GOP field begins to emerge in 2026 race for Pennsylvania governor
But will Stacy Garrity run?
Virtually the entire Republican Party in Pennsylvania is waiting for the answer. The 2026 gubernatorial election race looms, and Garrity, the twice-elected state treasurer from Bradford County, has been the main focus of attention since U.S. Rep Dan Meuser removed himself from consideration.
"I will have an announcement about the future of my career in service very soon," Garrity said when asked about her plans.
Social media posts have hinted the 2022 Republican nominee, Sen. Doug Mastriano of Franklin County, might be thinking about another run. But attempts to obtain a comment from Mastriano were not successful, and higher-ups in the party say there has been little talk about the former nominee.
"I have not heard a soul discuss that he is running, or should run, or that he would have any support," said Jason Richey, Allegheny County Republican Committee chairman and a former gubernatorial candidate himself. "I think Stacy is going to announce. I think she is going to run."
State Senate President Pro Tempore Kim Ward of Westmoreland County said she hopes Garrity will run.
"She's a fighter. And she's smart. She's a really intelligent, thoughtful treasurer, and I think she would make a superb governor because she's got all the ingredients," Ward said. "I look forward to her announcement and being behind her 100%."
And Melissa Hart, an attorney in Allegheny County and former Republican congresswoman, said Garrity has the "inner strength" to go up against Shapiro - widely regarded as a very tough opponent. While he has not yet formally announced a bid for reelection, recent polling has shown more than twice as many Pennsylvanians approve of Shapiro's job performance than disapprove. And his national prominence was underscored by a Thursday night appearance on Stephen Colbert's late-night television show.
To Hart, who was once a state senator, hesitancy to declare candidacy is understandable. There's a "coarseness" in modern politics that did not used to be present, she said.
Hence, the "enthusiasm for running for office is not as healthy as it should be," she said.
Nonetheless, while Republican chatter focuses on an unannounced Garrity, other potential Republican candidates may be sitting on the sidelines, according to pollster Chris Borick. A political science professor at Muhlenberg College in Lehigh County, Borick said if Garrity chooses not to run, "you would probably see a bunch of candidates throw their hats in the ring."
In 2024, Garrity beat Democratic challenger Erin McClelland in the state treasurer's race by a 52%-to-46% margin in a field with five candidates. Her total of more than 3.5 million votes was the largest ever for a state-level candidate in Pennsylvania history, observers said.
The campaign raised eyebrows when Shapiro opted not to endorse McClelland, a fellow Democrat - a decision that may have been influenced by less-than-flattering social media posts made by McClelland concerning Shapiro.
The only hat in the ring for Democrats in the May 19, 2026, primary will likely belong to the 52-year-old Shapiro. He will ride into the 2026 contest on a long string of election victories - for state representative, Montgomery County commissioner, attorney general, and governor.
"Gov. Shapiro is in a very strong position, as most incumbent governors are," said former Republican state Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman of Centre County. To date, Corman said, things "have gone very well" for Shapiro but a lot could happen before the November 2026 general election.
In his first year on the job, Shapiro received a barrage of criticism from Republicans for a decision to line-item veto money for a voucher-style school scholarship program, a concept he had supported during during his election campaign.
They have consistently attacked his spending proposals as unsustainable - one senator said a Shapiro budget would "bankrupt" the state - and more recently, Republicans have attacked what they describe as a lack of transparency in the use of taxpayer-funded airplanes.
Some Republicans believe Shapiro's continued flirtation with a possible presidential run may sour some voters.
"Gov. Shapiro has always had his eye on his next office," Ward said. "Everything he has done, as far as I am concerned, has been calculated into 'How does that affect his run for president.' And I don't think that's a positive for Pennsylvania."
Since he was a finalist in Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris' 2024 search for a running mate, Shapiro has remained on the national stage. A late June Emerson College poll put Shapiro in a tie for fourth when Democratic primary voters nationwide were asked about a potential 2028 presidential candidate.
Both Shapiro and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez polled at 7%, behind former U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg with 16%, Harris with 13%, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom with 12%.
Shapiro will have national and state Democratic backing in the 2026 governor's race, according to state Sen. Jay Costa of Allegheny County, the top Democrat in the state Senate. Hanging on to the Pennsylvania governorship is "imperative" for the party, Costa said, and Shapiro and Lt. Gov. Austin Davis of McKeesport comprise "a very strong, formidable team."
