fighter pilot and qualified for the test pilot program at Edwards AFB. He did not qualify for the Mercury astronaut program, but was later accepted into the Gemini program. Again, a second try was successful.
Handling adversity
These setbacks steeled James Lovell to be an astronaut who could handle the pressures in times of adversity. Fear was not an option in times of crisis. As Lovell told the New York Times years later, 'We were all test pilots, and the only thing we could do was try to get home,' he said to The New York Times in 1995. 'The idea of despair never occurred to us, because we were always optimistic we would get home.'
It was this kind of bravery that transfixed the nation and, decades later, after Lovell published his story of the mission, led to a landmark motion picture directed by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks as Lovell.
Crisis leadership and teamwork
One thing Lovell noted about the Apollo 13 mission was NASA's leadership. It scrambled together ad hoc solutions to engineer fixes that could make the command module safe enough to return to Earth.
As Lovell told NPR in 2014, Apollo 13 'showed was what you could do with good leadership in an organization, how good leadership fosters teamwork, and how teamwork and initiative, when you faced a problem - to use the initiative or imagination to try to solve the problem because everything doesn't flow freely in life, and things change.'
Perseverance + Resilience
Perseverance is something that strengthens as we use it—learning from Lovell's example, when we face obstacles, we do not give up immediately. Learn from what you did and improve when necessary. Perseverance is an attribute of resilience, a must-have for anyone in leadership.
Resilience emerges, as it did for Lovell, from setbacks. Do not become discouraged. Reflect on your past successes. Self-confidence is honed by achievement. Sometimes achievements come easily, but the ones that require extra effort are those that prepare us to face emerging challenges.
Although Lovell captained Apollo 8, the first mission to leave Earth's orbit and circle the Moon, he never achieved his dream of landing on the Moon. Life does not always work out as planned but Lovell made his mark in history by turning disaster into a life-saving mission.
Godspeed, Jim Lovell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
4 Ways ‘AI Anxiety' Can Hurt Your Sense Of Self, By A Psychologist
AI is advancing at a rate that is becoming increasingly difficult to keep up with. Techniques and products that were once only conceptually reserved for sci-fi movies and computer scientists' dreams have now become a reality, seemingly overnight. In turn, nearly every area of technology has shifted in some way or another to account for, or to include, AI automation. While this initially seemed promising to most people, rapid progress has led to what can only be described as total AI inundation. Now, it's in our homes, our jobs and our pockets. It's rewriting how we work, reshaping our search engines, curating who we date, grading our essays and somehow, even deciding when our milk is about to expire. Of course, some of these advancements do add convenience to our lives. Others that are being thrust upon us, however, are beginning to feel disorienting or and borderline intrusive. As a result, many people are beginning to develop a pervasive sense of unease surrounding the concept of AI. This is what researchers are now referring to as 'AI anxiety' — the discomfort and apprehension arising in the wake of a technology that is evolving so much faster than our own ability to adapt or trust it. Here's how to tell if you might be struggling with AI anxiety. The 'AI Anxiety' Scale In a 2022 study published in Interactive Learning Environments, researchers Yu-Yin Wang and Yi-Shun Wang set forth to find a way to measure the public's emerging AI anxiety. Surprisingly, however, the authors note that the concept of AI anxiety isn't entirely novel. Although AI's advancements seem both rapid and contemporary, the authors explain, 'The study of AI anxiety in the information system literature traces back to the first generation of computers, when researchers explored a widespread contemporary concern that computers threatened the meaning of being 'human.'' In other words, in nearly the exact same way that computers and robots used to make older generations nervous, AI is now giving rise to a similar sense of dread. Based on similar concepts from the past, Wang and Wang developed a 21-item scale to measure the novel yet reminiscent concept of AI anxiety. Users can take the test by rating their level of agreement to each of the statements on a scale from 'strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree': If you find yourself in agreement with a majority of the statements in this scale, this likely indicates that you're experiencing AI anxiety to some degree. However, it's certainly not something you're alone in feeling — far from it. It's no surprise that researchers are finding that discomfort with AI is something becoming increasingly common within society, especially considering how much harder its role in our daily lives has become to ignore. Fortuitously, the authors also outline the four core concepts that make up AI anxiety. Simply by knowing what they are, and, in turn, being able to identify them in your own thoughts and experiences, you'll be taking the first and most important step toward taking control of your uneasy feelings. 