Employees Provident Fund income drops 13% due to weaker equity markets, says MoF
Kuala Lumpur:
The Employees Provident Fund (EPF) saw its investment income fall by 13 per cent in the first quarter of 2025 (1Q 2025), recording RM18.31 billion compared to RM20.99 billion in the same period last year.
According to the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the decline was mainly due to weaker equity market performance and had no connection to EPF's sale of foreign assets or increased investments in domestic equities aimed at supporting the ringgit.
Advertisement
'The weaker performance was largely driven by rising global trade tensions and the unpredictable trade policies of the United States,' the ministry said in a written reply published on the Dewan Rakyat portal.
Although some central banks have begun loosening monetary policy, the MoF noted that investor sentiment remains fragile due to concerns over geopolitical instability, fiscal imbalances, and regional conflicts, all of which have weighed on market confidence.
SPONSORED CONTENT
The response was issued in reply to a question from Tanjong Karang Member of Parliament Datuk Dr Zulkafperi Hanapi, who had asked about the main factors behind the drop in EPF's income and whether it was tied to the fund's overseas asset sales.
The ministry said the impact of current market conditions was reflected in EPF's equity investment returns, which fell by two per cent to RM10.81 billion in 1Q 2025, down from RM14.02 billion in 1Q 2024.
Advertisement
'Equities remain the largest contributor to EPF's investment income, making up 59 per cent of the total in the first quarter of this year,' MoF said.
Despite the softer performance, the ministry said that EPF will continue to follow a disciplined investment strategy guided by its Strategic Asset Allocation framework to ensure long-term, sustainable returns.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
12 hours ago
- The Sun
Target of 1m affordable homes viable: Experts
PETALING JAYA: The government pledge to construct one million affordable homes under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) is realistic but will require consistent momentum and tighter coordination, say experts. UTM real estate economy expert Dr Muhammad Najib Razali said current data supports the target viability because about 180,000 units have been completed this year, with an additional 235,000 under construction, bringing the total to approximately 415,000 homes. 'If this rate of development can be accelerated, the one million target is well within reach.' However, he said a unified coordinating agency is urgently needed to avoid overlapping responsibilities among stakeholders and ensure streamlined implementation. He recommended scaling up the use of technologies such as the Industrialised Building System and Building Information Modelling to reduce costs and accelerate delivery timelines. 'Inclusive financing mechanisms, such as expanding the Rent-to-Own scheme and Credit Guarantee Housing Scheme, must also support B40 and M40 buyers.' He added that under the 12th Malaysia Plan, about 57.8% of the 500,000 unit target was achieved by March 2024, with progress surging this year. He said achieving the 13MP goal requires building 585,000 units over the next decade, about 58,500 annually. He also said past schemes such as PR1MA, while aimed at lower income groups, were undermined by speculation and unsustainable financing. 'Some buyers resold their units immediately after the moratorium, undermining the purpose of affordable housing. Others depleted their EPF savings to qualify for loans, putting their financial security at risk.' He said the government must improve long term ownership monitoring, balance supply with real local demand and enforce clearer boundaries to prevent speculation. 'Between 2020 and 2025, units priced under RM300,000 made up over 55% of total housing transactions, yet only 23% of unsold units were in this price range. 'This reflects strong demand and affirms the importance of aligning supply with real affordability.' Housing community expert Assoc Prof Dr Noorsidi Aizuddin Mat Noor said the one million target is possible, but warned that poor delivery models could undermine the effort. He said many past initiatives were built in so-called 'strategic' locations without considering whether residents could actually live and work there. 'Too often, feasibility studies are based on outdated or inaccurate data. We need to assess real readiness, such as whether jobs, schools and clinics are nearby, not just label a site as 'promising''. Noorsidi said speculation remains a threat, and called for a transparent, tech-driven one-stop system for housing allocation and monitoring of resales. 'If people don't feel these homes are meant for them, we're not building communities. We're building shells.' UiTM Shah Alam Built Environment expert Assoc Prof Dr Rohayu Abdul Majid said public-private partnerships and tech like 3D printing could speed up delivery, but only if homes are built where they are needed. 'Affordable housing must go beyond visibility, it must be habitable, accessible and sustainable for long term use.' She stressed the need for micro-level demand mapping and stronger federal-state-private sector collaboration to prevent mismatches between supply and demand. 'Rising land and material costs remain a challenge, but fast approvals, tax breaks and digital tools could help, if homes are to stay truly affordable for B40 and M40 buyers.'
