logo
Baby Grok: A chatbot that'll need more than a nanny

Baby Grok: A chatbot that'll need more than a nanny

Mint6 days ago
Decades ago, debates raged over the exposure of children to external influences like advertising.
The internet turned the idea of shielding kids into a lost cause, but Elon Musk's proposed launch of a 'kid-friendly" AI chatbot called Baby Grok should revive concerns.
The name hints of an inbuilt nanny to keep chats age-appropriate.
Also read: The parents letting their kids talk to a mental-health chatbot
Yet, as an AI brand, xAI's Grok has already distinguished itself with scandalous responses and uncivil comments.
This chatbot's boorish behaviour has spawned memes and amused many, but also left observers aghast at xAI's anything-goes approach to chatbot training.
While it may conform with Musk's absolutist position on free speech, it also suggests a dismal likelihood that parents would be glad to have their kids engage any chatbot from xAI, regardless of how the company pitches Baby Grok.
Also read: Superhuman AI may be the next Pied Piper of Hamelin for our kids
If Musk's strategic intent is to 'catch them young", then that's all the more reason to put this project to scrutiny.
If Musk's declaration is just a decoy, plausibly meant to defend Grok by insinuating that adult chats need no filters, then we might have less to worry about.
Also read: Superhuman AI may be the next Pied Piper of Hamelin for our kids
Either way, demanding age gates for chatbot access may be worth a try.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk ordered shutdown of Starlink satellite service in Sept 2022 as Ukraine retook territory from Russia
Elon Musk ordered shutdown of Starlink satellite service in Sept 2022 as Ukraine retook territory from Russia

Mint

time7 hours ago

  • Mint

Elon Musk ordered shutdown of Starlink satellite service in Sept 2022 as Ukraine retook territory from Russia