1. Learning AI isn't a single app or device you have to 'master' and then forget about. Today, and for the foreseeable future, it should be considered as an entity that's constantly evolving. New tools and updates emerge so quickly; by the time you've wrapped your head around one, the next one has probably already arrived. For people who aren't particularly 'techy,' the lightning-like pace of these updates' can feel absolutely overwhelming. The pressure to 'keep up' with them often isn't self-imposed, either. Seeing all your friends and colleagues boasting their adeptness in all the latest AI tricks can make it seem like a near essential life-skill. Regardless, it's crucial to remind yourself that there's no need to become an expert in every emerging tool in order to live or do your job successfully. Unless your career explicitly demands you to have a particular AI skill set, it's perfectly reasonable (and healthy) to limit the usage of AI in your everyday life. You can try learning only what's directly useful to you, and just ignore the rest — or, all of it, if you're not interested. 2. Job Replacement There are very few anxieties that could ever feel more personal than the idea of losing your livelihood. Unfortunately, AI has made that worry very real for employees in countless sectors. Each day, individuals are starting to feel the tangible increase in their fears of replacement, irrelevance and of being left behind in a market that values efficiency over humanity. And for some, there's the adjacent worry that the only way to survive will be to rely heavily on AI. This gives rise to an equally valid secondary fear: that their actual skills, as a result of this reliance, may atrophy over time. And for others, there's also the worst-case scenario at mind — that is, being laid off entirely in favor of cheaper, tireless AI systems. Each one of these concerns is entirely valid considering the state of modernity. However, a reassuring 2018 article from the Harvard Business Review suggests that the more likely reality is that AI will be implemented to complement human skills. It's unlikely that AI will ever replace the human workforce in its entirety. Even so, the most practical way to counter job-related AI anxiety is by putting your efforts into honing the skills that you know AI would never be able to truly replicate: your creativity, emotional intelligence, leadership and interpersonal abilities. These are the areas where your humanity and strength will always shine brightest. 3. Sociotechnical Blindness One of the most unsettling fears people have about AI is the idea that it might 'go rogue.' That, in becoming more autonomous, they may also become uncontainable or even dangerous. Popular media loves to dramatize this possibility, especially in the wake of Elon Musk's xAI antisemitic and genocidal controversies. This is why Wang and Wang caution against what they call 'sociotechnical blindness:' forgetting that AI systems are always conceived, built and governed by human beings. AI is not, and likely will never be, a sentient entity plotting its own path; it is a set of algorithms operating within human-defined boundaries. Even Grok's (xAI) 'outburst' was the product of human error; it wasn't anything close to a rogue I, Robot situation. If you're prone to ruminate on worst-case scenarios like these, do your best to reroute your thinking patterns to emphasize AI as a tool, rather than an independent actor. It's incredibly important to be in the know about the human role behind every AI system. This can help you to remember that, collectively, we still hold the reins. 4. AI Configuration Of course, there's also the irrefutable creepiness of humanoid robots. Despite the fact that these robots are carefully designed to look 'friendly' or approachable, their kind-of-but-not-quite human appearance never fails to raise the hairs on the back of one's neck. This is a symptom of what psychologists refer to as the 'uncanny valley' effect. It's a well-documented byproduct of human psychology that triggers when entities look close to being human, but not convincingly so. As 2012 research explains, the incongruence between these robots' human-like appearance and non-human mannerisms can result in a confusion so profound that it legitimately scares us. But, as uneasy as this experience can be, it's worth remembering that it's not irrational in any way. It's just your biology doing its job, by protecting you subconsciously from what it perceives to be threatening. Interested in finding out exactly how deep your AI anxiety runs? Take the test here to receive a breakdown of your score: AI Anxiety Scale
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Carbon monitoring data from Colorado State University shaky as federal budget looks to cut NASA funding
