logo
What New Zealand could gain from India's booming pharmaceutical sector

What New Zealand could gain from India's booming pharmaceutical sector

RNZ News25-05-2025

Photo:
123RF
Dr Chinthaparthi Prabhakar Reddy remembers the sleepless nights of March 2020.
The World Health Organisation had just declared Covid-19 to be a pandemic, and the confirmed number of cases was steadily rising into the thousands.
He would often wake up in a cold sweat, anxious about how life might unravel before his eyes.
As the virus was spreading fast, one thing became imminently clear - the race for a vaccine had begun, and it was time for him to raise his hand to the challenge.
A clinical pharmacologist and professor at Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences in Hyderabad, Reddy volunteered to become a principal investigator for the phase three clinical trials for Covaxin - India's first indigenous Covid-19 vaccine.
It was an inactivated virus vaccine or, in other words, a "killed" version of the virus that could trigger an immune response within patients without causing infection.
Conducting the trials for such an important vaccine was a mammoth task, but when Reddy describes the process, it sounds almost simple.
"We just needed to take the virus, grow it, kill it with chemicals, then package and administer it," he says.
"This method has a well-documented safety history, so we were confident the side-effects would be minimal. Almost all vaccines today follow this process."
Covaxin was India's first indigenous vaccine against Covid-19.
Photo:
123RF
Confidence in the science, however, didn't make the process any less grueling.
Reddy and his peers faced an unprecedented challenge with Covid-19.
Where the average vaccine development timeline can take anywhere from 10-15 years, Reddy had just 10-15 months.
"Developing a fast-tracked vaccine at record speed was the challenge … any drug or vaccine development typically costs US$3 billion to US$4 billion and can take around a decade because of the sheer manpower involved.
Dr Chinthaparthi Prabhakar Reddy
Photo:
RNZ / Jogai Bhatt
"Pre-clinical trials on cells and animals can take up to six years, while clinical trials, which unfold in three phases and involve human participants, can take up to two years for each phase.
"The first phase of clinical trials tests the safety of the vaccine on a small group of volunteers, which expands into larger and larger groups. By phase three, we see thousands of participants injected.
"Only after these trials are over can manufacturers apply for approval, and that process itself can take up to six months.
"In a pandemic, we didn't have that kind of timeline. Twelve years became 12 months. We were scared every day."
Covaxin's phase one trials began in July 2020 and lasted just 96 days before moving into phase two.
Reddy says emergency approval for the vaccine was granted in just two days, before the phase three stage was even complete.
"Regulators, manufacturers, researchers, everyone was working day and night. So, years became months, months became days. It really was that fast."
Manufacturers had begun producing Covaxin long before it was officially approved - which meant by the time regulators gave it the green light, there was already plenty of stock to distribute around the country.
"Covaxin got approved very quickly, and it had high efficacy rates," Reddy says. "But each day was tense… By the time we reached phase three, there were around 26,000 participants across nearly 20 centres throughout India. Everyone worked incredibly hard for this."
Reddy, now in his 70s, says he was exposed to somewhere between 100 to 200 trial subjects throughout the phase three stage of vaccine development. His own health was at risk every day, but he developed a personal litmus test to ensure he would be okay.
"I used to walk six floors every day, up and down at the institute where we did the trials. If I could reach the top without breathlessness, I knew I was safe. If I got breathless, it was time to get admitted.
"But all jokes aside, it was a very scary time for everyone. In the end, we were happy because Covaxin was safe, and it nearly saved our country, and we were also able to export it to around 25 countries."
Photo:
123RF
Although New Zealand ultimately relied on Pfizer for its vaccine rollout, Indian-made vaccines such as Covaxin played a crucial role in the global fight against Covid-19, even benefitting some of New Zealand's Pacific neighbours, including Fiji and the Solomon Islands.
The Covaxin journey is a testament to India's prowess when it comes to vaccine development and distribution, with Hyderabad being considered the vaccine capital of the world.
In recent years, it has also emerged as a global leader in generic medicines, supplying one-fifth of the world's medication by volume.
