logo
Scientists use Stephen Hawking theory to propose 'black hole morsels' — strange, compact objects that could reveal new physics

Scientists use Stephen Hawking theory to propose 'black hole morsels' — strange, compact objects that could reveal new physics

Yahoo4 hours ago
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Tiny black holes created in the aftermath of violent cosmic collisions could offer unprecedented insight into the quantum structure of space and time, a new theoretical study proposes.
What's more, signals from these "black hole morsels" could potentially be detected by current instruments, scientists reported in the study, which was published in the journal Nuclear Physics B.
"Our work shows that if these objects are formed, their radiation might already be detectable using existing gamma-ray observatories," Francesco Sannino, a theoretical physicist at the University of Southern Denmark and co-author of the study, told Live Science via email.
Hawking radiation and the smallest black holes
One of the deepest mysteries in modern physics is how gravity behaves at the quantum level. The new study offers a bold proposal to explore this regime by looking for the glow produced by tiny black holes created in the aftermath of giant black hole collisions.
The idea that black holes are not entirely black, and therefore could emit faint radiation, was first proposed by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s. His calculations revealed that quantum effects near a black hole's event horizon would cause it to emit radiation and lose mass — a process now known as Hawking radiation. The black hole temperature is predicted to be inversely proportional to its mass. So for massive astrophysical black holes, the effect is minuscule, with temperatures so low that the radiation is effectively undetectable. But for very small black holes, the situation is different.
"Black hole morsels are hypothetical micro-black holes that could be formed during the violent merger of two astrophysical black holes," Giacomo Cacciapaglia, a senior researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and co-author of the study, said in an email. "Unlike the larger parent black hole, these morsels are much smaller — comparable in mass to asteroids — and thus much hotter due to the inverse relationship between black hole mass and Hawking temperature."
Related: Scientists detect most massive black hole merger ever — and it birthed a monster 225 times as massive as the sun
Because of this elevated temperature, these morsels would evaporate relatively quickly, releasing bursts of high-energy particles such as gamma-rays and neutrinos. The team's analysis suggests that this radiation could form a distinct signal that may already be within reach of present-day detectors.
A new handle on quantum gravity
Although no such morsels have been observed yet, the researchers argue that the formation of these tiny black holes is theoretically plausible. "The idea is inspired by analogous processes in neutron star mergers," Stefan Hohenegger, senior researcher at the Institut de Physique des Deux Infinis de Lyon and co-author of the study, explained in an email. "It's supported by estimates from beyond-General Relativity frameworks, including string theory and extra-dimensional models."
In such extreme environments, small-scale instabilities might pinch off tiny black holes during the merger process. These objects, in turn, could evaporate through Hawking radiation over timescales ranging from milliseconds to years, depending on their mass.
Crucially, if such radiation is detected, it could open a window into new physics. "Hawking radiation encodes information about the underlying quantum structure of spacetime," Sannino said. "Its spectral properties could reveal deviations from the Standard Model at extreme energy scale, potentially leading to discoveries of unknown particles or such phenomena as extra dimensions predicted by various theories."
Such energy scales lie far beyond the reach of even the most powerful particle colliders, like the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. The possibility that black hole morsels might provide a natural "accelerator" for probing these physics is what makes them so compelling.
According to the team, the signature of a black hole morsel would be a delayed burst of high-energy gamma-rays radiating in all directions — unlike typical gamma-ray bursts, which are usually beamed.
Instruments capable of detecting such high-energy signals include atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes, like the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS), in Namibia; the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC), in Mexico; and the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) in China, as well as satellite-based detectors, like the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. "Some of these instruments already have the sensitivity required," Hohenegger noted.
The researchers didn't stop at theorizing. They used existing data from HESS and HAWC to place upper bounds on how much mass could be emitted in the form of morsels during known black hole mergers. These limits represent the first observational constraints on such phenomena.
"We showed that if black hole morsels form during mergers, they would produce a burst of high-energy gamma rays, with the timing of the burst linked to their masses," Cacciapaglia said. "Our analysis demonstrates that this novel multimessenger signature can offer experimental access to quantum gravitational phenomena.'
What comes next
While the study provides a compelling case for morsels, many uncertainties remain. The exact conditions for their formation are still poorly understood, and no full simulations have been performed at the scales necessary to model them. But the researchers are optimistic.
RELATED STORIES
—See the universe's rarest type of black hole slurp up a star in stunning animation
—Exotic 'blazar' is part of most extreme double black hole system ever found, crooked jet suggests
—Paperclip-sized spacecraft could visit a nearby black hole in the next century, study claims
"Future work will involve refining the theoretical models for morsel formation and extending the analysis to include more realistic mass and spin distributions," Sannino said. The team also hopes to collaborate with observational astronomers to perform dedicated searches in both archived and upcoming datasets.
"We hope this line of research will open a new window into understanding the quantum nature of gravity and the structure of spacetime," Hohenegger said.
If black hole morsels exist, they may not only illuminate the sky with exotic radiation but could also shed light on some of the deepest unsolved questions in physics.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

