Ban on ‘X': LHC adjourns proceedings
Earlier, a law officer informed the court that AGP had to attend meeting of Security Council Pakistan at Islamabad.
A full bench headed by Chief Justice Aalia Neelum adjourned the petitions to be fixed after May 10.
The petitioners contended in their petitions that the government imposed restrictions on social media and blocked access to platform X.
They argued that the access to information was a fundamental right of every citizen.
The petitioners asked the court to lift all restrictions on social media.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Commercial, revenue and fiscal cases: Body to address issue of protracted litigation and injunctive orders
ISLAMABAD: The National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee (NJPMC) constituted a body to address issue of protracted litigation and injunctive orders in cases of commercial, revenue and fiscal nature for formulating recommendations. Justice Shafi Siddiqui, a judge of Supreme Court, will head the Committee, comprising Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh from Lahore High Court (LHC), Justice Agha Faisal from Sindh High Court (SHC), Justice Arshad Ali from Peshawar High Court (PHC), attorney general for Pakistan (AGP) and chairman Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). The committee shall also examine the suggestion of the attorney general regarding Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and place its recommendations in the next meeting. Tax, financial matters: CPs to be decided by HC Div benches: NJPMC The 54th meeting of the NJPMC was convened on Monday at the Supreme Court under the chairmanship of chief justice of Pakistan. It was attended by the chief justices of all the High Courts, while AGP Usman Mansoor Awan attended on special invitation. The NJPMC, unanimously, reiterated the need for a comprehensive mechanism for ensuring production of any detained person before the magistrate within 24 hours. The AGP ensured that such mechanism would be developed and placed before the Committee in its next meeting. The committee for safeguarding judicial independence commended the High Courts for formulating standard operating procedures (SOPs), but emphasised the inclusion of stage-wise timelines from complaint filing to final action. It was decided that all such instances of extraneous influence shall be reported within 24 hours and action thereon shall be finalised within 14 days. The SOPs should also provide for immediate redressal measures to safeguard the dignity of the complainant judge. Additionally, a reporting mechanism to the chief justice of Pakistan was desired for information and intervention, where necessary. The High Courts shall notify the SOPs and share the same with LJCP. The NJPMC, while acknowledging the commendable efforts made by the high courts, prescribed uniform timelines for the disposal of various categories of cases; Declaratory Suit (Land Disputes) in 24 months, Declaratory Suit (Inheritance Disputes) 12 months, Injunction Suit (Land Disputes) six months, Recovery Suit (Public Revenue/ Money Matters) 12 months, Specific Performance (Contract Enforcement) 18 months, Rent Cases six months, Family Suit (Dissolution/ Dower/ Maintenance/ Guardianship) six months, Succession Cases (Uncontested) two months, Execution Petitions/ Family Court Decree six months, Execution Petitions/ Banking Court Decree 12 months, Execution Petitions/ Civil Court Decree 12 months, Execution Petitions/ Rent Matters three months, Criminal Trial (Juvenile Offenders-JJSA, 2018 six months, Criminal Trial (Punishment up to seven years in 12 months, Criminal Trial (Punishment above seven years) in 18 months, Criminal Trial (Murder) 24 months, Labour cases in six months. These timelines would be considered as one of the key performance indicators in judges' performance evaluation and would be in-built at the dashboard. The committee, expressed its deep appreciation for the progress made by the SHC and the PHC, noting that these efforts would significantly contribute to enhancing access to justice and ensure its effective and timely delivery. It was further observed that such initiatives reflect strong institutional commitment to continuous improvement for making justice system citizen-centric. The committee acknowledged the progress made by the High Courts and underscored the importance of pre-trial mediation. The attorney general for Pakistan assured that the forum would be updated about the progress on legislative intervention at federal and provincial levels about mandatory pre-trial mediation in the next meeting. Agenda items concerning performance evaluation, standardized recruitment, establishment of a District Judiciary Policy Forum (DJPF), parity in terms and conditions of service, and access to international exposure opportunities were taken jointly. The NJPMC, unanimously, decided to include the chief justice LHC in the committee formulating recommendations on these matters, to be finalised before the next meeting. The committee expressed satisfaction with progress on the Professional Excellence Index, recognising it as a vital instrument for promoting professional standards and strengthening justice system effectiveness. After deliberation, the forum desired the High Courts to establish an accessible, user-friendly public forum at both the High Courts and District Courts level for provision of information and complaint redressal. The forum, while appreciating the efforts made by the LHC, decided that the High Courts may pilot the initiative for oldest civil cases in chronological order. The High Courts may determine the number of Model Civil Courts in each district keeping in view the number of target cases. The district and sessions judges may assign such case to Model Civil Courts under a time bound trial regime. The committee deliberated on jail reforms and resolved to share the reports of Provincial Sub-Committees and the Prison Reform Action Plan with the High Courts for input. A National Prison Policy will be formulated and placed before the next meeting. The forum was further sensitised to the issues of suspension of sentence pending appeal under Section 426 CrPC; Repatriation of Judicial Officers of Special Courts and Tribunals. The AGP assured that the matter of delay in repatriation of judicial officers posted in special courts and tribunals would be looked into pragmatically. He committed that the high courts would be facilitated for posting of audit officers in coordination with accountants general of the provinces for carrying out internal audit. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
