
Is Trump the future or just a passing tremor?
In The Twittering Machine (2019), Richard Seymour explores the evolution of social media from a tool of communication to a powerful industry shaped by capitalism and control. Borrowing its title from a 1922 painting by Paul Klee, the book argues that platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook are not neutral spaces. Rather, they are built to capture attention, encourage addiction and manipulate users for profit and influence.
Seymour shows how social media no longer fosters organic, meaningful dialogue. Instead, it creates an environment of superficial connection and toxic engagement. Attention is the currency, and controversy is the engine. The platforms reward rage, mockery and spectacle — fuel for what Seymour calls a 'machine' that generates cruelty, division and distortion.
Trump mastered this system. His online presence wasn't just political — it was performative, provocative, and perfectly suited to a space that values impact over substance. His presidency, as Seymour suggests, wasn't simply a result of political trends but also of the very design of social media itself.
My return to Seymour's work was prompted by two things. First, a column published in Oman Daily (March 8), which reflected on the fading role of the intellectual. It noted that today's thinkers no longer lead public opinion, but instead watch from the sidelines, overwhelmed by a digital space that celebrates 'influencers' over minds.
The second was a conversation with a friend, where I found myself explaining why I had all but abandoned social media for over a year. In the eyes of many, absence from platforms like X or Facebook is equivalent to nonexistence. But this belief — that true relevance requires constant online visibility — is deeply flawed. Many meaningful voices choose to stay away, resisting a culture that values noise over depth.
The platforms reward rage, mockery, and spectacle—fuel for what Seymour calls a 'machine' that generates cruelty, division, and distortion.
I wrote about this dilemma in an earlier essay titled Twitter Against Twitter (April 2023, Al Falaq). Inspired by critics like Noam Chomsky and Roland Barthes, I questioned the takeover of public discourse by corporate platforms. Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter and the so-called 'Twitter Files' revealed troubling signs of manipulation, including during moments of crisis like the war on Gaza, when content was filtered or suppressed.
As Seymour warns, social media platforms are not open forums — they are industries of control. They shape public perception, filter content and steer conversations to serve their interests. Instead of open dialogue, we now face echo chambers and hostile spaces where thought is drowned by noise and engagement becomes exhausting and shallow.
Even time — our most precious resource — is consumed by the endless scroll. For intellectuals, the challenge is not just keeping up, but making sense of a fragmented and fast-moving landscape. Most either burn out trying or retreat entirely, only to be dismissed as detached.
Today, social media is rarely a space for building knowledge. It has become a stage for self-promotion, quick reactions and empty trends. Even discovering new, thoughtful voices often requires personal connections — returning us to the old gatekeeping systems. Users are left to choose between isolated bubbles or aggressive, chaotic arenas, where depth is buried beneath spectacle.
Are we trapped in this cycle? Is the screen destined to remain a space for control rather than freedom? Maybe not. Despite the noise, some still fight to share ideas, spark thought and imagine a better digital future. Perhaps, beyond the moment's glare, lies a wider horizon waiting to be reached.