As New Zealand restarted free trade negotiations with the South Asian nation, is it time to re-examine the potential for pharmaceutical trade?
According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, pharmaceuticals are currently one of New Zealand's biggest imports from India, contributing a value of $131 million in 2024.
The South Asian nation is currently New Zealand's sixth-highest medication provider overall, offering affordable, high-quality alternatives to brand-name drugs for the country's prescription market.
By 2030, its pharmaceutical sector is expected to reach US$130 billion.
Dr Shubhadeep Sinha
Photo:
RNZ / Jogai Bhatt
It's a figure that doesn't surprise Dr Shubhadeep Sinha, senior vice president and medical director at Hetero Labs in Hyderabad.
Sinha says India has cemented its position as the global leader in generic drugs.
"It's the generic drugs capital of the world for a reason," he says.
"We know that diseases don't differentiate, whether treatment is coming from an innovator company or a generic manufacturer. And neither do patients.
"They need the products for their health, so when you have an equally good-quality product, available at a significant fraction of the cost, which is also accepted by the regulatory guidelines and laws, why not?
"The need for generics is strong everywhere, and the kind of manufacturing volumes that we can do in India is significant."
Generic drugs have been found to be just as safe and effective as brand-name ones and cost significantly less. However, New Zealand has stricter regulations on importing them.
Before entering the New Zealand market, generics must be deemed bioequivalent to the original drug - meaning they need the same active ingredients, dosage form, strength and absorption rate - verified through rigorous Medsafe testing.
A free trade agreement between the two nations would remove significant barriers to importing generics into New Zealand.
According to MFAT, customs procedures would be simplified, tariffs on goods would be removed and there would be fewer unjustified restrictions on what can and can't be traded.
Sinha says Hetero Lab's products could be beneficial to New Zealand's health system.
His company currently manufactures generics for a range of Indian pharmaceutical companies, including Cipla, Lupin, Pfizer India and Dr Reddy's - the latter two of which already supply generic drugs to New Zealand's prescription market.
Additionally, Hetero Lab's founder, B Partha Saradhi Reddy, was one of the original co-founders of Dr Reddy's itself.
"He was instrumental in developing their manufacturing and research capabilities. So essentially the mind of Dr Reddy's had come and started Hetero, and a lot of companies have come out of that."
Photo:
123RF
Sinha says generic drugs are often unfairly maligned for being a mere copy - but there's a lot of effort that goes into developing them.
"There's a lot of science behind the development of generic products, a lot of effort goes into synthesizing a compound, and a lot of high-quality development as well as manufacturing, which is a huge effort.
"India's mastered that, and because we're able to massively provide high-quality products, the costs have come down significantly. Generics already come at a low cost, and with high volume production it's further gone down, so it helps everybody."
Sinha questions what's stopping New Zealand from accepting generic drugs from India more freely.
"Healthcare costs are rising everywhere, nobody has a tray of money to spend every time," he says. "Even with strong healthcare in New Zealand, the need for generics is there."
High cholesterol, diabetes and heart disease are particularly prevalent conditions in New Zealand.
Sinha claims Hetero Labs is a global leader in these areas and would happily supply generic drugs to New Zealand.
"We do the largest of [cardiovascular and cholesterol medications] … we have all the antihypotensive drugs, that's the drugs that lower blood pressure, all the major classes for heart failure and anti-diabetic drugs.
"We also manufacture anti-cancer drugs, not just chemical compounds but biologics. We're now one of the largest biological manufacturers in the world."
Sinha believes a free trade agreement between New Zealand and India would be a game-changer.
"New Zealand might currently rely on China for generics but even China is now depending on us," he says.
"We have our own manufacturing facility in China, Russia, Egypt, the US. ... We're producing medicines worldwide, not only in India.
"An FTA would definitely help [strengthen that relationship] with New Zealand, of course it will."
* Jogai Bhatt travelled to India with support from the Asia New Zealand Foundation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IPL's Bengaluru pledge financial aid for victims of crowd surge
IPL's Bengaluru pledge financial aid for victims of crowd surge

