Illegal and unseen: Nine surprising facts about Indians in the US
Last week Narendra Modi said India would take back its nationals who were in the US illegally, and also crack down on the "human trafficking ecosystem".
"These are children of very ordinary families, and they are lured by big dreams and promises," he said during his visit to Washington.
Now a new paper by Abby Budiman and Devesh Kapur from Johns Hopkins University has shed light on the numbers, demographics, entry methods, locations and trends relating to undocumented Indians over time.
Here are some of the more striking findings.
Unauthorised immigrants make up 3% of the US population and 22% of the foreign-born population.
The number of undocumented Indians among them is contested however, with estimates varying widely due to differing calculation methods.
Pew Research Center and Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) estimate some 700,000 people as of 2022, making them the third-largest group after Mexico and El Salvador.
In contrast, the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) puts the figure at 375,000, ranking India fifth among origin countries.
The official government data from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offers yet another picture, reporting 220,000 unauthorised Indians in 2022.
The vast differences in estimates highlight the uncertainty surrounding the true size of the undocumented Indian population, according to the study.
Indian migrants make up only a small share of the overall unauthorised migrant population in the US.
If Pew and CMS estimates are accurate, nearly one in four Indian immigrants in the US is undocumented - an unlikely scenario given migration patterns, the study says. (Indian immigrants are one of the fastest-growing groups in the US, surging from 600,000 in 1990 to 3.2 million in 2022.)
The DHS estimated in 2022 that the undocumented Indian population in the US dropped 60% from its 2016 peak, falling from 560,000 to 220,000.
How did the number of undocumented Indians drop so steeply from 2016 to 2022? Mr Kapur says the data doesn't provide a clear answer, but plausible explanations could be that some obtained legal status while others returned, particularly due to COVID-related hardships.
However, this estimate doesn't reflect a 2023 surge in Indians at US borders, meaning the actual number could now be higher.
Despite rising border encounters, US government estimates show no clear increase in the overall undocumented Indian population from the US financial year (FY) 2020 to 2022, according to the study.
Encounters refer to instances where non-citizens are stopped by US authorities while attempting to cross the country's borders with Mexico or Canada.
Visa overstays by Indians have remained steady at 1.5% since 2016.
The number of Indian recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) has also declined from 2,600 in 2017 to 1,600 in 2024. The Daca programme protects migrants who came to the US as children.
To sum up: the undocumented Indian population grew both in numbers and as a share of all unauthorised migrants, rising from 0.8% in 1990 to 3.9% in 2015 before dropping to 2% in 2022.
The US has two main land borders.
The southern border along the states of Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas bordering Mexico sees the most migrant crossings. Then there's the US-Canada border spanning 11 states.
Before 2010, encounters involving Indians at the two borders were minimal, never exceeding 1,000.
Since 2010, nearly all encounters involving Indians occurred along the US-Mexico southern border.
In FY 2024, encounters of Indian nationals on the northern border surged to 36% of all Indian crossings, up from just 4% the previous year.
Canada had become a more accessible entry point for Indians, with a shorter visitor visa processing times than US.
Also, there was a surge in attempted border crossings from 2021 onwards, and the encounters at the Mexico border peaked in 2023.
"This is not specific to Indians. It is part of a larger surge of migrants trying to come into the US after Biden was elected. It is as if there was a high tide of migrants and Indians were a part of it," Mr Kapur told me.
The study finds that the states with the largest Indian immigrant populations -California (112,000), Texas (61,000), New Jersey (55,000), New York (43,000) and Illinois (31,000) - also have the highest numbers of unauthorised Indian immigrants.
Indians make up a significant share of the total unauthorised population in Ohio (16%), Michigan (14%), New Jersey (12%) and Pennsylvania (11%).
Meanwhile, states where more than 20% of Indian immigrants are unauthorised include Tennessee, Indiana, Georgia, Wisconsin and California.
"We expect this because it's easier to blend in and find work in an ethnic business - like a Gujarati working for a Gujarati-American or a Punjabi/Sikh in a similar setup," Mr Kapur told me.
