logo
GOP Congressman: U.S. Tax Sovereignty Under Threat

GOP Congressman: U.S. Tax Sovereignty Under Threat

Newsweek5 hours ago

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. tax code is subject to continual review by Congress. It's a system that honors merit; tax incentives in the United States aim to reward pro-growth outcomes. Success in the marketplace comes from innovation, productivity, and job creation. That's the American way.
The American approach to tax competition isn't a chaotic free-for-all; it's a deliberate engine that drives investment based on real economic potential. Businesses thrive or fail based on market fundamentals—supply, demand, innovation, efficiency—not on the whims of a government handout.
Our tax system stands tall in a world where economic freedom is losing ground. It's a beacon of hope, but the global tax deal negotiated at the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) threatens to snuff it out.
The OECD's global tax deal includes a new 15 percent minimum corporate tax for countries that have never had one. It's intended to end tax-dodging by multinationals, but its flawed design trades one problem for another. Instead of fostering open, fair, and transparent markets, it will usher in a Hunger Games-style contest for direct state subsidies in the form of direct cash handouts or refundable tax credits. Countries will dangle these incentives to lure businesses to their shores.
This shady system favors political connections and authoritarian governments over ingenuity and innovation.
WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: U.S. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) speaks to the media after leaving a House Republican conference meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill on October 24, 2023 in...
WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: U.S. Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK) speaks to the media after leaving a House Republican conference meeting in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill on October 24, 2023 in Washington, DC. MoreAs currently formulated, the deal will place U.S. multinationals at a disadvantage in two critical ways: (1) they face two layers of minimum taxes—the existing U.S. system and the emerging OECD system—and (2) their traditional income-based tax incentives face stricter scrutiny than the corporate welfare regimes in China and the EU.
Under current OECD rules, traditional tax incentives can easily trigger the OECD minimum tax, allowing other countries to siphon away the U.S. tax base. On the other hand, the direct cash handouts or refundable tax credits favored by the OECD are far more likely to be protected from the OECD minimum tax regime.
Far from progress, this is cronyism dressed as fairness, and it's being forced on nations worldwide under the OECD's banner.
Here's the truth: pushing subsidies out of the income tax system and into the hands of bureaucrats is an inefficient way to energize economic activity. It distorts markets, picks winners and losers, and forces taxpayers to foot the bill for political pet projects that have dismal economic prospects.
If other nations want to tie their economies in knots with this nonsense, that's their decision. The U.S. won't play the role of global nanny, dictating domestic policy to sovereign states. Countries around the world are free to determine a domestic policy that meets their political and economic demands. Right?
Wrong. This stops being a "mind your own business" issue the moment the OECD's grand plan starts picking American taxpayers' pockets to fund France's social programs or Germany's pet projects.
The global tax deal isn't just a friendly suggestion. It's a loaded gun aimed at countries that don't join in. It's taxation without representation on steroids, a direct threat to our economic sovereignty.
America's tax sovereignty belongs in Washington, D.C., not Paris.
I'm glad that President Donald Trump and Secretary Scott Bessent believe this, too. My colleagues and I are continually working to improve a U.S. tax system built on a principle worth defending: competition should be about economic productivity and value, not favoritism. The OECD's subsidy circus flips that principle on its head, dragging the world toward a future where markets bend to political will and growth and prosperity will stagnate.
We've seen that movie before, and (spoiler alert) it doesn't end well. Washington needs to hold the line, reject this global tax trap, and remind the world why economic freedom still matters. Our businesses, our workers, and our taxpayers deserve nothing less.
Representative Kevin Hern serves as Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee and sits on the Tax Subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow
Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow

Newsweek

time7 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge in Massachusetts, William Young, a Ronald Reagan appointee, has ruled that the Trump administration's decision to cut National Institute of Health (NIH) grants—allegedly in response to executive orders targeting gender identity and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies—was "illegal" and "void." In his ruling, as reporting by Politico's Kyle Cheney on X, formerly Twitter, Judge Young ordered that many of the rescinded grants be reinstated. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements

Los Angeles Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements

It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' Mulvihill writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this report.

Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast
Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast

The headquarters of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting in Tehran was hit by an Israeli airstrike during a live broadcast Monday, setting the building on fire and knocking the network off the air for a short time. Footage shows a female anchor speaking on-air on the state-run broadcaster as the bomb from an Israeli fighter jet struck. A loud boom was heard, shaking the camera and knocking out the stage lights as the anchor hurriedly left the desk. More from Deadline What To Know About Saturday's Army Parade, Donald Trump's Birthday And The No Kings Protests Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update House Votes To Rescind PBS, NPR And Public Broadcasting Station Funding - Update Israel's defense minister confirmed the attack on the building, which houses Iran's state TV operations, calling the IRIB a 'propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority' in a post on X. Al Jazeera is reporting the anchor on the air at the time of the attack is Sahar Emami, referring to her 'one of the most famous state TV presenters in the country.' The IRIB said in a statement that 'live programs were briefly halted at the IRIB News Network but returned to normal a few minutes afterwards.' It added that 'it was not immediately clear if and how many personnel had been wounded or killed.' Video online showed the building on fire. Israeli officials and Iranian journalists on the ground confirmed there were evacuation warnings issued for that part of Tehran ahead of the strikes, which come on the fourth day of an Israeli offensive across Iran in response to intelligence that warned of Iran's increasing nuclear capability. The two countries have been trading bombing attacks using aircraft, ballistic missiles and drones since Sunday, with air raid sirens heard across Israel and civilians fleeing Tehran. Best of Deadline 'Bachelor in Paradise' Cast Announcement: See Who Is Headed To The Beach For Season 10 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store