Disqualification of a member: Speaker's role is limited and clearly defined: PA Speaker
Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan emphasized that there is no ambiguity in Article 63(2) of the Constitution. It clearly states that if a question arises regarding the disqualification of a member, it is the Speaker who decides whether such a question has indeed arisen. If the Speaker does not make a decision within thirty days, the matter is automatically referred to the Election Commission.
He informed that he has received three applications from Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rehman, Ahmad Iqbal, and Iftikhar Chhachhar. He clarified that these are not references, but constitutional applications that must be decided strictly in accordance with the Constitution.
Referring to a key incident from the past, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan recalled that in 2017, twenty-two MNAs of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf approached then Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, demanding action under Article 63(2) of the Constitution based on a statement by Mian Nawaz Sharif. Even at that time, when the matter was not resolved within thirty days, the Supreme Court took suo motu notice, which was constitutionally controversial since the apex court does not possess suo motu powers over another system of governance.
He mentioned that he has encouraged both the government and the opposition to resolve matters through dialogue. Discussions were held on five key points, with both sides agreeing that foul language, sloganeering, and violations of human rights would be unacceptable in the House, and that Article 223 of the Constitution must be fully respected.
The Speaker also noted that there has never been chaos in the House during a Chief Minister's speech. While the opposition has the constitutional right to protest, it is equally important to uphold parliamentary norms and the sanctity of the House.
He reiterated that he does not believe in character assassination or humiliation of any member, nor will he prevent anyone from speaking. However, mob behaviour, aggressive conduct, and acts such as throwing books are completely unacceptable.
Speaker shared that the Speaker of KP Assembly has sent him letter regarding the suspension of opposition members, to which detailed responses along with constitutional interpretations are being sent.
In conclusion, the Speaker asserted that his goal is not to undermine anyone but to protect the sanctity of the House while remaining within the constitutional framework. He said that a decision will be made soon, and whatever is decided will be documented and agreed upon by both the government and the opposition to ensure more conducive atmosphere in the House moving forward.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Punjab speaker halts action against suspended PTI MPAs
Listen to article The Punjab government has decided to halt further punitive action against suspended Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Members of Provincial Aseembly (MPAs) amid ongoing negotiations. The opposition lawmakers were suspended by Punjab Assembly Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan following chaotic scenes in the House on June 27, when members from both sides of the aisle engaged in a physical altercation during Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's address. In an effort to resolve the standoff, the speaker had constituted an eight-member negotiation committee comprising members from both the treasury and opposition. The committee held two rounds of talks, the latest on Sunday evening. While no formal breakthrough was achieved in those meetings, government sources indicated on Tuesday that some progress had been made, prompting a decision to de-escalate. Read More: No headway in talks over suspended PTI MPAs; dialogue to continue According to Express News, the speaker has directed the Assembly secretariat and government members to suspend any further action against the opposition until the talks yield conclusive results. The Assembly secretariat had initially planned additional measures against 19 suspended opposition MPAs, including fines imposed on 10 of them for alleged vandalism in the House. These fines, along with second notices and deductions from salaries, have now been paused. Sources said that the suspended lawmakers had been collectively fined over Rs20 million and were previously given a one-week deadline to pay or face stricter action. However, these enforcement measures have now been withheld pending the outcome of the ongoing dialogue. In addition, the government has also suspended plans to table no-confidence motions against nine more opposition chairpersons of standing committees. Previously, four such chairpersons had already been removed through similar motions. According to government sources, a total of 13 opposition lawmakers were slated to be removed from their committee positions as part of the disciplinary response to the June 27 events. That plan, too, has been put on hold in light of the negotiations.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Donkey slaughtering project sparks controversy