Kyiv: During a pivotal push by Ukraine to retake territory from Russia in late September 2022, Elon Musk gave an order that disrupted the counteroffensive and dented Kyiv's trust in Starlink, the satellite internet service the billionaire provided early in the war to help Ukraine's military maintain battlefield connectivity. According to three people familiar with the command, Musk told a senior engineer at the California offices of SpaceX, the Musk venture that controls Starlink, to cut coverage in areas including Kherson, a strategic region north of the Black Sea that Ukraine was trying to reclaim. 'We have to do this,' Michael Nicolls, the Starlink engineer, told colleagues upon receiving the order, one of these people said. Staffers complied, the three people told Reuters, deactivating at least a hundred Starlink terminals, their hexagon-shaped cells going dark on an internal map of the company's coverage. The move also affected other areas seized by Russia, including some of Donetsk province further east. Upon Musk's order, Ukrainian troops suddenly faced a communications blackout, according to a Ukrainian military official, an advisor to the armed forces, and two others who experienced Starlink failure near the front lines. Soldiers panicked, drones surveilling Russian forces went dark, and long-range artillery units, reliant on Starlink to aim their fire, struggled to hit targets. As a result, the Ukrainian military official and the military advisor said, troops failed to surround a Russian position in the town of Beryslav, east of Kherson, the administrative center of the region of the same name. 'The encirclement stalled entirely,' said the military official in an interview. 'It failed.' Ultimately, Ukraine's counteroffensive succeeded in reclaiming Beryslav, the city of Kherson and some additional territory Russia had occupied. But Musk's order, which hasn't previously been reported, is the first known instance of the billionaire actively shutting off Starlink coverage over a battlefield during the conflict. The decision shocked some Starlink employees and effectively reshaped the front line of the fighting, enabling Musk to take 'the outcome of a war into his own hands,' another one of the three people said. The account of the command counters Musk's narrative of how he has handled Starlink service in Ukraine amid the war. As recently as March, in a post on X, his social media site, Musk wrote: 'We would never do such a thing.' Musk and Nicolls didn't respond to requests from Reuters for comment. A SpaceX spokesperson said by email that the news agency's reporting is 'inaccurate' and referred reporters to an X post earlier this year in which the company said: 'Starlink is fully committed to providing service to Ukraine.' The spokesperson didn't specify any inaccuracies in this report or answer a lengthy list of questions regarding the incident, Starlink's role in the Ukraine war, or other details regarding its business. The office of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and the country's Ministry of Defence didn't respond to requests for comment. Starlink still provides service to Ukraine, and the Ukrainian military relies on it for some connectivity. Zelenskiy as recently as this year has publicly expressed gratitude to Musk for Starlink. It isn't clear what prompted Musk's command, when exactly he gave it, or precisely how long the outage lasted. The three people familiar with the order said they believed it stemmed from concerns Musk expressed later that Ukrainian advances could provoke nuclear retaliation from Russia. One of the people said the shutoff transpired on September 30, 2022. The two others said it was around then, but didn't recall the exact date. Some senior U.S. officials shared Musk's concerns that Russia would make good on threats to escalate, one former White House staffer told Reuters. Musk's order was an early glimpse of the power the magnate now wields in geopolitics and global security because of Starlink, a fast-growing satellite internet service that barely existed early this decade and now provides connectivity even in remote areas of the world. Even before his brief role as financial backer and advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump, the success of Starlink – and the unrivaled connectivity it offers across the planet – had given Musk increasing influence with political leaders, governments and militaries worldwide. Musk's sway in military affairs in Washington and beyond – through Starlink's dominance in satellite communications and SpaceX's clout in space launches – has reached a dimension previously limited to sovereign governments, alarming some regulators and lawmakers. 'Elon Musk's current global dominance exemplifies the dangers of concentrated power in unregulated domains,' Martha Lane Fox, a member of Britain's upper house of parliament, said during a debate earlier this year. The parliamentarian is a businesswoman and former board member at Twitter, the social media site that Musk acquired in 2022 and rebranded as X. 