The US immigration system allows people who are detained at the border who fear persecution in their home countries to undergo credible "fear screenings". Those who pass can seek asylum in court, leading to a rise in asylum applications alongside rising border apprehensions.
Administrative data doesn't reveal the exact demographics of Indian asylum seekers, but court records on spoken languages provide some insight.
Punjabi-speakers from India have dominated Indian asylum claims since 2001. After Punjabi, Indian asylum seekers spoke Hindi (14%), English (8%) and Gujarati (7%).
They have filed 66% of asylum cases from FY 2001–2022, suggesting Punjab and the neighbouring state of Haryana as key migrant sources.
Punjabi speakers from India also had the highest asylum approval rate (63%), followed by Hindi speakers (58%). In contrast, only a quarter of Gujarati speakers' cases were approved.
US data collected by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows Indian asylum requests in the US have skyrocketed.
The requests jumped tenfold in just two years, rising from about 5,000 in 2021 to over 51,000 in 2023.
While this spike is most dramatic in the US, similar trends are seen in Canada, the UK and Australia, where Indians are among the largest asylum-seeking groups, the study says.
Mr Kapur believes this is "largely a way to game the asylum system rather than an objective fear of persecution, as processing takes years".
Given the large number of Punjabi-speakers who seek asylum, it's unclear what has changed in the northern Indian state ruled by the Congress party (2017-22) and latterly the Aam Aadmi Party (2022–present) to drive this surge.
Under Trump's second presidency, asylum requests are set to plummet.
Within his first week, a key app for migrants was shut down and removed from app stores, cancelling nearly 300,000 pending appointments, including asylum cases already in progress.
US data shows most Indian asylum seekers are Punjabi and Gujarati - groups from India's wealthier states, better able to afford high migration costs.
In contrast, Indian Muslims and marginalised communities and people from conflict zones like the regions affected by Maoist violence and Kashmir, rarely seek asylum, the study says.
So most Indian asylum seekers are economic migrants, not from the country's poorest or conflict-hit regions.
The arduous journey to the US - whether via Latin America or as "fake" students in Canada - costs 30-100 times India's per capita income, making it accessible only to those with assets to sell or pledge, the study says.
Not surprisingly, Punjab and Gujarat - top origin states for unauthorised Indians - are among India's wealthier regions, where land values far exceed returns from farming.
"Even illegality takes a lot of money to pursue," the study says.
While rising asylum claims may seem linked to "democratic backsliding" in India, correlation isn't causation, the authors say .
Punjab and Gujarat have long histories of emigration, with migrants heading not just to the US but also the UK, Canada and Australia.
Remittances - India received an estimated $120bn in 2023 - fuel aspirations for a better life, driven not by poverty but "relative deprivation", as families seek to match the success of others abroad, the study says.
A parallel industry of agents and brokers in India has cashed in on this demand.
The Indian government, says the study, "has looked the other way, likely because the issue of illegal migration is much more a burden for receiving than sending countries".
Between 2009 and 2024, around 16,000 Indians were deported, according to India's ministry of external affairs.
These deportations averaged 750 per year under Obama, 1,550 under Trump's first term, and 900 under Biden.
Indian migrant removals spiked between FY 2023 and 2024, but the peak was in 2020 with nearly 2,300 deportations.