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

IPL's Bengaluru pledge financial aid for victims of crowd surge

Family members of a victim who died during the stampede outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium grieve. Hundreds of thousands had packed the streets in Bengaluru to celebrate Royal Challengers Bengaluru's IPL win, 2025. Photo: AFP Indian Premier League franchise Royal Challengers Bengaluru have pledged one million Indian rupees (NZ$19,276) to each family of the 11 fans who died in a crowd surge outside the team's home stadium on Wednesday during celebrations following their maiden IPL title. The franchise will also launch a support fund for the injured. At least 11 people died and 47 were injured in the crowd surge as thousands of people lined the streets around the Chinnaswamy Stadium as the team's bus arrived. Bengaluru were celebrating their win over Punjab Kings in the final of the IPL's 18th edition, the world's richest T20 cricket league. The team had given away free passes for the event on their website but said that numbers would be limited. As the celebrations continued, some fans without passes tried to push through the gates while others climbed trees and the stadium wall for a better view. Images from the scene showed people climbing over each other. "The unfortunate incident in Bengaluru yesterday has caused a lot of anguish and pain to the RCB family," the team said in a statement on Thursday. "As a mark of respect and a gesture of solidarity, RCB has announced a financial support of 10 lakh (one million) Indian Rupees to each of the 11 families of the deceased. "In addition, a fund called RCB Cares is also being created to support fans injured in this tragic incident." Karnataka State Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, who uses only one name, said the venue could not handle the size of the crowd, adding that the stadium's capacity was 35,000 but 200,000 to 300,000 people had turned up for the celebrations. "In the wake of the tragic stampede during RCB's victory celebrations, the Karnataka Government will bear the full medical expenses of all those injured, whether admitted in government or private hospitals," Siddaramaiah said in a statement on Thursday. "Orders have been issued to the Health Department and Suvarna Arogya Suraksha Trust (SAST) to ensure this without delay." -Reuters

Health Committee hears submissions on Medicines Amendment Bill
Health Committee hears submissions on Medicines Amendment Bill

RNZ News

time16 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Health Committee hears submissions on Medicines Amendment Bill