Translated by Badr al Dhafari
The original version of this article was published in Oman Arabic newspaper on March 23, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
20 hours ago
- Observer
Germany's Thyssenkrupp cuts targets as US tariffs weigh
FRANKFURT: Thyssenkrupp's shares slumped on Thursday as the struggling German industrial giant slashed its sales forecasts due to weak demand amid US President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught. The group, whose products range from steel to car parts and submarines, said it now expects sales to fall by five to seven percent in the current fiscal year. This compared to a previous forecast of a drop of up to three per cent. Thyssenkrupp's shares plunged seven percent on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange following the announcement. The group has long been struggling, particularly as its traditional steel business faces competition from Asia, but the turmoil triggered by Trump's tariffs have worsened its problems. "The past quarter was characterised by enormous macroeconomic uncertainty," said Thyssenkrupp CEO Miguel Lopez. "We are very much feeling the weak market environment in key customer industries such as the automotive, engineering and construction industries." The firm, one of Germany's best-known industrial groups that traces its history back to the 19th century, also posted a hefty net loss for the April-to-June period of 278 million euros ($325 million) — five times greater than a year ago. The results were hit by an impairment in the troubled steel division as well as restructuring costs at its auto unit. The company also gave a more cautious forecast for operating profits for the current fiscal year, which runs to the end of September. The firm expects them to be in the lower end of a previously announced range of 600 million to one billion euros. On a brighter note, its unit that makes submarines and warships reported a jump in sales and orders, driven by a boom in the defence sector triggered by the Ukraine war. Thyssenkrupp shareholders voted last week in favour of spinning off the division so it can benefit more from growing demand. It is part of a broader overhaul to split the entire group into a series of standalone businesses, but the plan has fuelled fears of further job cuts at the historic conglomerate. — AFP


Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Trump-Putin summit to take place on US military base
WASHINGTON: The summit between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, a White House official said on Wednesday. The two leaders will meet on Friday to discuss an end to the more than three-year war in Ukraine, in what will be their first standalone summit since a 2018 meeting in Helsinki. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson - located near Alaska state capital Anchorage - is made up of the Elmendorf Air Force base and the Army's Fort Richardson, which were combined in 2010. The base is the headquarters for entities including Alaska Command - responsible for US forces in the state - as well as the Alaskan NORAD Region, which helps provide aerospace control and warning. The US military regularly conducts intercepts of Russian aircraft that venture near American airspace in Alaska, contacting Moscow's planes visually or electronically. Russia launched a full-scale war on Ukraine in February 2022, and Trump has spent the first months of his second term in office trying to broker a peace accord, an effort that has so far failed to yield a breakthrough. Meanwhile, Trump said on Wednesday he'd had a 'very good call' with European leaders including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky as he prepares for Friday's summit with Putin. 'We had a very good call. He was on the call - President Zelensky was on the call. I would rate it at 10, you know, very, very friendly,' he told reporters during an event at Washington's Kennedy Center. Trump added that he wants to hold a 'quick second' meeting with Putin and Zelensky after the Alaska summit. — Agencies


Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
'No unilateral Ukraine peace deal in Alaska': Zelenskyy, European leaders urge Trump
Berlin: European leaders, concerned about potential concessions to Russia, urged US President Donald Trump not to strike a unilateral Ukraine peace deal with President Vladimir Putin during their upcoming meeting in Alaska, CNN reported. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz convened a virtual summit with Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and several European leaders amid fears that Putin could seek to influence the US president into accepting terms favourable to Russia. After the virtual summit, Zelensky and German Chancellor address reporters in Berlin, Germany, following their meeting with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, as per CNN. Two European diplomats familiar with the virtual meeting confirmed that Trump appeared to say that he would push for an unconditional ceasefire in his meeting with Putin. According to sources, Trump said that he believed that a ceasefire would be a show of goodwill from Russia, and he also noted that the Ukrainian territory is not for him to negotiate. The leaders of Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland, NATO, and the European Union had taken part in the virtual meeting with Trump. It was followed by another larger meeting of the "Coalition of the Willing" that US Vice President JD Vance attended, according to CNN. After the meeting, Zelensky said leaders agreed on "five common principles" to lay out the "format of negotiations" to be held in Alaska, including a focus on a ceasefire and "truly reliable" security guarantees. "Everything concerning Ukraine must be discussed exclusively with Ukraine. We must prepare a trilateral format for talks. There must be a ceasefire, that is number one," he said. He added: "There must be security guarantees, truly reliable ones. And today, President Trump spoke of his support for this and of America's readiness to participate." "Russia cannot have a veto over Ukraine's European and NATO prospects," he said. "Peace talks must be combined with appropriate pressure on Russia." Zelensky also emphasised that sanctions against Russia should be strengthened if no ceasefire agreement is reached on Friday.