logo
Here are the Republicans targeted by California's proposed redistricting

Here are the Republicans targeted by California's proposed redistricting

Yahooa day ago
Democrats have proposed a new congressional map for California that could offset Republican efforts to redistrict in Texas, giving the party a chance at five new Democratic House seats in the Golden State.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is leading a charge to put a redistricting ballot measure before voters in a special election this fall, a play to bypass California's independent redistricting commission and redraw lines mid-decade. State lawmakers introduced related legislation Monday and are expected to move quickly to set the plan in motion.
The map, proposed by the Democrats' House campaign arm, needs to work its way through the Legislature — then survive legal challenges and get the green light from voters. But in its current form, it's expected to endanger five House Republicans and give Democrats a boost in some competitive seats.
The GOP currently holds nine of California's 52 House seats. Here are the Republicans at risk in the new proposal.
Rep. Kevin Kiley, 3rd Congressional District
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R) has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Newsom's redistricting plan, and he would be one of the lawmakers most impacted if the proposed maps move forward.
Kiley's 3rd Congressional District would pick up some of the blue Sacramento while losing Death Valley, according to analysis from Cook Political Report, changing the seat from one that went to President Trump by 4 points to one that sided with former Vice President Kamala Harris by 10 points.
'Newsom is so desperate to get rid of me he's gerrymandered my district in the shape of an elephant. The 'trunk' captures as many Democrat voters as possible,' Kiley wrote on social media. 'Like all his attempts, this will fail. We'll keep beating him at the ballot box and the Capitol.'
Kiley has proposed federal legislation that would ban mid-decade redistricting nationwide and nullify any new maps approved before the 2030 census.
Rep. Doug LaMalfa, 1st Congressional District
Rep. Doug LaMalfa's (R) 1st Congressional District would make a similarly drastic shift, jumping from a district Trump won by double digits to one that would have gone to Harris by more than 10 points, according to Cook Political Report.
By shifting Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman's 2nd Congressional District in Marin County to take on more of California's northern border, LaMalfa's district would pick up parts of blue Santa Rosa.
The seats held by Kiley and LaMalfa would both become 'likely' or even 'safe' Democratic seats, 'depending on the candidates and campaigns,' analysis from Sabato's Crystal Ball predicts.
'If you want to know what's wrong with these maps – just take a look at them. How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge?' LaMalfa wrote on X.
The Congress member, who has held his seat for more than a decade, also sounded alarms that Newsom's efforts in California will 'set off a series of retaliation in other states across the country,' pointing to mid-decade chatter about redistricting in red Florida, Missouri and Indiana.
Rep. Ken Calvert, 41st Congressional District
Rep. Ken Calvert's (R) 41st Congressional District in Riverside County, which went to Trump by 6 points last fall, could be effectively replaced with a new seat in central Los Angeles County.
The new Latino-majority seat would make for another solid Democratic pickup opportunity in the midterms — though Sabato's Crystal Ball notes it may be less so in future cycles, if Hispanic voters continue the rightward shift seen in the last election.
Calvert, who has represented California in Congress for more than three decades, has stressed the popularity of California's existing independent redistricting commission, which voters approved in 2008 and 2010, as he pushes back on the Democrats' effort.
'A bipartisan majority of Californians oppose efforts to eliminate our Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. It only adds insult to injury to ask taxpayers to pay hundreds of millions of dollars on a special election power grab that would wipeout the Commission's work,' Calvert has written on social media.
Newsom has stressed that the redistricting measure would only bypass the commission through the 2030 election, then revert back to the commission's typical redraw timelines after each census.
Rep. Darrell Issa, 48th Congressional District
Democrats have long targeted Rep. Darrell Issa's (R) 48th Congressional District, where the incumbent won by double digits in November.
Issa retired from Congress in 2018 but returned with a win in 2020.
Under the map proposal, Issa's district would pick up Palm Springs, while other parts shift to nearby Democrats. That would flip his seat, according to Cook Political Report, from one that went to Trump by 15 points to one that would have gone to Harris by 3.
Sabato's Crystal Ball suggests that Issa's seats would 'probably' become a toss-up if the map takes effect, along with Rep. David Valadao's (R) seat.
Analysis from CalMatters, citing registration data in the district, dubs it 'the biggest reach' for Democrats.
Rep. David Valadao, 22nd Congressional District
Valadao, one of the two remaining House Republicans to have voted for Trump's impeachment after Jan. 6, 2021, would see his already competitive 22nd Congressional District in Central Valley get even more so under the new maps.
Cook Political Report forecasts that Valadao's would shift from its current 'lean Republican' rating to toss-up territory — from a district that went to Trump by 6 points to one that would have favored Trump by a single digit — becoming 'the most tenuous for Democrats to flip' among the targeted districts.
'Neither political party should have the authority to rig maps to protect their own power,' Valadao said in a statement late last month, calling Newsom's effort a 'blatant power grab.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time10 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style
Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

Vice President JD Vance criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Wednesday for trying to 'mimic' President Trump's style on social media. In an interview on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle,' the vice president said Newsom's revamped approach to online messaging misses the 'fundamental genius' that has fueled Trump's appeal. 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style — I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success,' Vance said, 'which is that he's authentic.' 'He just is who he is,' Vance added. The comments came after Fox News host Laura Ingraham noted Democrats 'are still doing their 2024 autopsy' and seem to have concluded that they need to be tougher and 'be more like Trump in tone' to win future elections. Vance said that lesson is misguided. 'Look, the autopsy for the Democrats — some free political advice from the president of the United States — is stop sounding like crazy people,' Vance said. 'That really is all it is.' 'You've got to be yourself,' Vance added after criticizing Newsom's approach. 'You've actually got to talk to people honestly about the issues. I don't think it's that complicated: Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic.' Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, in recent days has rolled out a revamped messaging strategy that mirrors Trump's signature social media style. The California governor has posted rants in all-caps letters, he's assigned nicknames to his political opponents, and he's referred to his legislative proposals and political rallies as 'beautiful.' While Newsom's approach has been embraced by many Democrats, who have struggled to find their footing since losing the 2024 election, the governor has faced criticism from some Republicans and Fox News hosts. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week, responding to that criticism.

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store