Borick said that's a charge Republicans are sure to hurl at the governor regardless of who their candidate is. His likely response, Borick said, has already become apparent in his frequent appearances all over the state.
"He is saying, 'Look at my job performance. Look at where I am. Look at what I am doing,'" Borick said.
As July nears to a close, Shapiro is bogged down in closed-door negotiations for a state budget that had a deadline of June 30. How long it takes and how the spending plan is perceived will influence the upcoming campaign, multiple observers said.
And even though Garrity has not declared her intentions, friction has developed between supporters of Shapiro and those who plan to back Garrity.
Earlier this month, a Philadelphia-area union official said on social media that if Garrity ran for governor, she would never again have support from the union, "not even for county dog catcher." That and other comments raised the ire of Ward and other women in the Senate Republican caucus, who claimed they were sexist and meant to intimidate.
Costa, who said he saw the posts, rejected that notion and said the wording did not convey the message Republicans were trying to attach to it. Shapiro was asked about it during a public appearance on Wednesday, and he brushed it off.
"Here is what I know to be true. The Republicans will nominate someone to run against me for governor. Let them play that out - that deals with their politics on their side. I am going to continue doing my job, governing for all Pennsylvanians," he said.
That response drew more fire from Republican women in the Senate, who believed he failed to address the issue. Sen. Camera Bartolotta, R-Washington, said it was a "masterful" dodge of the topic.
Shapiro's win by more than 700,000 votes over Mastriano in 2022 came after the senator was the top vote-getter in a bruising, nine-way primary. The state Republican party wants to avoid a repeat of the chaotic scenario.
Its communications director, James Markley, said the GOP is working to narrow Democrats' registration advantage, which he put at less than than 70,000 "active" voters. The goal, he said, is to provide the eventual nominee with "the strongest infrastructure possible" for the campaign.
Garrity worked at Global Tungsten & Powders Corp. in Towanda in Bradford County for decades - eventually becoming a corporate vice president - but also served a full career in the Army Reserve, with three deployments.
Markley said Garrity has produced "real results" in multiple aspects of her life. And Borick, the pollster, said an opt-in from Garrity would set up a fascinating match.
"We don't see this very often in Pennsylvania politics - where you get two clear party stars to face off."
_____
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Arizona political battle over border rages as local governments choose whether to cooperate with ICE
National news constantly highlights the turmoil at the U.S.-Mexico border, but in southern Arizona—where red desert dust swirls and cacti rise like sentinels—the people living closest to the issue face a daily reality shaped by more than headlines. Amid this rugged landscape, a political battle simmers as local leaders grapple with balancing community safety and the broader national immigration debate. Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, expressed her dissatisfaction with how federal budgets have been managed over the past four years. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Winn said infrastructure received 'millions and millions of dollars' under the Biden administration, alleging that some of those funds were used to 'encourage the facilitation of illegal immigration into this country.' Advertisement 'That money went unaccounted for, it was infused into the budgets. And so now they're finding that they have to cut programs because they don't have that money anymore,' she continued. 'We were the front door for the last four years of all kinds of atrocities happening in this country… we're paying a price for it now.' In a statement to Fox News Digital, Eric Robbins, chair of the Pima County Democratic Party, sharply criticized what he described as the Trump administration's legacy of cruelty and misinformation on immigration policy. 7 Kathleen Winn, chair of the Pima County Republican Party, in an interview. Fox News Digital 'Arizonans are exhausted by the Trump administration's gaslighting, cruelty, and lies,' Robbins said. He accused Republican leaders—both nationally and within Arizona—of profiting from fear, citing what he called a surge in unjustified arrests by 'masked, unidentifiable agents' targeting individuals without criminal records. Advertisement 'These agents have reportedly detained mothers en route to buy food, leaving their children alone by the roadside,' he said. Robbins further claimed that such tactics have undermined local law enforcement efforts and funneled detainees into what he described as 'for-profit detention centers.' Labeling these practices as part of a 'documented pattern of abuse,' Robbins cited allegations, including the harassment of nonprofit workers, increased privatization and militarization at the border, due process violations, and widespread family separations. 'This isn't security—it's systemic failure dressed as patriotism,' Robbins stated. 'Trump is not a patriot. He's a nationalist, and Americans need to recognize that distinction.' Advertisement On the other hand, Jesus Jerez, a member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Committee, echoed Winn's concerns and claimed enforcement had been limited during the last four years. 