logo
The remarkable life and afterlife of Malcolm X

The remarkable life and afterlife of Malcolm X

CBS News04-05-2025
This month marks the 100th birthday of Malcolm X, the defiant, charismatic Black leader who electrified America with his blunt talk and biting humor. In his brief 39 years, Malcolm was many things: a street hustler who found religion in prison; a spokesman for the Nation of Islam who preached racial separatism; then, he became that rarest of leaders, one who admits a mistake. He began a new human rights movement that reached out to Whites of good faith.
Simon & Schuster
Malcolm's most famous phrase – "By any means necessary" – was widely seen as a threat of violence. But to his admirers, it stood for self-defense, for asserting Black pride and culture, and telling it like he saw it in describing the advances of the civil rights era.
"I will never say that progress is being made," he said. "If you stick a knife in my back nine inches and pull it out six inches, there's no progress."
In 1964, after breaking with the Nation of Islam and publicly accusing its leader, Elijah Muhammad, of adultery, Malcolm was candid with CBS News' Mike Wallace about the danger he faced.
Wallace: "Are you not perhaps afraid of what might happen to you as a result of making these revelations?"
Malcolm X: "Oh yes, I probably am a dead man already."
He was indeed. Seven months later, Malcolm X was murdered at a rally on February 21, 1965. Yet, as I chronicle in my book, "The Afterlife of Malcolm X" (to be published May 13 by Simon & Schuster), in the 60 years since, he has experienced a remarkable afterlife.
It began with "The Autobiography of Malcolm X," which touched millions. Throughout the 1960s, Malcolm inspired leaders of the Black Power and Black Arts movements, and activist athletes like Muhammad Ali and Olympic sprinter John Carlos.
In the 1980s and beyond, hip hop artists invoked Malcolm, and Spike Lee immortalized him on film.
Meanwhile, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas argued that Malcolm was actually a conservative: a believer in self-help, not looking for handouts.
Now, Malcolm X is hailed by scholars alongside Martin Luther King Jr., whose nonviolent message Malcolm once mocked. Historian Peniel Joseph, author of the forthcoming book "Freedom Season," likens them to a sword and a shield. "Malcolm, we usually think of as the political sword of this period; Dr. King, as the political shield," said Joseph. "I'd say the differences between them were really about how they conceptualized freedom for Black people.
"King has the famous quote where he says the law can't make somebody like me, but it can prevent someone from lynching me, right? That was Dr. King. Malcolm really felt that Black people needed to recognize their own dignity," Joseph said.
"So, it was a sort of a psychological liberation that had to happen before the political liberation?" I asked.
"Yes, dignity meant that we would no longer suffer from self-hatred and self-loathing, which Malcolm diagnosed as one of the ills of the ghetto," Joseph replied.
In a 1962 speech in Los Angeles, Malcolm X asked those in attendance: "Who taught you to hate the shape of your nose and the shape of your lips? Who taught you to hate yourself, from the top of your head to the soles of your feet?"
Those piercing questions, and that call to self-belief, still resonate in the fractious politics of today, as does Malcolm's warning to Mike Wallace about the consequences of injustice:
Malcolm X: "White people don't realize how frustrated Negroes have become."
Wallace: "I think they have come to understand the Negroes' frustration. But they're also of the opinion that no good can possibly come from violence."
Malcolm X: "If they are of that opinion, Mike, if you think that the powder keg that's in your house is going to explode under certain conditions, either you have to remove the powder keg, or remove the conditions."
READ AN EXCERPT: "The Afterlife of Malcolm X" by Mark Whitaker
In his book exploring the cultural hold that the activist continues to hold decades after his death, journalist Mark Whitaker examines the artistic choices made by Spike Lee and Denzel Washington in their masterful 1992 biopic, "Malcolm X."
For more info:
Story produced by Reid Orvedahl. Editor: Jason Schmidt.
See also:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations
Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations

Black America Web

timean hour ago

  • Black America Web

Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations

Source: The Washington Post / Getty Donald Trump's latest 'anti-crime' crusade against Democratic-led, predominantly Black cities is a blatant lie. The 34-count felon turned grifter in chief doesn't care about crime; he's a criminal, and his latest propaganda push is nothing more than the preservation of a regime built on fear and racial division and another act in his decades-long performance of racist political theater. He's doing the same tired ol' routine of painting Black and Brown communities as dangerous, only to position himself as the 'law-and-order' savior while laying the groundwork for an authoritarian power grab; but the jig is up—Trump is not fighting crime; he's manufacturing it to dismantle democracy. His fixation on cities like Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Oakland, and Chicago has nothing to do with reducing crime and everything to do with undermining democracy, targeting Black political leadership, and manufacturing a false narrative that paints Black and Brown communities as violent, dangerous, and in need of 'rescue,' in order for him to justify illegally taking control. We care about your data. See our privacy policy. This strategy is straight out of the authoritarian playbook: create a crisis where there isn't one, assign blame to a marginalized group, then use the fabricated emergency to consolidate power. For Trump, that means militarizing policing in Black cities, vilifying their leaders, and distracting his followers from the reality that violent crime in most major cities is down—not up—over the past two years. Data shows declines in violent crime, murders, and robberies. Oakland has seen significant drops in homicides. Baltimore just recorded its lowest homicide rate in over 50 years. Chicago's violent crime is down over 30%. Yet Trump trots out false, misleading statistics to paint these communities as hellscapes. Why? Because they have Black mayors, significant Black populations, and they vote against him in overwhelming numbers. While Trump points fingers, the truth is that the only convicted felon in this conversation is Donald J. Trump himself—a man who has been convicted of sexual assault, fraud, and who has repeatedly stiffed small business owners out of money owed. He's not interested in making Black communities safer—he's interested in dismantling the institutions that protect them, all while enriching himself and those bankrolling his political ambitions. In response to Trump's announcement that his administration would be taking over the city, the Washington Post reports officials in Washington, D.C., stated they were still in command of their police department, operating as usual, having received no new orders from the Trump administration. The city's police chief, Pamela A. Smith, has been supplying ideas about how federal law enforcement could be used by D.C. — not the other way around, but the White House, however, continued to project clear control. 'We plan to work with the D.C. police,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday, 'but ultimately the chain of command is as such: The president of the United States; the attorney general of the United States; our DEA administrator, Terry Cole,' who she said 'is in charge of' the department and is 'working with the chief to ensure that law enforcement officers are allowed to do their jobs in this city.' On Tuesday evening, the White House announced the National Guard would begin to arrive on D.C.'s streets that night. Five Humvees lined the street at the corner of Jefferson Drive and 14th Street SW, between the National Museum of African American History and Culture and the Holocaust Memorial Museum. National Guard troops walked the sidewalks that form walking paths around the monuments, as three DEA agents headed east toward the U.S. Capitol. This racist fearmongering is a smokescreen to distract from his own many failures and crimes. If we're talking about criminals that need removing from this country, let's start with Trump, his entire administration, and every enabler in Congress, statehouses, and boardrooms funding this regime. Because make no mistake, the clown in the seat is not the real danger—it's the regime of hatred paying him to dismantle America from within, to rewind the clock to an era when white supremacy was the law of the land. That's the real threat. The attack on predominantly Black cities is part of a broader strategy. Trump's targeting of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, his hostility toward Black billionaires, his focus on dismantling Black political influence, and his push to gut protections in education, housing, reproductive health, and environmental justice are all interconnected. These efforts are designed to keep Black and Brown Americans economically weakened, socially marginalized, and politically powerless. We've already seen the fallout since the great white heist began; over 300,000 Black women professionals have been laid off. Trump's interests in controlling college athletes' Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, his attacks on Hollywood and the Kennedy Center, and his assaults on Black-led educational and legal institutions all point to one thing—he's targeting the economic, cultural, and political engines of progress in our communities. Trump has already said the quiet part out loud. During his recent interview with CNBC, the disgraced president said that 'the inner city isn't going to work on the farms,' before outlining an indentured labor scheme where brown immigrants 'come to work and leave' because they 'do it naturally.' The over-policing of Black neighborhoods isn't just about intimidation—it's about filling prison beds when immigrant labor won't suffice. It's one step closer to the full authoritarian implementation of Project 2025, which is designed to strip away civil rights, consolidate executive power, and crush any community or institution that resists. Under its provisions, the president could wield near-unilateral authority over the federal government, erasing decades of legal safeguards designed to protect marginalized communities. Source: Andrew Leyden / Getty Project 2025 is not abstract—it is a clear and present danger to Black America across seven critical areas: • Civil Rights: It guts anti-discrimination laws and bars federal agencies from collecting racial demographic data, making it nearly impossible to enforce workplace protections. • Education: It dismantles the Department of Education, allowing discriminatory discipline to run rampant and making higher education even less accessible for Black students. • Political Power: By overhauling the Census and criminalizing election-related activity, it will suppress the Black vote and destabilize multiracial democracy. • Criminal Legal System: It expands the racially biased death penalty and abolishes consent decrees that hold police accountable for civil rights violations. • Housing: It hands affordable housing programs to states with histories of racial discrimination, threatening millions of Black low-income families. • Reproductive Rights: It bans federal access to abortion care, disproportionately harming Black women, who already face dangerously high maternal mortality rates. • Environmental Justice: It shutters the Office of Environmental Justice, allowing environmental racism to further poison Black communities. What we're witnessing is a modernized version of post-Reconstruction America, when Jim Crow laws stripped newly freed Black people of their constitutional rights, locking them out of political power, economic opportunity, and social equality. The playbook is the same—change the laws, control the narrative, suppress the vote, and weaponize the justice system. By invoking images of chaos in Black cities, Trump is not just playing to racist stereotypes—he's setting the stage for federal takeovers of local governance, replacing elected leaders with handpicked loyalists and eroding the very foundation of home rule. Washington, D.C., has already been subjected to this unprecedented seizure of power, and the list of targeted cities is growing. The bottom line is: Trump is lying and Trump is the criminal. The projection in his 'lock them up' chant is as transparent as it is tired. His lies about crime in Black-led cities are more than campaign rhetoric; they're part of a deliberate, well-funded scheme to erode democracy, suppress Black political power, and cement an authoritarian regime. The 'law and order' talk is nothing but code for racial domination and political control, and his repeated targeting of these cities is a direct assault on the progress made by generations of Black Americans. The only people who should be behind bars are the ones orchestrating this dismantling of democracy. It's time to stop treating this as politics as usual. This is a coordinated assault on truth, justice, and equality—and the regime funding the coup are betting we won't fight back. We've seen this move before, and we know how it ends if we don't act. It's time to clean house, America—before there's nothing left to save. America's biggest threat is not the residents of D.C., Baltimore, Chicago, or Oakland—it's the man in the Oval Office who sees democracy as an obstacle, truth as a liability, and the law as something that applies to everyone but himself. SEE ALSO: Black D.C. Is The Stage For Trump's Authoritarian Rehearsal Dean Cain's New Job: Being A Superhero For White Nationalism SEE ALSO Trump Is Targeting Cities With Large Black Populations was originally published on

