
Howell returns to work as county elections seek stability
Howell returned to the job May 1 after she was put on administrative leave March 31. At the time, county Clerk and Recorder Corinna Brown didn't say why Howell was put on leave, but said her office would be managing the elections with help from election office assistant Sierra Gustin.
Howell spoke to The Western News on Election Night, Tuesday, May 6, about the situation and her return to the job she was hired to do in May 2023.
"I'm happy for the voters and for the support I received," Howell said. "It's been really hard not knowing what would happen, but now it's time to move forward and do the best we can. A lot of people stepped up to make sure this election was held."
Howell also provided a report at the county commissioners meeting Wednesday.
"Corrina (Brown) blessed us with a good handoff from the work she and her staff had done prior to the election," Howell told the commissioners. "We had 246 ballots that were undeliverable, many to seasonal addresses, and we had 55 ballots from Libby and 27 from Troy that were postmarked too late, but we can't control that."
Howell believes her return to her job has a lot to do with a measure introduced by Montana House of Representatives member Tom Millett, R-Marion. Millett represents District 2, which includes sections of Lincoln and Flathead Counties.
House Bill 293, introduced Jan. 22, sought to have a election administrator report directly to the governing body of the county, specifically the county commissioners, as opposed to reporting to the clerk and recorder.
"I'm glad that HB 293 was overwhelmingly passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor because it clarified the law (MCA 13-1-301) thereby allowing the Commissioners to make a well informed decision as to the best path forward for the administration of Lincoln County elections," Millett said in a statement to The Western News.
According to Montana Code Annotated 13-1-301, in part, the county clerk and recorder of each county is the election administrator unless the governing body of the county designates another official or appoints an election administrator.
In addition, the election administrator is responsible for the administration of all procedures relating to registration of electors and conduct of elections, shall keep all county records relating to elector registration and elections, and is the primary point of contact for the county with respect to the statewide voter registration list and implementation of other provisions of applicable federal law governing elections.
District 1 Commissioner Brent Teske is pleased something was worked out.
"I'm happy to have a less-conflicted resolution," Teske said. "We didn't find out about HB 293 until Senator Cuffe told us.
Howell said reporting to the commissioners and making decisions together will be better.
"The rotation is set so that I'll report to Brent (Teske) first, then Jim Hammons and finally, Noel Duram," Howell said. "My hope is for each of them to understand elections better and when they make a decision about a question I have, I'll have to stick to it."
Howell's assistant, Sierra Gustin, will work full-time in the election department when they are preparing to hold an election. But during slower times, she'll work in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, which is dealing with not having enough help to perform its usual tasks.
Millett's bill saw little opposition in the House and Senate and was signed May 1 by Gov. Greg Gianforte.
All parties are hopeful the recent resolution will bring stability to a department that has seen more than its fair share of trouble since 2020.
Howell was hired to run the county's elections in May 2023 following the resignation of Paula Buff. Buff, former Clerk and Recorder Robin Benson and another election office employee resigned in March 2023 following heightened tension between them and former County Commissioner Josh Letcher.
Letcher alleged Buff falsified election documents at a March 1, 2023 meeting, though Benson said she had no idea of what documents Letcher was referring to and was not provided a copy of any specific documents.
Buff later sued the county, alleging she was constructively discharged.
"Constructive discharge" means the voluntary termination of employment by an employee because of a situation created by an act or omission of the employer which an objective, reasonable person would find so intolerable that voluntary termination is the only reasonable alternative. Buff also alleged acts and omissions by the county were "malicious."
Buff's case is set for a jury trial in December.
Brown was appointed to take over the Clerk and Recorder job in March 2023 and won election to the position in 2024.
While they seem ready to move forward, Brown and Howell have butted heads previously. In July 2024, Howell sought a split from the Clerk and Recorder's Office. She cited various reasons at a July 10, 2024, commission meeting, including election security and to avoid confusion for voters.
Howell is the fourth person to hold the election administrator title since 2020. Buff was on the job from 2021 to 2023. Before her, Chris Nelson served from August 2020 to November 2020. He resigned following the general election that year.
