Ignore Trump's tantrums, focus on domestic strength: Porinju's mantra for investors
Porinju Veliyath
, Equity Intelligence India.
So much is happening—how should the Indian investor be looking at equities right now and cut through all the surrounding noise?
Porinju Veliyath:
Yes, it's true there's a lot of noise around the tariffs, but I believe this will be a passing phase. The world will continue to do business and engage in trade, with or without America. It's not a big issue. But we cannot respond to this whole crazy situation created by a rather unpredictable man with an emotional or sentimental mindset.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
Get Quote
Undo
India has come a long way over the last decade as a stable and strong nation. We have our own individuality and personality. We have evolved significantly. Today, we are one of the strongest nations globally—not just in terms of the size of the economy, but also in terms of identity and maturity. We're not going to react to such developments emotionally or based on temporary sentiment.
Everyone knows about Trump. Even those who voted for him acknowledge that he's a bit erratic, perhaps even uncivilized in some ways. The way he impulsively says things, makes sudden decisions—even ones with serious consequences for large nations like India—based on personal emotions or perceived insults, is not sustainable. This too shall pass.
We can't depend on one individual, even if he is the president of the world's most powerful country today. Presidents and people will come and go. But the India–US relationship is deep and strong, and will continue to remain so in the long term.
Live Events
We must view this as a responsible and confident nation—and I'm glad to see that the Indian government is doing exactly that. We're not reacting impulsively. We're not trying to escalate the situation with rhetoric. We're being rational, sticking to facts, and showing maturity. That approach deserves appreciation.
So, investors shouldn't worry too much. Yes, there's an issue right now, but we will overcome it.
But as an investor, what should one be buying right now? And what should one be avoiding, considering the uncertainty—not just from tariffs, but also from earnings pressures and signs of a slowdown back home?
Porinju Veliyath:
Coming back to the market and economy—India is one of the fastest-growing large economies. We are going through a very vibrant economic phase. In fact, our true potential—the ecosystem and platform being built for much higher growth—is not fully reflected in the current 6% to 7% GDP numbers.
Our domestic economy alone is quite large, and it is growing steadily. Investors should focus on the domestic market—on goods and services.
There's another important point many small-time investors may not realize: this tariff talk is primarily about goods, not services. And when it comes to global exports, services form the largest part of India's exports, and that segment continues to grow.
Even though there are some concerns about possible disruptions from the AI revolution, those fears may be exaggerated. While AI might impact certain top layers of service jobs, India has a big role to play in AI applications globally. Many Indian companies have already started building products and services in this space and are working with global clients.
So yes, there is uncertainty—but equally, there are opportunities. There are pockets of value. However, investors must understand that this is not a cheap market from a value investing perspective. Broad market valuations are not low. It's not a time for indiscriminate bargain hunting.
That said, opportunities always exist. Even in today's market, we see potential in domestic-focused companies, service exporters, and businesses in the AI segment. Investors need to be selective—this is a stock-picker's market. Cherry-picking is the right approach.
To sum it up, while the broader market may not be offering deep value, there are pockets where smart investors can find opportunities. The
Indian economy
will continue to perform well. These tariff and trade issues are temporary blips. And as I said earlier, India is too big and too stable a country to be impacted by the whims of one individual—even someone like Mr. Trump and his unpredictable or childish behaviour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
India's consumer giants put their ad money where the shoppers are
