Shopping for an electric vehicle? How long until that $7,500 tax credit expires?
The federal government will stop paying a $7,500 incentive for new electric vehicles and a $4,000 credit for used ones on Sept. 30. It's an abrupt reversal by the Trump administration of Biden-era efforts to address climate change emissions from gasoline cars. The details are laid out in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' that passed this month.
The tax credits have been available for cars that plug in but also have a gas tank, such as the Toyota Rav4 Prime and the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid.
Transportation is the largest contributor to climate change both in California and nationally, and experts say it must get much cleaner to preserve a recognizable climate. About 1 in 4 cars sold in California is fully electric or plug-in hybrid, according to the California Energy Commission.
The elimination of the credits is expected to further stunt EV sales that have already slowed amid plateauing interest in California and steep auto tariffs. Industry analysts and auto dealers predict they'll see a spike in interest in electric vehicles while people can still get the credits.
Buday, who is looking to buy his second Tesla after purchasing a Model 3 two years ago, said he wants to stay ahead of the curve.
'People tend to not pay attention until it's getting close to a deadline,' Buday said. 'There's hundreds and hundreds of Teslas even within 60 miles for sale, but I think once people catch on to the fact that these credits are going away, there may be a rush to snap them up.'
The tax credits can be applied to most electric vehicles for sale, including the SUVs and trucks on display at Camino Real Chevrolet in Monterey Park. Dealership president Robb Hernandez said he hasn't yet seen a significant jump in EV sales yet. Manufacturers are estimating an increase over the coming weeks, he said.
About 20% of the dealership's total sales come from its electric offerings, Hernandez said, including the popular Chevy Blazer and Equinox. Competition in the electric vehicle space has become increasingly fierce as major auto makers release lines of electric vehicles alongside their gas-powered cars, including Ford and Porsche. Electric-only companies including Rivian and Lucid further crowd the field of competitors.
Hernandez is bracing for a drop-off in sales at his dealership with the expiration of the tax credits but said he's confident in Chevrolet's foothold in California.
'We're kind of anticipating there will be a surge, and then possibly after the expiration of the EV credits, there might be a lull,' Hernandez said. 'Hopefully it will all even out.'
Tesla is using the credits' expiration to try to motivate potential customers, with marketing emails that say, 'Order soon to get your $7,500.'
Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk said in an earnings call this month that the elimination of the credits could hurt his company's sales and lead to 'a few rough quarters.'
The electric vehicle leader has been turning its attention to robotics and autonomous driving technology as vehicle sales falter. Tesla reported a 16% year-over-year decline in automotive sales last quarter.
The news that the credits are expiring may also be drowned out by the overall price volatility consumers are dealing with.
'Most people in this economy are reading the news and struggling to make purchase decisions based on all these moving targets,' said Dominick Miserandino, a consumer behavior expert and chief executive of Retail Tech Media Nexus.
'The average person is just trying to make sense of it all,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
LA city leaders are in high-stakes negotiations on Olympics costs
LOS ANGELES - Los Angeles city leaders are at a critical juncture ahead of the 2028 Summer Olympics, with potentially hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars at stake. They are in negotiations with LA28, the private committee overseeing the Games, for the use of the city's police, traffic officers and other employees during the Olympics and Paralympics. Millions of visitors are expected to pour into downtown L.A., the Sepulveda Basin and the Westside when the Olympics kick off in July 2028. Security, trash removal, traffic control, paramedics and more will be needed during the 17-day event and the two-week Paralympics the following month. Under the 2021 Games agreement between LA28 and the city, LA28 must reimburse the city for any services that go beyond what the city would provide on a normal day. The two parties must agree by Oct. 1, 2025, on "enhanced services" - additional city services needed for the Games, beyond that normal level - and determine rates, repayment timelines, audit rights and other processes. LA28 has billed the Games as a "no cost" event for the city. Depending on how "enhanced services" are defined, the city, which is in a precarious financial state, could end up bearing significant costs. One of the biggest expenses will be security, with the LAPD, as well as a host of other local, state and federal agencies, working together to keep athletes and spectators safe. Overtime for Los Angeles police officers, and any other major expenses, would be acutely felt by a city government that recently closed a nearly $1 billion budget deficit, in part by slowing police hiring. The city continues to face rising labor costs and diminished revenues from tourism. At the same time, President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, recently passed by Congress, includes $1 billion for security and planning of the Games. But what those funds will cover - and what will be covered by LA28 - are not yet known. Against that backdrop, civil rights attorney Connie Rice sent a six-page letter dated July 17 to Mayor Karen Bass and other city leaders, asking questions about the enhanced services agreement and urging the city to take a tough stance. Rice said city staffers reached out to her because they were worried