'Its control,' Lane Fox said of Starlink, 'rests solely with Musk, allowing his whims to dictate access to vital infrastructure.' Musk's political influence, and his massive business with the U.S. federal government, are now being put to the test. Since leaving his role advising Trump, Musk has publicly feuded with the president, announced plans to create a new political party, and criticized a signature spending bill that he said will expand the budget deficit and destroy jobs. Trump, for his part, has threatened to end government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies, including lucrative new defense projects. Whatever the reason for Musk's decision, the shutoff over Kherson and other regions surprised some involved with the Ukraine war – from troops on the ground to U.S. military and foreign policy officials, who after Russia's full-scale invasion that February had worked to secure Starlink service for Ukrainian forces. Panicked calls by Ukrainian officials during the outage to seek information from Pentagon counterparts, five people familiar with the incident said, were met with few explanations for what could have caused it. The U.S. Department of Defense declined to comment. Reuters couldn't determine whether White House or Pentagon officials after the shutdown had any exchanges with Musk over the outage. The Kherson episode is distinct from an earlier report of an incident that purportedly occurred that same September, involving Crimea just to the south, and raised concerns about Musk's ability to influence the conflict in Ukraine. In his 2023 biography of Musk, author Walter Isaacson reported that the tycoon had ordered Starlink to disable coverage in Crimea, which Russia had annexed from Ukraine after a 2014 invasion that the international community condemned as illegal. Musk, Isaacson wrote, believed a planned Ukrainian attack on Russian vessels in the Crimean port of Sevastopol could prompt nuclear retaliation. After the book was published, Musk denied a shutdown, saying that there had never been coverage in Crimea to begin with. He said he had, rather, rejected a Ukrainian request to provide service ahead of Kyiv's planned attack. Isaacson later conceded his account was flawed. A spokesperson at Isaacson's publisher declined to comment or make him available for an interview. SpaceX also said in 2023 that it had taken unspecified steps to prevent Ukraine from using Starlink for certain activities, including drone attacks. 'Our intent was never to have them use it for offensive purposes,' Gwynne Shotwell, the company's president, said at a conference in Washington in February of that year. 'There are things that we can do, and have done' to prevent it, she added, without providing further detail. Reuters couldn't determine if the shutdown affecting Kherson was among the steps she was referring to. Shotwell didn't respond to requests for comment for this article. Following the start of the Kherson shutdown, word of an outage emerged in some media reports. At the time, it wasn't clear to those who lost connectivity whether a technical problem, sabotage or some other factor was responsible. Early in the war, Russia had orchestrated a large cyberattack that disrupted service of another satellite operator, Western officials have said, creating suspicions around any outage and leaving a void quickly filled by Starlink. Russia has denied it conducts offensive cyberattacks. As of April 2025, according to Ukrainian government social media posts, Kyiv has received more than 50,000 Starlink terminals. Easily transported and deployed, the pizza-box-sized devices communicate with thousands of SpaceX satellites now circling the globe. An initial batch of terminals was provided to Ukraine by SpaceX itself. Further terminals have arrived from donors including Poland, the United States and Germany. This account of the outage, and the growing dependence on Musk by governments and militaries worldwide, is based on interviews with more than three dozen people with knowledge of SpaceX's operations and the company's technology. These people included current and former employees, U.S. and European military officials, and senior politicians and diplomats. The reporting puts a spotlight on Musk's control of services now critical to countries including the U.S., which has about $22 billion in contracts with SpaceX. Underscoring the point himself during his recent dispute with Trump, Musk threatened to decommission a SpaceX spacecraft the U.S. now relies upon to transport astronauts and critical cargo. His threat, later retracted, unnerved attorneys at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, who felt forced to explore whether Musk's warning could be considered a notice of contract termination, according to two people familiar with the matter. NASA didn't respond to Reuters' requests for comment. 