21 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Court questions summer break extension
Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench Senior Judge Justice Jawad Hasan expressed strong disapproval over the Punjab government's decision to extend summer vacations for classes from nursery to eight until August 31. Questioning the logic behind the move, Justice Hasan remarked, "Do parents pay Rs70,000 in school fees just for schools to remain closed? Shouldn't the Chief Minister of Punjab be summoned to court over this?" The remarks came during the hearing of a petition filed by student Daniyal, challenging the extension. The petition was admitted for regular hearing, and Justice Hasan dismissed the Assistant Advocate General's argument, stating that students, being the affected party, have a constitutional right to file such petitions. The court also issued notices to the Punjab Government, the Education Department, and the Deputy Commissioner of Rawalpindi, asking them to respond next week. Petitioner's counsel, Advocate Hafiz Waqar Awan, argued that the decision was made without justification and violated Section 12D of the Punjab Private Educational Institutions Act 1984, which delegates such powers to the District Education Authority in cases of emergency. He said that halting educational activities for three months is akin to jeopardising students' futures. Justice Hasan further questioned the Assistant Advocate General on what policy had guided the extension. He pointed out that even during wartime, courts remained operational and that children should not be deprived of their fundamental right to education under the pretence of extreme weather. Notices have been issued to the Secretary of Education and other respondents to submit their replies. box our correspondent RAWALPINDI. After a prolonged 78-day summer vacation, schools across the six districts of Rawalpindi Division partially reopened on Monday, August 18. However, attendance on the first day remained disappointingly low due to morning showers followed by heavy rain. Only classes 9 and 10 resumed, while students from nursery to grade 8 will return on September 1. Most schools dismissed students as early as 10 or 11am due to the poor turnout. In many institutions, schools opened latearound 8:00am instead of the scheduled 7:30amwith some teachers arriving to find the buildings still locked. Security measures were also lax, with guards often without uniforms and main entrances left unsecured. Cleanliness arrangements were notably absent on the first day. Several prominent higher secondary schools in Rawalpindi city, which had been converted into flood relief camps, also saw low attendance. Some camps remained closed due to rain. In girls' schools, turnout was particularly poor. Despite the conditions, many students expressed joy at returning. Students from Islamia High School, Liaquat Bagh, said the summer homework was excessive, and they were relieved to be back in school. Faizan Ali of Danish Higher Secondary School commented that the break was unusually long but welcomed the return to academic routine.
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
High court's jurisdiction must not be exercised on a whim: LHC
LAHORE: Justice Mirza Viqas Rauf of the Lahore High Court advised a petitioner Muskan Zahra to approach ex-officio justice of peace for remedy and held that the constitutional jurisdiction of the high court should not be exercised at the whims of the parties. Justice Viqas noted that now a day a trend has developed to bypass the alternate remedies and instead to approach the high court in constitutional jurisdiction. He observed that the high court shall not exercise its writ jurisdiction in the cases where the petitioner has access to an equally efficacious and adequate alternative remedy under the law. The petitioner has approached the court against his parent and police officials harassing her and her husband for contracting the marriage against the will of her parents. The court dismissed the petition in liming and advised the petitioner to approach ex-officio justice of peace as alternate remedy, which is neither illusory nor ineffective, the court added. The court observed that nobody can be allowed to bypass or circumvent the natural course of law by avoiding to avail remedy provided there under and to invoke constitutional jurisdiction of this court. The court ruled that it is an extraordinary jurisdiction which is only to be exercised in rare and exceptional cases but not as per convenience of the parties. This on the one hand absolves the relevant forum from performing its functions and duties and on the other, unnecessarily burdened the docket of the high court and deprives the litigants, who have their genuine causes to lay before the high court, the court added. The court also observed that the Police Order, 2002, regulates the police and the police officials have been made answerable with regard to performance of their official duties. In case of any negligence or omission, they not only have to face disciplinary proceedings but also to be confronted with conviction in the shape of imprisonment and fine as well, the court added. The court observed that grievance of the petitioner, as agitated in the instant petition, can easily be remedied through a petition before the ex-officio justice of peace or even she can approach against the respondent police officials, the concerned authorities under the Police Order, 2002. Even otherwise in presence of alternate remedy, a person desirous to invoke the constitutional jurisdiction of high court is obliged to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that such remedy is only illusory and not adequate at all, the court concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
