‘Sin tax' increases considered as Indiana faces $2 billion revenue forecast shortfall
The current budget cycle for the 2025 fiscal year is also short by an estimated $400 million, but the state can rely on reserves to cover the shortfall.
After the meeting, budget architects Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka, and Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton, said 'everything is on the table' when it comes to budget cuts, according to the Indiana Capital Chronicle. Thompson said increasing 'sin taxes' — on cigarettes, alcohol and gaming — could be considered.
The Indiana Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Vanessa Green Sinders issued a statement after the forecast calling on the legislature to approve a $2 per pack increase in the cigarette tax.
'We urge lawmakers to put the increase in the state budget – both for the positive impact on the health of Hoosiers who smoke and the additional revenue,' Green Sinders said in the statement. 'Indiana proudly has built one of the country's most competitive business climates. But we also must be willing to identify, discuss and act on difficult matters surrounding the health of Hoosiers — like the adult smoking rate — so we can continue to prosper as citizens and as an economy.'
As House Bill 1001, the two-year state budget, was discussed in the Senate Monday, Senate Democrats proposed 60 amendments. A number of the amendments addressed the cigarette tax, including a $2 per pack raise on the cigarette tax proposed by Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington.
Mishler said Monday the legislature needs 'to keep all options open,' but called for the Senate to defeat the amendment, which it did in a voice vote.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, proposed an amendment to increase the cigarette tax by $1 in 2026 and by $2 in 2027. Qaddoura said the state would see an additional $211 million in revenue in 2026 and more than $300 million in 2027.
The amendment would designate the more than $500 million generated to fund Medicaid, Qaddoura said. The amendment failed in a voice vote.
Qaddoura proposed an amendment to raise alcohol taxes that would, within two years, bring in an additional $128 million in revenue. He also proposed an amendment to increase the gaming tax that would, within two years, bring in an additional $125 million in revenue. All of the amendments failed.
In total, Qaddoura said his three amendments would've brought in approximately $600 million in 2026 and approximately $750 million in 2027.
Lake County Councilman Randy Niemeyer, R-Cedar Lake, said he was concerned about raising the cigarette tax because it seems that fewer people are smoking. Raising sin taxes would impact low-income and middle class families, he said.
To address the budget shortfall, Niemeyer said said the state legislature should look at state departments and agencies to see where cuts could be made, similar to the Department of Government Efficiency at the federal level.
'I think they'd be surprised if they did their own form of DOGE, that they'd find quite a lot of room to restructure,' Niemeyer said. 'I think the first step is cut your government before you start taxing people.'
DOGE's claims of savings have been difficult to verify as it has taken credit for axing contracts that have already ended and inflated the value of its cuts, according to a Reuters report.
Porter County Councilman Jeremy Rivas, D-2nd, said the legislature should legalize marijuana to close the revenue shortfall. All the states around Indiana have legalized marijuana in some form, which has brought in revenues for the states, he said.
'It's high time they legalize marijuana,' Rivas said. 'There's got to be a lot of revenue available or other states wouldn't do it. It seems we're missing out.'
Under Senate Bill 1, the property tax relief bill that was signed into law this week, the state has cut funding to local governments by 'arguing that their budgets were excessive,' said Lake County Council president Christine Cid, D-East Chicago.
The only way local leaders can offset the impacts of Senate Bill 1 is to consider increasing local income taxes at the county or municipal level, Cid said.
'Ironically, this proposal comes from a party that claims to oppose tax increases,' Cid said. 'I urge the state to take a similar approach and identify savings within its own budget. People are tired of being taxed more and more.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asked for a yes or no on nonprofit transparency, top Maryland Democrats don't answer
BALTIMORE — It should be an easy yes-or-no answer, according to taxpayer advocate David Williams. But when Spotlight on Maryland asked the state's top three Democrats whether they would ensure transparency and accountability as tax dollars flow through nonprofits, none offered a yes or no response. The Baltimore Sun reported last month that neither state budget officials nor individual agencies can say exactly how much state money is flowing to nonprofits each year. That disclosure has led some state officials to call for more oversight. In response, Spotlight on Maryland — a partnership of The Sun, WBFF FOX45 in Baltimore and WJLA in Washington, D.C. — has launched an investigation into how much taxpayer money is allocated to Maryland nonprofits and how those dollars are spent. As part of that reporting, Spotlight on Maryland asked Gov. Wes Moore, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones and Senate President Bill Ferguson, if they would ensure full transparency and accountability around nonprofit funding. After receiving no response from Ferguson and Jones, Spotlight on Maryland sent a follow-up question to all three, asking if they would assist the investigation in the public interest as journalists follow the money through Maryland nonprofits. Moore, Jones and Ferguson did not respond to the follow-up question. 'This is crazy. It's an easy answer,' said Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. 'They should all say yes.' Moore, for his part, gave an answer on camera to a Spotlight on Maryland reporter at an unrelated news event in Salisbury last week. 'I think people know and realize that our administration believes in full transparency, that we understand that the things that we are going to support are things that are both sustainable and effective. And when you're looking at the entire budget for the state of Maryland, we are, we are very wise and smart stewards of taxpayer dollars to make sure that the right capital is going to the right usages,' the governor said. When The Sun asked last month whether Ferguson believes taxpayers should have access to a full accounting of how their money is spent and how much of it flows to nonprofits in Maryland, he said: 'All public dollars should be spent wisely and with the utmost care, whether a public agency or a nonprofit uses them. To that end, nonprofits are an important bridge between the state government and the communities they serve. That's why we have a robust audit division of the Department of Legislative Services that has been doing this important oversight work for decades.' As part of its July reporting, The Sun sent inquiries to individual state departments and agencies, asking them to provide the amount of money they allocate to nonprofits. A few offered specific dollar amounts. 