‘AI is now doing 30-50% of work at Salesforce,' says CEO Marc Benioff
Salesforce seems to be doubling down on artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline workflows and automate tasks in a hard pivot that comes months after the enterprise software giant announced mass layoffs as part of its broader restructuring efforts.
Marc Benioff, the company's CEO, has said that AI currently accounts for about 30 to 50 per cent of Salesforce's work. 'All of us have to get our head around this idea that AI could do things, that before, we were doing, and we can move on to do higher-value work,' Benioff said in an interview with Bloomberg.
His remarks come at a time when the tech industry is increasingly looking toward AI as a way to cut costs, boost productivity, and reshape workforces. Earlier this year, Salesforce reportedly laid off over 1,000 employees as it sought to restructure the company around AI.
The impact of AI on jobs has become a hot-button issue, amplified by warnings from tech CEOs themselves about the disruptive potential of the technology. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has said that AI may eliminate 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years.
Research studies and surveys have also echoed a similar concern. American think tank, The Brookings Institution, found that AI could replace more than half of the tasks carried out by entry-level roles, including market research analysts, sales representatives and graphic designers.
In another Bloomberg interview last month, Robin Washington, the chief financial and operations officer at Salesforce, had said that the company is hiring fewer software engineers due to productivity gains from artificial intelligence. 'We view these as assistants, but they are going to allow us to hire fewer people and, hopefully, make our existing team more productive,' she said.
Benioff termed the rise of AI in the workforce as a 'digital labour revolution.' He further revealed that Salesforce has reached about 93 per cent accuracy with AI. He said that it was not realistic to hit 100 per cent accuracy with AI. Other vendors are at much lower levels because they don't have as much data and metadata to build higher accuracy, he added.
Other tech companies such as cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike and Swedish fintech Klarna are also investing in AI while shrinking their headcount. Amazon will also use AI to reduce roles, as per the e-commerce giant's CEO Andy Jassy.
As millions of students around the world, particularly in India, prepare to become software engineers—and many even consider studying abroad for their master's degrees—their chances of landing a job at the world's biggest tech companies are beginning to look slimmer, all thanks to AI.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Why the Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez wedding festivities in Venice saw protests
Amazon founder and billionaire American businessman Jeff Bezos married journalist Lauren Sanchez earlier this week in Venice, Italy. Over 200 guests, including Oprah Winfrey, Ivanka Trump, Kim Kardashian, Queen Rania of Jordan, Bill Gates and Leonardo DiCaprio, were in attendance even as hundreds of locals protested the three-day festivities. The venue of one event was changed following the demonstrations. 'We are here to continue ruining the plans of these rich people, who accumulate money by exploiting many other people… while the conditions of this city remain precarious,' one demonstrator told the Associated Press. Some of the issues that the protesters cited have been raised previously, but the wedding of the world's fourth-richest man provided an opportunity to highlight them. Here is what to know. One reason is the growing frustrations over 'overtourism' in Europe. Multiple factors — increased global travel post-pandemic, long-haul movements becoming more accessible and social media adding a sense of glamour, trendiness and aspiration around travelling — are held responsible for tourists flocking to the continent. While Europe has long been a global tourist hotspot, locals in cities like Venice and Barcelona have increasingly become critical of the after-effects. Last year, thousands of people in Barcelona fired water pistols at tourists in protest, raising slogans of 'Tourism Kills the City' and 'Barcelona is Not for Sale'. With a population of approximately 1.6 million, the city has seen a significant increase in tourist numbers after the Covid-19 pandemic. From 9.7 million tourists in 2022, the number rose to around 26 million in 2023. They generated significant economic activity, but at the same time, higher demand has raised prices, making renting houses expensive for locals. Overtourism at beaches, mountains and other natural areas can also add to environmental pollution and degradation. The famous Venetian boats, as well as the speedboats at the Bezos wedding, can adversely impact water flows and aquatic life. To tackle this, some caps have been imposed on the number of tourists allowed in some cities, and additional payments have been mandated for short stays. However, not everyone agrees that the wedding in question will have a net negative impact. Caterer Rosa Salva told the AP, 'Events like this bring quality tourism to Venice,'' he said. 