logo
‘Nobody's talking about it': Republicans' incredible shrinking deficit talk

‘Nobody's talking about it': Republicans' incredible shrinking deficit talk

Yahoo22-05-2025

The tax and spending megabill that House Republicans celebrated passing early Thursday is estimated to add more than $3 trillion to the country's debt over the next 10 years.
Yet after years of railing against deficits as economically and politically toxic, Republicans are losing their appetite for the topic this time around.
Even as Treasury bond yields soared in a sign of investor queasiness about their bill's front-loaded debt, some Republicans insist their plan would boost revenues enough that deficits eventually shrink. Only a crop of the House GOP's biggest fiscal hawks raised deficit worries before the all-night session where their leaders muscled the bill through — and all but three swallowed their fears to vote 'yes.'
Republicans have an impressive statistic to help distract from their deficit denial: President Donald Trump's economic team argues that cutting taxes for manufacturers, tipped workers, car owners, retirees, high-tax-state residents, and others who benefit from their bill will bump the GDP by as much as 3.5 percent over the next decade (much more than third-party estimates).
The truth, however, is that some of the House's cuts to Medicaid and energy projects may not survive the Senate. And broadly speaking, the GOP's anti-debt orthodoxy lost ground in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' to his brand of economic populism.
'Isn't it amazing that the reality hasn't broken through the rhetoric yet?' Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Semafor. 'Nobody's talking about it.'
Before Trump finished helping to push the House bill to passage, some conservatives were prepared to talk about its high cost. Members of the House Freedom Caucus raised concerns over spiking bond yields that signal low investor confidence in US debt during their Wednesday huddle with Trump at the White House, said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo.
'I don't know that this bill is going to be, or [is] even capable of being, the fix to what's going on with the bond market,' Burlison said. 'The Senate may have an opportunity to make some new movement there.'
Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., another Freedom Caucus holdout, told Semafor after midnight on Wednesday that 'I'm not surprised nobody in this town doesn't talk about [the deficit] more. Everybody just ignores it.'
Hours later, Burlison and Burchett voted for the megabill they previously resisted.
On Tuesday, when Trump came to the Capitol to lobby Republicans on the tax and spending package, multiple lawmakers said the president did not talk about deficits at all. Instead, he underscored the importance that they raise the debt ceiling so the US can borrow more money.
That didn't work for Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, who voted no.
'Back home, people know that they want less spending,'' said Davidson. 'They're paying attention to the bond market, the downgrade of our credit. They know deficits do matter.'
Only one other House Republican opposed the bill: Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky. A longtime foil of the president who frequently wears a self-made debt-clock lapel pin, Massie delivered scathing floor remarks shortly before 2 a.m. Thursday and compared passing the bill to being on the Titanic, 'putting coal in the boiler, and setting a course for the iceberg.'
'Congress can do funny math — fantasy math, if it wants — but bond investors don't. And this week, they sent us a message,' Massie said to applause from Democrats.
Fiscal hawks in the Senate now get a crack at the megabill. They don't like what we see.
'When people talk about, 'Well, the bill is going to cut $800 billion' … that kind of sounds good. But what does it mean if you add it up against what comes in?' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who plans to vote no as long as the debt ceiling remains included.
Persistently high interest rates could strengthen their hand.
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., said he will push to make the bill deficit-neutral. He teamed up with Johnson for a presentation to colleagues Wednesday about the yawning deficit.
'We've got to balance the budget; we don't have a choice. You see what's happening; rates are going up, the American public is paying more for mortgages, car payments, for credit cards,' Scott said.
Johnson said if Republicans don't address the situation, they will eventually have to do something even more at odds with their identity than padding the deficit: boosting revenues.
'If we're not willing to address spending at some point in time, we're going to have to pay for this. And do we start paying for it by having a tax increase? Nobody wants that.'
The Congressional Budget Office predicts the US is already on track for its debt to exceed the size of its economy by 2032 — a marker it's only hit in the wake of World War II and the Great Recession — as interest payments alone exceed defense spending.
Former President Joe Biden's administration played its own role in that higher debt — but after years of absorbing deficit-spending criticism from Republicans, Democrats are eager to dish it out.
'They complain about the debt on Monday, and then they add $4 trillion to it on Tuesday,' Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, told Semafor. 'I'm astounded.'
Still, Democrats are careful not to focus on the debt too much. House Majority Forward, a nonprofit organization associated with House Democrats' super PAC, on Wednesday urged members to steer away from primarily talking about deficit increases when discussing the megabill.
When asked about the legislation's impact on the deficit, GOP officials cast doubt on official scorekeepers. House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., said this month that the party's 2017 tax cuts raised more in revenue than projected.
'Part of the reason why there's a lot of confusion in analysis of this stuff is because folks tend to, I would say, overly credit CBO forecasts,' White House Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran told reporters.
The House's deficit hawks tried to raise concerns this week, but they proved no match for Trump's force of will. We think Paul will stand strong against the bill in the Senate, but the president has proved that almost every other Republican is malleable.
The biggest issue for Senate Republicans is that cutting more spending means losing votes from the center of their conference. So the 'big beautiful bill' seems likely to increase deficits to some degree, if and when it becomes law.
One X factor remains: the bond markets. We've seen them change Trump's mind on tariffs. That formula may not work on legislation.
Hardline conservatives who voted to pass the bill out of the House say they still agree with Davidson and Massie.
'History may bear out that Warren and Thomas were the wise men in this course,' Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said.
But they also argue that the changes they secured made the bill more fiscally responsible than it was — and that they had to vote yes to maintain momentum, particularly since the Senate will change it anyway.
'There are going to be significant negotiations,' Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., said.
Republican economists they're skeptical of the White House's projection that revenue raised by tax cuts will cover their costs.
that long-term borrowing costs are up around the world as investors question several governments' ability to cope with deficits.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump seeks removal from a New Hampshire lawsuit challenging his order on transgender athletes
Trump seeks removal from a New Hampshire lawsuit challenging his order on transgender athletes