Mumbai: Hindustan Unilever Ltd, Marico Ltd, Godrej Consumer Products Ltd, and other consumer goods companies are allocating 30-50% of their media budgets for online advertising, in a strategic shift away from traditional media such as television. For Dabur India Ltd, digital is now a core pillar of its media strategy, accounting for over 30% of its advertising spending currently, up from about 10% in 2020-21. In FY25, the consumer goods company spent ₹864.6 crore, or 6.9% of its ₹12,563 crore consolidated revenue from operations, on advertising and publicity. 'This shift mirrors where our consumers are. They are spending more time on mobile, OTT (video streaming platforms), and increasingly on connected TV, which is emerging as a high-impact medium for reaching premium and urban audiences," said Rajiv Dubey, head of media at Dabur India. 'Digital offers us sharper targeting, real-time measurement, and seamless integration with e-commerce and quick-commerce, enabling a direct impact on sales," he added. 'Influencer marketing has also scaled rapidly, with the number of influencer-led campaigns at Dabur growing over 2.5 times in the last three years, spanning macro, micro, and regional creators." A large portion of overall media spending in India is now online, fueled by the proliferation of smartphones and increased access to cheaper data, which allows more consumers to browse content online. In 2024, digital media accounted for 60% of all ad revenue, according to recent estimates by media buying company GroupM. Television's share of advertising revenues stood at 26%, a small decline from the year prior, while print accounted for 10%. Overall, GroupM expects Indian advertising to grow by 7% in 2025 to reach ₹1,64,137 crore, adding an incremental ₹10,730 crore. Where consumers go More than half of Hindustan Unilever's media spending is now online, with a large portion allocated to social media promotions, former chief executive Rohit Jawa said following the consumer goods giant's earnings announcement last month. 'We are going where the consumers are going, if they watch more social media, we go there. If they watch more media on digital platforms, we go there. So we go where the eyeballs go," he said. 'Our intention is to follow the viewer and to be competitive on the aggregate in terms of our share of voice. That means we have to change the way we do marketing and brand content." On a consolidated basis, the maker of Lux soaps and Kissan sauces, spent ₹6,199 crore on advertising and promotions in FY25. HUL's strategy isn't limited to urban markets but also aimed at reaching consumers in rural areas, ' Jawa said. 'It's not just an urban thing; influencers are in rural areas also. For brands like Wheel (detergent), we are testing influencers or even using digital channels like YouTube." Other fast-moving consumer goods companies (FMCG) too are engaging influencers to reach consumers on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, taking the fight to online-first or direct-to-consumer brands, some of which rely solely on social media to sell their products. 'Media monies have always chased eyeballs. There was a time when advertising was print-heavy, then it moved to TV, and now it's digital because that's where the consumption is," said Shantanu Sirohi, CEO, Interactive Avenues, the digital agency under the IPG Mediabrands, a media and marketing services company. 'Digital isn't just one thing but within that 7-10 things," he said. As a result, digital is more cost-effective as an advertising medium. Television, on the other hand, has become more fragmented with more regional channels and options. 'If companies wish to chase larger volumes and make a big impact, the number of large shows or properties where brands can go big are limited (say, the Indian Premier League or Kaun Banega Crorepati).," he added. 'No one media model' Among other large FMCG companies, Godrej Consumer Products too has increased its spending on digital media—from 5-6% of its overall media spending pre-covid to 20-25% now. 'Many global markets we operate in may have higher digital spends. In India, we are roughly about three-fourths on TV and one-fourth on digital. A lot of the digital spending is actually on connected TV," said Ashwin Moorthy, global head of marketing, India, at Godrej Consumer Products. Connected TV refers to any television set that connects to the internet, allowing users access to video streaming platforms. 'We realize today that there's no one media model. The view we have taken is [that] we need to look at media from the perspective of where the consumer is likely to be exposed to an ad in the most impactful way at the cheapest possible cost," Moorthy said. The company, which sells brands such as Cinthol soaps and Hit mosquito repellant, spent ₹1,020.22 crore on advertising and publicity in FY25. Marico's digital media spending has also increased substantially from a few years ago to 30% now, according to the company. 'Some of our brands like Livon (haircare brand) will have a far greater majority of spending online versus a brand like Saffola (edible oil," said Saugata Gupta, managing director and CEO. 'This doesn't include the digital-first brands (such as PureSense for skincare and CocoSoul for hair) where 100% of spending is digital," Gupta added. 'If I add the digital brands, we will be one of the biggest digital spenders because those brands have a high A2S (advertising-to-sales ratio) and they have high gross margins."
