eToro vs Trading 212: Which one should you consider?
The two providers have a lot of similarities. These include:
Stocks, ETFs, crypto trading and forex – trading currencies to profit from the sell – are available.
Neither charges a platform fee or any trading fees to UK customers when they buy or sell shares.
You can open an Isa on either platform. They differ on how the Isas work, however. At Trading 212 investors can choose their own investments, but at eToro the Isa is run by an external provider – Moneyfarm – which offers managed Isa portfolios.
Both offer a type of social investing.
You can also access a community forum on both platforms, where investors can share news and investment ideas, and browse other posts and conversations.
Both charge a foreign exchange fee on trades in certain currencies.
Both platforms charge a buy-sell spread on assets.
eToro and Trading 212 are regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). They are also backed by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
Advantages of eToro
Ideal for both beginners and advanced traders.
Customers have access to a wide range of assets – including over 6,000 stocks from 20 exchanges. You can also access investment trusts where other similar trading apps tend not to offer them.
Offers comprehensive resources to educate both novices and seasoned investors, with plenty of analysis and data on hand.
eToro is considered the industry leader in social investing, offering copy trading. This works just as the name suggests – you find a successful investor, also referred to as 'popular investor', and replicate their trades. Every time they buy or sell a stock you will do the same. You don't need to physically monitor and copy each and every move, as this can be done automatically. eToro allows you to copy up to 100 traders simultaneously.
Advantages of Trading 212
Offers an extensive selection of investments with more than 13,000 shares across the major stock exchanges.
Fees are highly competitive, with free trades on stocks and ETFs.
At the time of writing, its cash Isa pays 5.07pc interest in for new customers for the first 12 months, 4.35pc afterwards – with no account fees, but the rate is variable and may change at any time.
Stocks and shares Isa has no account or trading fees – and currently pays 4.6pc on any uninvested cash. It gives investors the option to choose their own investments to hold in their portfolio.
Trading 212 offers a variety of ready-made portfolios – known as 'pies' – with different risk profiles (conservative, moderate, aggressive). They are also available by themes, or you can create your very own homemade pie.
The Pie Library offers a list of the most popular shared pies so that you can explore a variety of new ideas and replicate any you like the look of.
No inactivity fee if you need to take a break.
Forex trading comes with a fee of just 0.15pc per conversion.
Disadvantages of eToro
At eToro you'll pay 1pc for buying and selling Bitcoin.
eToro charges a flat $5 withdrawal fee on standard accounts. The fee is waived if you withdraw through an eToro Money wallet or if you're a Platinum-tier (or higher) club member.
UK customers can hold their funds in GBP, but when trading assets priced in a different currency (such as US stocks) or when depositing and withdrawing in a different currency (via eToro Money), a currency conversion fee of 0.75pc applies.
There is no phone support – customer service is only available on email, online ticketing systems, live chat or Whatsapp. A call can only be booked with an account manager for those with silver tier status – but you must have at least $5,000 in your account for this.
Disadvantages of Trading 212
Trading 212 charges a foreign exchange fee of 0.15pc of the value of the trade when buying or selling non-UK shares.
Less comprehensive research tools.
You can't buy cryptocurrency direct – Trading 212 only offers cryptocurrency trading through Contracts for Difference (CFDs), allowing you to speculate on the price movements of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.
There's no phone support. Customer service is only available on email, online ticketing systems or live chat.
Only whole shares are transferable, so if you have taken advantage of buying fractional shares it's not possible to transfer your assets to another provider. If you close your account, the fractional shares held in your account will need to be sold. You'll then have to start investing elsewhere through another broker and re-buy your previous positions. However, there is a way you could get around this. For example, if an investor holds 60.2 shares of Apple; to fully transfer out, they would either need to sell 0.2 worth of fractional shares or buy 0.8 shares to round the quantity to 63.
Which one is best for you?
This depends on a lot of factors – your investing style, how much money you're investing and what kind of services you really value.
How and what you invest in will impact your decision. For example, if you're a fan of investment trusts you might be more inclined to use eToro. But if you already invest in funds in a separate platform account this might not be enough to sway you.
If you like to invest in overseas stocks, thanks to the low foreign exchange fee, overseas share trading at Trading 212 is very competitive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
We want to sell our listed house — do we need an EPC?