US military plane carrying deported Indians lands in Punjab
Why Indians are risking it all to chase the American Dream
H-1B: Visa row under Trump fuels anxiety for Indian dreamers
Trump's citizenship order leaves expecting Indian immigrant parents in limbo
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
12 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump administration revoked more than 6,000 student visas, State Department says
WASHINGTON — The administration of President Donald Trump has revoked more than 6,000 student visas for overstays and breaking the law, including a small minority for 'support for terrorism,' a State Department official said Monday. The move, first reported by Fox Digital, comes as the Trump administration has adopted a particularly hard-line approach toward student visas as part of its immigration crackdown, tightening social media vetting and expanding screening. Directives from the State Department this year have ordered U.S. diplomats abroad to be vigilant against any applicants whom Washington may see as hostile to the United States and with a history of political activism. Around 4,000 visas were canceled because the visitors broke the law, with the vast majority being assault, the official said. Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs and burglary were other offenses, the official added. About 200 to 300 visas were revoked for terrorism, the official said, citing a rule about visa ineligibility under the State Department's Foreign Affairs Manual. The rule identifies ineligibility grounds generally as 'engaging in terrorist activities' and 'having certain links to terrorist organizations.' The official did not say which groups the students whose visas have been revoked were in support of. Trump has clashed with several top-level U.S. universities, accusing them of becoming bastions of antisemitism following large-scale student protests advocating Palestinian rights amid the Gaza war. In his clash with Harvard, Trump has frozen funding for investigations and threatened to remove the university's tax-exempt status, prompting several European nations to increase research grants to attract talent. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said he has revoked the visas of hundreds, perhaps thousands of people, including students, because they got involved in activities that he said went against U.S. foreign policy priorities. Trump administration officials have said that student visa and green card holders are subject to deportation over their support for Palestinians and criticism of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza, calling their actions a threat to U.S. foreign policy and accusing them of being pro-Hamas. A Tufts University student from Turkey was held for over six weeks in an immigration detention center in Louisiana after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. She was released from custody after a federal judge granted her bail.


CNN
42 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump wants DC to charge 14-year-olds as adults. Here's where the district's laws stand
As hundreds of federal law enforcement officers and National Guard troops descend on Washington as part of President Donald Trump's public display of force against crime in the nation's capital, the president and his allies have increasingly directed their ire toward the city's juvenile crime laws. More than two weeks after a 19-year-old former DOGE staffer was allegedly assaulted in DC by a group of teens, the president suggested that decades of Democratic leadership in the district were to blame for a system that seems to let violent juvenile offenders off the hook. Youth arrests reached a post-pandemic high in 2023, before falling the following year, according to DC government statistics. But from January 2025 until the end of June, DC Metropolitan police had arrested juveniles at the highest rate in that time period since 2019. 'Local 'youths' and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-years-old, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent Citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released,' Trump said on Truth Social earlier this month. 'The Law in DC must be changed to prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14.' Trump and US Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro's criticism of DC's juvenile justice system highlights a longstanding rift between the US attorney's office and that of the DC attorney general, which prosecutes juvenile offenses in the district. The district's current laws don't allow juvenile offenders younger than 15 to be prosecuted as adults in the vast majority of cases. But offenders under 18 can still end up in the adult justice system in one of two ways. Federal prosecutors from the DC US attorney's office can unilaterally charge 16 and 17-year-olds as adults when facing four of the most serious criminal charges on the books: murder, sexual assault, armed robbery, and assault with conspiracy to commit the three offenses. Alternatively, the district's attorney general's office – which has jurisdiction over most juvenile crimes – can petition a judge to charge juvenile offenders 15 and up as adults but must prove that the defendant lacks 'reasonable prospects for rehabilitation' in the juvenile system. In a statement, a spokeswoman for the DC attorney general's office touted the office's prosecution rates for violent juvenile offenses, writing that the office 'prosecutes all serious and violent crimes committed by juveniles where we have the evidence required to do so, and we seek to hold young people accountable if they harm others.' Trump ally Pirro, who was confirmed this month as US Attorney for DC, has targeted three laws to change or overturn. The top DC federal prosecutor last week attacked the district's 2018 Youth