How the L.A. Wildfires Pushed the City's Restaurants to the Brink
In 2016, The New York Times signaled its intent to stretch its culinary reach nationwide, with its chief critic Pete Wells looking to evaluate restaurants outside of the five boroughs. His first review took him all the way to the other coast, to Santa Monica, where he gave Bryant Ng and Kim Luu-Ng's Southeast Asian-inspired Cassia a three-star rave. It was yet another feather in the cap of the ascendant L.A. food scene that had become one of the most exciting restaurant cities in the world during the 2010s. But since then, battered by the pandemic, entertainment industry strikes, and January's devastating wildfires, the region's restaurant scene is being pushed to the brink. Cassia has announced it has all been too much to endure; it will shutter this weekend. There may be more closures to come.
When the Palisades Fire ignited on January 7, chef Dave Beran was running service at his new restaurant Seline in Santa Monica. That night, an eerie mood hung over the tasting-menu spot as lights flickered from the severe wind and guests checked their phones constantly to see the fire spreading through the neighboring L.A. enclave. The restaurant would shut down for days after, and air quality in Santa Monica remained poor for a week. Seline—which had been open only six weeks when the fires started—along with Beran's more casual Pasjoli nearby, took a big hit when they did reopen. 'At Seline, week five was our busiest week, but for six, total revenue of the whole week was less than the Saturday prior,' Beran says.
More from Robb Report
A Reimagined Pierre Koenig Home in L.A. Is Up for Grabs at $5.8 Million
Inside the Windsor, the Private Terminal at London's Heathrow Airport
Star Moves: Selena Gomez and John Legend Pick Up New Digs, Keke Palmer Sheds Her Starter Home
A little further north in Santa Monica, where Josiah Citrin's Michelin-star Citrin and two-star Mélisse share a building, the level of business was similarly dire. 'The first three weeks of January with the fires are the worst I've ever seen,' says Citrin, who has operated at the location for 25 years.
A.O.C. in the affluent west L.A. enclave of Brentwood was shut down for four days as evacuation warnings edged closer and smoke from the nearby blaze filled the restaurant. But restaurateur Caroline Styne says they also saw a big hit to business in the restaurant's West Hollywood location, too. 'I've been talking to other restaurateurs, and everybody has been going through it,' she says. 'Especially in that first two weeks, we were all really struggling.'
Over on the east side of L.A., closer to where the Eaton Fire swept through Altadena claiming lives and homes, the award-winning restaurant Bar Chelou in Pasadena announced it would close. 'We braced ourselves for a drop, knowing we would see a 20 to 30 percent decrease in business,' chef-owner Doug Rankin told Eater LA. 'But in reality, it was closer to 50 percent. I love this city so much and thought we'd be here forever. But you have to read the writing on the wall and cut your losses.'
Beran has been hearing the same thing in his conversations. 'I've talked to four or five different friends who were, right after the fires, saying if this doesn't improve in the next four to five weeks, they were talking about the potential of having to close,' he says.
While the locals are starting to come back out again, tourism has taken a hit. 'When the world outside sees L.A. on fire, they're not hopping on planes to go here.' Beran says. So the displacement of the neighboring community and the lack of tourists is taking its toll. 'It's a guess, but around 70 percent of our audience is flying in or coming from the Palisades,' he says.
Citrin has been able to fill the tables at his intimate tasting-menu spot Mélisse, but with fewer covers than normal as tables of four just sat two. And he's still seeing the lag of tourists. For a Michelin two-star restaurant like his, when he opens bookings, they're usually filled first by people outside of the region who are planning ahead for trips, then get filled closer to the dates by Angelenos. 'I look at the reservations for March, which we opened February 1, and it's not filling up like it usually does,' Citrin says. 'And that's the tourist part.'
The predicament L.A. restaurants are in now can't be explained by the fires alone. You have to go back to the Hollywood strikes that still hang over the local economy nearly two years later. The prolonged work stoppages by the Writers Guild of America and the Screen Actors Guild took, by some estimates, up to a $6 billion bite out of the economy nationwide, with most of the burden shouldered by California.
'In the first quarter of 2023 that's when we felt like diners are going out again, our numbers are up, and we're back to being profitable—and then the writer's strike happens and it bottoms our entire business out,' Styne says. 'And we've been treading water now for almost two years.' There was hope that once the strikes ended, business would bounce right back. But productions have been slow to resume in the L.A. area, meaning that people all up and down the entertainment industry—from actors to editors to gaffers to production assistants—have less discretionary income. And it also means just fewer meetings between power players at local restaurants. 'There's a huge fear it will never come back to what it was,' Styne says.
