logo
State Sen. Emil Jones III will testify in his own defense at bribery trial

State Sen. Emil Jones III will testify in his own defense at bribery trial

Yahoo15-04-2025
Democratic State Sen. Emil Jones III has decided to testify in his own defense of bribery charges alleging he solicited a $5,000 contribution and a job for his former intern from a red light camera company executive who was seeking the senator's help on legislation.
Jones' decision to take the witness stand is risky, particularly for a sitting elected official facing high-stakes public corruption charges.
But clearly the calculus of the defense team was that only Jones can put a different spin for the jury on statements he made on a series of undercover recordings at the heart of the case.
His testimony is expected to begin at about 3:45 p.m.
Earlier Tuesday, the jury heard Jones as he told FBI agents who knocked on his door in September 2019 that he never felt 'comfortable' talking to his longtime colleague, then-state Sen. Martin Sandoval, particularly about a red light camera company executive who wanted to be his 'friend.'
'Because he's an intimidating guy, you know?' Jones said about Sandoval on the morning of Sept. 24, 2019, the day the FBI raided Sandoval's offices in Springfield along with more than a dozen other locations. 'And you hear rumors about him…that he's just shady.'
In the recorded interview, which was played for the jury in Jones' bribery trial Tuesday, the agents pointed out Jones' claimed trepidation about Sandoval didn't stop him from sitting down for a steak dinner with Sandoval and Omar Maani, the co-founder of SafeSpeed LLC, to talk about how he could compensate Jones in exchange for his help on legislation in Springfield.
Didn't Jones ask Maani specifically to raise $5,000 for his campaign? Didn't he ask Maani to hire his former intern? And didn't he offer to 'protect' SafeSpeed from state Rep. David McSweeney, a staunch opponent to red light cameras?
When Jones seemed to downplay what he'd said, the agents, Timothy O'Brien and Nijika Rustagi, laid their cards on the table: They had video of the entire thing.
'I don't think it was as soft as that,' O'Brien warned Jones near the end of the 40-minute interview. 'I think it was a little more direct. I certainly have the video with me where (you) said: 'I'll make sure I'll take care of you guys with McSweeney…'.I'd be happy to play the video for you if you want.'
Jones was also warned by Rustagi that everything he said could be used in the federal grand jury and that if he lied he could be charged. When Rustagi asked if Jones wanted to change any of his answers based on that, Jones declined.
Then he joked: 'After watching Trump for the last two years, I understand.'
On Tuesday afternoon, prosecutors rested their case against Jones after presenting five witnesses over five days of testimony.
Jones, 46, whose father, Emil Jones Jr., led the state Senate for years before orchestrating to have his son replace him in 2009, is charged with bribery, use of an interstate facility to solicit bribery and lying to federal agents. The most serious charge carries up to 10 years in prison, while the others have a five-year maximum term.
According to the charges, Jones agreed to accept $5,000 in campaign funding from Maani in exchange for Jones' help with legislation in Springfield. Jones also asked Maani to give his former office intern a part-time job, which led to $1,800 being paid to the intern in exchange for no work. the charges alleged.
Jones is the first sitting member of the state General Assembly to face trial at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in nearly a decade. If convicted, Jones would be forced to resign under Illinois law and would almost certainly forfeit any future pension.
The roughly 40-minute interview played in its entirety Monday took place in Jones' living room and was recorded without Jones' knowledge, which O'Brien said was done in an effort to 'facilitate an honest and truthful conversation' with the senator.
O'Brien testified Tuesday that when the interview concluded, he and his partner seized Jones' cell phone pursuant to a search warrant and made a digital copy at the FBI offices. Later that day, O'Brien went back to Jones' South Side home to return the phone.
Jones answered the door, O'Brien testified, and as he took back the phone, he said 'something to the effect that he was chewed out by his dad and by his attorney for speaking to me.'
Five months later, Jones came in for another interview at the IRS offices across from Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, O'Brien said. This time, he had a lawyer participating by phone, and the purpose was for Jones to come clean and begin cooperating with the investigation, O'Brien testified.
Unlike in his previous interview, O'Brien said this time Jones was asked if he made any agreements with Omar Maani, 'He acknowledged that he requested a job for (his intern) as well as a campaign contribution in exchange for changing the legislation.'
According to O'Brien, Jones admitted that he and Maani had specifically come up with the $5,000 figure at their July 2019 dinner, and that he knew the intern, Christopher Katz, was being paid even though Maani was not giving him work.
O'Brien said the interview moved on to 'additional information' Jones may have 'related to other topics for investigations we had or potential investigations.'
Jones was shown photos, made identifications 'and provided information about those individuals and others,' he said.
Their next interview with Jones was in August 2021, when Jones had new attorneys, O'Brien testified. Jones continued to provide information unrelated to the facts of the SafeSpeed case, he said, though Jones was never considered to be 'actively' cooperating.
Jones was charged a little over a year later via a criminal information, which typically indicates the defendant has an agreement with the U.S. attorney's office to plead guilty. Instead, Jones took the case to trial.
jmeisner@chicagotribune.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP
Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP

President Trump is threatening to wage war on mail-in ballots — and the GOP has to hope he thinks again before the 2026 mid-terms. In a Truth Social post, Trump said he is 'going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS,' and he'll start off with 'an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 midterm elections.' Trump likes the idea of in-person, same-day voting, which has much to recommend it. Advertisement But mail-in and early voting are so ingrained and widespread that they aren't going anywhere. Most Republicans have concluded that there's no alternative to making use of these modes of voting, and crucially, they managed — most of the time — to get Trump on board in 2024. Advertisement This aided the Republican get-out-the-vote operation in a close election. Clearly, though, Trump believes that mail-in voting is a Democratic plot, and he also hates contemporary voting machines. Old-school paper ballots don't guarantee honesty, however: In an infamous instance of voter fraud, allies of Lyndon Johnson stuffed Box 13 with enough ballots to put him over the top in the very narrow 1948 Democratic Senate primary in Texas. Today's voting machines, moreover, were a reaction to the Florida fiasco in 2000, when punch-card ballots had to be painstakingly examined by hand with a presidential election at stake. Advertisement The fact is that vote-by-mail has been steadily growing since the 1980s, and it needn't favor one side or the other. In Florida, Republicans have long made it a priority to maximize mail voting. A study by the academic Andrew Hall of pre-COVID voting patterns in California, Utah and Washington found a negligible partisan effect as those states rolled out vote-by-mail systems. Advertisement Overall, turnout went up only very slightly, and 'the Democratic share of turnout did not increase appreciably.' Mail-in voting didn't change who was voting, but how they did it — encouraging, as you might expect, voting by mail rather than in-person. Vote-by-mail did have a strong partisan tilt in the COVID election of 2020, in part because Trump inveighed against it. In 2024, Republicans made a concerted effort to make up ground — and succeeded. The GOP went from 24% of the mail vote in the must-win swing state of Pennsylvania in 2020, to 33% in 2024. And Republicans outpaced Democrats in mail-in balloting in Arizona. The advantage to a party of getting people to vote early — whether in person or by mail — is that it takes high-propensity voters off the table. Then, a turnout operation can focus on getting lower-propensity voters to the polls. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters If no one votes until Election Day, party operatives waste time and money right up to the cusp of the election contacting people who are going to vote no matter what. Advertisement None of this is to say that all mail-in voting is equal. So-called universal mail-in voting, or automatically sending a ballot to every registered voter and scattering live ballots around a state, is a bad practice. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The rules should be more stringent. Advertisement Georgia, for example, gets this right: You have to ask for an absentee ballot and provide your driver's license number or a copy of another form of valid ID. Ballots have to be requested at least 11 days before the election and must be returned by Election Day. The outer 'oath' envelope has to be properly completed or the ballot is subject to being rejected, although the county elections office will provide the voter a chance to 'cure' the envelope. Advertisement It's also important to count early and mail-in ballots quickly, something that too many states fail to do, with California — as usual — the worst offender. States should be expected to abide by whatever rules have been set prior to an election, rather than changing them on the fly, and they should ensure that voter rolls are regularly cleaned up. The real question about vote-by-mail isn't whether it is staying or going, but whether Republicans, too, will take advantage of it. Twitter: @RichLowry

Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request
Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Baldwin unsure of Trump Administration, Wisconsin's FEMA request

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin's Democratic U.S. senator says she has little doubt that there is enough flood damage around the state to qualify for federal help. But Tuesday she said she has less confidence in President Donald Trump. 'Confident and Trump Administration are not two phrases that I don't necessarily always put in a sentence together,' Baldwin told reporters. 'The president has said very disparaging things about FEMA, before the start of his term. He even talked about abolishing FEMA.' Baldwin said the president has changed his tune. But she also said she wants to 'hold his feet to the fire.' Her comments came just hours after Wisconsin's entire Congressional delegation signed off on a letter to FEMA asking for federal assistance after last week's record flooding. 'On Aug. 9 and 10, historic rainfall caused severe flooding across the Milwaukee region, resulting in widespread damage to homes, businesses, and public infrastructure. The storm produced the second-highest 48-hour rainfall total on record in Milwaukee. Some areas saw more than 14 inches of rain in under 24 hours, overwhelming roads, basements, parking structures, and utility systems,' the letter states. 'The Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Root rivers reached record levels, flooding thousands of properties and prompting emergency crews to respond to hundreds of rescues and infrastructure problems.' Baldwin signed the letter. The letter asks for a Joint Preliminary Damage Assessment to get a sense of the damage. The congressional delegation also said it expects to make a formal request for a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration. That would not only open a pipeline for money to flow to the government's impacted by the floods but some of the 13,000 people who saw damage to their homes or businesses. "Federal assistance will be critical to repairing the damage from these severe weather events and supporting the long-term recovery of our communities," the letter states. " Solve the daily Crossword

Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say
Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump is turning the FBI away from investigating terrorism and corruption, sources say