31 shipwrecks found in Germany, including one believed to be steamer destroyed in WWII air raid
31 shipwrecks found in Germany, including one believed to be steamer destroyed in WWII air raid

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

31 shipwrecks found in Germany, including one believed to be steamer destroyed in WWII air raid

More than 30 shipwrecks have been discovered hidden in a lake in Germany, officials announced this week, including one vessel believed to be a steamer that was destroyed by an air raid in World War II. The ships were uncovered on the floor of Lake Constance during a project launched in 2022 called "Wrecks and Deep Sea," according to the State Office for Monument Preservation. The office said scientists have dispatched divers and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) to discover a wide array of vessels — from century-old paddle steamers to a fully intact cargo sailing ship. Scientists had identified more than 250 potential anomalies in Lake Constance, which is up to 800 feet deep. Of these, 31 locations were determined to be wrecks, "including both objects of cultural and historical significance as well as modern recreational boats and watercraft of recent times," the State Office for Monument Preservation said in a news release. Among the notable discoveries were two large metal ship hulls, which were discovered and surveyed using ROVs. Based on their size, characteristics and location, researchers believe these wrecks are the hulls of two paddle steamers — SD Baden and the SD Friedrichshafen II. According to the archeology site Arkeonews, the Friedrichshafen II was destroyed by an air raid during World War II, while the Baden was decommissioned in 1930 and eventually sunk. Both ships could carry up to 600 passengers. Images show the handwheel of the Friedrichshafen as well as the hulls and bows of both ships lying on the lake floor shrouded by marine life. Researchers also announced another "special discovery" — a nearly fully intact cargo sailing ship with its mast and yardarm preserved. The team did not estimate how old the vessel is but noted that its excellent condition is a "rarity in underwater archaeology" considering its depth and age. Experts noted that because the growth of invasive quagga mussels has been sparse, scientists were able to clearly view the ship's intricate details, including clamps in the bow, mooring pins and a gear ring with a ratchet. "The find offers unique insights into the sailing technology and shipbuilding of historic Lake Constance ships and represents an important reference object for research," said Alexandra Ulisch, a scientific associate on the project. The project marked the first detailed investigation of the Lake Constance bed to identify underwater monuments, officials said. To complete the mission, scientists first analyzed data from bathymetry, which is the topographical surveying of water, using multibeam echo sounders. After that, researchers used side-scan sonar to examine anomalies that were detected underwater. After the sonar inspection, divers and ROVs examined potential locations of interest, which resulted in the discovery of the 31 shipwrecks. The team conducted detailed analyses of objects deemed "cultural monuments" but researchers said there was no plan to salvage individual objects, a process that is costly. The focus, researchers said, is on preserving the documentary value. "Wrecks are much more than just lost vehicles — they are real time capsules that preserve the stories and craftsmanship of days long past," Ulisch said. Lake Constance (known as Bodensee in German) borders Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Fed by the Rhine River, it's the largest lake in Germany and is a popular tourist destination.

