Duke Prepares for Major Change After ACC Announcement
Duke lost numerous stars to the NBA draft, including likely No. 1 overall pick Cooper Flagg, ACC Tournament MVP Kon Knueppel and center Khaman Maluach, among others.
Advertisement
But the Blue Devils have compensated nicely for their losses, adding Cameron and Cayden Boozer, the twins of former Duke star Carlos Boozer, and five-star forward Nikolas Khamenia.
The ACC will also undergo some major changes starting in the 2025-26 season that could have a big impact on Duke and other programs in the conference.
According to CBS Sports' Matt Norlander, the ACC has approved a scheduling change that will reduce the conference slate from 20 games to 18 per season. It will go into effect next season.
"Sources: ACC ADs have officially approved moving to an 18-game schedule in basketball, sources tell @CBSSports," Norlander wrote on X. "League had been on a 20-gamer since 2019-20 (save the COVID year). Decision was made in part because the ACC only sent four of its 18 teams to the men's NCAAT this yr."
As Norlander mentioned, the scheduling shift is a direct result of the ACC sending only four teams to the NCAA Tournament in 2025, despite having a program in the Final Four in each of the past three years.
Advertisement
The change could allow Duke to add up to two more high-profile opponents to its November and December schedule. However, with 18 teams in the ACC, the door also is open for major rivalries, like Duke vs. North Carolina, to be played only once per season instead of twice.
"This frees up the likes of Duke, Carolina, Louisville, Virginia, etc. to add at least one more notable/high-profile game to their dockets this Nov/Dec," Norlander added.
Duke Blue Devils head coach Jon Scheyer.© Aryanna Frank-Imagn Images
Similarly, the SEC and Big 12 play 18 conference games each season, whereas the Big East and Big Ten remain at 20.
Related: NBA Makes Cooper Flagg Announcement Before Draft
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
A scavenger hunt to find college football's next national champion coach turns up key names
A guided quest to find the next coach to win his first college football national championship turns up obvious names like Brian Kelly and Kalen DeBoer, but also wild cards Josh Heupel and Lane Kiffin. Let's embark on a scavenger hunt to find the next college football coach who will win his first national championship. Kirby Smart, Dabo Swinney and Ryan Day account for the only active championship coaches. Who's next? Reflecting on past winners and adhering to some guiding principles will help identify top candidates. Sixteen coaches won their first national championship during either the Bowl Championship Series or College Football Playoff era that started in 1998. We'll use that group of coaches as our guide, as we try to winnow the list: ∎ Each of the 16 first-time championship coaches from the BCS and CFP eras coached a school that's now in the Power Four ranks. So, we'll confine our search for the next champion to the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC, plus Notre Dame. ∎ Miami's Larry Coker was the only coach from our control group of 16 who won a national championship in his first season. Coker inherited a team that went 11-1 the prior season. He stepped into a ready-made winner. No current first-year coach enjoys a situation so nice, so let's eliminate the Power Four's six coaches who are entering Year 1. Sorry, Bill Belichick, that includes you. Second-year coaches like Michigan's Sherrone Moore remain in the mix. Bob Stoops, Jim Tressel, Urban Meyer and Gene Chizik won a national championship in their second season, making Year 2 a time to shine. Looking at you, Kalen DeBoer. ∎ Programs rarely go from the outhouse to the penthouse overnight. The 16 coaches who won their first national title during the CFP or BCS eras coached teams that finished 7-5 or better the season before the championship. The majority of first-timers won at least 10 games in the season preceding their first title. Let's eliminate coaches whose teams didn't achieve at least a .583 winning percentage last season. That cuts 29 more coaches from our list, leaving 30 coaches still alive. Eliminated coaches include Southern California's Lincoln Riley, Utah's Kyle Whittingham and Oklahoma State's Mike Gundy. They built accomplished careers before losing the plot last year. ∎ Each of the 16 first-time championship coaches from the BCS and playoff eras steered teams that were ranked in the preseason Top 25. So, let's consult the preseason US LBM Coaches