Jackson and Sotomayor dissent from colleagues' rejection of race discrimination appeal
Supreme Court Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from their colleagues' refusal to hear a race discrimination case Monday, in a dispute that also tells a bigger story about the current state of the high court.
The rejected petition came from adult entertainer Chanel Nicholson, who performed at clubs in Houston. She brought a lawsuit claiming that the clubs had engaged in race discrimination. An appeals court said her claims were barred because they fell outside the statute of limitations. But in her dissent, which was joined by Sotomayor, Jackson wrote that the lower court ruling 'flouts this Court's clear precedents.'
It takes four justices to grant review. On a court with six Republican appointees and three Democratic appointees, liberal-leaning petitions are all but doomed, saying nothing of how a majority of the court would rule if review were granted.
But Nicholson's case is also the latest example of a case not even garnering all three Democratic appointees' interest, with Justice Elena Kagan not joining the dissent. That's not a new phenomenon — Jackson and Sotomayor have spoken out on their own plenty before, without Kagan — but it reinforces a split within the Democratic appointees' priorities.
We saw a split among Republican appointees play out in a separate case Monday, when a Second Amendment appeal fell just short of getting four votes. In that case, however, a statement from Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested that the right to bear assault weapons could land on the high court docket soon.
Yet, when it comes to an appeal like the one Jackson and Sotomayor flagged, it's not a matter of time but a matter of the court's composition. Indeed, the two Democratic appointees didn't just say they wanted the discrimination appeal to be reviewed but that they wanted to summarily reverse the lower court's ruling. That generally takes six votes, showing how much further out of reach their judicial goals are in this case and others.
Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zelenskyy dismisses Russian demands, proposes direct Putin talks
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Russia's maximalist demands mean there's no point in continuing with lower-level talks aimed at brokering an end to the war. Calling Russia's conditions for peace an "ultimatum," Zelenskyy said that he remains willing to meet directly with President Vladimir Putin. But low level talks such as those that took place in Istanbul on Monday make no sense unless they lead to a meeting of the two leaders, he said. "To continue diplomatic meetings in Istanbul at a level that does not resolve anything further is, in my opinion, meaningless," Zelenskyy told reporters in Kyiv on Wednesday. Zelenskyy is upping the pressure on Putin after a pair of audacious attacks against Russian targets in recent days that represented an embarrassing setback for the Kremlin. U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg said yesterday that additional sanctions on Russian are "ready to drop," based on his conversation with Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. Another prisoner exchange with Russia involving around 500 people is possible over the coming weekend, according to Zelenskyy, who said that Russia was motivated by a desire to avoid further western sanctions. Prisoner exchanges "are going on and should go on, but the Russians are not ready for a ceasefire; at least the delegation level is not ready to resolve this and they believe that this is a matter for the leaders, they told us so themselves," he said. Zelenskyy proposed a ceasefire until a leaders' meeting in a place "of Russia's choice," citing Istanbul, the Vatican, or Switzerland. "If we see that we can continue the dialogue and are ready to take steps towards de-escalation, we will continue the ceasefire with American monitoring and American guarantees of mediation," he said. However, he said a meeting with Putin would also be possible "tomorrow" without such a ceasefire agreement in place. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill would cover ‘Forever Chemical' exposure at bases under VA benefits
A bipartisan bill would allow veterans with health issues caused by exposure to 'forever chemicals' at U.S. military bases to be treated as service-connected disabilities, which would further open the door to health care and benefits compensation for those impacted. Forever chemicals, more technically known as polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are long-lasting chemicals that break down slowly. They are found in many everyday objects, food, and in air, water, and soil around the world, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The bill, titled 'Veterans Exposed to Toxic PFAS Act,'' or the ''VET PFAS Act,' would designate exposure to PFAS as a service-connected condition for veterans, making them eligible for disability compensation through the Department of Veterans Affairs. It would also allow military dependents, including those 'in utero while the mother' resided at a base with PFAS exposures, to be eligible for hospital care and medical services for certain diseases and conditions, according to the text of the bill. If passed, the legislation would be a major expansion of health conditions and illnesses for which veterans could receive VA care and disability benefits. The bill was introduced in the House on May 29 by New York Rep. Josh Riley, a Democrat, and Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican, and builds upon measures from the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act. The PACT Act, passed in 2022, was the largest expansion of service-connected health conditions eligible for VA care, including service members exposed to burn pits during Iraq and Afghanistan deployments, for Vietnam War veterans exposed to Agent Orange-related chemicals, and very specific