The Hidden Hazards of Generative AI in Medicine
The Hidden Hazards of Generative AI in Medicine

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

The Hidden Hazards of Generative AI in Medicine

The idiosyncrasies and inadequacies of NHS IT systems — past and present — have driven many a doctor to frustration and despair, as they grapple with yet another new software package whilst trying to manage patient demand. There is an understandable reluctance to embrace change, given that change has rarely delivered the promised efficiencies. It is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that some healthcare professionals view artificial intelligence (AI) with suspicion. Dr Sara Jamieson Even those who have embraced it and are optimistic about its benefits admit they're unsure about the risks. AI, though, is different from anything that has come before. It is something we should consider embracing and incorporating into our practice as it develops. If we don't, we risk being left behind. Imagine how life might look if we had ignored the introduction of the World Wide Web back in the mid-90s. Similarly, think back to the rapid introduction of telemedicine at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This method of consulting with patients, previously frowned upon as too inherently risky, continued even after infection levels subsided. Any new way of practising will bring with it new medicolegal risks, and steps will need to be considered to mitigate these. Whilst beyond the scope of this article, a true understanding of the medicolegal implications of using AI in healthcare requires an understanding of what AI is and how its outputs are generated. This is particularly true for generative AI tools such as ChatGPT. Dr Lucy Hanington According to a survey of over 1000 GPs in the UK, published in BMJ Health & Care Informatics, a fifth of GPs are using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to help with day-to-day tasks such as writing letters. One in five said they had used these tools in their clinical practice, and of these, nearly a third (28%) said they had used them to suggest a different diagnosis, and a quarter said they had used them to suggest treatment options. Consider this scenario: Dr C, a GP, was running behind schedule and still had three more patients to see. During her next consultation, a 50-year-old patient, Mr B, came in with a set of vague symptoms. Dr C considered a range of possible conditions. Feeling under pressure, she discreetly opened ChatGPT and entered an anonymised summary of the patient's symptoms, requesting a differential diagnosis and possible lab tests. The AI quickly returned a detailed summary of plausible possibilities, including some that Dr C hadn't considered herself. She was impressed and used the suggestions to help her decide on the next steps for Mr B, which included arranging further tests. That night, however, the consultation weighed on her mind, and she couldn't sleep. She knew she hadn't disclosed her use of AI to the patient. She also worried whether she had inadvertently input details that could make Mr B identifiable. She also questioned whether the AI's suggested diagnoses might have influenced her clinical judgement. By morning, Dr C was feeling anxious and uneasy, and decided to call Medical Protection Society (MPS) for advice. A medicolegal consultant advised her to consider whether, objectively, she still agreed with the management plan and could justify it clinically. The GP was also advised to rectify any omissions immediately and to discuss the case with a colleague if helpful. The medicolegal consultant also explained the consent and confidentiality principles around AI use. Benefits Generative AI tools offer many potential benefits for both doctors and patients. Patients may use these tools to understand medical terminology or a diagnosis they have been given. Doctors may find that, when used safely, generative AI can aid diagnosis or identify potential drug interactions. However, generative AI is not always correct. As well as errors or omissions, it can sometimes produce 'hallucinations,' confidently presenting incorrect information as fact. It is incumbent on the clinicians using these tools to ensure that information shared with a patient is reliable and accurate. Bias, whilst not unique to AI, also deserves consideration. The data used by AI tools may be biased due to the inclusion or exclusion of certain information. Outputs may also fail to account for the demographics of a particular patient population. The use of generative AI does not permit doctors to work outside the limits of their competence. There should be no overreliance on the software, and doctors remain ultimately responsible for the decisions they make. Data Protection and Confidentiality Data protection and confidentiality, as highlighted in the earlier scenario, are key considerations. Compliance with General Data Protection Regulation is essential when using generative AI. These tools, by their nature, store, share, and learn from the information entered into them and can be accessed by anyone. Care must be taken not to input any personal patient data. Simply removing a patient's name may not be sufficient to anonymise their information, as other details could make them identifiable. To ensure compliance with data protection legislation, we recommend seeking guidance from: Hospital Data Protection Officers, who may be able to advise on this in a secondary care setting Integrated Care Boards, who may have policies that would be applicable The Information Commissioners Office (ICO) Consent The earlier scenario also highlights the issue of consent. Consent remains a key cornerstone of all doctor-patient interactions. The ICO advises that, for consent to be a lawful basis for processing data when using AI, it must be freely given, specific, and clear. The individual must agree to it, and they must be able to withdraw their consent at any time. AI as an Aid It is important to hold in mind that AI is a tool to assist, rather than replace, the clinician. When it comes to decision-making, AI software can't readily consider the individual wishes and circumstances of the patient. The 'black box' problem — a lack of transparency in how an AI system reaches conclusions — can make it difficult to challenge outputs or detect errors. Ultimately, AI should not replace clinical reasoning, evidence-based medicine, or consultation with colleagues, peers, multidisciplinary teams, specialists, seniors, and supervisors. Training and Continued Learning Clinicians should aim to be literate in AI, understand its basis and governance, and know how to use it safely. We would encourage all clinicians to incorporate learning on the topic as part of their annual development plans. A multitude of resources on AI are available across medical colleges and institutions. We would also recommend watching the recordings of the recent MPS Foundation AI symposia. A white paper, published by the MPS Foundation, the Centre for Assuring Autonomy at the University of York, and the Improvement Academy hosted at the Bradford Institute for Health Research, offers further useful guidance for doctors to consider on AI use. Conclusion Like it or not, AI is here to stay. Readers should consider its potential benefits while remaining alive to its limitations and risks. Doctors should also ensure they continue to work in a manner consistent with General Medical Council guidance and relevant legislation. If in doubt about using AI tools and their medicolegal implications, doctors can contact MPS or their medical defence organisation to request advice. This article is published as part of an editorial collaboration between Medscape UK and MPS that aims to deliver medicolegal content to help healthcare professionals navigate the many challenges they face in their clinical practice. Dr Sara Jamieson, MBBS, trained in psychiatry before joining MPS in 2016 as a medicolegal consultant. She has disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr Lucy Hanington, BMBCh, MRCPCH, has worked as a medicolegal consultant at MPS since 2016. She has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Talk Therapy Less Effective in Young vs Middle-Aged Adults
Talk Therapy Less Effective in Young vs Middle-Aged Adults