Poll, and trim from our list nine more coaches, whose teams are unranked. We're down to 21 contenders. ∎ Most first-time championship coaches were winners before they won it all. The 16 new champions from the BCS and CFP eras compiled a combined .684 winning percentage before ever winning a national title. This excludes records compiled coaching in the Championship Subdivision. Auburn's Gene Chizik became notable exception. Before Cam Newton spurred Chizik to brief glory, Chizik's career winning percentage had been .351 across stints at Iowa State and Auburn. Not surprisingly, Chizik didn't last long after Newton departed. LSU's Ed Orgeron had a .532 career winning percentage before Joe Burrow propelled the Tigers to an undefeated national championship. Acknowledging outliers exist to our .684 guideline winning percentage, let's create a buffer and eliminate any coaches that do not have at least a .650 career winning percentage coaching in the FBS. Also, trim any coaches who aren't above-.500 at their current school. Each of the past 16 first-time championship coaches were above .500 at their school entering their breakthrough season, except for Coker, who won his title in his first season. Applying the winning percentage parameters trims 12 more coaches and leaves nine coaches standing: They are Kalen DeBoer (Alabama), Brian Kelly (LSU), Lane Kiffin (Mississippi), Josh Heupel (Tennessee), Dan Lanning (Oregon), James Franklin (Penn State), Curt Cignetti (Indiana), Marcus Freeman (Notre Dame) and Rhett Lashlee (SMU). That's a strong list, with a couple of notable omissions. More on the omissions in a bit. First, let's examine the nine names to whom our scavenger hunt guided us. DeBoer, Kelly, Lanning, Franklin and Freeman are obvious contenders. DeBoer, Kelly and Freeman previously coached a team to a national runner-up finish. Each of these five coaches have teams ranked in the preseason top 10. The list also includes four wild cards. Kiffin, Heupel, Cignetti and Lashlee coach teams with longshot national championship odds, but the stock of each coach is on the rise, and it's no guarantee the next championship coach will emerge this season. Day, Smart or Swinney could win another ring and prolong this exercise. It's not unthinkable that Heupel or Kiffin would win a title from his current job – just perhaps not this season. Also, this next coaching carousel projects to be more active than the last, especially if Brent Venables doesn't ignite Oklahoma. Any of four wild-card names our scavenger hunt surfaced could nicely suit the Sooners. As for notable omissions, Texas coach Steve Sarkisian stands most prominently. His .618 career winning percentage resulted in his name being trimmed, but he's coming off the best two seasons of his career. His Longhorns rank No. 1 in the preseason, after back-to-back playoff semifinal appearances. In February, I picked Sarkisian as the best-positioned coach to win his first national championship. He'd need to become another exception to the career winning percentage trend. His winning percentage is superior to what Orgeron had amassed before Burrow led LSU to glory. Might Texas' Arch Manning produce a Burrow effect? Our scavenger hunt also nixed Michigan's Moore. Officially, his career winning percentage is .643, resulting in his cut, but that clip does not include his three victories in 2023 while he served as acting coach during Jim Harbaugh's Big Ten suspension. Moore is entering his second season as Harbaugh's replacement. He, too, could be an exception to the career winning percentage rule, like Stoops was when he won a national title in his second season at Oklahoma, after a 7-5 debut. Michigan's roster features freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood, the nation's No. 1-ranked recruit. If Day, Smart or Swinney wins another title and prolongs the runway for the next championship coach, Moore could look like a stronger contender in 2026. If we could combine some common sense with the results of our scanvenger hunt, I'd insert Sarkisian and Moore onto the list in place of Cignetti and Lashlee, for a nine-name collection of DeBoer, Kelly, Kiffin, Heupel, Freeman, Lanning, Franklin, Sarkisian and Moore. Or, perhaps, this scavenger hunt serves as little more than a wild-goose choose, and the real exercise in this NIL era should be to follow the money to Texas, where the Longhorns' handsomely paid roster seems capable of making a champion out of Sarkisian, just as the pricy Buckeyes did for Day. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
Fox Sports