Data vs. dog whistles: Debunking Trump's manufactured DC emergency
Data vs. dog whistles: Debunking Trump's manufactured DC emergency

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Data vs. dog whistles: Debunking Trump's manufactured DC emergency

Washington, D.C. is not a war zone, but you wouldn't know it from the president's orders. On Monday, President Trump staged a dramatic show of federal force: 800 National Guard troops patrolling D.C. streets, the Metropolitan Police Department seized under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973 and 130 FBI agents ordered to 'take our capital back.' All because of a so-called 'crime emergency.' The real crisis is that Trump is ignoring research-backed crime deterrent strategies and actively gutting programs that actually work to promote public safety. Trump's manufactured emergency is not a public safety strategy — it is political theater. It is a distraction from more pressing national headlines, from the Epstein investigation to ongoing tariff disputes. Although the Home Rule Act grants the president emergency authority, using it to occupy the city in defiance of data-backed realities tramples D.C.'s autonomy, needlessly scares tourists off and sets a perilous precedent for federal overreach. The truth? No emergency exists. Violent crime in D.C. has dropped 26 percent compared to last year, including declines in homicides, carjackings and other serious offenses. Crime analyst Jeff Asher notes that: Murders have steadily declined since late 2023, tracking pre-pandemic trends. Carjackings, after 2023, have fallen back to early-pandemic levels and continue to drop Violent crime overall remains far below its peak in the early 1990s and below levels from a decade ago. This trend isn't unique to D.C. Violent crime nationally is near 50-year lows. So why the military spectacle? Because fear is politically useful. Trump's rhetoric casts D.C. as a city overrun with ' bloodthirsty criminals,' ' drugged-out maniacs ' and homeless people who must be removed. This rhetoric seemingly justifies carceral responses, even though research shows they neither solve crime nor address underlying causes, and often make conditions worse. Trump's emphasis on locking up young people may grab headlines, but it does not produce long-term safety. By invoking exaggerated threats and casting youth, especially Black and Hispanic youth as inherently violent, Trump is resurrecting the long-discredited 'superpredator' myth. Coined by criminologist John Dilulio in the 1990s, this false narrative fueled punitive juvenile sentencing laws and disproportionately criminalized youth in communities of color. While we should be rejecting this toxic legacy, Trump is instead ignoring what works, rooted in evidence, to keep communities safe. Decades of research show that mass incarceration of youth yields no evidence of sustainable crime reduction. What works instead? Mentorship, employment, safe spaces, educational pathways — investments that anchor youth rather than isolate and incarcerate them. Arrest sweeps also won't erase the need for housing, and neither FBI agents nor National Guard troops are equipped to tackle the structural drivers of crime. Crime is fundamentally a problem of social conditions, including housing, jobs, education, healthcare and mental health needs, all well documented. Evidence is clear: permanent supportive housing, robust mental health services, and targeted economic support reduce chronic homelessness. Starve a community, and you invite instability. This 'emergency' was built strategically. Earlier this year, Republicans in Congress gutted D.C.'s budget, freezing funding for everything from violence interruption programs to youth employment initiatives. It's a calculated, exploitative playbook: Cut resources that keep people safe, let the fractures deepen, then point to the damage as proof the city is 'out of control.' Now, Trump leverages this fabricated crisis to justify militarizing the nation's capital, while distracting from dominating headlines that further undermine his credibility. Imagine redirecting even a fraction of the D.C. military deployment budget (estimated to be in the millions) into community investments. Research is unequivocal — these investments lower crime more sustainably than militarized, force-first approaches. These are real solutions grounded in prevention, not political propaganda. The spectacle of soldiers may project power, but effective public safety comes from prevention, not performance. The District doesn't need occupation; it needs investment. We must reject fearmongering and demand an evidence-based response to crime that builds a safer D.C. for all.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store