Nelson replaced longtime election administrator Leigh Riggleman, who resigned in 2020 while the commissioners were indecisive over holding an all mail-in election, meant to avoid the spread of the coronavirus, or a traditional poll election.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Colorado lawmakers tap reserve, end tax breaks to fill budget gap
Democratic leaders at the state Capitol outlined plans Tuesday to increase taxes, cut services and tap reserve funds to close a $1 billion budget hole spurred by President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." State of play: The legislation will generate fierce debate about how the state should manage its money when lawmakers return Thursday for a special legislative session. The core of the Democratic plan eliminates a handful of corporate tax breaks worth a combined $300 million to $400 million. The five-bill package will limit the business tax deduction, remove corporate tax breaks on foreign-sold goods and crack down on corporate profit shifting to tax haven countries. The intrigue: The most controversial proposal is lowering the state's 15% financial reserve by $200 million to $300 million, dropping it to 13% at a time when fiscal analysts are warning about a potential recession. Yes, but: Those moves are not enough to close a roughly $750 million gap. Instead, lawmakers will punt $300 million in spending cuts to balance the $44 billion state budget to the governor in consultation with the legislative Joint Budget Committee in the coming weeks. The governor is expected to move quickly to implement cuts by Sept. 1. What they're saying: "We're looking forward to rolling up our sleeves and making sure we can maintain strong fiscal stewardship here in Colorado," Gov. Jared Polis told Axios Denver in a recent interview. Between the lines: More than most states, Colorado is susceptible to changes in federal taxes because they affect state income taxes. The federal tax bill, known as H.R. 1, reduced the state's individual and corporate income taxes by an estimated $1.2 billion, according to the governor's office. The other side: Republican state lawmakers are touting the cuts from Trump's tax bill and pushing back against Democratic efforts to generate new tax revenue, suggesting spending cuts are what is most needed. Sen. Byron Pelton (R-Sterling) plans to introduce legislation requiring voter approval for any bill that changes state tax liability caused by federal tax law. What's next: Beyond the budget, Democratic lawmakers also plan to introduce legislation to stabilize the state's health care marketplaces amid projections that thousands of residents could lose their insurance and enable Planned Parenthood to accept Medicaid payments.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan
Republican state legislators in California filed suit on Tuesday to block a mid-year redistricting plan meant to counter Texas's effort to redraw congressional district lines. The emergency petition argues that the process being used in the California assembly violates laws requiring a 30-day period between the introduction of legislation and voting on it. 'Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented instead with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature,' states the filing on behalf of senators Tony Strickland and Suzette Martinez Valladares, assemblymember Tri Ta and assemblymember Kathryn Sanchez. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, announced his state's redistricting plan last week in terms on social media mocking Donald Trump's flamboyance, intent on using the voting power of the US's most populous state to counteract Texas's redrawn map, which would be expected to deliver a net gain of five congressional seats to Republicans in 2026. Newsom praised the California effort on Monday, calling it a necessary response to Trump's influence over redistricting in Texas and other Republican-led states. 'We are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power,' Newsom said, adding that the proposal gives Californians 'a choice to fight back'. To do so in time for a special election in November, the state assembly must pass the plan this year. As has been a common practice near the end of legislative terms, California lawmakers took an existing bill introduced earlier in the session and gutted it of its language, replacing it with legislation that overrides the state's neutral redistricting commission to present maps to voters. On Tuesday, a spokesperson for Newsom said the governor was unconcerned with the legal challenge seeking to blunt his redistricting effort. 'Republicans are filing a deeply unserious (and truly laughable) lawsuit to stop Americans from voting?' Brandon Richards, the spokesperson, said. 'We're neither surprised, nor worried.' The Mandeep Dhillon law firm filing the suit was previously owned by Harmeet Dhillon, who is now assistant attorney general overseeing the US Department of Justice civil rights division. Dhillon was known for her efforts to sue California's university system to overturn policies which barred controversial conservative speakers from appearing. She sold her firm to her brother Mandeep Singh Dhillon after Trump nominated her to take over civil rights enforcement in his administration. The suit does not challenge 'gut and amend' in principle, but rather asks the court 'to enforce an external constitutional constraint against the Legislature to protect the people's rights'. Internal polling presented to lawmakers showed voters favored the measure 52% to 41%, with 7% undecided, according to the local television station KCRA. Republicans in California condemned the proposal as an assault on the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission and said they plan to introduce legislation that advocates for creating similar map-drawing bodies in all 50 states. 'Governor Newsom, this is nothing more than a power grab,' Strickland said during a Monday news conference in Sacramento. He warned the redistricting tit-for-tat sets a dangerous precedent that will not be easily undone. 'The Golden Gate Bridge toll was supposed to be temporary,' he added. 'You're still paying the toll.' The legislature could hold floor votes to send the measure to voters for approval as soon as Thursday, KCRA reported. House Republicans currently hold a razor-thin three-seat majority in the US House and Trump has pushed to redraw district boundaries ahead of next year's midterm elections, in which the president's party typically loses seats. Republicans are also poised to redraw congressional districts in Ohio, Missouri and Florida, as well as potentially Indiana.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here are the Republicans targeted by California's proposed redistricting
