logo
2025 Subaru BRZ tS: Is It Worth $36,465? My In-Depth Guide to Its Upsides & Downsides

2025 Subaru BRZ tS: Is It Worth $36,465? My In-Depth Guide to Its Upsides & Downsides

Miami Herald2 days ago

At a time when most new vehicles are big, heavy, and more closely resemble a home theater than a car, the 2025 Subaru BRZ tS is refreshingly simple. It's a small, lightweight, rear-wheel-drive coupe with a manual transmission and no interest in keeping up with the horsepower arms race. That might sound like a niche formula-and it is-but for enthusiasts who want a real connection behind the wheel, the BRZ tS might be exactly what they're looking for. But the question is: at $36,465, does it deliver enough to justify the price?
Let's be clear: most of the magic of the BRZ tS is already baked into the base model, which starts just north of $32,000. Both versions use the same naturally aspirated 2.4-liter flat-four engine, putting out 228 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque. That might not seem like much in an era of 400-hp family SUVs, but the BRZ's secret lies in its light curb weight (just over 2,800 pounds) and nimble chassis.
What you get with the tS trim is a sharper, more focused version of that same recipe. It brings upgraded Brembo brakes, a Hitachi suspension setup tuned by Subaru's STI division for flatter cornering, 18-inch wheels wrapped in sticky Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires, and some subtle styling touches. The powertrain stays the same, and so does the philosophy: it's about balance, not brute force.
The BRZ's exterior design is sporty but restrained. It's low-slung, neatly proportioned, and avoids the overstyled aggression that plagues many modern sports cars. There are no fake vents, no massive wings, and no angry grilles trying too hard to look tough.
Instead, the BRZ tS looks like what it is: a car built to be driven hard and enjoyed, not just shown off. It's approachable and unpretentious, which makes it all the more charming. Subaru didn't try to reinvent the sports coupe-they just refined it.
Inside, the BRZ tS keeps things simple. The front seats are supportive and well-bolstered for spirited driving, and the driving position is excellent, low and centered, with perfectly placed pedals and a short-throw shifter that begs to be used. Visibility is surprisingly good for a coupe this low, which makes it easier to daily drive than you might expect.
The dashboard features a mix of analog controls and a small, somewhat outdated touchscreen. There's Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but don't expect flashy tech. Instead, you get real knobs for climate control and a driver-focused layout. It's not luxurious, but it works-and it reinforces the BRZ's mission: minimize distractions, maximize engagement.
Yes, there are rear seats-but they're really just extra storage space or emergency kid haulers. If you regularly carry passengers (ones you like anyway), this isn't your car. But if you want to toss a couple of tires or a backpack back there? It's surprisingly usable.
None of the BRZ's spec sheet numbers can really convey how it feels to drive. The steering is quick and responsive (though not quite as communicative as the rest of the car), the chassis is beautifully balanced, and the manual gearbox is an absolute joy. There's a level of confidence and connection here that's rare at any price-and nearly nonexistent under $40,000.
You can push the BRZ hard, and it rewards you without being intimidating. The limits are approachable, the tires communicate clearly, and the whole car feels like it wants to work with you, not against you. Whether you're on a twisty road or a track day, it's a car that constantly encourages you to be a better driver. Even better? You can drive it hard without breaking the law. That's increasingly rare in today's world of overpowered machines.
There are a few downsides. The cabin can get noisy, due in part to the car's relatively stiff suspension. Some interior materials feel a little low-rent, and the infotainment system is several years behind the times. And yes, it could use a bit more power-there's always that moment when you wish it had just 40 more horses coming out of a corner.
The steering, while precise, lacks some of the tactile feedback found in cars like the Mazda MX-5 Miata. And if you're looking for everyday comfort or lots of tech, you'll probably be happier in something like a Volkswagen GTI or even a lightly used BMW 2 Series. But if your goal is pure, unfiltered driving joy? The BRZ still delivers.
The BRZ's closest rival is the Toyota GR86, which is nearly identical under the skin. In fact, the two are jointly developed, and your decision might come down to styling or dealer preference. The GR86 often comes in slightly cheaper, especially in its Premium trim, and has its own tS equivalent in the GR86 Trueno Edition.
Then there's the Mazda MX-5 Miata, a perennial favorite among purists. It's lighter, has an even better shifter, and offers the option of open-air motoring. However, it also has less cargo space, less practicality, and a higher starting price when compared to similarly equipped models.
Other options like the Ford Mustang EcoBoost offer more power on paper, but with more weight, less balance, and (as of 2025) no manual transmission. The BRZ might not win a spec sheet battle, but it's one of the few still designed with enthusiasts in mind from the start.
If you just want the BRZ driving experience, you don't need to spend $36,465. The base model already delivers 90% of what makes the car great. But if you plan to hit the back roads or track regularly, the tS's better brakes, upgraded suspension, and grippier tires do make a noticeable difference.
The BRZ tS isn't trying to impress with 0–60 times or touchscreen sizes. Instead, it focuses on what matters: sharp handling, a playful chassis, and a sense of analog engagement that's rapidly disappearing. It's not for everyone, but for the people it is for, it might be one of the last truly satisfying new cars under $40K.
So, is it worth it? If driving fun is your priority and you want something that still feels made for you (not just for the masses), the answer is yes. Just be ready to explain to your SUV-driving friends why 228 horsepower is more than enough.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 Ford F-150 Lobo gets racy ‘street truck' makeover
2025 Ford F-150 Lobo gets racy ‘street truck' makeover