7 Military vehicles and a soldier overlooking a border fence. AP 'The last four years, there was no enforcement activity,' Jerez told Fox News Digital. '[Agents were] told that you can't arrest anybody, but you give them these papers, and you hold them until someone can take them to be processed and then released.' Winn underscored Tucson's importance in the national immigration flow. Advertisement 'Everything that happens at the border in order to get into the innermost regions of the country. [Tucson is] a stopping point once you go into the country,' she said. 'It erodes the quality of life here because people don't have [financial] means, so crime gets increased, people steal… We are at the effect of whatever is happening at the border.' When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). 'We're not seeing as many illegal immigrants,' she said, although she acknowledged that drug smuggling remains an issue in the region. 'Even though human being smuggling has stopped, the drug smuggling has not. And there's a huge network set up in Arizona. So drugs come over the border in whichever way,' Winn said. Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. 7 When asked about border security changes under Trump, Winn aligned her view with that of Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). REUTERS 7 Winn also outlined the challenges facing Pima County due to what she described as a mismanaged policy. AFP via Getty Images 'Pima County is experiencing high homelessness, high drug use, and not a lot of solutions, and we're low on police because… they underfunded the police over the last three years. So we are at the effects of the bad policies from the last four years. 'Although it's getting better, it seems that it got worse, to [the] great detriment of the people of Pima County,' she added. Advertisement Dan Dellinges, a state committeeman for the Santa Cruz County Republican Party, noted an uptick in property theft along common travel routes. 'We've had an increase in general property theft along routes of travel [and] pass-throughs here. We also have a number of people who die crossing the desert here to the east, coming into the country illegally, and oftentimes those bodies are discovered by hunters or hikers or side-by-side drivers and then the county or the border patrol comes in and recovers those bodies,' he said. Dellinges criticized what he described as a breakdown in cooperation between local and federal authorities. 7 Jesus Jerez, member of the Santa Cruz County Republican Party. Fox News Digital Advertisement 7 U.S. Army soldiers stand next to Stryker combat vehicles on a hilltop overlooking the U.S.-Mexico border fence in Nogales, Ariz. AP 'Arizona state constitution recognizes supremacy with federal, United States Constitution. At this county it's not recognized, there's very little cooperation with the federal government,' he explained. When asked to expand on this claim, Dellinges pointed to a fundamental disagreement he has with the county sheriff. In the context of immigration enforcement, the Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office in Arizona, led by Sheriff David Hathaway, has shown reluctance to fully cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Advertisement According to a January report from KGUN9, Hathaway pulled his deputies out of a program where they worked alongside Border Patrol. 'The City of Nogales, Arizona is 95% Hispanic. The County of Santa Cruz is 80% Hispanic. I don't want there to be fear or tension between the community and my Sheriff's Office. We run the 911 dispatch center for the county, and most households are Hispanic here, so I don't want them to fear that they're inviting an immigration officer, a border patrol agent, into their house if they hear an intruder at the back door. I want them to not fear calling us,' he said at the time. 7 Vehicle driving near border wall with razor wire. AP Hathaway has pointed to courts ruling that state and local agencies cannot be forced to enforce immigration law, labeling it a federal issue. He also believes his team does not have the specific training or funding necessary for immigration enforcement–instead urging his office to focus on local violent crimes. Advertisement Jerez warned of the risks posed by letting in large numbers of unvetted migrants. 'We let in so many people: unknown people, unvetted people, and some very bad people. The people here know how many people came through… These people are desperate and they don't know our rules. We're catching up, slowly catching up,' he said. He also expressed concern about public complacency.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bipartisan Senate price transparency bill can fix US health care
In the aftermath of Republicans' divisive reconciliation bill, Congress has the opportunity to come together and pass bipartisan legislation to address one of the nation's biggest problems: The broken health care system. Approximately 100 million Americans have health care debt, and one-quarter of insured families avoid care each year due to unknown costs. The Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, recently introduced by Sens. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), can reverse runaway health care costs that are placing a tremendous burden on American families by empowering them to compare and save. Since 2000, hospital prices have increased by 257 percent, which explains why the growth rate in health insurance premiums has outstripped workers' earnings by a ratio of almost 3 to 1 over this timeframe. The Marshall-Hickenlooper bill gives employers and patients the upfront price information they need to protect themselves from overcharges and choose affordable care. It requires the publication of actual prices, including discounted cash and negotiated insurance rates, not estimates, throughout the health care system. And it requires insurers to give patients an advanced explanation of benefits —a breakdown of costs, including their out-of-pocket responsibility — before care is delivered. I joined a letter signed by 40 leading health economists calling on senators to co-sponsor and quickly pass this crucial legislation. Economists understand actual prices are essential to functioning marketplaces that generate fair-market costs. Under the opaque status quo, consumers are essentially required to pay for care with the equivalent of a blank check, giving hospitals and health insurers tremendous market power to overcharge and profiteer. Hidden prices result in wide cost variations for the same care, a sign of market failure. Recent research I conducted for Rice University's Baker Center reveals that mean outpatient hospital prices in Houston vary by nearly 200 percent for the same insurer. A recent study in Health Affairs Scholar shows that colonoscopy rates can vary by seven times for those with the same health coverage. Price transparency corrects this information asymmetry between consumers and providers, putting downward and convergent pressure on prices. It fosters competition and returns excessive health industry profits to patients, businesses, unions, school districts and workers where they belong. Redirecting funds from the health care industrial complex back to the private economy can create an enormous economic stimulus. Employers and employees especially stand to benefit. The average employer-sponsored family health insurance plan now costs $24,000 per year, with workers bearing the majority of the cost through premium deductions and lower wages. One analysis found that about the same amount of employee compensation growth since 2000 has gone to premium costs as to paychecks. Transparency empowers employers to steer workers to high-value care, reducing premium costs and increasing take-home pay. The Marshall-Hickenlooper bill also gives employers access to their claims data and reveals the contractual relationships of their health plan administrators, allowing them to remedy overbilling and spread pricing. My research suggests that lowering annual premiums by just $1,373 per employee can boost the profitability of retail businesses by an average of 12.4 percent. You don't need to be an economist to understand that upfront prices are needed to avoid overcharges and shop for affordable care and coverage. But economists can speak to the significant impact of price transparency on business earnings, worker paychecks and economic dynamism. Actual prices, as required by the Marshall-Hickenlooper bill, can restore affordability, accountability and trust to American health care. That's something people of all political persuasions can support.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senators pick at USDA reorganization proposal
Deputy Agriculture Secretary Stephen Vaden took questions from the Senate Agriculture Committee on Wednesday after the agency's plan to slash its Washington offices and move staff to satellite locations across the country raised bipartisan eyebrows. Much of the panel's criticism focused on whether the administration had sufficiently notified Congress — friction that led to Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), the committee's chair, to call the hearing on relatively short notice. In a testy exchange with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Vaden said that the department was opening up a period to consult with agency employees and other stakeholders. Several Republicans also took issue with the way the plan had been announced without their consultation. 'It is something that ultimately this Congress has something to say about, both from an authorization standpoint, and certainly from an appropriation standpoint,' said Sen. John Hoevan (R-N.D.). 'Is this a process where we're going to work together on an outcome, or is this an outcome that we're not just going to talk about, but as a fait accompli?' Hoeven and Vaden will meet later Wednesday, the senator said. At the hearing, Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) also expressed disappointment with the agency's rollout of its plan, although she said she agreed with USDA's overall goal. The agency's plan, announced last week, would move most staff to five hubs — in North Carolina, Missouri, Indiana, Colorado and Utah — and wind down most of its federal buildings in Washington, D.C. Vaden defended the changes as an effort to bring the agency's employees — many of whom he claimed were working remotely anyway — closer to farmers and other constituencies of the agency. He claimed that the consolidations, in conjunction with voluntary buyouts given to thousands of agency employees, could save the federal government as much as $4 billion. At least 15,000 Agriculture Department employees accepted a deferred resignation in May as part of the Trump administration's push to aggressively reduce staff. 'We need more agencies to follow Secretary Rollins' and USDA's lead,' Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) said later in the panel. The plan would also consolidate various regional offices that Vaden referred to as 'middle managers,' a move that several senators worried could lead to services being lost. The reductions include the regional offices of the National Forest Service, which manages wildfires and other elements of America's woodlands. Several senators, including Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), said they were worried about the proposal's move to eliminate regional offices of the agency's research arm, including the branch of the Agriculture Research Service in Stoneville, Miss. Vaden claimed that the location's staff would remain, an answer that seemed to satisfy the Mississippi senator.