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

Talk Therapy Less Effective in Young vs Middle-Aged Adults

TOPLINE: NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (TTad) were less effective for adults aged 16-24 years than for those aged 25-65 years, a cohort study of over 1.5 million people revealed. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study using the data of 309,758 young adults (aged 16-24 years; 69.4% women; 82.5% White) and 1,290,130 working-age adults (aged 25-65 years; 65.2% women; 83.6% White) who received psychological treatment through England's NHS TTad services between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was the change in symptom severity scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire nine-item (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale seven-item (GAD-7) between age groups. Secondary outcomes were rates of recovery, reliable recovery, reliable improvement, and reliable deterioration. The analysis was adjusted for gender, ethnicity, local area deprivation, clinical factors, treatment intensity, and the number of sessions. Sensitivity analyses included geographical and temporal variation in age-related differences and adults older than 65 years in the working-age group. TAKEAWAY: Differences in pre-post symptom severity scores on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 increased with age. In the unadjusted analysis, young adults experienced smaller improvements in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores than working-age adults (PHQ-9: b, -0.98; GAD-7: b, -0.77; P < .001 for both). The magnitude of difference was smaller in the adjusted analysis. Young adults had lower rates of reliable recovery (41.5% vs 48.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.76), reliable improvement (68.6% vs 72.6%; aOR, 0.83), and recovery (43.7% vs 51.1%; aOR, 0.74) but higher rates of reliable deterioration (5.9% vs 5.2%; aOR, 1.15) than working-age adults. Age-related differences were consistent across regions and treatment years, with London having the smallest difference (3.0%) and the South West having the largest difference (~6.5%), and unchanged when including adults older than 65 years. IN PRACTICE: "Getting young adults into treatment more quickly, offering them treatment in a convenient and desired format, and working hard to ensure they stay in treatment have the potential to improve outcomes for this group. Addressing social factors that are of particular concern to emerging adults — eg, job and housing insecurity — might also be required to improve outcomes in young adults," the authors wrote. "Considering and trialling adaptions tailored to specific requirements of this age group, the management of information on mental health and mental illness, as well as expectations of treatment, might also be necessary," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Rob Saunders, PhD, and Jae Won Suh, DPhil, University College London, London, England. It was published online on August 6 in The Lancet Psychiatry. LIMITATIONS: The use of routinely recorded health service data limited the availability of measures on general well-being and personal sense of improvement. Although the analysis was adjusted for neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and intellectual disability, the severity of these conditions and other potential confounders, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, and social support, were not captured. Moreover, unmeasured differences in treatment delivery and other common disorders in young adults may have influenced the results, and the findings were not generalisable to non-binary individuals due to limited data availability. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store