The Medicines Amendment Bill will continue to be considered by the Health Committee over the next two months. Photo: 123RF MPs on Parliament's Health Select Committee were told by the public this week that, while the government's Medicines Amendment Bill is a step in the right direction, changes are still needed to ensure it balances safety with efficiency. The bill, which amends the Medicines Act 1981, received its first reading in April, and is a component of a wider push by the government to loosen burdensome regulation across sectors. Under current settings, prescription medicines can take a long time to be approved, funded, and made available to the New Zealanders that need them. Historically, we have ranked well below the OECD average for access to medicines. In his oral submission on the bill, New Zealand Initiative chief economist Dr Eric Crampton suggested that New Zealand simply wasn't a desirable target market for medicine companies. "We are a small, relatively poor country at the far end of the world that will not be at the top of anyone's agenda in getting their regulatory affairs team to deal with paperwork… It can take years after a drug has been approved by at least two markets overseas before anybody puts it into the New Zealand approvals process." In his submission, Crampton mentioned the concept of an "invisible graveyard," referring to the people who may have died or been harmed as a consequence of not having access to unapproved medicines. The Medicines Amendment Bill seeks to shake up the status quo, improving patients' access to medication by doing three things. Primarily it would introduce what has been dubbed as 'the rule of two', whereby if a medication has been approved for use in two recognised overseas regulators, Medsafe (New Zealand's medicines regulator), can bypass its usual, often lengthy, assessment process. The government hopes this will reduce the time it takes for new medicines to reach patients. The recognised overseas regulators are those from Australia, Canada, the EU, UK, USA, Switzerland and Singapore. As well as these fast-tracking medicine approvals, the bill also expands the power to prescribe medicine to a wider range of healthcare professionals, such as nurse practitioners, midwives, dentists, and optometrists, so long as the medication falls within their scope of practice. Thirdly, the bill updates some of the settings around the Medicines Classification Committee, which makes recommendations to the Minister of Health around how new medicines should be classed. This week the Health Committee also heard from Dr Graeme Jarvis, CEO of Medicines New Zealand, which represents pharmaceutical companies. While in support of the bill's intent, he told MPs, it needs refinement in order to better achieve its goal outcomes. When asked by Labour's spokesperson for Health Ayesha Verrall, why he was sceptical of the automatic approvals that Dr Crampton had suggested to the committee earlier, Dr Jarvis suggested that doing so would create "unintended consequences around parallel importing and other activities". "People flood the market, and the product may not necessarily be what you think it is, you may end up with counterfeit products coming in. There is no clawback for the regulator to go after a sponsor who has been acting in an unsatisfactory manner." When New Zealand lawmakers look outward for policy inspiration, they tend not to just throw a dart at a map on the wall and hope for the best. There are generally agreed comparable countries, commonly drawn on as case studies for good lawmaking here, which vary depending on the topic. The Medicines Amendment Bill's 'rule of two' provisions reflects this tradition, using a familiar set of jurisdictions in its list of recognised overseas regulators. Members of the Wellington Community Justice Project, a volunteer group made up of Victoria University law students, suggested to the Health Committee that while these overseas regulators have been historically reliable, that does not mean they always will be. "While the bill allows the minister to make rules for verification through secondary legislation so they can be refined to reflect changes in best international practice, we feel as though there needs to be something within the text of the bill itself, ensuring that the regulatory authorities themselves are regularly assessed and upheld to the standards of best international practice," the students told the committee. They went on to cite the current changes being made to the United States FDA, which has long been the world leader in approving medicine. "The FDA's placement on this list, most notably for the reason that the FDA is currently headed by RFK Jr, a health secretary who has been described as a conspiracy theorist, and relevant to this bill, has cancelled or frozen billions of dollars of research grants for the development of the medicines. Clearly, this bill [will outlast] RFK Junior's appointment. However, this example illustrates the need for a process to review the regulatory authorities in Section 22A, so when the questions arise about jurisdictions' suitabilities to be on the two-step verification process, these are able to be addressed." The Medicines Amendment Bill will continue to be considered by the Health Committee over the next two months, before being reported back to the House by the 9 August. You can listen to the audio version of this story by clicking the link near the top of the page. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.

Nursing union members hold stop work meetings over stalled pay talks
Nursing union members hold stop work meetings over stalled pay talks

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Nursing union members hold stop work meetings over stalled pay talks

File photo. The Nurses Organisation and Health NZ have been in bargaining since late last year. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Nurses are looking for better pay and higher staff-to-patient ratios after rejecting the latest Health NZ offer, a Nurses' Organisation delegate says. A series of stop-work meetings take place this week to discuss the next steps following a vote by members to turn down the offer. Wellington Hospital delegate Hilary Gardner said a commitment to improving staff-to-patient ratios was needed, and the pay increase was essentially a pay cut. "It's what's not in the offer that's the big concern for us. There's not a lot that commitment for health and safety and safe staffing." She said nothing was off the table, including strike action. Health NZ said it wanted nurses to return to the bargaining table to resolve the issue. Gardener said the rejected offer came after many days of bargaining already since their contract expired late last year. Health NZ regional deputy chief executive Dr Mike Shepherd said it believed the offer was fair. "The employment relations authority agrees with that view, we're really keen that our nursing colleagues return to the negotiation table, so we can continue this conversation, so we can continue delivering the care our community needs. "We really respect our nursing colleagues, we do need to be fiscally prudent, and we've made this offer. "We think nursing pay rates have had a number of uplifts over recent years and of course we're keen to continue to that conversation," he said. He said there was a system in place, set up in conjunction with the nursing union, that matches demand on the wards with the nurses available.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store