Company, two directors charged with dumping hazardous waste in PD
SEREMBAN: A company and its two directors, including a former state Environment Department (DOE) deputy director, claimed trial at the Sessions Court here to a charge of illegally dumping hazardous wastes.
Nature Energy Products Sdn Bhd and its directors S. Sivanathiran, 62, who was former state DOE deputy director, and Chan Kwai Soon, 47, pleaded not guilty after the charge was read to them before Judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam.
Chan also represented the company.
They were charged with dumping the waste (code SW322) on Lot 11224, in Jimah, Port Dickson at around 4.30pm on Oct 14, 2024.
SW322 refers to "waste of non-halogenated organic solvents". This classification falls under the broader category of hazardous waste and requires specific handling and disposal procedures.
The company and both directors were charged under Section 34B(1)(a) of the Environmental Quality Act 1974 (EQA) which prohibits the placement, deposit, or disposal of scheduled waste without the approval of the Director-General of Environment.
Section 34B(1)(a) directly addresses the illegal disposal of scheduled wastes, which are hazardous materials designated by the government.
Offenders can be jailed up to five years and fined between RM100,000 and RM10mil upon conviction.
Deputy Public Prosecutor from the DOE Nurliyana R. Azmi then told the court the offence was non-bailable but left it to the court's discretion.
She said in the event the court allowed bail, her team proposed an amount of RM50,000 for each director.
She also asked the court to order the directors to surrender their passports and to not contact prosecution witnesses.
Lawyer Ramzani Idris, who represented the accused, then asked the court to impose bail adding that the directors have been cooperative in the department's probe.
Haresh Mahadevan, who assisted Ramzani, then got up to say that the directors should not be asked to surrender their passports as both were businessmen who travelled often.
Sivanathiran, he added, was a retired government servant and was not a flight risk.
He said if the court were to impose bail, an amount of RM5,000 was sufficient.
Judge Mohamad Kamil then set bail at RM9,000 each for the directors and fixed July 3 for mention.
He also ordered the duo to report to the nearest DOE office monthly until the case is disposed of and to stay away from prosecution witnesses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
5 hours ago
- Daily Express
Court to hear Muhyiddin's reference bid on August 28
Published on: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 By: Ho Kit Yen, FMT Text Size: Former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. (Bernama pic) Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here will hear Muhyiddin Yassin's bid to refer legal questions to the apex court on the validity of certain provisions under the Sedition Act on Aug 28. The former prime minister is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. Justice Jamil Hussin fixed the date after lawyer Joshua Tay, appearing for Muhyiddin, told the court that the defence and prosecution had agreed on the date. The court then instructed the prosecution and defence to file their submissions by Aug 14. Deputy public prosecutor Razali Che Ani appeared for the prosecution. Muhyiddin allegedly said he was not invited by the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as prime minister following the 2022 general election, despite having obtained the majority support of 115 MPs. If found guilty, the Perikatan Nasional chairman and Bersatu president will face a jail term that could extend to three years or a maximum fine of RM5,000. Muhyiddin was initially charged at the Gua Musang sessions court in August last year. On Nov 27, Justice Azmi Abdullah allowed his application to have the case transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
![[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FPMXjudge_NSTfield_image_socialmedia.var_1749022242.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has failed in his bid to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the legal provisions on the immunity of a sitting prime minister. High Court Judge Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed the application, ruling that it did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA). "Having considered the affidavits, the eight proposed questions, and submissions of all parties (both written and oral), this court is not satisfied that the statutory threshold under Section 84 of the CJA is met. "The questions posed are speculative, not necessary to the disposal of this case, and do not concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision," she said in her decision. Anwar's application is linked to a sexual assault lawsuit filed against him four years ago by his former research officer, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. The trial is scheduled to begin on June 16. Roz Mawar said the proposed constitutional questions failed to meet the statutory threshold under the section, and that not every question referencing the Federal Constitution warrants referral. "The Federal Court is not a forum for speculative advisory opinions. "Furthermore, the defendant (Anwar) has affirmed readiness to proceed with trial and there is no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform constitutional duties. "This court finds no special circumstances warranting a stay of proceedings," she said. Roz Mawar awarded RM20,000 in costs to Yusoff Rawther. She also ruled that the June 16 trial will proceed. After the proceedings, Anwar's lawyer Datuk Seri Rajasegaran Krishnan said they will file a notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal. On May 23, Anwar applied to the High Court to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, which included whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by Yusoff. Anwar had sought the apex court to rule whether Articles 5,8, 39,40 and 43 of the constitution grant him qualified immunity from Yusoff's suit. Yusoff had filed the suit before Anwar became prime minister on Nov 24, 2022. Anwar had asked the court to decide whether Yusoff's suit would impair the effective discharge of his executive duties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar had also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution. Previously, Anwar's senior political secretary Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin had said there was no attempt in the application to seek absolute immunity. He said Anwar's application to the Federal Court is a lawful process to seek clarity from the court on his position in carrying out official duties when facing a civil suit based on claims that precede his appointment as prime minister. Shamsul Iskandar had said the issue is whether such civil action could interfere with the efficiency of a prime minister in carrying out the executive functions of the state. He had said it is a legitimate and lawful matter to be referred to the Federal Court, the highest judicial institution in the country, with the jurisdiction to interpret the constitution fairly and objectively.
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Former TV station employee faints while facing 743 data tampering charges
KUALA LUMPUR: A former television station employee fainted in the dock after part of the 743 charges of data tampering involving the company's customer management system were read out to her in the Sessions Court here today. Nora Idayu Jaafar, 48, who was serving with Astro at the time, collapsed and fainted as the court interpreter was reading the 30th charge under the Computer Crimes Act 1997 before Judge Norma Ismail. The court then set June 26 for the reading of the remaining 713 charges, after the accused pleaded not guilty to the first 30. The court allowed Nora Idayu bail of RM10,000 with one surety, with the added conditions that she must surrender her passport to the court until the case is concluded and report to the nearest police station once a month. According to the 30 charges, in her capacity as an associate with the Department of Commercial Support Unit at Astro, she allegedly modified data by converting 30 ordinary customer accounts into corporate accounts in the Astro customer management system (AMDOCS CRM), resulting in unauthorised database alterations. The offences were allegedly committed at the Astro Office at Menara Icon, Jalan Tun Razak here. The charges, under Section 5 (1) of the Computer Crimes Act 1997, provide for a penalty of up to RM100,000 fine or imprisonment of up to seven years, or both, upon conviction. The prosecution was conducted by deputy public prosecutor Rohaiza Abdul Rahman, while the accused was unrepresented.
