Traveling soon? You'll need a REAL ID going forward. Here's what Virginians need to know.
After years of delays, the federal government is finally going to begin enforcing the REAL ID requirement May 7. That means you'll need a REAL ID if you use your driver's license or state ID to board domestic flights or enter federal buildings.
'At the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, there's no 'last day' to get a REAL ID—just plenty of good days to apply—because DMV is issuing REAL IDs year-round,' a DMV spokesperson said in a release. 'The key is for customers to have a REAL ID before their next domestic flight or visit to a secure federal facility.'
Other forms of identification, like passports, will still be accepted. The REAL ID, which costs a one-time fee of $10 in addition to the standard fee for an ID, is optional in Virginia. You won't need it to drive or to vote.
Lines at local DMV offices to get REAL IDs have reportedly been long. Those who are traveling soon without a passport should plan on making an appointment to get one now, the DMV said.
To get a REAL ID, start the application process online at the DMV's website, or fill out the paper application at a DMV customer service center. Once you've scheduled an appointment at the DMV, you'll be asked to provide:
One proof of identity.
Two proofs of Virginia residency, like bills or mail.
One proof of legal presence, like a passport, visa or birth certificate.
Proof of your Social Security number (SSN), if you have been issued one. If you know your SSN, DMV can verify it electronically.
Proof of name change, if your name appears differently on your proof documents
$10 fee, plus the cost of the driver's license or ID card you're applying for. For example, a standard driver's license renewal costs $32, while a standard driver's license replacement costs $20.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has a bold take on Trump-Musk feud
Ever since President Donald Trump took office after his reelection last year, it's seemed as if he'd acquired a new bestie: Tesla CEO Elon Musk. When Musk was hired as a special government employee and tasked with running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it was obvious that the president and the world's richest man were planning to do big things together. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Musk's work with DOGE ticked away for roughly five months, but sputtered in April when Tesla announced its Q1 earnings. Tesla's net profit took a 71% nosedive, leading Musk to announce in May that he would refocus on Tesla. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security By the end of May, Musk announced he would leave DOGE, although it would continue to operate in his absence. Not long after the departure, Musk started to criticize Trump's "big beautiful bill" openly on X, saying it contains "the largest increase in the debt ceiling in U.S. history." This quickly escalated into a social media war, with Trump threatening to sell his Tesla and cancel all of Musk's government contracts, and Musk saying SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately, which will play a crucial role in NASA's space operations. Watching it all go down has alarmed many a Tesla investor over the last week, but one expert voice thinks that the clash is nothing to be worried about. "Shark Tank" star and high-profile investor Kevin O'Leary posted to X on the morning of June 6 about the Musk-Trump battle, encouraging fellow Tesla bulls to keep the faith. "Elon Musk is a unique individual," O'Leary wrote. "Think about the achievements he's made and all of the different industries he's involved in that express the technical might of America. Trump wants to be close to that." "I keep saying this about Trump, and I say this about Elon Musk. Ignore the noise. Focus on the signal. It's not easy to do in the world we live in." O'Leary went on to stress that the feud should not shake Tesla investors. "I'm an investor. I don't care about noise. I don't care about the, the tiff these two are having right now. It's irrelevant. I focus on the signal. Do I stay long Tesla? Yes." O'Leary further addressed the spat in a second post shared a few hours later, saying, "If you go back to Trump's first term and even in the second term, the number of people in the inner circle, it's very volatile. People come, people go. It's kind of like a rotation. You get too close to the sun, your wings melt, and you fall out. It's not the end of the free world as we know it." The millionaire's prediction is that all this is going to pass. "I actually think these two men will get back together again," O'Leary said. "I know it's salacious, it's really an interesting story, but at the end of the day, they both have attributes that the other wants." While Tesla stock has seen a dip over the last few days due to the public feud, O'Leary also advises that the clash has nothing to do with the strength of the stock. "If you own Tesla stock like I do, you're already used to the chaos," he said in a third post on June 5. "This company doesn't just move with earnings - it moves with Elon's tweets. One post and the stock can swing 10%. But here's the deal… Volatility doesn't scare me - it's part of the price you pay for growth. Tesla isn't just a car company. It's a bet on the future: EVs, robotics, autonomous driving. If you believe in the tech, you hold the stock." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sounds the alarm on a disturbing new trend The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
President Donald Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill Is Missing His "No Tax on Social Security" Promise -- and There's Likely a Good Reason Why