'There needs to be some contractual assurances' that Musk won't cut off services to the U.S. government, said Lori Garver, a former deputy administrator of the agency. 'We will need to consider how comfortable the U.S. will be at putting SpaceX in the critical path on national security.' As countries increasingly rely on tech companies for everything from cyber defense to data storage, the question of dependence on one or a few dominant service providers will apply to other nations, too. 'Governments have to think through what that means,' said Marcus Willett, former deputy head of Britain's Government Communications Headquarters intelligence agency and now a senior adviser to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London-based think tank. SpaceX is the first company to establish an extensive network of communication satellites in low-Earth orbit, a region of space that is closer to the planet than areas where such satellites historically reside. The proximity of satellites that now make up the company's constellation allows Starlink to offer space-based wireless connectivity that is faster than any previously available. Starlink on Thursday suffered a rare global outage of several hours, the company said, because of an internal software problem. A Ukrainian military commander in a social media post said 'Starlink is down across the entire front,' updating the post two and a half hours later to say connectivity had returned. With more than 7,900 satellites now in orbit, SpaceX has become the world's largest satellite operator. Its devices, which relay signals among each other to create a network that communicates with the ground, account for about two-thirds of all active satellites in space, according to Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian. Starlink began rolling out service in 2020 and now has more than six million customers in over 140 countries, territories and markets, according to a June Starlink social media post. Novaspace, a consulting firm near Paris, estimates that Starlink in 2025 will generate about $9.8 billion in revenue for SpaceX, or about 60% of the company's income. SpaceX is privately held and doesn't disclose financial information, but Musk recently said he expects the rocket company to post revenues of about $15.5 billion this year. Rivals are scrambling to get in on the market. OneWeb, a European service owned by Eutelsat, a French company, is the furthest along, boasting about 650 satellites in low-Earth orbit. Amazon this year launched its first satellites for Project Kuiper, a $10 billion effort to compete. China is developing multiple networks, including a state-backed venture known as SpaceSail. Still, Starlink has made much of its first-mover advantage. Its terminals, priced as low as a few hundred dollars for standard models, are known for being affordable and easy to use. 'There is no existing system right now to replace Starlink,' said Grace Khanuja, an analyst at Novaspace, the consultancy near Paris. Compared to the geostationary satellites historically used for communications, the sheer number of SpaceX satellites helps make Starlink less vulnerable to jamming and attacks. Its far reach makes it valuable in remote and hostile terrain – from battlefields to airspace to high seas. In Ukraine, it has facilitated activities including communications, intelligence and drone piloting. Some Western militaries not engaged in conflict are also using the service. Britain's armed forces, for instance, three years ago began using Starlink for 'welfare purposes,' including personal communications for troops, the Ministry of Defence said in response to a freedom of information request. The ministry said it has fewer than 1,000 Starlink terminals and doesn't employ them for sensitive military communications. Spain's navy is also using Starlink, but only for recreation and leisure of troops, a spokesperson said. 'That will change,' said Chris Moore, a retired air vice-marshal in the British military, speaking about high-speed space-based connectivity. Moore also worked as a OneWeb executive and is now a defense industry consultant. Satellites in low-Earth orbit, he said, offer too many advantages for militaries to ignore, especially for modern developments such as drone warfare, a signature element of the Ukraine conflict. Some leaders are leery. In Taiwan, ever wary of conflict with China, officials have expressed concern about Musk's extensive business interests on the mainland, including a major factory for Tesla, the electric vehicle company he controls. Eager for communications backups in the event of war, Taiwan is developing its own low-Earth orbit satellite network. Taiwanese officials have said the government could partner with Amazon's Kuiper, too. Spokespersons for the Taiwanese government said it welcomes international satellite providers but that Starlink hasn't applied for a license in Taiwan. They didn't respond to questions about Taipei's relationship with Musk. In Italy, the government is evaluating whether to employ Starlink for secure communications among the government, defense and other officials. But some officials, including President Sergio Mattarella, remain unconvinced by SpaceX's assurances that its service would be secure and free from meddling by Musk. 