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
US threatens more tariffs on India ahead of Trump–Putin Alaska talks; New Delhi responds
The United States has been relentless on its Donald Trump induced tariff war, as US treasury Secretary has warned another spate of secondary tariffs on India over Russian oil trade. Washington has accused New Delhi of 'fuelling' the war machinery of Russia, by buying their oil at discounted prices. This comes as US President Donald Trump is headed to Alaska to meet Russia's Vladimir Putin to seal a deal to 'stop' the Ukraine war. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that secondary tariffs could be raised depending on the outcome of President Donald Trump's high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Speaking to Bloomberg TV on Wednesday, Bessent said Washington had already imposed secondary tariffs on India for purchasing Russian oil, and further measures were on the table if negotiations with Moscow failed to produce results. 'We've put secondary tariffs on Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up,' he remarked. The warning comes against the backdrop of strained India–US ties, fuelled by Delhi's rising imports of discounted Russian crude since the start of the Ukraine war. Russian oil accounted for 35–40% of India's total crude imports in 2024, a sharp increase from just 3% in 2021. India has defended its buying strategy, citing the need to secure affordable energy for its vast population amid volatile global prices. During a press briefing on Thursday, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal described India–US relations as a comprehensive global strategic partnership, grounded in shared interests, democratic values, and strong bilateral ties. He noted that the partnership has endured various transitions and challenges in the past, expressing hope that it will continue to advance on the basis of mutual respect and common interests. He further stated, 'We have already issued our statement and would draw your attention to it.' Trump and Putin are set to meet in Anchorage on Friday in a bid to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. The US president has warned of 'severe consequences' if Moscow refuses to agree to a peace deal. Bessent urged European nations to align more closely with Washington's sanctions regime, saying, 'The Europeans need to join us in these sanctions. The Europeans need to be willing to put on these secondary sanctions.' Trade negotiations between the two nations have been ongoing for months but remain stuck on key issues, including India's high tariffs on agricultural and dairy products. The tensions have deepened after Trump announced a new 50% tariff rate on Indian goods, due to take effect on 27 August — a move some analysts have likened to an informal trade embargo. The higher tariff would make India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia, dealing a potential blow to key export-oriented sectors such as textiles and jewellery. Economists warn it could shave as much as 0.5% off India's GDP growth. The US administration has framed the tariffs as part of a broader plan to 'make global trade fairer' and to narrow America's $45 billion trade deficit with India. Trump has repeatedly accused India of being a 'tariff abuser' and is keen to use trade policy as leverage in both economic and geopolitical negotiations. US trade envoys are expected to arrive in New Delhi on 25 August to resume talks — but with the Alaska meeting looming, the outcome could hinge on a separate stage entirely.
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
What does Trump's 15% deal mean for Nvidia?
Picture this: You're running the world's most valuable company, sitting on a $4.4 trillion market cap, and suddenly the U.S. government knocks on your door with an unusual proposition. "Hey, we'll let you sell chips to China again, but we want 15% of every sale." Welcome to Nvidia's new reality under Trump 2.0. In an unprecedented move that has left analysts scrambling for historical comparisons, Nvidia and AMD have agreed to hand over 15% of their Chinese AI chip revenues to the U.S. government. This isn't your typical corporate tax or export duty – it's a revenue-sharing agreement that feels more like a mafia protection racket than traditional trade policy. The deal centers around Nvidia's H20 chip, a deliberately "dumbed-down" version of their flagship AI processors designed specifically for the Chinese market. Think of it as selling a Ferrari with a speed limiter – it looks impressive but may not be able reach its full potential. The H20 was created after Biden-era export controls banned the sale of Nvidia's most advanced chips to China, citing national security concerns. But here's where it gets interesting: Trump initially expanded these restrictions in April, effectively killing H20 sales to China entirely. Nvidia had to write off $4.5 billion in inventory and commitments – a financial gut punch that would make even the most seasoned CFO wince. Then, just as suddenly, the ban was reversed, but with a catch that almost nobody saw coming. Trump's approach to this situation reveals his fundamental worldview: everything is negotiable, and America should get paid. Rather than maintaining the traditional binary of "national security threat" versus "safe for export," he's created a third category: "safe enough if we get our cut." The numbers are staggering. Before the April restrictions, Nvidia was selling around $7.1 billion worth of H20 chips per quarter to China. With the 15% government take, that means Uncle Sam could pocket over $1 billion every three months from Nvidia alone. For a president who made his fortune in real estate deals, this must feel like the ultimate win-win scenario. From Nvidia's perspective, this deal seems to represents pragmatic capitalism at its finest. CEO Jensen Huang, who has been walking