9 hours ago
- Fox Sports
2025 Louisville Football Predictions: Cardinals Ranked 27th in RJ Young's Ultimate 136
College Football 2025 Louisville Football Predictions: Cardinals Ranked 27th in RJ Young's Ultimate 136 Published Aug. 10, 2025 9:02 p.m. ET share facebook x reddit link This isn't your average college football ranking. My Ultimate 136 is a set of rankings that is fluid, but it's my job to look ahead and make a claim for all FBS teams based on what I know and why I know it. Here are the three pressing questions I started by asking when putting together this list: Who do I think is good? Why do I think they're good? What are the chances they will finish above or below my expectations? Here is a look at where Louisville lands in my Ultimate 136. Team ranking: 27 Last year's ranking: 35 Top player: RB Isaac Brown: One of 12 Power 4 players last season to rush for 1,100+ yards and 10+ rush TDs. [Louisville's 2025 schedule] RJ's take: Jeff Brohm returns a whopping 17 upperclassmen starters from a team that knocked off 2024 ACC champion Clemson by two scores on the road. The Cardinals got to 10 wins and could get there again with Miller Moss at QB, who should partner well with wideout Chris Bell, who averaged more than 17 yards per catch and accounted for more than 700 yards receiving last year. RBs Duke Watson and Isaac Brown will be formidable if the offensive line comes together, but that might take some time with seven of them coming out of the portal. On defense, I can't wait to see how Abilene Christian transfer Jerry Lawson can do at 300 lbs. after picking up 14 tackles for loss at a lower level. But he's also one of 30 new faces that came to Louisville through the portal—after 28 exited. ADVERTISEMENT This team could feast (2024 Indiana). This team could experience famine (2024 Florida State). Louisville Win Total Odds: Over 8.5 (-162) Under (+132) Have an issue with my rankings? Think your alma mater is too low, or your school's rival is too high? Get at me on X, @RJ_Young , and I'll select my favorite tweets and respond to them in a future article. RJ Young is a national college football writer and analyst for FOX Sports. Follow him at @RJ_Young. [ Check out RJ Young's Ultimate 136 College Football Rankings here ] FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience College Football Louisville Cardinals share
Fox Sports
9 hours ago
- Fox Sports
2025 Duke Football Predictions: Blue Devils Ranked 42nd in RJ Young's Ultimate 136
College Football 2025 Duke Football Predictions: Blue Devils Ranked 42nd in RJ Young's Ultimate 136 Published Aug. 10, 2025 9:09 p.m. ET share facebook x reddit link This isn't your average college football ranking. My Ultimate 136 is a set of rankings that is fluid, but it's my job to look ahead and make a claim for all FBS teams based on what I know and why I know it. Here are the three pressing questions I started by asking when putting together this list: Who do I think is good? Why do I think they're good? What are the chances they will finish above or below my expectations? Here is a look at where Duke lands in my Ultimate 136. Team ranking: 42 Last year's ranking: 51 Top player: QB Darian Mensah: Fourth in the AAC last season in total offense at 2,855; threw for 22 TDs last season, one of just 10 QBs in Tulane history to eclipse the 20 mark. [Duke's 2025 schedule] RJ's take: Manny Diaz finished 9-4 in a year that would've been for rebuilding in the Before Times. But in the modern era you can flip on the transfer portal and NIL switch and put together a winner. ADVERTISEMENT Diaz aims to do that again with the signing of an $8 million QB Darian Mensah, former Oklahoma wide out Andrel Anthony and the retention of four defenders in Chandler Rivers, Wesley Williams, Vincent Anthony Jr. and Aaron Hall who combined for 34 tackles for loss in 2024. Outside a Week 2 matchup with Illinois and then a Week 3 clash at Tulane, the schedule is manageable. If Duke walks into Death Valley on Nov. 1 as a one-loss team, they'll be in the mix to hunt for the CFP. Duke Win Total Odds: Over 6.5 (-200) Under 6.5 (+160) Have an issue with my rankings? Think your alma mater is too low, or your school's rival is too high? Get at me on X, @RJ_Young , and I'll select my favorite tweets and respond to them in a future article. RJ Young is a national college football writer and analyst for FOX Sports. Follow him at @RJ_Young. [ Check out RJ Young's Ultimate 136 College Football Rankings here ] FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience College Football Duke Blue Devils share