'I don't think people realize how restaurants were affected as a result of the entertainment strikes,' Beran says. 'Even us trying to raise money for Seline was a huge challenge, because as soon as the strikes happened a lot of people said, 'We don't know how long these will go, so we need to stay liquid and keep cash reserves.''
So in the wake of the fires, restaurants couldn't afford to sit fallow for an extended period of time, because many had exhausted cash reserves. But getting locals to dine has been a delicate dance, as many restaurateurs know regulars who lost their homes in the fires. 'It's difficult to complain about because what we're losing from clientele, that clientele has lost so much more, so you feel guilty about talking about it,' Beran says. That initial shock and trauma in the wake of the fires is why the entertainment industry postponed awards season events and Angelenos felt awkward about going out and having a good time. It almost led to the annual DineLA Restaurant Week to be canceled. But restaurateurs realized they literally couldn't afford lose that revenue driver after such a terrible start to the year.
'We were all trying to be sensitive to the issue,' Citrin says about conversations surrounding the cancellation of DineLA. 'But then we said, 'You can't do that right now, because if you do that, it's going to be the worst bloodbath.'
Restaurateurs banded together to push for DineLA to go through starting January 24, with restaurants across the city offering prix-fixe menus while receiving marketing support from the tourism board. The event appears to have tapped into Angelenos' desire to get back out weeks after the fires. 'DineLA was busy, one of the busiest we've seen,' Citrin says. 'Banc of California matched money to donate to fire relief, the tourism board contributed to fire relief and it got people going out.' The DineLA organization reports that it raised $100,000 for fire relief during the event, and the week was so successful that many restaurants were extending their menus and discounts for additional weeks.
What comes next for L.A. restaurants, even the most seasoned operators aren't quite sure. Citrin has been part of the L.A. scene for decades and remembers previous shocks to the city that date back to the '90s, including the L.A. Riots and the Northridge Earthquake. 'We've been through a lot here, we're a resilient city,' Citrin says. 'Restaurants will be here, restaurants won't, you just try to fight the fight—that's all I can do and use all of my experience to keep it going.'
Best of Robb Report
Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One
9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now
The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec
Click here to read the full article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eater
2 hours ago
- Eater
On Instagram, Recipe-Sharing Automation Is Here to Stay
In December, the actress Sarah Snook, best known for playing the icy Shiv Roy on Succession , commented just one word on an Instagram post by NYT Cooking: 'Meatball.' And who could argue with that? Ali Slagle's Thai-inspired chicken meatball soup looked good, and getting the recipe required only that one leave the word 'meatball' in a comment. Do so, and a message from NYT Cooking pops into your inbox in seconds, offering a direct link to the recipe. This new format for engaging readers circumvents the clunky 'link in bio' maneuver, a workaround necessitated by the photo app's incompatibility with clickable links in captions and now considered the norm for publications and creators who use the platform to promote work that lives on other websites. Recently, a slew of new add-ons — including Manychat, which NYT Cooking uses — has allowed creators to automate messages and replies in this way. Food52 uses them too, as do recipe developers with unwieldy follower counts, like Yumna Jawad of Feel Good Foodie (4.7 million) and Deb Perelman of Smitten Kitchen (1.8 million). Influencers and creators have taken advantage of automation like this for a while, whether it's to send followers recipes or to share shoppable affiliate links. The effect is twofold, saving individuals from the tedious act of manually responding thousands of times and guaranteeing higher engagement since it prompts people to leave comments. These tools have become common enough to have instilled a habit: Some people now attempt to trigger chatbots even when a creator doesn't use them or instructs other steps for getting recipes. 'It doesn't actually matter as a content creator/pusher whether you use the bot thing — it's so standard now that people assume you do,' Perelman of Smitten Kitchen told me in a DM. For viewers, these tools are easier and less confusing than asking people to click the link in her bio. 