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump seeks removal from a New Hampshire lawsuit challenging his order on transgender athletes

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — President Donald Trump's administration wants to be dropped from a lawsuit in which two New Hampshire teens are challenging their state's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports and the president's executive order on the same topic. Parker Tirrell, 16, and Iris Turmelle, 14, became first to challenge Trump's 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' order when they added him to their ongoing lawsuit over New Hampshire's ban in February. A federal judge has ruled that they can try out and play on girls sports teams while the case proceeds. In a motion filed Friday, attorneys for the government say the teens are trying to 'drag the federal government into a lawsuit well under way not because of an imminent injury, but because of a generalized grievance with polices set by the President of the United States.' Deputy Associate Attorney General Richard Lawson argued that the government has done nothing yet to enforce the executive orders in New Hampshire and may never do so. 'Plaintiffs lack constitutional standing and their stated speculative risk of future injury is not close to imminent and may never become ripe,' wrote Lawson, who asked the judge to dismiss claims against Trump, the justice and education departments, and their leaders, Trump's executive order gives federal agencies wide latitude to ensure entities that receive federal funding abide by Title IX — which prohibits sexual discrimination in schools -- in alignment with the Trump administration's view a person's sex as the gender assigned at birth. Lawyers for the teens say the order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to 'promote gender ideology,' subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX. In its response, the government argues that the order does not discriminate based on sex because males and females are not similarly situated when it comes to sports. Transgender people represent a very small part of the nation's youth population – about 1.4% of teens ages 13 to 17, or around 300,000 people. But about half of the states have adopted similar measures to New Hampshire's sports ban, with supporters arguing that allowing transgender girls to play is unfair and dangerous. In interviews earlier this year, neither New Hampshire teen said they feel they hold any advantage over other players. Tirrell says she's less muscular than other girls on her soccer team, and Turmelle said she doesn't see herself as a major athlete. 'To the argument that it's not fair, I'd just like to point out that I did not get on the softball team,' Turmelle recalled of her tryout last year. 'If that wasn't fair, then I don't know what you want from me.'

Obama's Doctor Gives Telling Update on Biden's Health Amid His Aggressive Cancer Diagnosis
Obama's Doctor Gives Telling Update on Biden's Health Amid His Aggressive Cancer Diagnosis

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Obama's Doctor Gives Telling Update on Biden's Health Amid His Aggressive Cancer Diagnosis

Ever since former President Joe Biden announced his cancer diagnosis, there have been questions about his health. This is pretty much on par for the course; the same has happened to public figures like King Charles and Kate Middleton, too, after their own diagnosis. It's just that a lot of the conversation regarding Joe Biden's health has to do with the question of whether he should have run for a second term in office. It matters not that, in the end, Kamala Harris took over or that she lost the election anyway. Now, Barack Obama's former physician is adding to the questions surrounding Biden. Jeffrey Kuhlman said in an interview that the former President's doctor should have given him a cognitive test during his final year as president due to his age. The last report by White House physician Kevin O'Connor in February 2024 didn't include any mention of neurocognitive testing. Biden was 81 at the time. More from StyleCaster Obama Just Got Roped into Diddy's Trial in Shocking Claim King Charles Responds to Joe Biden's 'Aggressive' Cancer After Their Eerily Similar Diagnoses Related: Here are the celebrities who support Donald Trump 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest,' Kuhlman said of O'Connor, who also expressed that such a test would have given voters a clearer picture of whether Biden was up for another 4 years in the Presidency. 'It shouldn't be just health, it should be fitness,' Kuhlman said. 'Fitness is: Do you have that robust mind, body, spirit that you can do this physically, mentally, emotionally demanding job?' But Kuhlman stopped short of saying there was a conspiracy, calling O'Connor 'a good doctor' who seemed to do his best to 'give trusted medical advice.' 'I didn't see that he's purposely hiding stuff, but I don't know that,' he added. 'Maybe the investigation will show it.' This criticism comes as Republicans subpoenaed O'Connor and President Donald Trump ordered White House attorneys to determine if Biden's inner circle tried to conceal his alleged cognitive decline. Biden's diagnosis is of metastatic prostate cancer, the kind of diagnosis that sheds no light on his mental health, but reports about Biden's alleged decline have run rampant even before he stepped aside to allow his Vice President, Kamala Harris, to run. These claims were in many ways strengthened by the book published by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, titled Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. The book is based on interviews with Democratic insiders. Biden's response to this whole thing was telling. During a Memorial Day event, the former President said. 'You can see that I'm mentally incompetent, and I can't walk, and I can beat the hell out of both of them,' he told reporters. Meanwhile, his granddaughter, Naomi Biden, called the book 'political fairy smut.' The Republicans will continue to investigate the matter, but the facts remain that Joe Biden isn't President anymore, and he didn't even stay in the race until the end in 2024. If there was, indeed, a cognitive decline on his part, it clearly hurt the Democrats more than the Republicans and, perhaps, the party in power should be thankful for that. Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways

L.A. immigration protests: California to sue Trump admin over National Guard deployment after dozens arrested, Waymos set on fire, freeways blocked
L.A. immigration protests: California to sue Trump admin over National Guard deployment after dozens arrested, Waymos set on fire, freeways blocked

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

L.A. immigration protests: California to sue Trump admin over National Guard deployment after dozens arrested, Waymos set on fire, freeways blocked

The Los Angeles Police Department has declared all of downtown L.A. an unlawful assembly area after protests erupted over the weekend in response to the Trump administration's intensified immigration crackdown. President Trump sent National Guard troops into California without the consent of the governor, inflaming tensions between demonstrators and law enforcement that has led to dozens of arrests. At least 44 people were arrested by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents during a raid at several locations around Los Angeles on Friday, including Ambiance Apparel in the garment district and a Home Depot in the Westlake District. These areas are known to have significant migrant populations and labor-focused industries. Protests then erupted in Los Angeles in response to Trump's immigration crackdown that has seen federal agents arrest a student on his way to volleyball practice and erroneously deport a man to El Salvador. Sunday marked the third straight day of protests over the wave of immigration raids. Crowds gathered in downtown Los Angeles and Boyle Heights. Protesters marched from Boyle Heights to the Metropolitan Detention Center, a federal building, in downtown L.A. This led to the LAPD declaring the area an unlawful assembly. Protesters moved from outside the federal building and walked onto the 101 Freeway, blocking it, around 3:30 p.m. local time. Police fired tear gas and other projectiles into the crowd and cleared the crowd by 5 p.m. Meanwhile, another protest started Sunday outside of Los Angeles City Hall Protesters outside the city's prison in Alameda were arrested, according to the LAPD. Around 300 National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles County on Sunday after Trump deployed them to protect federal property and personnel, without the consent of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat with whom he often spars. As governor, Newsom would normally retain control and command over California's National Guard. The White House said the deployment was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in the state, and initially stated that 2,000 troops were being deployed. About 500 Marines are also prepared to deploy to the area, the Northern Command said. It's the first time in nearly 60 years that a president has called in the National Guard without a state's request or consent. The last time was when President Lyndon Johnson sent the Guard to protect a 1965 civil rights march in Alabama. Newsom said California is suing the Trump administration over the federal mobilization of the National Guard. Newsom told MSNBC that Trump's federal mobilization of the National Guard was 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' The governor also alleged that Trump is the one to blame for the escalation in California, saying, 'He's exacerbated the conditions. He's lit the proverbial match. He's putting fuel on this fire.' Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, told NBC News that anyone who obstructs immigration enforcement would be arrested. When asked if that would include Newsom or Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, he replied, 'I'll say it about anybody. … You cross that line, it's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.' Newsom responded to Homan's NBC interview on Sunday by saying: 'He knows where to find me.' Homan later clarified those remarks in an interview with Fox News. 'The reporter asked me, well, could Gov. Newsom or Mayor Bass be arrested? I said, 'Well no one's above the law — if they cross the line and commit a crime, absolutely they can.'' He added: 'There was no discussion about arresting Newsom.' The peaceful protests escalated into vandalism, autonomous cars set ablaze, fireworks and other objects thrown at law enforcement, police firing rubber bullets (including at an Australian journalist), and dozens of arrests by the LAPD. 'In recent days, many protests across the city have been peaceful and we thank the community for expressing their views and their frustration in a responsible manner,' LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said in a Sunday news conference. 'However, when peaceful demonstrations devolve into acts of vandalism or violence, especially violence directed at innocent people, law enforcement officers and others, we must respond firmly.' McDonnell said that a total of 39 people had been arrested — 29 on Saturday and 10 on Sunday. He also said the LAPD was not given advance notice that federal operations would occur in the area. On Sunday, several Waymo driverless vehicles were vandalized and set on fire in downtown Los Angeles. A Waymo spokesperson told USA Today Monday morning that its autonomous vehicles have been removed from the area and the company has temporarily suspended its ride-hailing service 'out of an abundance of caution.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told CNN on Monday that the situation has since calmed in the city. 'If you dial back time and go to Friday, if immigration raids had not happened here, we would not have had the disorder that went on last night,' Bass said. 'We do not know where and when the next raids will be. That is the concern because people in this city have a rapid response network.' 'If they see ICE, they go out, and they protest, and so it's just a recipe for pandemonium that is completely unnecessary,' Bass added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store