The FBI was once known for taking down gangsters like Bonnie and Clyde. But in recent years, its targets have been more like the Boston Marathon bombers. After the Sept. 11 attacks, then-Director Robert Mueller reorganized the bureau around national security and intelligence, with the top priority stopping another terrorist attack on American soil. Now the Trump administration is changing that, as Trump-appointed FBI Director Kash Patel is moving to reorder the agency's priorities with little input from Congress or the public. Patel, who often refers to FBI agents as 'cops' — a label they tend to shy away from — is taking steps to get the bureau more involved in investigating violent crime, even as he is carrying out a plan to dramatically slash the workforce. Current and former FBI officials tell MSNBC the changes are coming at the expense of the FBI's role protecting the U.S. from terrorists, hackers and spies — as well as its traditional missions of fighting white-collar fraud, public corruption and child sex crimes. If more agents are working on violent crime cases as their total number is being reduced, these officials say, there won't be the manpower left to devote the same level of resources to national security and other threats. Multiple current and former FBI officials say they have already seen that happening over the past several months, as agents have been diverted to immigration enforcement and veterans with years of experience have left the bureau.' 'This is putting the nation in jeopardy — they seem to be making national security threats secondary,' said Rob D'Amico, a retired FBI agent and MSNBC national security and law enforcement contributor. 'They are effectively making the FBI a national police force,' said one senior agent, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation. 'Who will address the missions the FBI has focused on for decades? There is no other entity that does them.' Last week, top FBI official Jodi Cohen informed the heads of more than 50 FBI field offices that Patel plans to equip FBI agents with Tasers; that all agents are expected to spend time investigating violent crime; and that the bureau will begin allowing other federal law enforcement agents to join the FBI after an abbreviated training, whether or not they have a college degree, one current and four former officials briefed on the call told MSNBC. In addition, the FBI plans to cut around 15% of its workforce — 5,800 people from a total of around 37,000, the FBI field office leaders were told, according to the sources. (The bureau employs around 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice.) Coming at a time when FBI agents have been ordered to devote time to immigration enforcement, and when dozens have been required to patrol the streets of Washington, D.C., each night as part of the attempted federal takeover of that city's police force, news of the changes is sparking alarm among current and former senior bureau officials, the sources said. They say the national security threats facing the U.S. are more acute than ever, from Chinese espionage to lone-wolf terrorism to ransomware attacks that could take down critical infrastructure. They worry that fraud and corruption will bloom as the FBI cuts back on investigating it. The Justice Department also slashed its public integrity section and stopped pursuing certain kinds of corruption cases. Speaking on condition of anonymity because they fear retaliation, current and former FBI officials say that Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, don't understand the FBI's mission and are making decisions based on Trump's political agenda. 'You have the top two decision-makers, both with limited exposure to the law enforcement and legal system, solely making long-impacting decisions based on social and political rhetoric, conspiracy theories rooted in 'deep state' cleansing, and lack of understanding of the true implications of the decisions which they will soon walk away from and leave for others to clean up,' one former senior agent said. The FBI declined to comment. Patel has said the FBI remains committed to its national security mission, but he has made no secret of his desire to steer the bureau more intensively into combating violent crime. After spending years denouncing the FBI as a corrupt tool of a 'deep state' plot to frame Trump, Patel now says it's important 'to let good cops be cops.' He has overseen changes to the FBI website elevating 'crush violent crime' above other traditional priorities though on the same level as "defend the homeland." Violent street crime historically has been the purview of state and local police, while the FBI has focused first on national security threats such as espionage and terrorism, as well as civil rights, white collar crime, public corruption and organized crime. The bureau also specializes in battling child sexual exploitation and other specific crimes that demand its expertise, such as kidnapping, serial killers and bank robberies. An FBI webpage devoted to some of the bureau's most famous cases is a compendium of notable moments in American history — very few of them violent street crimes. From the 1955 murder of Emmett Till to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to mortgage fraud in the 2007 housing crisis, the FBI is often called upon to deal with complex cases of national import. For years after 9/11, Justice Department documents listed the FBI's top priorities in this order: terrorism, espionage, cyberattacks, public corruption, civil rights, transnational criminal organizations, white collar crime — and then violent crime. While Trump has portrayed crime as out of control in many parts of the country, the FBI's own data shows that violent crime rates nationally aresignificantly lower than they were two decades ago. A spike in violent crime during the Covid pandemic has abated, the data shows. While some FBI agents are former police officers, many more joined the bureau after earning degrees in law and accounting. A bachelor's degree has been required to become an FBI agent. In Washington, D.C., some FBI agents are frustrated over being ordered to go out at night on anticrime foot patrols, something they are not trained for, current and former officials said. FBI agents, for example, are armed with pistols but not equipped with less-lethal options, such as Tasers. The plan to change that that sources have described is sparking concern, because it suggests leadership believes more FBI agents should be policing the streets like beat cops. 'Morale is low and people are stressed,' one FBI official in Washington said in a text, adding that a senior colleague reported that 'people are coming into her office in tears talking about how they are really uncomfortable with these orders and their supervisors are at a loss to help them.' Subscribe to the Project 47 newsletter to receive weekly updates on and expert insight into the key issues and figures defining Trump's second term. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store