'The actual conversation I had with myself was, 'Am I going to ignore hundreds of comments a day like this, or am I going to cough up $100/month(!) to give people what they want? With social media, the latter is my default — just make it easy; meet people where they are.' It's true: Recipe developers and creators use these tools because Instagram isn't the best place to share their recipes. Dropping instructions and measurements into a caption is easiest for viewers, but for creators, that means losing the potential revenue and the boosts to their engagement statistics that come from someone clicking through to their blog or signing up for their newsletter. However, since it isn't in Instagram's best interest to direct people to leave the app — or empower them to do so easily — the workarounds for highlighting off-platform content are annoying. Today, many people still don't understand their way around a 'link in bio,' even though the strategy has been in use since around 2018. Thus, recipe-sharing chatbots have emerged and taken hold. Do creators like them? Not necessarily. Do users? Begrudgingly. For the people who use them, these automation tools are a new necessary evil, just like being beholden to the whims of an algorithm. At best, these tools ensure that creator and commenter both get what they want. For one, that's a click; for the other, a recipe. At worst, they undermine the social nature of social media and depersonalize the experience of sharing food online. I went to Instagram — where I post pictures of food, pointedly without recipes — to ask food creators for their thoughts on these tools. The responses were overwhelmingly negative. 'Yes I hate it if that's strong enough of a sentiment,' said one. 'HATEEEEE,' said another. 'I HATE IT,' said yet another. Non-creators felt strongly enough that they had to write in too. Words that came up often were 'scammy' and 'desperate,' and some people resented them for being too obvious a play for engagement. Indeed, in one ad, which claims 'No Follow. No Freebies,' Manychat promotes that it allows creators to 'request a follow' before they 'give away content.' A common throughline was the idea of transactionality. 'On a deeper level, as a content creator who puts a lot of thought into how I create my recipes and corresponding content, I don't want people to simply think of me as a robotic recipe mill, constantly churning out recipes for consumption,' Lisa Lin, who runs the blog Healthy Nibbles, told me. 'An automated tool seems antithetical to that sentiment,' she added. This has long been the situation with food on social media. Get enough eyes on a picture of food online and you'll certainly become familiar with the 'recipe?' commenter. Not all pictures of food warrant a recipe, and not all people who post food are recipe developers; sometimes, the point is just to be proud of a nice lunch. Yet the 'recipe?' commenter sees no distinction between the professionalism of a published recipe meticulously shot and developed, and the individual's personhood, preserved and savored. At best, it's a well-meaning follower's detour into modest annoyance; at worst, it's the prelude to a total internet stranger becoming put out when a poster doesn't provide on-demand service, tailored to every need. In 2022, The New York Times 's Tejal Rao wrote of this phenomenon, coining it the 'endless torment of the 'recipe?' guy.' The core intentions of the ''recipe?' guy' are rarely bad: Isn't a desire to imitate a compliment? Yet their assumptions speak to a sense of entitlement around recipes and theto cooks for providing them. With one word, that request turns a shared appreciation of food into a transaction, regardless of whether its creator intended for it to be or if they even benefit at all financially. 'It's a way of treating the people who share their cooking online entirely as products. But I think it's also a way of becoming a bit less human,' Rao wrote. Indeed, this use of chatbots and automation tools only accelerates the normalization of treating people who share food online like robots themselves. Automation tools reward this behavior. They make it normal to drop a one-word comment to a stranger, like a caveman grunting a demand, without any effort toward etiquette or building a rapport. They reinforce the notion that creators must always provide, as well as the problematic sentiment that whatever we see on our screens should also be available for us to have. 'I've worked so hard to build a community,' said recipe developer and creator Erin Clarkson, known as @cloudykitchen. She chooses not to use automation tools, in part because she feels they detract from the conversational vibe she works to foster on her platforms. 'A chatbot destroys comment sections,' Clarkson said. That sentiment was echoed in the responses I got on Instagram, especially from non-creators. It used to be funny or helpful to read the comments, where people made jokes, shared their candid reactions and experiences, or asked clarifying questions. Now, as people seek to trigger auto-response tools, it's useless. We might see this as yet another example of enshittification: a once-social space optimized in favor of efficiency, but ultimately resulting in a worse experience for the people using the product. To Clarkson, these tools have also made readers 'even more lazy.' Clarkson says she regularly sees readers' assumptions that she uses them, even though she doesn't. She sees those presumptive comments another way: If these people can't bother to read the captions to figure that out, then they likely won't fare well with the level of detail on her blog . Everyone wants things instantly and easily, and recipes are no exception. Still, these tools remain a 'stopgap,' Lin said. Despite her ideological hesitation to tools that encourage robotic behavior from both creators and their audiences, the reality for her and most other recipe developers and food creators is that she 'primarily earns a living on a website outside of Instagram. At the end of the day, I need eyeballs on my website,' she said. Having now subscribed to one of these tools for several months, Lin has found that they're useful in getting people to visit her website. (Even when it comes to the established link-in-bio system, 'many, many people can't be bothered.') 