
Anthony Albanese's ‘red army' of MPs in Western Australia told to put WA first amid GST fight
But also in focus will be how the confident Prime Minister and his party handle the cut and thrust of Parliament with a slimmed-down Opposition, led by Sussan Ley.
Pundits and parliamentary watchers will be keeping a close eye on how Labor's frontbench strongmen line up to attack the Opposition, with suggestions since the election the Government may find it more difficult to attack Ms Ley than her predecessor, Peter Dutton.
A record number of WA Labor MPs are heading to Canberra this weekend in preparation for Tuesday's opening of Parliament. Unexpected wins in Moore and Bullwinkel, where Tom French and Trish Cook beat their Liberal opponents, sees Mr Albanese's 94 members in the 150-seat House of Representatives include 11 West Australians.
Four Liberals and Curtin Teal MP Kate Chaney will also be part of the WA contingent in Canberra.
Fresh from a week-long visit to China, Mr Albanese's top Parliamentary priorities are expected to include legislation to cut student debt by 20 per cent and strengthening the regulation of the childcare industry as key post-election priorities.
And it will also be a test for new Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who will likely use one of her first face-offs in Question Time to quiz the Prime Minister about a leaked Treasury report which casts doubt on a Federal target of 1.2 million new homes over five years, and to drill down on mooted tax hikes.
The report warned the Budget cannot be repaired with raising taxes and slashing spending, and said Mr Albanese's election promise to build 1.2 million homes across Australia would not be met.
Business is also protesting the penalty rate changes, which will have measures to enshrine overtime and other perks to keep them from forming part of overall pay rates.
But WA MPs will be faced with big decisions on issues important to the people who voted them into office.
A recent survey of nearly 1000 West Australians by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry WA gives a strong hint as to what Sandgropers believe their MPs need to stand up for this term.
With a Productivity Commission review of a 2018 GST deal — which saw WA's GST take raised from 30¢ in the dollar to no less than 75¢ — due in 2026, West Australians are worried billions in GST receipts are at risk.
More than three in five West Australians said they were concerned about a potential reduction in the State's GST share.
'Without that deal in 2018, WA would be getting back just 18¢ for every $1 we pay in GST, or around $6 billion less than with the 75¢ floor in this financial year alone,' CCIWA acting co-chief executive Aaron Morey said.
'That would hamstring WA from developing the infrastructure we need to continue to power the national economy.'
Premier Roger Cook this week backed the Albanese Government not to dud WA on the GST.
'While eastern state whingers won't stop coming for WA's fair share of the GST, I know Anthony Albanese and his Cabinet has WA's back and will ensure our State receives its fair share of the GST,' Mr Cook said.
But concerns remain the Commonwealth's debt-laden budget will put pressure on the Government to re-visit the deal, and in turn put pressure on Labor solidarity — on show last year when WA Senator Fatima Payman publicly spoke out against the party's stance on the Middle East conflict, resulting in her resignation to sit as an independent.
Notre Dame Professor of Politics and International Relations Martin Drum said West Australians would expect that 'the representatives they send to Canberra stick up for their State'.
'I'd expect that every time the Prime Minister comes to WA, local MPs are in his ear about the importance of holding the line on this issue,' Professor Drum said. 'That said, it would be politically disastrous of the government to consider any change to the GST, which saw WA disadvantaged.'
WA has two representatives in the Albanese Cabinet: Resources Minister Madeleine King and Small Business Minister Anne Aly.
Perth MP Patrick Gorman, Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister, said he and his colleagues were well aware of the importance for WA of maintaining the 2028 GST deal.
'Our WA team are proud members of the Albanese Government and will continue to work together to ensure WA's fair share of GST and the economic policies that will deliver a more productive WA economy,' he told The Sunday Times.
'Western Australians made it clear at the election: they want a party that backs them.'
But Senator Michaelia Cash — the most senior WA Liberal in Sussan Ley's shadow cabinet — is not so sure WA Labor MPs will break ranks and fight the government on behalf of their State.
She said elected WA Labor members and senators 'should remember who sent them to Canberra'.
'The first test for the Labor WA team will come at the Treasurer's so called reform summit where no doubt WA's fair share of the GST will come under attack,' Senator Cash said. 'They need to make sure WA's hard-fought win on GST under the former Coalition Government is not wound back.'
Senator Cash said proposed new environment laws were also vitally important to WA.
'I'll be watching closely where Labor goes with its so-called nature positive laws,' she said.
Curtin MP Kate Chaney said she needed no reminders of the need to put the local community first.
'As it was in my first term, my absolute priority will be the concerns and values of the Curtin community,' she said.
Ms Chaney said new environmental laws were of vital importance to WA.