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

2025 Ford F-150 Lobo gets racy ‘street truck' makeover

America's best-selling pickup gets a racy "street truck" makeover in the 2025 Ford F-150 Lobo, a lowered and menacing looking newcomer that goes on sale now for delivery in fall 2025. The 2025 F-150 is the second truck to get Ford's new Lobo badge, following the aggressive little 2025 Maverick Lobo that's in dealerships now. Don't be surprised to see Ford apply the lowered and menacing Lobo approach to other trucks and SUVs in its lineup. Standard four-wheel drive Standard 5.0L V8 400-horsepower, 410 pound-feet of torque 10-speed automatic transmission Standard crew cab 5.5-foot bed 22-inch Lobo gloss black wheels Apple CarPlay Android Auto Tow hitch 7,900-pound towing capacity 1,450-pound payload Price: $57,800, plus $2,195 destination charge More: 2025 Ford Maverick Lobo reinvents the compact sport truck — at a price Ford lowered the F-150 Lobo's rear ride height 2 inches to create what designer Josh Blundo calls a sinister profile. It comes in five exterior colors, two unique to the Lobo. Other unique Lobo touches include: Black hood and fender vents "Lobo" badge on fender vents Gloss black exterior trim Unique grille and headlights Gloss black lower mesh grille open for ventilation LED light bar connecting headlights across grille Black satin twin exhaust outlets Black oval Ford badge on tailgate The Lobo package is a $4,695 addition to added to the F-150's popular STX trim. It stickers at $57,800 plus $2,195 destination charge. Ford builds the R-150 Lobo at its Rouge plant in Dearborn Contact Mark Phelan: mmphelan@ Follow him on Twitter mark_phelan. Read more on autos and sign up for our autos newsletter. Become a subscriber. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: 2025 Ford F-150 gets sinister 'Lobo' street truck treatment

These Are The Ugliest Cars Our Readers Still Love Anyway
These Are The Ugliest Cars Our Readers Still Love Anyway