Democrats have proposed a new congressional map for California that could offset Republican efforts to redistrict in Texas, giving the party a chance at five new Democratic House seats in the Golden State. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is leading a charge to put a redistricting ballot measure before voters in a special election this fall, a play to bypass California's independent redistricting commission and redraw lines mid-decade. State lawmakers introduced related legislation Monday and are expected to move quickly to set the plan in motion. The map, proposed by the Democrats' House campaign arm, needs to work its way through the Legislature — then survive legal challenges and get the green light from voters. But in its current form, it's expected to endanger five House Republicans and give Democrats a boost in some competitive seats. The GOP currently holds nine of California's 52 House seats. Here are the Republicans at risk in the new proposal. Rep. Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District Rep. Kevin Kiley (R) has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Newsom's redistricting plan, and he would be one of the lawmakers most impacted if the proposed maps move forward. Kiley's 3rd Congressional District would pick up some of the blue Sacramento while losing Death Valley, according to analysis from Cook Political Report, changing the seat from one that went to President Trump by 4 points to one that sided with former Vice President Kamala Harris by 10 points. 'Newsom is so desperate to get rid of me he's gerrymandered my district in the shape of an elephant. The 'trunk' captures as many Democrat voters as possible,' Kiley wrote on social media. 'Like all his attempts, this will fail. We'll keep beating him at the ballot box and the Capitol.' Kiley has proposed federal legislation that would ban mid-decade redistricting nationwide and nullify any new maps approved before the 2030 census. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District Rep. Doug LaMalfa's (R) 1st Congressional District would make a similarly drastic shift, jumping from a district Trump won by double digits to one that would have gone to Harris by more than 10 points, according to Cook Political Report. By shifting Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman's 2nd Congressional District in Marin County to take on more of California's northern border, LaMalfa's district would pick up parts of blue Santa Rosa. The seats held by Kiley and LaMalfa would both become 'likely' or even 'safe' Democratic seats, 'depending on the candidates and campaigns,' analysis from Sabato's Crystal Ball predicts. 'If you want to know what's wrong with these maps – just take a look at them. How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge?' LaMalfa wrote on X. The Congress member, who has held his seat for more than a decade, also sounded alarms that Newsom's efforts in California will 'set off a series of retaliation in other states across the country,' pointing to mid-decade chatter about redistricting in red Florida, Missouri and Indiana. Rep. Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District Rep. Ken Calvert's (R) 41st Congressional District in Riverside County, which went to Trump by 6 points last fall, could be effectively replaced with a new seat in central Los Angeles County. The new Latino-majority seat would make for another solid Democratic pickup opportunity in the midterms — though Sabato's Crystal Ball notes it may be less so in future cycles, if Hispanic voters continue the rightward shift seen in the last election. Calvert, who has represented California in Congress for more than three decades, has stressed the popularity of California's existing independent redistricting commission, which voters approved in 2008 and 2010, as he pushes back on the Democrats' effort. 'A bipartisan majority of Californians oppose efforts to eliminate our Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. It only adds insult to injury to ask taxpayers to pay hundreds of millions of dollars on a special election power grab that would wipeout the Commission's work,' Calvert has written on social media. Newsom has stressed that the redistricting measure would only bypass the commission through the 2030 election, then revert back to the commission's typical redraw timelines after each census. Rep. Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District Democrats have long targeted Rep. Darrell Issa's (R) 48th Congressional District, where the incumbent won by double digits in November. Issa retired from Congress in 2018 but returned with a win in 2020. Under the map proposal, Issa's district would pick up Palm Springs, while other parts shift to nearby Democrats. That would flip his seat, according to Cook Political Report, from one that went to Trump by 15 points to one that would have gone to Harris by 3. Sabato's Crystal Ball suggests that Issa's seats would 'probably' become a toss-up if the map takes effect, along with Rep. David Valadao's (R) seat. Analysis from CalMatters, citing registration data in the district, dubs it 'the biggest reach' for Democrats. Rep. David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District Valadao, one of the two remaining House Republicans to have voted for Trump's impeachment after Jan. 6, 2021, would see his already competitive 22nd Congressional District in Central Valley get even more so under the new maps. Cook Political Report forecasts that Valadao's would shift from its current 'lean Republican' rating to toss-up territory — from a district that went to Trump by 6 points to one that would have favored Trump by a single digit — becoming 'the most tenuous for Democrats to flip' among the targeted districts. 'Neither political party should have the authority to rig maps to protect their own power,' Valadao said in a statement late last month, calling Newsom's effort a 'blatant power grab.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.