that the agreement wouldn't adequately protect the city. "Los Angeles faces multiple fiscal hazards that many current leaders negotiating this and other Olympics agreements, will not be around to face," Rice wrote. "The City cannot afford an additional $1.5 billion hit in 2028 because city officials inadequately protected taxpayers in 2025." Rice's letter asks if LA28 and the city have resolved differences about the definition of venue "footprints," or perimeters around sporting events, with the footprint changing depending on whether it's defined by a blast radius, a security perimeter or other factors. The letter questioned why LA28 isn't paying the city up front for costs, using money in escrow, and asked if LA28 has provided the city with a budget for security, transit and sanitation. Rice, in an interview, said she wants to ensure the Games are indeed "no cost." Both Paul Krekorian, who heads Mayor Karen Bass' major events office, and an LA28 representative declined to directly address Rice's letter. "The City and LA28 have been collaborating for years to ensure that all Angelenos benefit from the Games for decades to come," said Krekorian. "While the [agreement] is currently under negotiation, we fully expect that LA28 will be successful in its fundraising efforts to deliver the Games." The city routinely provides police officers and traffic officers for major events, such as Dodgers games and the Grammy Awards. In 2022, the Rams reimbursed the city $1.5 million for resources it provided for the team's Super Bowl parade, according to City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo. Last month, Szabo's office released a document on the city's investor website outlining potential liabilities facing the city, including some related to the 2028 Games. The document noted that roughly $1 billion in security costs will have to be paid by the city if they are not covered by LA28 or the federal government. Jacie Prieto Lopez, LA28's vice president of communications, told The Times that security and other planning costs haven't been finalized. Rice's letter questioned whether LA28 would cover the cost of security. Prieto Lopez didn't directly answer when asked by The Times if LA28 will cover the LAPD's expenses. "We are grateful that the Administration and Congress recently appropriated $1 billion in security funding and we will continue to work with our partners at the federal, state and local levels, including the City of LA, to ensure a safe, secure and successful Games," Prieto Lopez said in an email. How the $1 billion from the Big Beautiful Bill is distributed will be determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency through the Homeland Security Grant Program, which is focused on preventing terrorism and other threats. Anita Gore, a spokesperson for the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, told The Times that she expects those funds to be managed by the state through the Homeland Security Grant process. The Office of Emergency Services is the "coordination hub" for the Games and is overseeing a statewide task force focused on security, traffic management and more, Gore said. At a recent hearing in Sacramento, LA28 Chief Executive Reynold Hoover said the nonprofit continues to push for federal support for the Games. He said the $1 billion recently approved by Congress will "help us with that initial funding requirements for security." Hoover told a Senate subcommittee in June that LA28 is asking the federal government to fully reimburse the public agencies that will provide critical security at the Games. A representative for the Department of Homeland Security declined to answer questions about how the $1 billion will be used. Trump's mercurial nature and past attacks on California make it difficult for some city leaders to gauge how his administration will handle funding for the Games. Rep. Nellie Pou of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the Congressional Task Force for Enhancing Security for Special Events, held a public hearing last month on preparing for the World Cup and Olympics. She told The Times that she has not received any specifics about the $1 billion. "This administration has withheld and frozen other federal funding appropriated by Congress, so we cannot simply assume that World Cup or Olympic security funding will make it to our communities," she said. Krekorian, when asked about Pou's concerns, said the city "is in direct communication with state and federal partners, as well as LA28, about the allocation of these funds." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is There Such a Thing as an 'Indestructible' Wheel? Tesla Owners Can Find Out
New wheels from the aftermarket company Unplugged Performance, which caters to owners, are claimed to be indestructible. The claim is a bit far-fetched, but the Road Warrior wheels appear to be tough and well-designed. Priced between $2795 and $2995, they're also relatively light and don't add much to aerodynamic drag. If you want to market your product to Tesla owners, you're going to need to make a claim that stands out. Thus, aftermarket outfit Unplugged Performance doesn't just say that its latest set of forged alloy wheels for the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y are tough—it's claiming the wheels are literally indestructible. This claim is backed up by the company's guarantee of free replacement for life if a wheel should be bent or cracked. Think of Darn Tough, the Vermont manufacturer of heavy-duty socks. Those socks, made in the United States, are guaranteed for life, warranted for replacement should they wear out. On one hand, you're buying a corporate promise, but they really are decent socks. These wheels also look to be a solid product. At $2795 for a set of 19-inch wheels and $2995 for 20s, the Road Warrior wheels are reasonably priced for forged aluminum. Load rated at over 2000 pounds per wheel, they're theoretically stronger than many wheels used in actual rally racing, and those cars are