Listen to article As a nation, we often show little regard for the rights of animals, with the mistreatment of working animals—particularly donkeys—ranking high on the list. Now, it appears that in a couple of years, donkeys, like dinosaurs, will become fictional animals from books thanks to the government's haphazard decision to initiate commercial donkey slaughtering in the absence of any breeding farms. Reportedly, the slaughterhouse in Gwadar is preparing to export donkey bones and hides to China, where they are used to produce gelatin for traditional medicine. This, however, won't stop at Gwadar since applications have already been received from other companies looking to establish slaughterhouses across the country. Animal rights activists, however, argue that with the donkey population already dangerously low and no breeding farms available, slaughtering the working animals will only exacerbate the decline in their population. Speaking to The Express Tribune, Dr Javed Gondal, CEO of Brooke Pakistan, an international organization working for the welfare of working animals, claimed that the slaughterhouse established in Gwadar will have the capacity to annually process and slaughter 216,000 donkeys, who will be transported from different parts of the country to the slaughterhouse before they are exported to China. 'High exports of donkeys may lead to their shortage in Pakistan, where the birth rate of donkeys is lower than that of other animals. Some African countries have banned the exports of donkeys after a decline in their population,' said Dr Gondal. Likewise, Altamash Saeed, an environmental and animal rights consultant, expressed his fears that in the aftermath of the project, donkeys will be transported from different parts of the country to Gwadar through inappropriate ways. 'Apart from this, donkeys are the source of livelihood for thousands of families across the country. They are being used for freight, garbage collection, agriculture, industry and mining. Hence, slaughtering donkeys will increase poverty. Moreover, slaughtering donkeys is forbidden on the grounds that Article 2A of the Constitution states that no action can be taken against the fundamental principles of Islam in Pakistan,' highlighted Saeed, who believed that slaughtering donkeys was not only against the Constitution but was also religiously inappropriate. According to the Donkey Sanctuary, a welfare organization working for the protection of donkeys, the African Union has banned the slaughtering of donkeys for skin trade on the grounds that the practice could eventually lead donkeys towards becoming an endangered species just like the rhinos and elephants. Responding to the concerns, Former Animal Husbandry Commissioner Dr Muhammad Akram, who is monitoring this project at the official level, informed that the country was home to 5.2 million donkeys, whose body parts, including the skin were used in the manufacture of cosmetics and other products. 'The main reason behind the decline in the number of donkeys is that their use has decreased. Due to this, donkey farming has never been pursued like other livestock. The company working on the donkey slaughtering project has been required to first work on donkey farming and then start slaughtering. They will be required to farm the same number of donkeys they will slaughter annually. Discussions are currently underway with five companies on donkey farming. These companies want to build slaughterhouses in different parts of the country,' said Dr Akram.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump cleared by court to implement education cuts
A person walks in front of the Department of Education building, in Washington, U.S., February 4, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/ A divided United States supreme court gave US President Donald Trump the green light on Monday to resume dismantling the Education Department. The conservative-dominated court, in an unsigned order, lifted a stay that had been placed by a federal district judge on mass layoffs at the department. The three liberal justices on the nine-member panel dissented. Trump pledged during his White House campaign to eliminate the Education Department, which was created by an act of Congress in 1979, and he moved in March to slash its workforce by nearly half. Trump instructed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to 'put herself out of a job'. Today marks a victory for education! We're one step closer to returning education to the states. — Secretary Linda McMahon (@EDSecMcMahon) July 14, 2025 Around 20 states joined teachers' unions in challenging the move in court, arguing that the Republican president was violating the principle of separation of powers by encroaching on Congress's prerogatives. In May, District Judge Myong Joun ordered the reinstatement of hundreds of fired Education Department employees. The supreme court lifted the judge's order without explanation, just days after another ruling that cleared the way for Trump to carry out mass firings of federal workers in other government departments. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent joined by justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said in the Education ruling that 'only Congress has the power to abolish the Department'. 'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naïve, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave,' Sotomayor said. Traditionally, the federal government has had a limited role in education in the US, with only about 13 per cent of funding for primary and secondary schools coming from federal coffers, the rest being funded by states and local communities. But federal funding is invaluable for low-income schools and students with special needs. And the federal government has been essential in enforcing key civil rights protections for students. After returning to the White House in January, Trump directed federal agencies to prepare sweeping workforce reduction plans as part of wider efforts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — previously headed by Elon Musk — to downsize the government. Trump has moved to fire tens of thousands of government employees and slash programmes — targeting diversity initiatives and abolishing the Education Department, the US humanitarian aid agency USAID and others.