'If Instagram would simply allow us to embed clickable links in our captions, we would not need this ridiculous workaround to deliver links to our audience,' Lin said. 'This automated recipe-sharing ecosystem wouldn't even need to exist. But I don't see Instagram developers changing their ways any time soon, so we're all stuck in this situation.' After hearing the malaise of social media users on all sides of the issue, I returned to the prompt that started it all. Committed to testing it out, I, like Snook, commented on that NYT Cooking post. Immediately, it felt silly — not just to comment 'meatball' publicly, but also to add to the mindless cacophony of requests and to masquerade as yet another someone who didn't bother to Google or search NYT Cooking. Afterward, I felt weirdly embarrassed: What friction was I really removing from my life by commenting? Sure, the recipe ended up in my inbox immediately, but then again, my mess of DMs is where useful information goes to die. The instant access didn't make me any more likely to make the recipe, and in fact, it would take me an awkwardly long time just to find the link in my inbox if I were in need of it while planning out dinner. I thought about all the recipes that have piled up in my saves on Instagram and in my screenshots folder. So many of them came to me so easily, offered up by way of too-knowing algorithms, and yet, I've never made most of them either. We now have access to so much information that we take its abundance — and the work that went into creating it — for granted. We see recipes as commodities that we are owed by virtue of us simply having seen them, even when we don't have any intention of following through. I thought about the technique that always works better for me anyway: just googling ingredients I have and then seeing how other people have already put them together. It makes me think a little more, of course, but especially in the age of AI, the most humanizing thing is to do a little of the work yourself — to have to think through a problem. I end up with something that's all mine; not something anyone willing to just comment 'meatball' can reproduce. The freshest news from the food world every day

Refinery29
2 hours ago
- Refinery29
6 Food-Inspired Beauty Trends That'll Have You Serving Looks
Glazed donut nails, tiramisu makeup, cinnamon cookie butter hair… Food-inspired beauty trends are giving new meaning to the term 'serving looks,' and not unlike patisserie day on my favorite baking show, new options stay coming in hot by the second. The inspo for your next look isn't just on your feed — it's in your fridge. Think sugared pink and red tones with a slight glossy sheen, mimicking the dewy glow of that viral $19 strawberry (you know the one), or decadent toffee hues that give your look equal parts warmth and sweetness. Scrolling through #BeautyTok feels like making that weekly grocery run, and honestly? Yes, chef. The trend goes beyond indulgent aesthetic choices, too. With the launch of the new Glow Reviver Melting Lip Balms, e.l.f. Cosmetics is taking food-inspired beauty trends to the next level. These buttery soft, nourishing lip balms combine hues that pay homage to gummy candies, strawberry shortcake, and toffee among other delicious treats, with coordinating scent and flavor profiles for that 360 experience deserving of a Michelin star.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Indiana Pacers Respond to Caitlin Clark's NBA Finals Message
Indiana Pacers Respond to Caitlin Clark's NBA Finals Message originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Caitlin Clark is undeniably one of the Indiana Pacers' biggest fans, and so when the NBA franchise staged a massive comeback in Game 1 of the NBA Finals, the Indiana Fever star was naturally hyped. Advertisement Tyrese Haliburton saved the Pacers from the verge of defeat after trailing by as many as 15 points against the Oklahoma City Thunder on Thursday. With 0.3 seconds left and Indiana trailing 110-109, the All-Star guard took matters into his own hands and delivered a 21-foot pull-up jumper for the win. Right after Haliburton made the game-winning shot, Clark quickly took to social media to express her disbelief. She wrote, "YOU CANT MAKE IT UP," referring to the clutch basket and how the All-Star playmaker has repeatedly delivered for the team when it matters the most. Clark also shared a video of the play on her Instagram Stories, further highlighting how amazed she was by what happened. The Pacers, for their part, showed appreciation for Caitlin Clark and her continued support by acknowledging her reaction. Advertisement "@caitlinclark22 on @tyresehaliburton's game-winner," the Pacers wrote on Instagram along with a smirking face emoji. The post was accompanied by a screenshot of Clark's reaction. The Pacers also responded to the Fever star's actual post on X, writing several smiling faces with horns emojis. For what it's worth, Clark was not the only Fever player to celebrate the Pacers' epic win. Aliyah Boston, Sophie Cunningham, Natasha Howard and Brianna Turner were also quick to share their thoughts, all expressing their shock and amazement. Indiana Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton (0) once again delivered in clutch Ruszkowski-Imagn Images Game 2 of the Thunder-Pacers series is scheduled for Sunday. Sure enough, it's safe to expect Clark and the rest of the Fever to tune in to the game as they cheer for Indiana. Advertisement Related: Indiana Fever Post First Message After Loss Without Caitlin Clark This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.