expected to survive jumps, not just potholes. Also, at a claimed 23.5 pounds per wheel for the 19-inch application and 26.0 pounds for the 20s, they aren't adding a bunch of unsprung weight. Perhaps more important for an EV application, the increased aerodynamic drag is claimed to be minimal, with Unplugged Performance claiming that the coefficient of drag with its wheels is within roughly 4 percent of the most slippery 18-inch factory wheels. The Road Warrior wheels also fit Tesla's factory tire sizes and come with a built-in, replaceable curb protector. The marketing release for the Road Warrior wheels comes with a bunch of copy about how these "indestructible" wheels will be ideal for ride-share drivers and owners of fleets of robotaxis, with wheels that will never have to be replaced. While it all sounds pretty hyperbolic, the company has designed these wheels based on learnings from the beatings its wheels have taken on municipal Tesla police fleets. These wheels do look tough, well-designed, reasonably priced, and light enough to be a decent upgrade for a privately owned Tesla. The built-in curb rash protectors are a lot less garish than the plastic aftermarket offerings more commonly available, although at $80 for a replacement set of two, you're going to want to pay some attention while parking. Which you should be doing anyway. Making bold claims and not following up on them is, unfortunately, a winning corporate strategy in 2025. Slightly exaggerating but putting out a solid product? By comparison, entirely forgivable. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Ford CEO predicts huge industry shift after latest tariff developments
From the beginning, many economists warned that the full effects of President Donald Trump's unprecedented trade war wouldn't be felt until the second half of the year. As U.S. companies finish reporting their first-half financial results, it's clear that they have also felt the pain immediately, and it could get worse. The auto industry has been especially affected by the tariffs. Related: Ford CEO Jim Farley still supports US tariffs despite hefty cost Unlike other industries, the domestic auto industry has fully welcomed the tariffs, which were initially imposed at 25% tariffs on all imports. The duties gave the Detroit Big 3 - Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis - a leg up on competition from Japan, Korea (and, to a lesser extent, Europe and the UK), which has been taking market share for decades. "For decades now, it has not been a level playing field for us automakers globally, with either tariffs or non-tariff trade barriers," GM CEO Mary Barra recently said. While U.S. hallmark General Motors still has the highest U.S. market share at 17% and Ford ranks third with a 13% market share, foreign models from Asia round out the top five, according to Cox Automotive data. Toyota ranks second with 15% U.S. market share, while Korean brand Hyundai ranks fourth with 11%. Toyota's fellow Japanese brand, Honda, is fifth in the market, with 9%. But the automotive industry is so globally integrated that the tariffs not only hit the materials used. GM, for example, imports more than half of its U.S. inventory, despite being a U.S.-based company. Stellantis' ratio isn't much better. Ford, on the other hand, makes 77% of its vehicles domestically. Still, CEO Jim Farley sees tariffs irreparably changing the automotive industry for the long term. This week, Ford said it expects tariffs to cost the company $2 billion in 2025. Ford, and every original equipment manufacturer (OEM), relies on imported parts to complete its vehicles, so even with a large manufacturing footprint in the States, tariff costs still add up. The tariffs, plus Ford's aggressive incentive spending, helped push the company into becoming the best-selling brand in the U.S. in the first half of 2025. While the $2 billion tariff cost in the short term is worth noting, Farley seemed very cognizant of what the tariffs could mean in the future. Related: Ford debuts plan to increase sales that car buyers will love "That is a really important question to answer. We increasingly see Europe, North America, and Asia becoming kind of regional businesses with trade tariff rates that are aligned for those three or four regions. And I believe that is a very long-term change," Farley said in response to a question about whether the tariffs were ever going away, even after President Trump leaves office. "And the regions will pick them. So I believe this is quite a fundamental change." Farley went on to say that he and his team discussed this issue before the second-quarter earnings call started and concluded that "Everything seems to be changing in the car business." In addition to further balkanization, Farley is advocating for a renegotiation of the USMCA North American trade deal that President Trump introduced during his first term, only to summarily dismantle it during his second term. Farley does not believe the tariffs are large enough to force major changes in manufacturing. But, he said, "These tariffs feel like, especially the ones in Europe and Asia into the U.S., feel kind of long-term for us." More Ford news: Ford CEO Jim Farley has a scary message about China EVsFord's $570 million mistake hits one of its most popular carsLatest tariff deals leave US automakers in a tough position The White House has given the auto industry a seat at the negotiating table from the beginning, and Farley hoped the administration would continue to listen, even while it cuts deals that undermine the stated goal of bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. "We're having very constructive conversations with them, being the most American company you can imagine. But depending on how that works out, you know, this could actually reverse and we could get a sustained advantage being an American company. So stay tuned," Farley said. Related: Popular Ford newcomer overtakes Jeep in a key area The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