A research scientist at the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere at Colorado State University studies carbon monitoring data from two NASA satellites to make more precise climate change predictions for decades to come. Those satellites are now at risk of losing funding in the upcoming proposed budget for the 2026 fiscal year. Senior scientist Chris O'Dell calls these satellites his babies. For more than 20 years, he's developed and worked on the Orbiting Carbon Observatories. "I'm always trying to look for new ways to use the data and to make the data itself more accurate," O'Dell said. When OCO-2 was launched in 2014, its mission was to beam back data to researchers by measuring how much of the sunlight reflected off the Earth is absorbed by carbon dioxide molecules in the air. OCO-3 was launched in 2019 as an attachment to the International Space Station. O'Dell says these instruments gather data that is difficult to attain from the ground. And with carbon measurements constantly changing, these precise data are groundbreaking. A happy accident came about when scientists working on the OCOs found that with "our instruments, we can actually tell on a specific day if they're doing photosynthesis or not, and that's really important. You can use it to predict crop yields if you fly overhead enough." Although it's very new, the United States Department of Agriculture has started to integrate the data. "It's just starting to be integrated now." But the Orbiting Carbon Observatories' future is now murky. President Trump's fiscal year 2026 NASA budget request states that both will close out and end next year. "It's a little bit painful, especially because they are functioning satellites, and they're really bringing down a lot of useful data, about emissions over cities that we can see for the first time directly," O'Dell says. O'Dell says his team got a directive to plan for a mission close-out in case they lose funding. OCO-3 would likely be turned off and remain on the ISS. But the free-flying OCO-2 would likely be destroyed by the same atmosphere it's meant to monitor. "You actually have to bring it down out of the atmosphere or out of the orbit. (It) will then burn up in the atmosphere," O'Dell said, meaning his life's work could literally go up in flames. Taking away federal funding would cripple research at CIRA. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the director of the Center on Energy, Climate and Environment at the think tank Heritage Foundation, says the private sector would take over. "We need to take a very serious look at what the government has to do and what it doesn't have to do," she says. "Technology is making constant progress, and private companies can take over. And we should let them, because our government expenditures are going up. (Funds) need to be spent in other ways." According to the Treasury Department, the U.S. has accumulated $37 trillion in debt throughout the nation's history, and the federal government has spent $1.34 trillion more than it planned for in fiscal year 2025. "It's like putting things on our credit card and expecting other people to pay for it," Furchtgott-Roth tells CBS News Colorado. She points to companies like Disney. "As technology catches up, private companies are going to be able to do jobs that the federal government didn't use to do," she says. "We need to be figuring out how we are going to get healthier balances for our children and grandchildren, so we do not tax them in the future with bills that we should have been paying ourselves." Disney partnered with Weatherbug and Weatherstem to forecast day-to-day weather at its parks. Weatherbug uses Severe Weather Alerts notifications that are issued by the National Weather Service, which uses data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Both of those agencies are also at risk of losing funding. The budget approval has a deadline of Oct. 1, or there will be a government shutdown. CBS Colorado reached out to the White House and NASA, neither of which would comment on the proposed cuts since the budget has not been finalized by Congress. However, Dan Powers, a science advocate and the executive director of the nonprofit CO-LABS, says privatization isn't practical. "Who's going to step in and do this instead, with some rationale of it being faster, cheaper, better, etc.? The government agencies that provide daily assessments, research, and information sharing--it would be like going back to before any (current) technology existed as a resource to the country," Powers says. But Furchtgott-Roth is confident that companies can take charge. "We have the most advanced universities in the world," she says. "People from all over the country want to come and do research here in the United States, and I'm not concerned about losing our competitive advantage" (to other countries). Were that the case, though, O'Dell would have to think about plan B: "I would certainly look at all my opportunities. Going overseas or working in the private sector would probably be two pretty high items on the list. I mean, I hope that doesn't happen. I have every faith that I think we're not going to lose this funding. But if the worst were to happen, yeah, I would (leave the country)." O'Dell estimates both satellites could continue functioning into the 2030s, and he says the lion's share of their costs has already been spent. "It cost about $750 million (in) taxpayer dollars to design, build, and launch the OCO instruments." It costs must less per year to run them. The budget for the two satellites was $16.4 million for fiscal year 2025. O'Dell wants to be able to continue with the work of the OCOs. "It's been the greatest pleasure of my life, actually, getting to work on these missions, getting the public's trust," he says. "It makes you feel really good, maybe how you might feel as, you know, your child was really successful in high school or college or something."
Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Strong Need' for Life Sciences Investing: Portal Innovations CEO
Venture firm Portal Innovations is raising a $100 million life sciences fund and helping universities launch startup incubators, as institutions pursue alternatives to federal research funding. Portal Innovations CEO John Flavin speaks with Romaine Bostick and Vonnie Quinn on "The Close." (Source: Bloomberg)
