&w=3840&q=100)
60 days or less: H-1B Workers get deportation notices despite legal status
The issue was flagged by Dillon Colucci, a partner at Greenberg Traurig LLP, who wrote in a firm post that some individuals were being served Notices to Appear (NTAs) despite remaining in legal status. His concerns were echoed by attorneys at Reddy Neumann Brown, Murthy Law Firm, Chugh LLP, and others.
'Losing your H-1B job is stressful enough—but now some workers are receiving Notices to Appear (NTAs) even while they're still legally within their 60-day grace period,' said Abhisha Parikh, a US-based immigration lawyer, in a social media post.
What's supposed to happen when an H-1B worker loses a job?
When employment ends, H-1B workers are allowed to stay in the US for up to 60 days to:
• Find a new job and transfer their H-1B
• Switch to a different immigration status (such as B-2 visitor)
• Leave the US voluntarily within the grace period
During this time, they are legally present and not considered out of status.
What's happening instead?
Several H-1B visa holders are reportedly receiving NTAs even before the 60-day period ends. An NTA is a formal notice initiating deportation proceedings in immigration court.
This contradicts US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) guidance, creates uncertainty for visa holders, and disrupts businesses relying on foreign talent.
The development follows a February 28, 2025 policy memorandum from USCIS, which expanded the types of circumstances that may trigger an NTA. The memo, accessed by Business Standard, clarified that Form I-862 (the NTA) outlines allegations and charges against an individual and initiates removal proceedings under section 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
USCIS, ICE and CBP all have the authority to issue NTAs.
Are rules being changed?
While there has been no official change to the grace period rule, the regulation allows the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to 'eliminate or shorten this 60-day period as a matter of discretion.' Colucci noted that, although this provision existed since 2016, its use was not widespread until recently.
He added that USCIS may now be using this discretion more frequently, though this has not been formally acknowledged by the agency.
Parikh questioned the move: 'This raises serious questions: Is this a new enforcement tactic or just administrative errors? Either way, it's putting skilled professionals at risk of deportation before they've done anything wrong.'
Who is affected?
NTAs are being issued in situations where individuals may technically no longer be in nonimmigrant status, even though they have pending applications such as:
• Adjustment of status (Form I-485)
• Change or extension of status
• Employment authorisation (EAD) while waiting for green card processing
In some cases, NTAs are issued because an employer notifies USCIS of termination, prompting the agency to consider the person out of status—even if an application is pending. Others may have filed change-of-status applications slightly late, which could also lead to an NTA.
According to Murthy Law Firm, an NTA starts the legal process for deportation. It requires the individual to appear before an immigration judge, beginning with a procedural master calendar hearing that may be followed years later by a full hearing.
If the individual leaves the US after receiving an NTA but before attending court, it may be considered a self-removal. This can trigger a re-entry ban for several years. Some may choose voluntary departure to avoid harsher penalties.
What H-1B workers can do
• Act quickly to find a new employer and file an H-1B transfer
• Consider switching to another visa category, such as B-2
• Leave the US voluntarily before the grace period ends, if no other option is available
If issued an NTA, individuals are advised to contact an immigration attorney immediately. Mistaken NTAs can sometimes be withdrawn or dismissed.
'The system is complicated, but staying informed is your best defence,' Parikh said. 'If you're on an H-1B visa, make sure you know your rights, act fast if you lose your job, and get legal help immediately if you receive an NTA during your grace period.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Nuvama sees 40% upside in THIS multibagger stock. Should you buy?
Multibagger stock: Brokerage firm Nuvama has initiated coverage on AGI Infra with a 'buy' recommendation due to ongoing and upcoming projects, anticipated high cash flows, and increasing demand for residential property. Shares of the construction company closed 1.29 per cent higher at ₹ 1,066.9 on the BSE index after Friday's stock market session, compared to ₹ 1.053.35 at the previous market close. 'We initiate coverage with a 'BUY' rating and a TP of INR1,448, valuing the stock at 1x FY26E NAV. AGI Infra (AGIIL) is among the few reputed real estate players in Punjab, with a dominant presence in Jalandhar, aided by a strong track record of well-received, high-quality projects,' Nuvama said. Operating in a market with limited branded competition, it has built a presence and is expanding into high-demand markets throughout Punjab. With a solid project pipeline and a large, well-situated land bank, it is estimated to benefit from Punjab's rising housing demand, according to the brokerage firm. Nuvama further expects that the ongoing and upcoming residential projects will generate a gross cash flow of ₹ 8,282 crore and a net cash flow of ₹ 2,060 crore. It has been recommended to buy with a target price of ₹ 1,448, an upside of 36%. AGIIL is a Punjab-based real estate developer with presence in cities such as Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Chandigarh, and Mohali. It has delivered over 10 projects. Primarily focused on residential real estate, it is also engaged in the commercial sector. Currently, it has 10 ongoing projects with a total saleable area of 11.32 million square feet, of which 4.98 million square feet remains available for sale. For the financial year ended on March 31, 2025, the company reported a net profit of ₹ 67 crore, compared to ₹ 52 crore posted in the previous year. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations given in this article are those of individual analysts. These do not represent the views of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.


Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India unlikely to import US genetically modified agricultural items under trade deal: Sources
During the ongoing trade negotiations, India is unlikely to agree to US demands to accept genetically modified (GM) agricultural products such as corn and soya, a source closely monitoring the talks has indicated. 'Some things are matters of principle. We can't import GM,' the source said in response to a query over the government's position on GM imports from the US. This assumes significance since agriculture remains one of the contentious issues between the two countries, and the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has previously flagged restrictions on its GM products by countries as discriminatory. 'The Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006 includes specific provisions for regulating food products derived from genetically engineered (GE) sources; however, as of December 31, 2024, the FSSAI was still in the process of establishing its regulations. India's biotechnology approval processes are slow, opaque, and subject to political influences, and do not appear to take into account science-based approval processes for GE products in exporting countries,' the USTR report had said. While India is seeking greater market access for its textiles, leather and footwear, the US is pushing for access to India's agricultural and dairy markets — a major hurdle, as Indian farmers often operate on small land parcels with limited technological support. In contrast, the US has demanded that India should drop its GM regulation. There is significant resistance to genetically modified (GM) crops in India. Only one GM crop — Bt cotton — is approved for cultivation. No GM food crop is commercially grown, although experimental trials continue. However, imports of GM soybean oil and canola oil are permitted. A 2013 report by the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER) emphasised that many studies deeming GM foods safe were industry-funded, and that long‑term, independent studies were lacking. New Delhi‑based think tank GTRI said: 'Environmental studies have shown that widespread use of Bt crops can lead to pest resistance, such as in the pink bollworm, and pose risks to non‑target species such as monarch butterflies, as suggested in a 1999 Nature study. Additionally, the overuse of glyphosate with herbicide-tolerant GM crops has led to 'superweeds' and increased herbicide use.' The GTRI said that GM and non‑GM crops may intermingle at various stages of the supply chain — during transport, storage or processing. 'Once GM material enters, there is a high risk it could leak into local farming systems or processed food chains, posing risks to food safety, environmental integrity, and India's export reputation — especially in GM‑sensitive markets such as the EU,' the think tank warned. It said the import of GM products, such as animal feed, could negatively affect India's agricultural exports to the EU, which enforces strict GM-labelling rules and faces strong consumer opposition to GM‑linked products. Although GM feed is permitted, many European buyers prefer fully GM‑free supply chains. India's fragmented agri‑logistics and lack of segregation infrastructure increase the likelihood of cross‑contamination and trace GM presence in export consignments. This could result in shipment rejections, higher testing costs, and erosion of India's GM‑free image, particularly in sectors such as rice, tea, honey, spices and organic foods, the GTRI said. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rare earth supply risk: Indian electronics firms worried as Chinese curbs may hit; but can Beijing also afford this?
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. A number of applicants under India's Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS) have flagged concerns over meeting their first-year production targets due to ongoing shortages of rare earth minerals. According to ET, at least 10 companies have raised the issue with the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY), warning that if the shortage continues for another six months, they may not be able to meet the incentive-linked thresholds. The rare earth scarcity stems from export restrictions imposed by China, which controls more than 90% of global rare earth processing. China introduced special licensing requirements for seven rare earth elements and associated magnets from April 4 this year, leading to supply disruptions across key industries. These include electronics, automobiles, and clean energy technologies. "Companies have expressed concern, but within the sector, it isn't an alarming outcry," an official aware of the matter was quoted as saying by ET. 'If there is a component that uses rare earth, instead of importing that rare earth and making that component in India, they will simply import that component.' While firms are exploring alternatives, such as sourcing from different suppliers or shifting to rare-earth-free technologies, the timing has been challenging, particularly for those scaling up manufacturing for exports. 'The ECMS has been unveiled at a time when many entities want to scale up and take advantage of exports,' said Ashok Chandak, president of the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA), as quoted by ET. He added that supply shocks in rare earth magnets have hit the sector hard. The Rs 22,919 crore ECMS, launched in May, seeks to build a robust domestic ecosystem for electronic components like multi-layer PCBs, lithium-ion cells, resistors, capacitors, display and camera modules. PCBs have attracted particular attention from applicants, according to KS Babu, secretary of the Indian Printed Circuit Association (IPCA), who noted that the scheme addresses both multi-layer and high-density interconnect boards. However, he also pointed out that local production of key inputs like copper-clad laminates is still missing. 'Chinese suppliers are now taking advantage by squeezing prices, citing problems with shipments,' Babu said, as per ET. The scheme, effective from FY26 through FY32, includes a one-year gestation period. However, manufacturers, particularly MSMEs, have sought quicker access to incentives to recover their investments. A Delhi-based PCB maker was cited by ET saying that the government has informally assured leniency during the verification and claims process. Responding to industry requests, MeitY will extend the ECMS application window beyond July 31, as confirmed by officials. Many small firms are still finalising their sourcing channels, joint ventures, and tech partnerships. In a written reply to the Rajya Sabha, minister of state for commerce and industry Jitin Prasada noted that the export restrictions on rare earth magnets have led to supply chain bottlenecks for auto and electronics sectors. However, the ministry has not received specific reports of cost escalation or project delays from industry hubs in Maharashtra, as per news agency PTI. Despite the disruption, industry leaders remain hopeful. 'China also can't afford to continue an export ban for long, since their companies will begin bleeding and it will place a long term strain on their relations with many countries,' Chandak said, as per ET. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now