Borneo Post
13 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Proposed EPF policy undermines contributors' right to their retirement funds, says SUPP man
Fang called upon the government to respect the voices and feedback of EPF contributors, whose funds had been accumulated over many years of employment. – Bernama photo KUCHING (Aug 3): The Batu Kitang branch of Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) has voiced opposition to the proposed move to restrict Employees Provident Fund (EPF) lump sum withdrawals, stating that such a policy would deprive contributors of rightful access to their own savings. In a statement issued yesterday, the branch's publicity secretary Fang Toung Shyuan acknowledged the government's intent of preventing retirees from misusing their EPF savings and potentially falling into financial hardships. However, he also stressed about the retirement funds rightfully belonging to the contributors. 'EPF savings are the result of a member's lifelong hard work. 'Once they reach retirement age, the funds belong to them, not the EPF. 'Imposing mandatory restrictions on how these savings can be accessed is unjustified,' he said in the statement. Fang called upon the government to respect the voices and feedback of EPF contributors, whose funds had been accumulated over many years of employment. He argued that retirees should not be subjected to a rigid, one-size-fits-all policy, especially when many already had personal retirement plans in place. 'At the very least, members must be free to choose their preferred method of withdrawal,' he said. Fang also expressed concern over recent declines in EPF investment returns, which he warned could lead to public suspicion that the proposed policy served as a means for the government to shift financial risk to the people. He noted that some contributors planned to use their EPF savings to start small businesses, invest, support their children's ventures, or to make home purchases. Furthermore, he cited EPF's data reporting that around 50 per cent of members had less than RM10,000 in their accounts at retirement funds. 'If a monthly disbursement system is enforced, it could mean receiving only a few hundred ringgit per month, which may last just two to three years.' In this regard, Fang called upon the government to drop the proposed policy, warning that it could cause unnecessary concern and inconvenience to EPF members. epf Fang Toung Shyuan lead lump sum withdrawals SUPP
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Malaysians want a say in how they receive payouts
PETALING JAYA: Should Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) members receive their retirement savings in monthly payments or a lump sum? For many Malaysians approaching the retirement age, they want to have a choice. Process senior engineer Adam Abu Bakar, 50, said having several options would allow eligible members to make a decision on how they want their savings to be disbursed. 'It shouldn't be limited to either monthly payments or a lump sum amount. Personally, I am fine with either but there must be clarity on how the monthly payouts are calculated,' he said. He also urged for EPF to have financial advisors readily available to help people manage their retirement funds. 'When a large sum of money suddenly presents itself, people may not know how to save or grow it,' he said. The 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), which was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat last Thursday, stated that the government was considering introducing a monthly pension payout under EPF. In response, EPF said any decision on this matter would go thorough engagement with key stakeholders and careful consideration of members' long-term interests. Events supervisor Karina Cheng, 54, favoured lump sum payments, saying it can help during emergencies. 'We've worked hard for the money and these are our savings. 'It helps to have cash on hand, as any emergencies beyond our working years can be difficult to manage financially,' she said. Accountant K. Shanmugam, 56, said he preferred the current system over a pension scheme. 'I have my Akaun Emas which I got at 55. I hope they will not force me to resort to a monthly pension scheme. It will not be sustainable for me as I will need my savings for expenses such as my children's wedding and so on,' he said. 'If I am able to fully withdraw my savings, then I can plan my finances better. Also, considering a person's age, there may be health emergencies as well that may require huge amounts of funds.' As such, he said he wanted the government to maintain the current system. Akaun Emas refers to an EPF account for members who reach the age of 55. Any contribution from members aged 55 will be credited into this account and can only be withdrawn once the member turns 60. A senior bank executive who wanted to be known only as Henry, 56, said the current mechanism allowed him to financially support his child's tertiary education expenses. 'Without the lump sum option, it can be very challenging to manage these expenses out of pocket,' he said. 'However, I do understand why the monthly payouts can help, as some people may splurge or even worse, get cheated of their savings.'
