Lawmakers push to anonymize people receiving Oklahoma's private school tax credit
Lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Kevin Stitt Wednesday to stop the names of Oklahomans receiving a private school tax credit from being included on a publicly available list of tax credit recipients. Students, parents and educators are pictured gathering at Oklahoma's state Capitol to celebrate the "success" of the program on March 12. (Photo by Emma Murphy/Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY — In an effort to 'protect family privacy,' Oklahoma lawmakers fast-tracked a bill to the governor on Wednesday that will no longer allow the public to view the names of Oklahomans who received a controversial private school tax credit.
If signed into law by Gov. Kevin Stitt, Senate Bill 684 would also remove individual names that were recently published to an existing state database of recipients of many tax credits. It listed those who received a share of hundreds of millions of state dollars allocated to the Oklahoma Parental Choice Tax Credit program.
House Democrats opposing the measure said it doesn't align with how other tax credit program recipients are treated and will create a lack of accountability on where tax dollars are spent and who receives them.
The voucher-like program offers a refundable income tax credit of up to $7,500 to families who attend eligible private schools in the state. When creating the program, lawmakers gave priority to families earning $150,000 or less, and promised it would help lower-income students have the ability to attend private schools. A recent report showed over 46% of participants made over $150,000.
House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, said the bill is about protecting the privacy of children and families. The publicly posted information does not list any children's names or schools, just the taxpaying adult who applied for and received the funds and how much they received.
'And while it does not list the names of students, it absolutely is to expose the students via their parents about the fact that they receive tax credits,' he said.
The measure also requires participating private schools to be accredited by March 2027.
Democrats argued that the tax credit program has benefited high-income families, not underprivileged children. A recent analysis of the recipients by Oklahoma Watch found less than 3,000 of recipients had attended public school the year prior to the credit and only 9% were families that qualify for income-based public assistance programs.
The recipients of other tax credit programs are publicly available online because that's how tax credits in Oklahoma work, said Rep. Ellen Pogemiller, D-Oklahoma City.
Rep. Forrest Bennett, D-Oklahoma City, said as a taxpayer he would feel uncomfortable not knowing where his tax dollars were going and who they were really benefitting.
He said he was bothered by 'dismissive' answers from the bill author to questions from other lawmakers on the House floor, specifically responses saying that questions weren't specific to the bill language.
'It behooves us, I think, to acknowledge that everything that we vote on is done in context,' he said. 'And if I had a nickel for every time I have to talk about this issue, we could fund the voucher program, I think.'
While most of the debate and discussion focused on the privacy aspects of the tax credit program, the bill also would give priority consideration for the credit to those who received it the prior year.
First priority would go to families with income below $150,000 and second to any others who received the credit the prior year, regardless of income.
The Senate unanimously approved the measure Wednesday morning, while the House voted 68-23 to approve the measure Wednesday afternoon.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morris County election results: Parsippany mayor survives challenge in heated GOP primary
PARSIPPANY — Mayor James Barberio appears to have emerged as the victor in one of the most contentious local primaries in recent Morris County memory. Unofficial results from the township clerk on Tuesday night showed Barberio leading Councilman Justin Musella by about 600 votes to secure the Republican nomination and a spot on the November ballot as he seeks his fourth term in office. As of 10 p.m., those returns showed Barberio ahead by a count of 3,115 to 2,559. That was enough for Musella to leave his campaign headquarters to congratulate Barberio at his watch party at the Lake Parsippany Clubhouse."I said we have to get behind him and beat the Democrats in November," Musella said. Those uncertified results also showed Barberio's council running makes — incumbent Frank Neglia and Jigar Shah —ahead of Musella's council slate of Casey Parikh and John Bielen. Neglia had 2,939 votes, followed by Shah (2,413), Bielen (2,371) and Parikh (2,151). The county clerk must certify election results by June 23. Barberio's next challenge will be a faceoff with Democratic candidate Pulkit Desai, whose ticket was unchallenged in the primary. The winner will claim the office of the only full-time mayor in Morris County, leading a municipality of almost 60,000 residents. "I gave it my all, and the voters chose otherwise," Musella said. "I have to respect that outcome and honor my words to support him if I lost. I told my supporters the same thing." Barberio, who has served three non-consecutive terms in office so far, could not immediately be reached for comment. The race saw prominent supporters change sides in recent months. Several Board of Education members initially signaled support for Musella. They were angered by tax breaks known as PILOTs — payments in lieu of taxes — that allegedly shortchanged the school district. Then-board