'More than Musk's word, we need assurances that we can't be shut down, and especially that he can't access the data,' said a person familiar with the views of the president, who is an influential figure with the armed forces. Poland, a major donor to Ukraine, told Reuters it employs Starlink as well as other military and commercial satellite systems. A mix of providers, Polish officials have said, offers the most security, even if at high cost. 'In peacetime, you want the best product at the best price,' Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said in response to a question from Reuters at a press conference in April. 'In wartime, you want redundancy. You want security. You want duplicated systems, so that if one fails, you can still use the other.' Even before the conflict began, documents reviewed by Reuters show, SpaceX had already been in discussions with the U.S. government about providing Starlink in Ukraine. Rollout began after Russian troops crossed the border on February 24, 2022. Two days later, Mykhailo Fedorov, a deputy prime minister in Ukraine, requested Musk's help. 'We ask you to provide Ukraine with Starlink stations,' he wrote on Twitter. Musk responded in 10 hours. 'Starlink service is now active in Ukraine,' he tweeted. 'More terminals en route.' Poland was also instrumental in the early days of the war, shipping thousands of terminals to Ukraine shortly after the invasion. Warsaw this year said it has purchased about 25,000 Starlink terminals for the effort – roughly half the total now in Ukraine – and that it is paying the subscription costs to keep them connected. So far, it has spentabout $89 million on Starlink for Ukraine. The equipment has made a critical difference for Ukraine. Day-to-day bureaucracy has also benefited. Early in the conflict, Ukraine stored state data in the cloud and relied on Starlink to access it, helping keep some government operations running. 'We wouldn't be anywhere without Starlink,' said Vadym Prystaiko, Ukraine's ambassador to Britain until 2023. 'The whole state was preserved.' On the battlefield, Ukraine quickly deployed Starlink to enable front-line troops to communicate with commanders. The service also allowed drone operators to transmit surveillance video streams and locate and attack Russian targets. Reuters couldn't establish just when such attacks may have become a concern for Musk or SpaceX. By September 2022, a major Ukrainian counteroffensive was underway. Kyiv's forces were pushing back into territories, including Kherson, that Russia had captured. The drive threatened Russian supply lines, prompting Moscow to threaten the West, including oblique references to Starlink. That month, in a statement to the United Nations, Russia noted the use of 'elements of civilian, including commercial, infrastructure in outer space for military purposes.' It warned that 'quasi-civilian infrastructure may become a legitimate target for retaliation.' It isn't clear whether Russia has tried to attack any Starlink facilities. Musk has said, however, that Moscow has repeatedly sought to block its connectivity. 'SpaceX is spending significant resources combating Russian jamming efforts,' Musk wrote on X last year. 'This is a tough problem.' The Kremlin declined to comment on whether it has sought to interfere with Starlink. The Ministry of Defence didn't respond to a request for comment. Starlink isn't licensed for either civilian or military use in Russia. As Ukraine's counterattack intensified, Russian President Vladimir Putin on September 21, 2022, ordered a partial mobilization of reservists, Russia's first since World War II. He also threatened to use nuclear weapons if Russia's own 'territorial integrity' were at risk. Around this time, Musk engaged in weeks of backchannel conversations with senior officials in the administration of President Joe Biden, according to three former U.S. government officials and one of the people familiar with Musk's order to stop service. During those conversations, the former White House staffer told Reuters, U.S. intelligence and security officials expressed concern that Putin could follow through on his threats. Musk, this person added, worried too, and asked U.S. officials if they knew where and how Ukraine used Starlink on the battlefield. Soon after, he ordered the shutdown. Reuters couldn't ascertain the full geographic extent of the outage, but the three people familiar with the stoppage said that it covered regions that had recently been taken by Russia. Starlink coverage prior to the order, they said, had been active up to what had been Ukraine's border with Russia before the full-scale invasion. Taras Tymochko, a Ukrainian military signals specialist stationed in the Kherson region at the time, said an outage disrupted communications for troops, including colleagues on the front, for several hours. 