'As we transition our economy for future prosperity in a decarbonising world, we urgently need to fix our ineffective, unworkable national environment laws.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
The two-timing Chinese act that made a complete fool of Albo's charm offensive as the world again sits on the brink of all-out war
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's recent six-day visit to China has once again raised hard questions about Labor's stance on our relationship with Beijing, which runs in parallel to our allied commitments to the US, the UK and other core security partners. Trade was on top of the PM's China agenda, despite renewed fears of Beijing's plans to resolve the Taiwan dilemma by force. Australia finds itself in a far more complex region than was envisaged a decade ago, a fact the recent talks seem to largely neglect. From 'undefeated combat brotherhood' to loose security triangles The problem with understanding the current geopolitical setting - who is your friend, who is your ally, and who is your foe - is no longer straight and clear as it used to be. We have truly entered the phase of geopolitical fluidity when old norms and rules are no longer set in stone. A need for an adaptive approach is of growing relevance when it comes to assessing allied dynamics in the Indo-Pacific, particularly with respect to our geopolitical rivals. The Moscow-led allied relationship between Russia and North Korea continues to progress and mature, as was noted during the visit of Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the country on July 12. During his meeting with the North Korean counterpart Choi Son-hui, Lavrov described the bilateral strategic treaty as "the basis of undefeated combative brotherhood". The alliance between the two nuclear-armed autocratic states will have to form a part of any future strategic calculus vis-a-vis power dynamics in northeast Asia and beyond. It is also worth reminding ourselves of China's close strategic relations with both Moscow and Pyongyang. Following his stopover in North Korea, Lavrov travelled to China to hold a series of strategic talks with his counterpart Wan Yi, even though he spoke to him just days before at the ASEAN summit in Malaysia. Although, it's too soon to look at this trio through the prism of a formed triangular security partnership, such as the 2023 Camp David agreement between the US, South Korea and Japan, the intensity of at least Russia-China high level contacts is telling and should not be dismissed as it happened to date. I doubt anyone imagined five years ago that Russia-North Korea rapprochement would reach current levels and that DPRK troops would see combat in the eastern European theatre of war. Being trapped in a set of self-comforting perceptions in such a dynamic and fluid geopolitical environment is a road with a dead end. What also requires closer attention is another emerging allied security triangle, China-Pakistan-Iran, in which Beijing is claiming a leadership role. It is a well-documented fact that China has close strategic ties with both countries, just like there is a close relationship between Islamabad and Tehran. Over the past two months, these deepened ties were put to the test during two major regional crisis, a near-war between India and Pakistan, and the 12-day war between Israel, the US and Iran. During the latest round of hostilities between New Delhi and Islamabad in May, Beijing was believed to be supplying Pakistani military not just with armaments and training but also with operational intelligence. According to the Depurty Chief of the Indian Army Lieutenant-General Rahul Singh, Islamabad received 'all possible support' from its de-facto ally, including 'live inputs' on India's defensive layout. Aside from political declarations, Beijing's military support for Iran during its latest open clash with Israel last month was more evasive. Yet, it had a limited footprint. During the intensive phase of the conflict, Chinese aircraft were believed to be delivering defence supplies into Iran, while an electronic warfare vessel was operating in the Gulf area, possibly tracking the trajectory of Israel's aerial and missile missions. In early July, the 47th Naval Escort Task Force of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), while operating in the Red Sea, was involved in a dangerous standoff with a German surveillance aircraft. This action could be perceived as a covert show of support for the Iran-backed Houthi militants, which stepped up their spectacular strikes against western shipping of the coast of Yemen. Pakistan was bolder in its support of the Iranian regime, by also escalating its political rhetoric with references to its nuclear capability and promises to offer its neighbour a de-facto extended deterrence. It is doubtful that the Chinese authorities were blissfully unaware of Pakistan's war of words over Israel. In the future, this triangular relationship may mature into a more substantive organisational structure. No appetite to 'discuss hypotheticals' This message from Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, was designed to be a bold response to equally bold messaging from Pentagon and the White House, which are seeking a clear commitment to a possible war contingency in the Taiwan Strait from Australia and Japan. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance…', Mr Conroy said. Clearly, Canberra was reluctant to engage in warmongering rhetoric prior to the PM's visit to China. This is all very well. But what is equally clear is that while Albanese prioritises trade with China, others like Minister Lavrov are busy discussing a whole range of strategic matters. 'The importance of strengthening close coordination between the two countries [China and Russia] in the international arena…. jointly respond to the challenges brought about by a turbulent and changing world," read extracts from the statement issued by the Chinese Foreign Ministry following Lavrov-Wan Yi talks. At the same time, Canberra finds it completely normal to engage in political fencing with our key security and defence ally, instead of securing a sit-down meeting between the PM and US President Donald Trump. Labor's ongoing balancing act may have worked in the past when the world's geopolitical dynamics were different. But not now, when geostrategic competition between great powers and respective allies gave way to power contests and conflict. Dr. Alexey Muraviev is Associate Professor of National Security and Strategic Studies at Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.