Q. We want to sell our listed house. The estate agents say we may not need an energy performance certificate (EPC) but should get one anyway. Do we need an EPC for a listed house? A. EPCs record the energy efficiency of buildings, rated from A to G. It is a common misconception that they are not needed for listed properties. It is far more complicated than that. The basic requirements are set out in part 2 of the Energy Performance of Buildings (Certificates and Inspections) (England and Wales) Regulations 2007. Regulation 6 requires a valid EPC to be available whenever a building is to be sold. The maximum penalty for marketing or selling a property without a valid EPC is £5,000, although prosecutions are rare. • Read more expert advice on property, interiors and home improvement Under regulation 5, certain properties are exempt from these requirements, including 'buildings officially protected as part of a designated environment or because of their special architectural or historical merit'. Although this potentially exempts listed buildings and houses in conservation areas, they are only excluded if 'compliance with certain minimum energy performance requirements would unacceptably alter their character or appearance'. For example, government guidance notes that many typical EPC recommendations — such as double glazing, new doors and windows, external wall insulation and external boiler flues — would probably cause unacceptable changes in most historic buildings. This presents a problem in that listed building owners are unlikely to know whether they will need an EPC without first asking an EPC assessor to advise on what energy efficiency measures are needed. Owners may also need to consult with their listed buildings officer to anticipate queries from potential buyers about any advice set out in the EPC. In addition, in December 2024, the government launched a consultation about reforms to the regime, which include proposals to bring all listed buildings within the EPC net. It is probably best to commission an EPC before marketing a listed house, even if it turns out that a valid certificate is not required by legislation. Mark Loveday is a barrister with Tanfield Chambers. Email your questions to
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I lost £97,000 to a scammer. Before you judge me, here's the unexpected - and tragic - reason I fell for it... and how it changed my life forever: SARAH GRACE
It was the dead of night when I made the devastating discovery. Combing frantically through the flurry of emails I'd received from a financial services company and trying to work out how I had got into such a mess, I suddenly realised the address was slightly different to the one on the website. An email to the legitimate firm that morning confirmed my worst fears; I had lost £97,000 to a gang masquerading as investment brokers.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
IAN WILLIAMS: Ministers blinded by Beijing's cash cannot see their dangerous folly
The warning from America is stark: selling Thames Water, Britain's biggest water and sewage business, to a Chinese company would be a 'national security threat' – or as Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader, puts it, 'stupidity on stupidity'. That the Labour government cannot see the dangerous folly of handing China control of the capital's water supply – a necessity for 15 million people – beggar's belief. It is only four months since the Chinese owner of British Steel was accused of trying to sabotage the company's blast furnaces, potentially to undermine UK production and increase reliance on imports from China. There have been multiple warnings about the need for vigilance in the face of industrial scale Chinese cyber espionage as well as influence operations to undermine our democracy. The world is becoming more dangerous – to a large extent because of China's behaviour. Yet ministers seem unable or unwilling to see beyond the cash – seemingly oblivious to the risks that come with inviting China into sensitive corners of the economy. Ministers are reportedly preparing to take struggling Thames Water into temporary public ownership, with Hong Kong-based CK Infrastructure (CKI) a leading contender to then take it over. CKI already has investments in British firms, including UK Power Networks, Northumberland Water and Northern Gas Networks. It also has a 65 per cent stake in UK Rails, which leases rolling stock to Britain's railway companies. Surely this is reason for caution, especially as relations with China deteriorate and Beijing seeks to exert greater control over CKI's parent company, CK Hutchison Holdings (CKH). The US government has raised the alarm over CKH, which controls ports at either end of the Panama Canal, because Washington fears the firm could hand China control of the vital waterway. In March, CKH agreed to sell the ports to an American-led consortium, but the deal has effectively been vetoed by Beijing, which has threatened CKH's business interests in China unless it takes on a partner closely linked to the Chinese Communist Party. CKH is headquartered in Hong Kong, which for a long time was a relatively autonomous place for business, free from the heavy hand of Beijing. No more. Hong Kong is now darkly repressive – as the trial and pending prison sentence of 77-year-old pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai, a fierce critic of China, will surely attest. Burner phones and throw-away laptops are commonplace for visiting foreign executives, fearing surveillance. Companies based in the former British colony cannot escape laws that oblige all Chinese firms do the Party's bidding on demand when it comes to issues of 'national security' – an infinitely elastic concept in China. As Beijing deepens its partnership with Russia, underwriting the Ukraine war, and grows increasingly hostile to the West, its 'Trojan horse' investments look dangerous and foolhardy. Selling Thames Water will be the first big test of the Labour government's 'China audit', which was supposed to forge a more coherent policy with this rising power. That followed disastrous decisions to invite firms linked to Beijing into sensitive industries, such as nuclear power and advanced telecoms. They were reversed only after political outcry – and American pressure. Sir Keir Starmer now claims to be trying to balance security concerns against economic opportunities. To sell Thames Water to a Chinese company would show how little he has learned.