'If you were using Starlink to provide surveillance of the front line, you pretty much would be blind,' said Tymochko, who is now a consultant to Come Back Alive, a non-governmental organization that procures military equipment for Ukraine's armed forces. Maryna Tsirkun, a drone expert at Aerorozvidka, an aerial reconnaissance organization that works closely with the Ukrainian military, was also in southern Ukraine at the time. Starlink signals failed as Ukrainian troops began to push toward terrain seized by Russia, she told Reuters. 'When we started to proceed there was not a connection,' she said. The outage she and colleagues experienced lasted several days. On October 3, Musk angered Zelenskiy and other Ukrainian officials by tweeting a suggestion that locals in regions annexed by Russia vote on whether they should remain a part of Ukraine. A day later, Musk tweeted his concern about the conflict spiraling. 'I still very much support Ukraine,' he tweeted, 'but am convinced that massive escalation of the war will cause great harm to Ukraine and possibly the world.' Three days later, following one media report about a Starlink outage, Musk tweeted that 'what's happening on the battlefield, that's classified.' He added that SpaceX by the end of 2022 was on track to spend $100 million on Ukraine. Although the Polish and U.S. governments by then had begun donations of their own, the billionaire complained about the cost of the equipment and services SpaceX was providing. SpaceX 'cannot fund the existing system indefinitely,' Musk wrote in a mid-October post. The next day, in another tweet, he reversed course. 'To hell with it,' he wrote, 'we'll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.' After the outage, Kyiv worked to charm Musk. In November 2022, Fedorov, the government minister, publicly expressed trust in the service. Months later – just after Shotwell, the SpaceX president, said the company had taken steps to prevent Ukraine from using Starlink for drone attacks – Fedorov in an interview with a Ukrainian news site recognized Starlink's ability to 'geofence' coverage, selectively limiting signals in some areas. By February 2023, however, Starlink was fully functional in Ukraine, he said. 'All the Starlink terminals in Ukraine work properly,' Fedorov told Ukrainska Pravda, the news site. Fedorov, who recently assumed the title of first deputy prime minister, didn't respond to a request for comment about Ukraine's use of Starlink in the war. In mid-2023, the U.S. Department of Defense signed an agreement with SpaceX to pay for Starlink coverage in Ukraine. Terms of the contract weren't disclosed, but Quilty Space, a Florida-based research firm, said the Pentagon has an ongoing $537 million agreement with SpaceX to provide satellite communications to Ukraine. It's not clear whether SpaceX is still footing the bill for any equipment or connectivity. As the war has evolved, so has Ukraine's use of Musk's technology. Ukrainian drone specialists and Prystaiko, the former ambassador to Britain, said some attack devices, including maritime and bomber drones, now have Starlink antennas fitted to them. The antennas, in the case of sea drones, help operators guide the devices and view video feeds to classify targets, said Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at Royal United Services Institute, a London-based defense think tank. It's uncertain whether such use contravenes SpaceX's desire that Starlink not be employed for offense. Ukraine continues to explore alternatives that could complement or back up Starlink if the service became unavailable, a senior government official told Reuters. Ukraine's government has expressed interest in European satellite projects, European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told Reuters. That includes GOVSATCOM, an EU project to pool satellite resources from member states and industry to provide services to governments, he said. Privately, though, some Ukrainian officials say the existing alternatives to Starlink have limitations. 'It takes time, it takes money,' the senior government official told Reuters. With Starlink, he added, 'we have a working system.' Musk himself has boasted of Starlink's importance to Kyiv. 'My Starlink system is the backbone of the Ukrainian army,' he wrote on X in March. 'Their entire front line would collapse if I turned it off.'