president Andrew Choffo introduced Musella at his campaign kickoff last June, which was also attended by state Sen. Jon Bramnick, who's seeking the GOP nod for governor. An incensed Barberio promised an audit of Board of Education finances last September, though he recently stated that review was "on hold." Musella also had early support from Morris County Republican Committee Chair Laura Ali, who withheld an endorsement of Barberio in 2021 when he ran in a rematch with Soriano. This time around, Ali again refused to back Barberio, branding him "the highest paid and least qualified mayor in Morris County." More: See North Jersey 2025 primary results for Bergen, Essex, Passaic and Morris counties But in January, Ali switched sides and got behind the mayor. She said she wanted to end the feud and gear up for a competitive general election in November. "The 2025 election cycle poses significant challenges, and I strongly believe a united front is essential for ensuring Republican success," Ali wrote in a letter to both mayoral candidates. She offered to back Musella for council if he withdrew from the mayor's race. Musella said no. "Our campaign to end the cycle of corruption, over-taxation and taxpayer-funded overdevelopment in Parsippany, once and for all, cannot be intimidated," the challenger declared. Musella first ran for a council seat in the 2021 primary with the county committee-endorsed Louis Valori for mayor. Valori lost, but Musella secured a council nomination and joined Frank Neglia on a Barberio slate that swept into office that November. Ali wasn't the only turnaround. Choffo surprised many when he switched sides and backed Barberio at the mayor's campaign announcement in February. Weeks later, Barberio announced he had reached an agreement with the school board on how to share the PILOT revenue and ensure the district receives its expected funds. Another controversy arose when Barberio announced in a campaign video that he had reached an agreement for a memorandum of understanding between Town Hall and the school board on revenue sharing, negotiated with Choffo. Within hours, current board President Alison Cogan issued a statement saying no agreement had been signed and that the mayor's pronouncement was "inaccurate." Barberio responded by insisting he and Choffo had come to terms and blamed the board for not acting on "this historic agreement that would greatly benefit our students, teachers, and school system." Two board members, Tim Berrios and Jack Raia, remained public supporters of the Musella campaign. This article originally appeared on Morristown Daily Record: Morris County election results: Parsippany mayor survives GOP primary


San Francisco Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Hundreds gather in Oakland in solidarity with Los Angeles protesters
Hundreds of demonstrators gathered in Oakland on Tuesday night to express solidarity with Los Angeles, where a fifth day of protests were held to denounce arrests of immigrants by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The gathering at Fruitvale Plaza stood in sharp contrast to demonstrations held in San Francisco on Sunday and Monday, which led to arrests of more than 200 people who refused police orders to disperse. Called 'The Bay Stands with LA,' the event drew a crowd of a few hundred people was organized by Faith in Action East Bay, Bay Resistance and others. People held Mexican flags and signs with slogans like 'Constitution Applies to All' and 'We Are all Los Angeles' and calmly listened to a drum circle and other music performances and speeches from faith leaders. On Sunday and Monday, thousands gathered in San Francisco to protest a spate of recent federal immigration arrests and the Trump administration's most recent travel ban, as well as his decision to deploy the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles following protests there. On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom sued the Trump administration over the deployment, and immigration courts in San Francisco and Concord were shut down after arrests by ICE agents prompted more protests. At the Oakland event, union and faith leaders prayed with the crowd and urged people to build community and stick together to fight back against the federal government. The speeches from the packed stage were intermittently interrupted by the whirring of a drill as a worker put up plywood planks to protect the windows at a CitiBank at the plaza. Imam Sundiata Rashid of Oakland's Lighthouse Mosque inspired loud cheers from the crowd, saying that the anti-ICE movement did not have friends in either political party – and that it would not have even if Democrats controlled the White House. 'If we think for one minute we would've had it better had the other side won, we are sorely mistaken,' Rashid said. 'The other side didn't put a stop to ICE either.' Rashid also said that local police were complicit in suppressing protests and are helping ICE by doing so. 'They overpolice us, they put us in prison, they take our lives,' Rashid said. 'It doesn't matter if it's a federal cop or a local cop.' Ruben, a 59-year-old who did not give his last name because he is undocumented, said that he wasn't going to miss the vigil even if it meant risking his own safety. Both immigrants from Mexico, he and his wife Andrea have lived in the U.S. since 2017 but he said they have never experienced this much fear. 'I don't want my name out there, but I couldn't stay home either,' he said 'What good is safety if it costs someone else their freedom?" The speeches ended and demonstrators started to disperse around 8 p.m., when some protesters briefly blocked traffic at International Boulevard and 34th street to watch a sideshow collision in the street, and then soon moved on.


CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump is hyping a case to use American troops on domestic soil
Posing as a wartime leader, President Donald Trump is building a political case to use American troops not in a foreign conflict, but at home, to bolster his mass deportation sweeps. But California Gov. Gavin Newsom, the Democrat who heads the state leading resistance to a president with a taste for unchecked power, says a long-feared moment of peril is at hand for US democracy. Trump, in an emerging campaign with stark constitutional implications, Trump is conjuring a narrative of invasion and insurrection. He's exaggerating disorder in the relatively contained unrest, looting and protests in Los Angeles. And he's implying that, to keep the country safe, he's ready to deploy soldiers across the country. Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed on Tuesday that if he'd failed to dispatch the National Guard and US Marines to Los Angeles, it would be 'burning to the ground.' The president also warned that he was looking beyond Los Angeles, as other cities, and states – especially those run by Democrats – brace for expanded sweeps against undocumented migrants and protests that could follow. 'You know, if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'But I can inform the rest of the country that when they do it, if they do it, they are going to be met with equal or greater force that we met right here.' Then, in a highly politicized speech to troops at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, later Tuesday, the president portrayed entire neighborhoods of Los Angeles as locked in the grip of an occupying force of 'transnational gangs and criminal networks.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles,' Trump said, as if he was referring to a city seized by a hostile foreign army. 'We will use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore law and order right away. We're not going to wait seven days and eight days and wait for a governor that's never going to call and watch cities burn.' A day earlier, Trump had suggested that Los Angeles is just the start, saying at the White House, 'We are going to have troops everywhere.' In another development Tuesday that appeared to reveal the administration's intentions, the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem previously asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct troops in Los Angeles to arrest protesters. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Noem made the request – which would likely violate the law if ever carried out – in a weekend memo. DHS later clarified that Noem wrote the memo before she and Hegseth met with Trump. Newsom responded to Trump's increasing pressure with a broadcast to California's citizens on Tuesday evening. 'Democracy is under assault before our eyes, this moment we have feared has arrived,' said a Democrat who is seen as a potential 2028 presidential candidate. Trump is 'taking a wrecking ball, a wrecking ball to our Founding Fathers' historic project – three co-equal branches of independent government. There are no longer any checks and balances.' The president's trip to Fort Bragg celebrated the 250th anniversary of US Army, and in calmer times would draw little notice. But his aggressive use of his authority as commander in chief has revived fears about his authoritarian streak. Trump's speech – at times indistinguishable from a campaign event – was jarring given that the military is supposed to be a nonpartisan force. The optics were of a commander in chief rallying troops for a mission on his behalf. Fort Bragg has been such a backdrop before. Twenty years ago, President George W. Bush used it for a national televised address to try to win back the public as it began to turn against the war in Iraq. The current administration's handling of the situation in Los Angeles is also lending a foreboding tone to another event marking the Army's 250th birthday – a huge military parade in Washington this weekend. The spectacular just happens to be taking place on the 79th birthday of a president who loves basking in strongman imagery and the martial glow of soldiers and weaponry. Trump set the tone with a dark warning in the Oval Office. 'If there is any protest that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he told reporters. 'I haven't heard about a protest. But you know, this is people who hate our country,' he said of citizens potentially exercising their constitutional right to peaceful dissent. 'But they will be met with very great force.' He amped up the authoritarian mood music as he headed home from Fort Bragg, portraying Los Angeles as a city at war – an illusion that would make the deployment of active troops seem more apt. 