Rehabilitation Act, which was enacted to 'separate youth offenders from more mature, experienced offenders,' citing the case of a 19-year-old who shot another Metrobus passenger and was sentenced to probation under the act. The law raised the upper age limit of juvenile offenders for sentencing purposes from 22 to 24 in 2018 – and permits judges to seal convictions after offenders serve their sentences, except in cases of homicide and sexual abuse. Pirro similarly criticized the 2021 Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act, which lets all offenders convicted before age 25 to ask for a sentencing reduction after serving 15 years in prison. The law requires judges to evaluate 11 factors – ranging from the defendant's own childhood abuse history and mental health evaluations to victims' statements – in determining whether the petitioner poses a danger to any community member, and that the 'interests of justice' warrant a sentence modification. 'I know evil when I see it, no matter the age – and the violence in DC committed by young people belongs in criminal court, not family court,' Pirro said in a statement to CNN. 'We're not dealing with kids who need a pat on the back – we're dealing with a wave of brutal violence that demands a serious response. While others debate causes, families are burying loved ones, and the only way to stop this is to treat violent offenders like the criminals they are.' She also claimed that the 2022 Second Chance Amendment Act allows for the 'stunning erasure of criminal convictions' by allowing all defendants to move for certain criminal convictions to be sealed or expunged. Some criminal justice experts and local officials say that Trump and Pirro's vision for DC is out-of-date and harkens back to the rhetoric of historic crime waves in the 1990s. Compared to their counterparts at the US attorney's office, the DC attorney general's office 'is much more grounded in research about what works and what doesn't work and about what is developmentally appropriate,' said Eduardo Ferrer, an associate professor of law and policy director of the Juvenile Justice Initiative at Georgetown University. 'I'm not prepared to just throw away the key on our young people, and most people are not,' said DC Councilmember Christina Henderson, adding that she believes that attacks largely ignore the complexities of the city's justice system. 'I feel strongly that the district should be able to make that decision for themselves, because these are our kids.'

an hour ago
What to know about redistricting fights as Texas Democrats return and California starts work
Republicans can move ahead with redrawing Texas' congressional districts now that Democratic lawmakers have returned to the state. Efforts to thwart President Donald Trump's push to tilt the political map for next year's midterm elections in his favor shifted to California. Dozens of Texas Democrats ended a two-week walkout Monday after Democrats in California heeded Gov. Gavin Newsom's call to counter the GOP effort in Texas. In California, the Democratic-supermajority Legislature faces tight deadlines, and a plan would have to be approved by voters in November. Republicans have more options for mid-decade redistricting than Democrats because they control more statehouses, and they've talked about redrawing districts in Florida, Indiana and Missouri. Here's what to know. Both Trump and the Democrats are looking ahead to the 2026 midterms knowing that they often go against the president's party, as they did during Trump's first term in 2018. Republicans currently have a seven-seat majority in the 435-member House. State legislatures draw the lines after each U.S. census in most states — including Texas — and only a few dozen House districts are competitive. In Texas, Republicans hold 25 of 38 seats, and they're trying to increase that to 30. In California, Democrats have 43 of the 52 seats, and they're trying to boost that to 48, to wipe out the advantage the GOP would gain from redrawing lines in Texas. In some ways, the nation's most-populous state, California, is a reverse-mirror image of the nation's second most-populous state, Texas. Democrats are even more firmly in control of state government there than Republicans are in Texas, with Democratic supermajorities in both California legislative chambers. But California's districts were drawn by an independent commission created by a statewide vote in 2008 after years of intense partisan battles over redistricting. Democrats are trying to avoid legal challenges to a new map by asking voters to approve it as an exception to the normal process, which would require a special election in November. Texas has no such commission, so its Legislature doesn't have to seek voters' approval for its maps. California lawmakers were returning Monday to the state capital from a summer break. They are scheduled to remain in session through Sept. 12. Republicans have solid majorities in both chambers of the Texas Legislature, and a Democrat hasn't won statewide office there since 1994. But Texas is among a handful of states where two-thirds of each chamber must be present to conduct business, and the GOP majorities are not that large. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott already had called a special legislative session when Trump began pushing for a new congressional map, but GOP lawmakers could not conduct business after most Democratic lawmakers left for blue states, including California, Illinois and Massachusetts. But there were pressures on Democrats against holding out longer. They were away from their families and nonlegislative jobs, and their walkout also prevented lawmakers from providing relief to the Texas Hill Country ravaged by deadly flash flooding in July. They also faced fines of $500 per day, as well as efforts to oust some of them from office.