Walmart ends popular perk for shoppers as the company braces for the impact of Trump's tariff policy
Walmart has quietly ended a key perk for low-income shoppers.
Since 2020, customers using food stamps were exempt from the $6.99 fee on grocery pickup and delivery orders under $35 — a benefit introduced during the pandemic.
That exemption has now ended.
The fee will once again apply to smaller orders placed by Walmart+ Assist members, the retailer's discounted subscription for those enrolled in programs like SNAP, Medicaid, or TANF.
These members, who pay $6.47 a month or $49 a year, had previously enjoyed the same perks as full-price subscribers — including waived basket fees.
The $6.99 charge covers the cost of selecting and packing orders and is on top of delivery fees.
Walmart says the rollback is part of broader cost-cutting efforts, citing financial uncertainty caused by new tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.
Walmart has also asked suppliers to absorb some of the tariff-driven price increases and has made staffing changes to cut expenses.
Walmart president & CEO Doug McMillon
Still, the retail giant remains optimistic.
Walmart ended its most recent quarter with $180.6 billion in revenue and reported $681 billion in sales for 2024.
Walmart bosses say uncertainty from President Donald Trump's tariffs means they can't give Wall Street the usual forecast on sales and profits — something they haven't done since the pandemic.
The company insisted it was confident in making sure they could navigate tariffs along with the fears of a recession.
'We see opportunities to accelerate share gains while maintaining flexibility to invest in price as tariffs are applied to incoming goods,' said chief finance officer John David Rainey.
CEO Doug McMillon added that Walmart is closely monitoring costs: 'There are so many variables playing out in terms of what costs are going to be, where people source from. We're going to have to manage this as we always do — daily.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Baffled Facebook users share embarrassing personal details with world
Facebook users are accidentally sharing legal woes, relationship dramas and health problems with the world after failing to realise that a chatbot they were speaking to was making the messages public. Internet users have publicly disclosed potentially embarrassing information or private personal details in conversations with an artificial intelligence (AI) app built by Meta. While the messages do not appear to have been meant for the public, dozens of posts have been shared on Meta AI's public 'Discover' feed. In one post seen by The Telegraph, a user asked the chatbot to write a character reference ahead of a court hearing, giving their full name. 'A character letter for court can be a crucial document,' Meta's chatbot said. 'To help me write a strong letter, can you tell me a bit more.' The person posting replied: 'I am hoping the court can find some leniency.' In another, a man appears to be asking for advice choosing between his wife and another woman. Others users shared long, rambling voice notes. Mark Zuckerberg 's company launched its standalone Meta AI app in April. On it, users can speak to the company's chatbot, asking it questions in a manner similar to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Public sharing of conversations is not turned on by default, and users have to log in and confirm that they want to publish a conversation. However, many of the posts suggest users are unaware that their conversations have been aired in public. It suggests people may have opted to publish their conversations without fully realising what they were doing. In a post on X, Justine Moore, a partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, said: 'Wild things are happening on Meta's AI app. The feed is almost entirely boomers who seem to have no idea their conversations with the chatbot are posted publicly.' Wild things are happening on Meta's AI app. The feed is almost entirely boomers who seem to have no idea their conversations with the chatbot are posted publicly. They get pretty personal (see second pic, which I anonymized). — Justine Moore (@venturetwins) June 11, 2025 In other shared conversations, users appeared to confuse Meta AI for a customer service bot, or asked it to provide technical support, such as helping them to log in. One chat begins: 'Dear Instagram Team, I am writing to respectfully request the reactivation of my Instagram account.' When it launched Meta AI, the tech company said its public feed was intended as a 'place to share and explore how others are using AI'. It said: 'You can see the best prompts people are sharing, or remix them to make them your own. And as always, you're in control: nothing is shared to your feed unless you choose to post it.' Technology giants have been aggressively pushing AI features despite fears that the tools are leaving social media filled with so-called AI 'slop' – nonsense images and conversations generated by bots. AI chatbots have been involved in a series of blunders. A Google chatbot last year told its users it was safe to eat rocks. In 2023, a chatbot from Microsoft went rogue and repeatedly expressed its love for users.