'I don't see how an event with 200 people can create disruptions. It's responsible tourism.' Bezos has also reportedly donated 1 million euros each to three environmental research organisations working to preserve Venice. Beyond overtourism, another factor at play may be the people in question. Bezos is not the first celebrity to wed in Italy — the Kardashians, actor George Clooney and human rights lawyer Amal Clooney, and closer home, actors Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh are among the many to have done so in the last decade. What sets Bezos apart is his net worth of $231 billion, a fraction of which (around €40 million or Rs 400 crore) will be on display. Extremely wealthy businessmen are also not a new phenomenon, but the wedding comes at a time when public perception of such displays — and the mere existence of billionaires — has become a moral issue for some. According to the AP, the protestors were joined by the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Tesla cars to protest billionaire businessman Elon Musk. Lauren Sanchez also came under fire in April for using a spacecraft from Bezos' private company, Blue Origin, to take an 11-minute trip to space with an all-women crew, dubbed by some as a 'vanity project'. Bezos, meanwhile, has come under criticism over the years with reports of Amazon workers at warehouses being made to work in difficult conditions, including in the United States. This has been contrasted with his rise, and against excesses such as the ninety private jets that flew in the celebrity guests to Venice. Other billionaires, such as the singer Taylor Swift, have previously been heavily criticised for using private jets for short rides in particular, given the large amounts of fuel they burn. Those critiques, especially online, often sarcastically compare such actions with the general calls for the masses to use paper straws to lessen their carbon footprint. The negative perception also goes beyond the actions of billionaires. One protesting group said they had no problem with the wedding, but were 'against unchecked wealth, media control, and the growing privatisation of public spaces.' In a 2019 article in The Washington Post ('Why does everybody suddenly hate billionaires? Because they've made it easy.'), journalist Roxanne Roberts noted that following the 2008 global financial crisis, high-earning bankers who were at the centre of it largely went unpunished in the United States. This gave birth to the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York in 2011, with slogans such as 'We are the 99%'. This cultural shift is also backed by data on increasing income inequality. 'In the 1950s, the average chief executive made 20 times more than their employees; now, chief executives earn 361 times more — about $13 million per year at the country's top corporations,' Roberts wrote. 'This isn't about blaming any specific billionaire, but a growing resentment that the richest people and corporations have somehow managed to get richer while most working stiffs are just one or two missed paychecks away from a food bank… It's a gut feeling that the game is rigged, and the middle class and the poor are losing,' she added. Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India. ... Read More
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Tesla Completes First Self-Driving Delivery To Customer's Home, Elon Musk Reacts
Last Updated: The Tesla Y Model drove itself from the company's Texas factory to the customer's home within 30 minutes by navigating highways, intersections, traffic signals Electric Vehicle (EV) giant Tesla has accomplished its first fully autonomous and driverless car delivery, with a Model Y driving itself to the customer's home. The Tesla Y Model drove itself from the company's Texas factory to the customer's home within 30 minutes by navigating highways, intersections, traffic signals, and city streets entirely on its own. The trip, which took place a day ahead of schedule, was announced by Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a post on X. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule. There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous," Musk said. The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule!!Congratulations to the @Tesla_AI teams, both software & AI chip design! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 27, 2025 The mega accomplishment was shared online, with Tesla first releasing a three-minute time lapse teaser, followed by a full 30-minute video on June 28. Captured from the back seat, the video, shared by Tesla, showcased Model Y operating entirely on its own, departing from the Gigafactory's parking area. It autonomously and adeptly navigated roads, executed turns, observed stop signs, yielded at red lights, and managed real-time traffic situations without any human input. The Model Y parked itself under the owner's building at the end of the journey. Musk reposted the video on X, with a one-word caption: 'Kapow." Kapow! 💫 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2025 Tesla's head of AI and Autopilot, Ashok Elluswamy, said the vehicle reached a top speed of 72 miles per hour during the 30-minute journey, Bloomberg reported. Tesla also debuted its robotaxi service in Austin this week. A small group of influencers and investors got rides in self-driving Model Y cars. Musk had hinted at both the robotaxi launch and the self-driving delivery earlier this month on X. He says Tesla plans to have millions of robotaxis on the road in the future. Tesla first showed off this kind of hands-free driving in April, when it posted a video of cars moving from its Texas factory floor to parking lots on their own.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Hulu to DoorDash: Why are more Americans slashing monthly subscriptions?