'I just want to see peace. If there's peace, we get out. If there's even a chance of no peace, we stay there until there's peace.' This is more than typical Trumpian hyperbole. There's a long tradition of autocratic-style leaders creating or exaggerating public-order incidents to justify the use of the military. The protests have included scenes of agitators throwing projectiles at police, some looting and burning of cars, and other kinds of unrest, which state and local leaders have condemned – even while insisting the situation is nowhere near bad enough to merit troop deployments. But from the start, the administration has worked to leverage the anti-ICE protests for political gain. Trump suddenly announced on Saturday night that he'd send National Guard troops over the objections of Newsom – the first time a president has taken such action in decades. The reservists were followed by 700 active-duty Marines. Trump's dystopian evocation of Los Angeles as a city hostage to 'paid insurrectionists' and 'animals' is potentially laying the rhetorical groundwork for any future use of the Insurrection Act to allow domestic troops to make arrests and act in a law enforcement capacity. His strategy, which is gathering in intensity each day, is reminiscent of his claims that he won the 2020 election. This seemed absurd at first. But Trump's demagoguery whipped up a true uprising against the federal government and democracy at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Millions of voters later bought into his narrative of a stolen election, which sparked the greatest political comeback in history in 2024. It's easy to imagine the president cementing false impressions about the situation in California. Still, Trump is prone to exaggeration and threats that are not always carried out. And his administration is yet to use troops on the streets of Los Angeles to directly confront protesters. They are mostly protecting several federal buildings – one reason Democrats balked Tuesday when the Defense Department revealed that the operation is costing $134 million. And the administration may have off-ramps at hand. Sources told CNN this week that officials were looking for alternative options to the Insurrection Act to bolster protection for federal agents working on immigration enforcement. But Trump now has a long record of choreographing his intentions in public, and he often ignores advice to act with restraint. It would be logical for him to try to co-opt the military to further his personal and political goals. After all, he's reshaped the entire US government and the powers of the executive to that role after returning to power. Los Angeles may not be an isolated crisis. 'I think we're an experiment, because if you can do this to the nation's second-largest city, maybe the administration is hoping that this will be a signal to everybody everywhere to fear them,' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Tuesday. California's two Democratic senators, Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, wrote to Hegseth and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan to warn that the deployments were an extreme and inappropriate step. 'A decision to deploy active-duty military personnel within the United States should only be undertaken during the most extreme circumstances, and these are not them,' they wrote. 'That this deployment was made over the objections of state authorities is all the more unjustifiable.' Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, drew a distinction between Marines and the National Guard. 'Active-duty forces are generally not to be involved in domestic law enforcement operations,' Collins said. Yet it's clear the administration has maneuvered Democrats into the familiar political weak spot they've often occupied since Trump burst into presidential politics and used immigration as a stepping-stone to power. And many of his supporters will regard his tough-guy act as an appropriate dividend for their vote last November and are unlikely to fixate on whether he's acting legally and constitutionally. 'ICE agents need to be able to do their job,' Hegseth said during a House of Representatives hearing Tuesday, channeling the views of MAGA world. 'They're being attacked for doing their job, which is deporting illegal criminals. … And President Trump believes in law and order.' Noem, meanwhile, told reporters that Trump was merely protecting everyday Americans. 'This president is standing up for the average American who wants to walk their child to school every day safely, run their small business and provide for their families. That's the action that he's taken,' she told reporters in the Oval Office. But as usual, the president landed on a particularly resonant image – one that called forth the somber possibility that he now perceives the homeland as a war zone: 'The only flag that will wave triumphant over the streets of Los Angeles is the American flag, so help me God,' he told the troops at Fort Bragg.