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

These Are The Ugliest Cars Our Readers Still Love Anyway

When you try something different with car design, it may be a hit, or it could end up universally reviled. It could also be loved by some and hated by others, as we've seen with many newer Hyundai and Kia models. Alternatively, what's considered ugly when a car is new could simply be ahead of its time, and years later, people may finally appreciate the genius of the design. After all, not everyone was ready for the Pontiac Aztek, and look how normal the Aztek's design feels today. OK, maybe that last one was a bit of a stretch, but my point still stands. You can also appreciate a design that you're pretty sure everyone else hates, and that's OK, too. On Tuesday, we asked you about the ugliest cars you still like anyway, and we got all sorts of responses, even if some were more defensible than others. Let's take a look at some of the most popular ones and see if you agree that these cars are actually great (in their own ways). Read more: The Best-Looking Pickup Trucks Ever Sold, According To Our Readers The kia soul, though I don't think its even that ugly. The marketing campaign and reputation of Hyundai in that era hurt this car's image alot, but it was never a particularly bad car. In fact, it may have even made sense for alot of people. A small, boxy suv-hatchback type thing makes sense for our market. Apart from any non-unique reliability issues, it was a fairly decent car as far as I can tell. Also the Nissan juke. That car IS ugly but I also found that car slightly appealing when it was sold here. Suggested by: Nauman Usmani For me, it's the 1995-1999 Buick Riviera. A lot of people would say it's not a pretty car. And it does have gawkish proportions--a short hood, a long wheelbase (it's about the same length overall as a Rolls-Royce Wraith), and a long deck, plus curves that look more nautical than automotive. But, I dunno, I've always loved it. Suggested by: G. K. Chrysler PT Cruiser... one of my buddies in high school had one and we spent a lot of time cruising around in it. I enjoyed it. They made a convertible, a turbo model, manual transmissions were available, all kinds of aftermarket support, etc. Others have mentioned the Juke and Soul, the Soul was honestly the first that popped to mind but the Juke is one I spent a couple days driving and really enjoyed it. Suggested by: cintocrunch1 Subaru WRX. I don't think they look good, but I still want one. Alas, probably just a touch out of my price range anyway. Edit to add...I love that purple paint that Subaru just added. Car back cool colors. Looking at you Honda with regard to the Civic Si. Suggested by: Crucial Taunt (Flame suit deployed) - Fiat Multipla. It is uglier than all sin. It has a design that looks cobbled together by designers who refused to talk to each other. But you know, 50 years from now, we're still going to be talking about that strange, odd, and ugly Fiat. And maybe it stands out more as the roads all over the world fills up with larger CUVs that tend to look the same. If I lived in Europe, and had the chance to get one in decent shape, I don't think I could say No. Suggested by: Xavier96 1st gen Geo Metro. Convertible. Spirited driving? HAH. A total death trap? ABSOLUTELY. Will it shake itself to pieces if driven over anything but pool table smooth pavement? OF COURSE. Are they dirt cheap, available with a stick, and generally painted fun colors? Yes. Yes they are. Love 'em. Suggested by: Stillnotatony Nissan Juke. I never thought it was ugly, however that seems to be a minority opinion. Suggested by: Earthbound Misfit I Mini Cooper Coupe JCW - AKA the backwards ball cap Suggested by: Something Something The Alfa Romeo Milano from the 80s. It still amuses me that this was designed by the same company that was responsible for the beautiful GTV Juniors from the early 70s. I thought these were hideous when I first saw them as a kid. Now I think they're rather ugly-cute. But one pull in 2nd to 3rd and the sound from that Busso V-6 forgives all. Suggested by: LarriveeC05 One of the vehicles which everyone seemed to think was ugly at that time, but I liked was the Isuzu Vehicross which came out in 2001. Anyone remember those? It has been probably 20 years since I've seen one so I don't think they proved popular. I am also a fan of Gremlins which a lot of people didn't care for. But I think they look great, especially in the GT setup with fun colors. The fact that they evolved from the AMX-GT concept which was one of the best AMX concepts IMHO, only made them cooler. Suggested by: Dan60 The Buick Rendezvous. Its like they couldn't decide if they wanted it to be a crossover... or a LeSabre... and the designers got stuck and made a compromise between the two.... giving it some very wonky angles. Its close relation to the "Legendary of Ugly" Pontiac Aztek is very noticeable. But then... my mom had to go and get one. And I loved it. It was actually a good car.... who knew? So now I have a soft spot for them. Suggested by: PLAN-B 77 Once again, I am back to foolishly endorse the utterly moronic, and yet inexplicably irresistible Chevy SSR. The "Wrong Truck." It doesn't make sense, but I don't care. I love it. Suggested by: Give Me Tacos or Give Me Death Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