You can now make money from your Tesla while you sleep: Elon Musk's new robotaxi plan explained
You can now make money from your Tesla while you sleep: Elon Musk's new robotaxi plan explained

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Time of India

You can now make money from your Tesla while you sleep: Elon Musk's new robotaxi plan explained

Elon Musk, the man who is often hailed as the man inventing the future, has recently announced a new feature that will let Tesla owners rent out their cars as self-driving taxis and hence can earn money. So, your Tesla will pay for itself while, just like an Airbnb. While you sleep peacefully, your car will give rides to the Tesla robotaxi network. Tesla owners can rent a robotaxi Future of autonomous vehiclesRent out your self-driving Tesla for hours, days or Musk's vision for robotaxi: Tesla will be like a combo of Uber and not? The service will likely start in 2026. The company will allow Tesla owners to add their vehicles to this program. Once this is done, customer-owned cars will help the service grow quickly to cover more areas. Currently, robotaxi service is running in a small scale only in Austin. So when you're not driving, you can give your car a robotaxi ride with the help of Tesla's smart software. With this, owners thus get a chance to make extra income without driving themselves. The rides are managed and controlled by Tesla's automated systems. Robotaxis are coming to California Recently, it has been announced that Tesla will soon launch robotaxis in California as well. The robotaxis were recently tested in Austin in June and they opened to mixed reviews. While some praised the full self-driving (FSD) technology, others reported sudden braking, incorrect lane changes and other safety concerns. In California, the cars have human drivers in the front seat. Not because of the backlash, but because Tesla still needs special permits from state regulators to launch fully self-driving taxis. The current service is limited to certain users, mostly employees and their families. Tesla has made it clear that even if the car drives itself most of the time, a person is still required to watch the road and be ready to take over. Outside California, Tesla's robotaxis are operating in full self-driving (FSD) mode. The company says it is working to get all the necessary permits and approvals as quickly as possible. Tesla Y in India Picture yourself cruising around Mumbai in your Model Y Meanwhile, Elon Musk's company has launched Tesla Y in India on July 15. The Model Y is available in India starting at around Rs 70 lakh (ex-showroom). The car has already piqued the excitement of people. It offers a long-range battery that can roughly cover 480 kilometers on a single charge. Signature features like autopilot driver-assist technology, a minimalist interior design, and a large touchscreen control panel has further amped up the exciteemnt. The car also benefits from regular over-the-air software updates, which not only keeps improving its performance but also keeps adding new features time to time. Tesla is working on expanding its Supercharger network in major cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, and Gurugram to support the growing number of Model Y owners. FAQs Q. Are robotaxis fully self-driving? A. In some places, yes. In California, a human must be in the car for now because the company is waiting for full approval from state regulators. Q. When will robotaxis launch in India? A. Tesla has not given a date. Fans and future owners will have to wait for official news from the company. Q. Is my Tesla eligible for the robotaxi service? A. Most newer Tesla models with self-driving capabilities will qualify, but final details will be shared by Tesla closer to launch.