Millions of Americans are cutting back on subscriptions from streaming platforms to food delivery apps as rising costs force households to rethink monthly expenses. A new CNET survey shows nearly 6 in 10 U.S. adults are planning to cancel at least some of their paid subscriptions, highlighting growing frustration with price hikes, hidden fees, and auto-renewing charges that often go unnoticed until bank statements tell a different story, as per USA Today report. According to the same CNET report, the average American spends more than $1,000 a year on subscription services(Pexels) Marco Bertini, a marketing professor at Esade in Barcelona said, 'When people's budgets are tighter, they start asking themselves: Do I need to be paying over time for this? It just feels like a heavier burden.' One couple in Arizona had enough. Cassandra Navarro, who lives in Scottsdale, Arizona, got tired of all the small bills stacking up. She canceled Hulu, Amazon Prime, and DoorDash earlier this year. She says streaming services aren't worth it anymore — they raise prices often and remove shows she liked. As for food and shopping, she'd rather go to Walmart or swing by to pick up her takeout instead of paying delivery fees. Navarro and her husband have decided they'll cut back even more once they settle into their new house. They plan to build a collection of CDs and DVDs instead of paying for digital access every month. Navarro, 30 said, 'It just all adds up so much. We don't mind having one or two subscriptions, but when you have so many subscriptions at once, you start to feel like you don't have control of your life anymore. … You can't keep track of your own finances.' How much American spends on subscription ? According to the same CNET report, the average American spends more than $1,000 a year on subscription services and about $200 of that goes to stuff they don't use or need anymore. The reason so many companies push subscriptions is simple: it's profitable. A Harvard Business School report says around 75% of direct-to-consumer companies offer a subscription option. Bertini says this model works in certain industries, especially where the items are expensive. But not everything needs a recurring fee. "There are some places where it makes sense, and some places where it doesn't," he said. He also pointed out that some businesses rely on customers forgetting they're being charged every month. That may backfire as people become more careful with their spending. U.S. retail sales dropped 0.9% in May and 0.1% in April, which points to growing caution among shoppers. 'Do I want to have a recurring expense when my disposable income is a bit fluctuating?' Bertini asked. 'Disposable income, during tough times, is a little more uncertain. It may be higher one month, lower another, then maybe I'm unemployed.' Experts says it takes effort to cancel subscription Robbie Kellman McCarthy, an expert in consumer habits, says subscription-based companies may still do better than those that rely only on one-time purchases. He said, 'It takes effort to cancel, where it takes no effort to not purchase." He noted that during the Great Recession, some subscription services actually grew. Netflix, for example, saw a 26% rise in subscribers at the end of 2008, and another 31% jump the next year. Salesforce also saw more customers and more revenue. Still, not all subscription models are created equal. McCarthy said, 'If you're a utility like a telecom provider, (the risk is) probably pretty low.' He added, 'If you start moving toward streaming services, I think the risk goes up. When you move toward a box subscription, the risk becomes pretty high.' Also Read: Squid Game season 3 review: Darker and emotionally more impactful, Netflix show gets an imperfect but fitting finale FTC wants to make canceling easier One thing that could change the game for consumers is a rule from the Federal Trade Commission called 'click to cancel.' This rule says companies should make canceling just as easy as signing up — no long phone calls, no hidden buttons. If it took two clicks to subscribe, then it should take only two clicks to quit. The rule was passed last year under former Democratic Chair Lina Khan, but it's still not being enforced yet. Business groups have sued, saying it's too much of a burden. And the current FTC Chair, Republican Andrew Ferguson, said he voted against it because it was pushed during a lame-duck period. For now, the rule is on hold until July, to give companies more time to prepare. But Khan stands by it. "I really hope that sticks because this is hurting people," she said on the Pablo Torre Finds Out podcast in June. "Nobody should be stuck paying for a subscription that they either never signed up for or want to cancel."