The Cadillac Optiq Shines—but Its Upcharges Don't
The Cadillac Optiq Shines—but Its Upcharges Don't

WIRED

timea day ago

  • WIRED

The Cadillac Optiq Shines—but Its Upcharges Don't

'The Optiq's algorithm minimizes your time,' Cadillac said in response, 'based on your battery state and the chargers in your area. It picks the route and charge stations for fastest [travel] time. The remaining-at-destination calculations are based on models of the vehicle using traffic patterns and elevation changes along the route. Fluctuation can come from changes to traffic patterns, winds, and driver behaviors.' Certainly a deal-breaker for some, there is no mobile-phone mirroring, so Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are entirely absent (as they are in Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid as well). Instead, drivers enter their user names and passwords into apps in the dash screen, and the car provides the connectivity over its cellular connection. For three years. After that, owners must pay $15 per month to continue 'App Access' … or revert to their phone, without the safety of having it mirrored onto the cash display. That's on top of $25 per month for Super Cruise after its own 36-month trial. It's all part of the billions a year in incremental 'digital services revenue' carmakers have promised the financial world. Buyers are the losers here; now they must pay monthly for a feature they used to get for free. Oh, That Rear End This is the smallest and shortest Cadillac, and while I found the front two-thirds of the Optiq fine, the rear end was jumbled at best. There's a kicked-up beltline over a short rear overhang, the brand's vertical rear lights, and an odd pattern of not-quite horizontal lines on the third side windows. Cadillac's larger SUVs and the Celestiq ultra-luxury sedan do a better and more coherent job with the same design language. The beltline is high, and only the glass roof kept the interior from feeling claustrophobic. But, what an interior. It's lovely, with woven-cloth fabrics, some mild bright-blue accents in the one I drove, and a handful of sustainable materials: yarn made from 100 percent recycled materials woven into patterned accent fabrics, and 'PaperWood' veneer from tulip wood and recycled newspaper. It's also one of the quietest cars I've ever driven, EV or not. Passengers are treated to a calm, smooth, pleasant, and altogether nice experience inside. That makes it an easy vehicle in which to cover miles—especially with the Blue Cruise hands-off adaptive cruise control. Interior space for four is generous, and while it may be a 'compact' SUV in North American terms, three people can ride in the rear seat without hating each other. Like all GM's EVs below the big trucks, there's no front trunk. That's a missed bet. It also lacks a rear wiper; Cadillac claims the airflow through its 'rear flow-through spoiler channels high-velocity air' to keep the rear window clean. Sloppy spring rainstorms in upstate New York beg to differ. Cadillac also suggests using the video rear-view mirror as an alternative to glass you can actually see through. Wait for the Hot Rod? Acceleration of the Optiq can best be described as deliberate. It's not slow, and 'Sport' mode is punchier, if any Cadillac driver ever uses it. GM has some of the best regenerative braking and one-pedal driving algorithms in the business, and overall the Optiq is easy to drive and holds the road adequately. Its weight and damping smooth bad roads and makes potholes shallower. But it offers absolutely none of the kick-in-the-back acceleration that sold a lot of EVs in the early years. That cues up the Optiq-V hot-rod model Cadillac has just announced. In the same compact crossover vehicle, power rises to a quoted 382h kW (519 hp) and 650 pound-feet (880 NM) of torque. In 'Velocity Max ' mode, Cadillac says the Optiq-V will accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds. Estimated range is 275 miles; it'll enter production this autumn.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store