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
China strikes cautious tone after Trump claims trade deal is 'done'
China will "always honour its commitments" when it comes to negotiating trade disagreements with the US, according to a spokesperson for the Chinese government. But when pushed by Sky News, he refrained from confirming what those commitments are. The reluctance is at odds with President Trump, who declared on his Truth Social account that "our deal with China is done", while also claiming that China has agreed to supply rare earth metals to the US"upfront", and to a 55% tariff rate on its goods. The comments follow high-stakes talks between delegations from the two countries in London aimed at stabilising the relationship amid an escalating trade and supply chain war. China's refusal to confirm these details has raised speculation that, contrary to what the US side is claiming, there may still be significant disagreements and some details yet to be worked out. The continued silence comes after two days of negotiations between delegations from the US and China in the UK. While both sides confirmed that they had agreed a "framework" to implement the "consensus" reached at previous talks in Geneva last month, as well as during a phone call between President Xi and President Trump on 5 June, the delegations were supposed to be taking the agreement to their respective leaders for sign-off. When asked by Sky News if any of the details in Trump's Truth Social post reflected what China understood to be in the deal, Lin Jian, China's foreign ministry spokesperson said "the two sides achieved new progress in addressing the concerns on economic and trade issues". "We always honour our commitments. Since we've reached common understandings, the two sides need to follow them." 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 When pushed by Sky News on whether China agrees with Trump's Truth Social assessment that the US-China relationship is "excellent", Lin declined to agree, saying simply: "Our position on relations with the United States has been consistent and clear". Such lukewarm language is not uncommon in China but there will likely be significant displeasure at the way Trump is unilaterally publishing details that may not yet have been officially signed off. It is in stark contrast to China's communication landscape which is highly scripted and controlled, and if it was designed to force China into an agreement it could well backfire. Indeed, if everything in Trump's Truth Social post is true it would represent quite a coup for the US, and that feels a little unlikely given the valuable bargaining chips China has, particularly over rare earth metals. 0:54 This will likely have been a crunch point in negotiations. China has the vast majority of the world's rare earth metals which are vital in the production of everything from cars to weaponry, and recent export controls imposed in response to Trump's tariffs have brought some production lines to the brink of standstill. In response, the Trump administration imposed extra export controls on high-tech chips, chip development technology and parts needed to make jet engines, as well as moving to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals. President Trump indicated in his Truth Social post that the measures to revoke visas will be rowed back. When pushed by Sky News, Lin refrained from commenting on whether Trump's communications on this matter have undermined the relationship more broadly, but the stakes remain enormously high, with the unfolding supply chain war set to do significant damage to the economies of both nations.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Boeing whistleblower died from 'self-inflicted gunshot wound' after raising safety fears at Dreamliner factory
A Boeing whistleblower found dead last year had raised safety concerns about the US factory that makes the Dreamliner plane that went down in the Ahmedabad air disaster. John Barnett alleged that second-rate parts were removed from bins before being fitted to planes that were being built in order to prevent delays. The engineer claimed there was a risk the decision could cause an explosion that would 'bring the whole plane down'. He also alleged that Boeing had tried to 'eliminate' quality checks at the factory where he worked in North Carolina, which builds the 787 Dreamliner. Mr Barnett accused the company of 'countless' violations of US law including use of sub-standard parts to prevent production line delays. He also alleged paperwork was knowingly falsified. He died in March 2024 at the age of 62. He was found dead in his truck in a hotel parking lot in South Carolina - seven years after he retired following a 32-year career with Boeing. The Charleston County coroner said he was shot and had died from a 'self-inflicted' wound. But a close friend had claimed that before he died Barnett had warned her that he would be killed and said: 'If anything happens to me, it's not suicide.' His former employer responded to the former worker's death last year, saying it was ' saddened by Mr. Barnett's passing.' But Boeing also insisted but said that the issues that he raised had been addressed. 'Engineering analysis determined the issues he raised did not affect aeroplane safety', the company said in a statement. Barnett's job for 32 years was overseeing production standards for the firm's planes - standards he said were not met during his four years at the then-new plant in Charleston from 2010 to 2014. 'The new leadership didn't understand processes,' Barnett told Corporate Crime Reporter in an interview in 2019 of how brass allegedly cut corners to get their then state-of-the-art 7878s out on time. 'They brought them in from other areas of the company,' he continued, two years after retiring in 20017. 'The new leadership team – from my director down – they all came from St. Louis, Missouri. They said they were all buddies there.' 'That entire team came down,' he went on. 'They were from the military side. My impression was their mindset was - we are going to do it the way we want to do it. Their motto at the time was - we are in Charleston and we can do anything we want. 'They started pressuring us to not document defects, to work outside the procedures, to allow defective material to be installed without being corrected. 'They started bypassing procedures and not maintaining configurement control of airplanes, not maintaining control of non conforming parts – they just wanted to get the planes pushed out the door and make the cash register ring'. He claimed that tests on emergency oxygen systems due to be fitted to the 787 had a one in four chance of failure in an emergency. Barnett claimed he alerted superiors at the plant about his misgivings, but no action was ever taken. Boeing denied this, as well as his claims. A 2017 review by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) went on to stand up some of Barnett's qualms, including finding that at least 53 'non-conforming' parts - as they put it - were misplaced, and considered lost. The Air India flight bound for London Gatwick carrying 244 passengers and crew including 53 Britons crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport today in the northwestern Indian state of Gujarat. The plane, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, careened back to earth in the densely populated Meghani area of the city just minutes after leaving the runway around 1pm local time. Shocking images shared to social media showed chunks of the plane's fuselage and tail protruding from a demolished building. Parts of the jet smashed into accommodation for doctors practising at the BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital. Remnants of the fuselage and the landing gear were seen dangling through a gaping hole in the side of what appeared to be a canteen, with half-finished plates of food clearly visible on benches inside. 'The building on which it has crashed is a doctors' hostel... we have cleared almost 70% to 80% of the area and will clear the rest soon,' a senior police officer told reporters at the scene. Firefighters doused the smouldering piles of debris with their hoses as photos and videos taken by horrified residents in Meghani showed plumes of thick black smoke emanating from the crash site. Emergency services are working fervently to locate survivors, but the scale of the damage displayed in early images suggests there are likely significant casualties. The plane careened back to earth in the densely populated Meghani area of the city just minutes after leaving the runway around 1pm local time India's Health Ministry confirmed that 'many were killed', but did not provide further details. As of 11:30am UK time, at least 30 bodies have been recovered from buildings damaged in the crash, rescue personnel at the site said. The cause of the tragedy is not yet known, but footage appeared to show the plane descending in a controlled manner with a high nose angle and landing gear deployed. It momentarily disappeared from view behind trees and buildings before a massive fireball erupted on the horizon. The jet was fuelled for a long-haul flight direct to Gatwick, intensifying the blast. The flight reportedly reached an altitude of just 625 feet before it began to descend, according to flight tracking service Flightradar 24, which declared the plane's transponder signal dropped just seconds after it left the runway. 'We received the last signal from the aircraft at 08:08:51 UTC, just seconds after take off,' it said. Air India's flight manifest said there were 169 Indians, 53 Britons, one Canadian and seven Portuguese nationals on board the stricken jet. India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation said the plane sent a mayday call moments before the crash.