Key Points Most retirees rely on their Social Security income, in some capacity, to make ends meet. Though Trump proposed ending the tax on Social Security benefits prior to and after his November election, the president's flagship tax and spending bill is missing this key promise. Social Security's long-term financial outlook likely played a key role in keeping the tax on benefits in place. In April, more than 52 million retired-worker beneficiaries brought home an average Social Security check totaling just shy of $2,000. Though this is a relatively modest monthly payout, a majority of retirees need it, in some capacity, to cover their expenses. For 23 consecutive years, pollster Gallup has been surveying retirees to determine how much they rely on their Social Security income. Consistently between 80% and 90% of respondents told Gallup that it was a "major" or "minor" income source. In other words, up to 9 out of 10 retirees would potentially be challenged to make ends meet if Social Security didn't exist. For the program's tens of millions of beneficiaries, nothing is more important than knowing how much they'll receive each month and seeing this payout increase over time via cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) to keep pace with inflation. While on the campaign trail, as well as following his January inauguration, President Donald Trump outlined a highly popular proposal that would have given roughly half of all Social Security beneficiaries a raise. However, the flagship tax and spending bill for Trump's second term, known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, is missing this key promise -- and there's likely a good reason why. Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill reneges on a key Social Security promise Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill is lengthy (more than 1,000 pages) and targets a number of his campaign promises. While this is far from an extensive list, this tax and spending bill, as introduced in the House of Representatives, would: Permanently extend the individual tax cuts enacted by Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law in December 2017. These individual tax cuts will sunset on Dec. 31, 2025, unless extended. Increase the state and local tax (aka, SALT) deduction to $40,000 for taxpayers earning less than $500,000. The SALT deduction is currently capped at $10,000. Introduce a four-year (2025-2028) tax exemption on overtime pay and tips, up to specific income thresholds for individual taxpayers and couples filing jointly. Expand annual contribution limits for Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) for select low and middle earners. Authorize low and middle earners aged 65 and up to deduct an additional $4,000 on their federal tax return if filing individually, or $8,000 for couples filing jointly.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump aims to slash Pell Grants, which may limit low-income students' college access
For many students and their families, federal student aid is key for college access. And yet, the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 calls for significant cuts to higher education funding, including reducing the maximum federal Pell Grant award to $5,710 a year from $7,395, as well as scaling back the federal work-study program. The proposed cuts would help pay for the landmark tax and spending bill Republicans in the U.S. Congress hope to enact. Roughly 40% of undergraduate students rely on Pell Grants, a type of federal aid available to low-income families who demonstrate financial need on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Work study funds, which are earned through part-time jobs, often help cover additional education expenses. More from Personal Finance:Social Security gets break from student loan collectionsIs college still worth it? It is for most, but not allWhat to know before you tap your 529 plan President Donald Trump's "skinny" budget request said changes to the Pell Grant program were necessary due to a looming shortfall, but top-ranking Democrats and college advocates say cuts could have been made elsewhere and students will pay the price. "The money we invest in post-high school education isn't charity — it helps Americans get good jobs, start businesses, and contribute to our economy," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told CNBC. "No kid's education should be defunded to pay for giant tax giveaways for billionaires." Nearly 75% of all undergraduates receive some type of financial aid, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. "Historically the Pell Grant was viewed as the foundation for financial support for low-income students," said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and a research fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research. "It's the first dollar, regardless of other types of aid you have access to." Under Trump's proposal, the maximum Pell Grant for the 2026-2027 academic year would be at its lowest level in more than a decade. "The Pell reduction would impact the lowest-income families," said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit. More than 92% of Pell Grant recipients in 2019-2020 came from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. If the president's cuts were enacted and then persisted for four years, the average student debt at graduation will be about $6,500 higher among those with a bachelor's degree who received Pell Grants, according to Kantrowitz's own calculations. "If adopted, [the proposed cuts] would require millions of enrolled students to drop out or take on more debt to complete their degrees — likely denying countless prospective low- and moderate-income students the opportunity to go to college altogether," Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement. Already, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, the average was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board. The Pell program functions like other entitlement programs, such as Social Security or Medicare, where every eligible student is entitled to receive a Pell award. However, unlike those other programs, the Pell program does not rely solely on mandatory funding that is set in the federal budget. Rather, it is also dependent on some discretionary funding, which is appropriated by Congress. The Congressional Budget Office projected a shortfall this year in part because more students now qualify for a Pell Grant due to changes to the financial aid application, and, as a result, more students are enrolling in college. Although there have been other times when the Pell program operated with a deficit, slashing the award amount is an "extreme" measure, according to Kantrowitz. "Every past shortfall has been followed by Congress providing additional funding," he said. "Even the current House budget reconciliation bill proposes additional funding to eliminate the shortfall." However, the bill also reduces eligibility for the grants by raising the number of credits students need to take per semester to qualify for the aid. There's a concern those more stringent requirements will harm students who need to work while they're in school and those who are parents balancing classes and child care. "These are students that could use it the most," said the University of Chicago's Turner. "Single parents, for example, that have to work to cover the bills won't be able to take on additional credits," Mayotte said. "If their Pell is also reduced, they may have to withdraw from school rather than complete their degree," Mayotte said.