instances of base exposures. The Department of Defense has identified 718 bases with known or suspected PFAS release. The military estimates that PFAS investigation and cleanup costs could come to more than $9.3 billion in fiscal year 2025, which was more than triple the estimate in 2022. Since 2017, the Defense Department has spent around $2.6 billion to address PFAS, according to a Government Accountability report from February. The bill states that covered health conditions would be identified by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the agency administrator of the Department of Health and Human Services' registry for toxic substances and diseases. Their suggestions would come from studies directed by Congress in the annual defense bill for fiscal year 2018, which are ongoing from the Centers for Disease Control. The CDC's website on health investigations states that existing research suggests that high levels of PFAS could lead to increased cholesterol, changes in liver enzymes, pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, decreases in birth weight, and increased risks of kidney and testicular cancers. The bill specifically calls for health care coverage of perfluorooctanoic acid exposures for veterans diagnosed with high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Other iterations of the legislation have been previously introduced. Some Democratic senators have expressed interest in crafting their own PFAS bill, but nothing formal has been introduced yet, a spokesperson for the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee told Task & Purpose. The issue of forever chemicals on military bases and their health impacts on military families has been gaining support in Congress. In April, Senate Democrats held an event on the Hill with former service members and their families who called for a broadening of the PACT Act. At the April event, military families described cancers and other illnesses they believe are the result of PFAS exposures, including former bases like George Air Force Base, California, which later became superfund sites, a designation by the EPA as one of the most polluted sites in the U.S. Despite the designation, the families based there were never notified of their potential exposure. The PACT Act also established a framework for the VA to establish presumptive conditions without an act of Congress through the federal rule-making process. The VA began the process for defining PFAS exposure as a presumptive health condition for VA care with a federal register notice in September. However, an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in January paused all federal rule-making. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Escalates Megabill Attacks, With Trump Reportedly ‘Furious'
Elon Musk ramped up his attacks on Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill, even as the president reportedly was 'furious' at his former adviser's stunning intervention. The gloves came off when the richest man in the world on Tuesday torched the so-called Big Beautiful Bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' On Tuesday night and into Wednesday, the Tesla boss, whose mission at the White House was to slash federal government spending, continued to post his disgust at a bill that would expand budget deficits by more than $2 trillion. In one message on X, formerly Twitter, the billionaire appeared to set up an electoral showdown with the GOP. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' wrote Musk, suggesting Republican politicians should be kicked out of Congress at the midterms. Musk was the biggest donor in the 2024 political cycle, lavishing $288 million to help elect Trump and other Republican candidates. He recently said he was scaling back his efforts unless there's 'a reason to do political spending in the future.' In his barrage of tweets, Musk, who left his temporary position at the White House just days ago, made repeated references to the damaging impact of the spiraling U.S. national debt. 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' he said above a post of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell warning in a 2024 interview that the current rate of spending is 'unsustainable.' In another post, Musk wrote, 'Mammoth spending bills are bankrupting America! ENOUGH.' He also responded with a '100' emoji when an X poster wrote that Musk had 'reminded everyone: It's not about Right vs Left. It's about the Establishment vs the People.' Trump has yet to publicly comment on Musk's maneuvers. On Tuesday night, the president said he wants his signature bill on his desk to be signed into law by the Fourth of July, yet made no reference to his former aide. But behind the scenes, Trump reportedly is livid. On Fox News' 'Fox & Friends' on Wednesday morning, co-host Brian Kilmeade said, 'I think the Elon Musk thing really caught the president by surprise. And I hear he is furious!' 'I think he's so smart to keep his powder dry,' Kilmeade added. 'Because it just plays into what critics would have to say, 'The right can't get out of their own way.' Instead, you have a goal: Pass it. Elon Musk is not in the Senate or the House. Don't worry about it.' The legislation includes nearly $4 trillion in tax cuts, mostly benefiting wealthy households. The cost is only partially offset by more than $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and federal food benefits. The House passed the legislation last month, and the Senate is working on its own version of the bill. Two Republican senators, Mike Lee (Utah) and Rand Paul (Ky.), signaled their agreement with Musk, who in turn shared posts from Republicans in Congress who publicly aligned with him. Elon Musk Takes A Chainsaw To The GOP's False Deficit Claims Elon Musk Unloads On Republicans' 'Disgusting Abomination' Big Beautiful Bill Republicans Big Mad At Elon Musk For Telling The Truth About 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