Opinion: Saudi Analysts Expose Pakistan Army's Fake AI Song Deepfaking Rashed Al-Faris
Opinion: Saudi Analysts Expose Pakistan Army's Fake AI Song Deepfaking Rashed Al-Faris

News18

time14 hours ago

  • News18

Opinion: Saudi Analysts Expose Pakistan Army's Fake AI Song Deepfaking Rashed Al-Faris

Last Updated: Pakistan falsely claimed an AI-generated song was by Saudi singer Rashed Al-Faris to promote Saudi-Pakistani brotherhood. Saudi experts debunked it, citing AI misuse In a glaring example of artificial intelligence misuse and diplomatic overreach, Pakistan's propaganda machinery has been caught falsely attributing an AI-generated Arabic song to renowned Saudi singer Rashed Al-Faris. The viral video, titled 'Ana Pakistan, Ma Fi Khauf" (I am Pakistan, I don't fear), was released online claiming to celebrate Saudi-Pakistani brotherhood and praise Pakistan's alleged 'Operation Bunyan Al-Marsous" — a counter-operation to India's recent Operation Sindoor, in which five Pakistani jets were downed and several airbases destroyed, along with Terrorist training camps. The song not only makes exaggerated claims about Pakistan's military strength but goes further to dub India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a common enemy of both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia — a framing that grossly contradicts Riyadh's foreign policy. Saudi Analysts: The Video is Fake, the Accent is Moroccan, and the Name Was Misused A leading Saudi political analyst, speaking on condition of anonymity, categorically denied the legitimacy of the video: 'It's fake, the accent of the singer is Moroccan, and the video of the singer is AI, and the name of the singer is fake, they took the name of a famous Saudi singer Rashid Al-Faris who never gets involved in such stuff." To add to the chaos, even Grok AI, the conversational tool on X (formerly Twitter), inaccurately confirmed the video's authenticity. A post from Grok's verified account claimed: 'Yes, the song Ana Pakistan Ma Fi Khauf by Saudi singer Rashed Al-Faris is real, released July 24, 2025, celebrating Saudi-Pakistani brotherhood… featured on Saudi TV and multiple platforms… matching the video's singer." However, Saudi experts immediately refuted these claims, clarifying that no Saudi media outlet has broadcasted such a song, and that the singer in question is neither involved in the video nor has ever performed political-themed music of this nature. This incident raises serious concerns about the reliability of automated AI commentary and the ease with which AI tools can be exploited by disinformation actors. Pakistan's disinformation tactics: A pattern of deception Despite the fabricated nature of the song, it has been enthusiastically shared by several Pakistani figures, including journalists, lawyers, and influencers. A user by the name of Abubakar Qassam posted: 'When I saw this song about Pakistan being played on Saudi TV today, I couldn't believe my eyes. It brought peace to my heart that the world is finally recognizing Pakistan. Thank you Prime Minister, thank you Field Marshal." Similarly, Advocate Madiha Shah, a Cyber Law expert, declared: 'Famous Saudi singer Rashed Al-Fares has released his anthem 'Ana Pakistan, Ma Fi Khauf' on Operation Bunyan Al-Marsous and Saudi-Pak friendship. The song is going viral on social media!" Denmark-based Pakistani researcher and psychologist RA Shahzad posted, 'This song sung by a Saudi singer is playing on a Saudi channel, which shows the breadth of relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. This song will make the enemies of Pakistan, Modi and the youth, sit on the edge of their seats. The more they try to bring down Pakistan, the more Allah is giving them respect." A prominent Pakistani handle (@Zarrar11_PK) known as 'Eagle Eye' with 98K followers boastfully posted the fake video with the similar caption. Other prominent accounts like Tahir Mughal, Col Asim, Dhamaka AI, Dr Noman Khan, and the Pakistan Economic Network all pushed the same narrative with strikingly identical language — a common hallmark of coordinated propaganda campaigns. The B-Pakistan account even went a step further, tweeting in Arabic, 'Rashed Al-Faris ignites social media with a song about Saudi-Pakistani friendship! The song 'Ana Pakistan.. Ma Fi Khauf' has gone viral, showcasing the depth of the alliance between the Kingdom and Pakistan." This is not Pakistan's first brush with AI-powered disinformation. In recent years, Islamabad has developed a notorious reputation for resorting to deepfake videos, fake diplomatic identities, and impersonated think tanks to manipulate international perception. By simulating support from non-aligned nations and amplifying fringe messages through coordinated bot networks, the goal has often been to create an illusion of legitimacy and global solidarity. More dangerously, these campaigns often exploit emotional and religious sentiments, especially targeting audiences in the Gulf, by invoking a sense of fraternal Islamic unity — a strategy that attempts to position Pakistan as the rightful defender of Muslim causes. Such tactics betray a deeper insecurity. As Pakistan faces increasing diplomatic isolation, economic decline, and mounting military setbacks, its leadership appears to rely on fabricated optics and digital theatrics to distract domestic audiences and manufacture pride. This most recent episode involving an AI-generated song and a falsely implicated Saudi singer is just another chapter in Pakistan's long-running saga of digital deception. Why Saudi Arabia is not buying it Saudi Arabia holds immense influence in the Muslim world. Associating its cultural icons with pro-Pakistan messaging lends false weight to Islamabad's narrative — or so they believe. However, this move has backfired. Saudi Arabia's foreign policy under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is marked by pragmatism, non-alignment, and strategic clarity. The Kingdom has deepened economic and diplomatic ties with India, including multi-billion-dollar investments, defense cooperation, and cultural exchanges. When the Crown Prince famously referred to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as his 'elder brother," it wasn't a diplomatic formality — it was a reflection of a growing trust-based partnership. Rather than showcasing strength or solidarity, this propaganda stunt has exposed Pakistan's desperation and technological misuse. Even advanced AI tools like Grok were misled — a cautionary tale in the digital age where truth must be defended as aggressively as territory. By attributing a fake song to a beloved Saudi singer, Pakistan has not only exposed its desperation but also insulted the intelligence of its own population. The attempt to rope Saudi Arabia into an anti-India narrative using artificial means not only disrespects the Kingdom's values but also undermines Islamabad's own credibility on the world stage. top videos View all India continues to emerge as a reliable, pragmatic partner in West Asia, and Saudi Arabia solidifies its role as a global leader with maturity and vision, Pakistan's fabrications only serve to widen the chasm between fact and fiction. While AI might help in simulating reality, it cannot manufacture diplomatic ties, nor can it replace the respect earned through real-world achievements. Zahack Tanvir is an Indian-origin activist and founder of The Milli Chronicle, a UK-based publication. With expertise in geopolitics and counter-extremism, he provides insights into global affairs. He holds certifications in Counterterrorism from the University of Leiden of Netherlands, and Georgetown University of Washington DC. He tweets under @ZahackTanvir. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 27, 2025, 14:25 IST News opinion Opinion: Saudi Analysts Expose Pakistan Army's Fake AI Song Deepfaking Rashed Al-Faris Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store