a diplomatic tightrope between Washington and Beijing, understands a fundamental truth: 85% of something is infinitely better than 100% of nothing. The company's statement was diplomatically bland but revealed their strategic thinking: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." To understand why Nvidia agreed to this unusual arrangement, you need to grasp just how crucial the Chinese market is. China represented about 13% of Nvidia's total revenue in fiscal 2025 – roughly $17 billion. But it's not just about the current numbers; it's about the future of AI development globally. Chinese tech giants like Alibaba, Tencent, and ByteDance aren't just customers – they're innovation engines driving AI advancement. When these companies can't access cutting-edge hardware, they don't just sit idle. They innovate around the constraints, potentially developing solutions that could eventually compete with American AI systems. Here's the kicker: Nvidia's absence from China has created a vacuum that competitors appear to be eager to fill. Huawei's Ascend AI chips, once dismissed as inferior alternatives, are rapidly improving. While Nvidia's H100 delivers 2,000 BF16 TFLOPs compared to Ascend 910C's 780 BF16 TFLOPs, the gap is narrowing. More importantly, every day Nvidia stays out of China is another day for Huawei to gain market share and customer loyalty. The market dynamics have already shifted dramatically. Nvidia once commanded 95% of China's GPU market. Under the restrictions, that number plummeted to 50%. In the high-stakes world of AI infrastructure, market share can be everything – losing it is easy, but winning it back requires years of relationship rebuilding. Let's break down the financial impact with some real numbers. Based on Nvidia's recent performance, a typical quarter of H20 sales to China generates around $7-9 billion in revenue. Under the new arrangement, if we assume $8 billion in quarterly sales, the U.S. government would receive $1.2 billion, leaving Nvidia with $6.8 billion. Now, this might sound like a massive haircut, but consider the alternative. During the export ban, Nvidia received exactly $0 from Chinese H20 sales. From a purely mathematical standpoint, $6.8 billion is infinitely better than zero. Moreover, this represents only about 2-3% of Nvidia's total quarterly revenue, making it more of a manageable cost of doing business than an existential threat. The timing couldn't be better for Nvidia's financial planning either. The company has been facing downward earnings revisions, largely due to geopolitical uncertainties rather than fundamental business problems. This deal provides clarity – expensive clarity, but clarity nonetheless. This arrangement reveals something fascinating about how Trump views technology policy. Unlike his predecessor, who treated chip exports as a binary national security issue, Trump seems to see them as bargaining chips in a larger economic game. The message is clear: American technology dominance should generate American profits, even when that technology is being used by competitors. Critics are having a field day with this logic. Republican Congressman John Moolenaar warned that this precedent could "incentivize the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities." The concern is valid – if national security can be monetized, does it cease to be about security at all? But Trump's supporters argue this approach is actually more honest about the real motivations behind trade policy. After all, if H20 chips were truly a national security threat, why allow their sale at all? By extracting a "tax," the administration is acknowledging that these exports are primarily about economic competition, not existential security concerns. From an investment perspective, the market's reaction has been surprisingly muted. Both Nvidia and AMD shares closed slightly lower on the news, but appear to be approaching panic selling. This suggests investors view the deal as a net positive – expensive access may still better than no access. The revenue-sharing arrangement also provides a strange form of insurance for Nvidia. Since the U.S. government now has a direct financial interest in these sales, there's less likelihood of sudden policy reversals. When Uncle Sam is getting $1+ billion per quarter from a business relationship, shutting it down becomes much more complicated. However, uncertainty remains about the long-term implications. Will the government demand an even higher percentage if sales grow? Could this model extend to other technology exports? These questions are keeping analysts busy and investors cautious. This deal represents more than just a corporate tax arrangement – it's a fundamental shift in how America approaches technological competition. Rather than using export controls purely as a security tool, the Trump administration seems to be treating them as revenue generators. This could reshape global technology trade in ways we're only beginning to understand. For Nvidia, this arrangement provides a pathway back into the world's second-largest economy, albeit an expensive one. For the U.S. government, it creates a new revenue stream while maintaining some control over sensitive technology transfers. For China, it offers access to advanced AI chips, though at a premium price and with lingering security concerns. The real winners and losers in this arrangement will only become clear over time. But one thing that may be certain: the intersection of technology, national security, and international trade just got a lot more complicated – and a lot more expensive. Disclaimer: This article is sponsored content. The inputs and details accounted for in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of Mint, and Mint does not endorse or assume any responsibility for the information provided. Investing in stock markets involve financial risks, take expert advice before investing.