'Many nonprofits receive funds directly from agency grant programs, and we don't track that centrally,' said Raquel Coombs, chief of staff for the Department of Budget and Management, in a July email. This lack of oversight raises concern, especially for a state that needed to make cuts and raise taxes to resolve a $3.3 billion budget deficit earlier this year. Nonprofit spending 'increases the size of government,' Williams said. The more that government spends — on nonprofits and other line items — the more taxpayer money that is needed to fund the government, he said. One political analyst said the state's top Democrats appear 'overly cautious' in not answering Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up questions on nonprofit spending. 'It seems like a no-brainer,' said Flavio Hickel, a political science professor at Washington College. 'You'd think they would say, 'I will do everything in my power to ensure good governance with taxpayer money.'' Why aren't they saying that? 'There are good nonprofits, but they're probably being cautious in case one bad actor fell through the cracks on their watch,' Hickel said. 'They're probably being overly cautious to prevent campaign ads down the line.' Even as the state's top leaders declined to answer Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up, the governor was quoted in a news release about his chief of staff, Fagan Harris, leaving for the top spot at the Abell Foundation, one of the state's biggest and most influential nonprofits with more than $300 million in assets. 'While he will be deeply missed personally and professionally, I look forward to working closely with him as he leads the Abell Foundation for years to come,' Moore said. Top officials in government administrations moving to nonprofits is similar to Pentagon officials going to work for defense contractors, Williams said. 'We need more checks and balances to stop the revolving door,' he said. 'The government and nonprofits are way too cozy. There needs to be a firewall.' Hickel said he couldn't comment on the specifics of Harris moving to a nonprofit and noted that it could be 'perfectly coincidental and benign.' But, he added, 'it does raise questions' about the relationship between the governor's office and influential nonprofits that shape life in Maryland. 'It's not uncommon at all, though, to see someone in a high government role going to work at a nonprofit,' Hickel said. 'We advise students to do that. We tell them to do legislative work for a few years, meet people, then go to a nonprofit.' --------------- Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrat Nicole Collier slams GOP in interview from state House floor
A Democratic Texas state lawmaker who spent the night on the Texas House floor rather than accept a police escort slammed the GOP in an interview as Republicans try to move forward with their plan to redistrict the Lone Star State. Texas Rep. Nicole Collier was one of the Democratic state legislators who fled earlier this month to break quorum and stall the plan, before returning to the Lone Star State on Monday after a two-week standoff. She opted to spend the night in the state House rather than let law enforcement surveil her as part of Republicans' effort to ensure lawmakers would return to the Capitol, The Associated Press reported. 'At the moment that the directive was issued, I felt like it was wrong. It's just wrong to require grown people to get a permission slip to roam about freely. So I resisted. I objected, in the only way I knew how, and that's to resist,' Collier told MSNBC's Ali Vitali in an interview from the state House floor, when asked why she wouldn't sign on to the law enforcement escort. Collier, who has been on the floor for nearly 24 hours, vowed to stay 'as long as it takes.' 'This is the fight that all of us have in resisting the end of our democracy, basically,' she said. She slammed Texas Republicans for putting 'politics over people' as the redistricting fight dwarfs conversations about disaster relief for Texans affected by recent floods. More than 50 Democrats left Texas in early August to deprive the state House of the numbers it needed to function, putting a pause on the redistricting plan that could net five GOP House seats. After their conditions were met, enough Democrats returned to Austin on Monday to reach quorum. The maps are expected to move quickly through the Republican-controlled state legislature. Meanwhile, California is expected to charge ahead with a plan to redistrict in response to the Texas changes. 'Typically they say, take that high road. Well, you know, that high road has crumbled. We're on a dirt road, and we're going to meet them on that dirt road and get down and dirty, just like they are,' Collier said.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Texas Democrat Is Stuck Inside The Statehouse After Refusing A GOP-Mandated Law Enforcement Escort
Texas state representative Nicole Collier spent last night on the floor of the statehouse. Collier was one of more than 50 Texas Democrats who left the state earlier this month in protest of Republican-led redistricting that would likely flip five national House of Representatives seats from Democrat to Republican. Texas Democrats have described the plan as "gerrymandering," which means dividing up the district map strategically for the purpose of political gains. Related: Now that Collier and her fellow Democrats have returned to Texas, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said Monday that representatives who had warrants issued against them during their absence would not be allowed to leave the chamber without agreeing to one very specific condition. "Members who have not been present until today, for whom arrest warrants were issued, will be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated [Department of Public Safety] officer appointment under the rules of the house." Collier, however, refused the escort, which led to her spending the night in the Texas statehouse. In a statement to the Fort Worth Report, Collier wrote, "I don't know how long I will be here. Instead of DPS officers looking for pedophiles, they have been assigned to follow Democratic state representatives around only to ensure their return to the Capitol on Wednesday (when the House reconvenes). I sure hope the public feels safe without those officers on beat." Related: According to Republican Rep. Charlie Geren, Collier may stay in the chamber or go to her office, but she is not allowed to leave the state capitol grounds. She is the only Democrat who refused a law enforcement escort, but other members have reportedly visited her. Online, people have a lot of thoughts about the situation. "They have a duly elected lawmaker locked in the Texas Capitol because she refused her Republican-assigned police babysitter," one person wrote. Related: In a tweet, Representative Jasmine Crockett called it "beyond outrageous," and wrote, "That's some old Jim Crow playbook. Texas Republicans have lost their damn minds." Some are calling it "kidnapping." And others are calling it "authoritarianism." Related: But others are applauding Collier for taking a stand, like this Arizona state senator who wrote simply, "American hero." As one Twitter user put it, "Not all heroes wear capes. Some wear bonnets!" Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
