Starmer: Watching Adolescence with my kids wasn't easy
The Prime Minister warned there was no 'simple solution' to stop boys from being dragged into a world of online misogyny as he spoke to the writers of the television drama.
He said he wanted to talk about 'what can we do as a society to stop and prevent young boys being dragged into this whirlpool of hatred and misogyny', as he hosted creators of the Netflix drama at Downing Street.
Jack Thorne, a writer for the show, Jo Johnson, a producer, and representatives from the NSPCC and Children's Society, joined the Prime Minister for a round-table discussion.
It comes as Netflix said it would make the series, which examines so-called incel (involuntary celibate) culture, free to stream for all secondary schools in the UK.
Sir Keir said he and his wife had watched it with his 14-year-old daughter and 16-year-old son.
He said: 'As a dad, I have not found it easy viewing.'
The drama centres around a teenage boy who is accused of killing a girl from his school.
Sir Keir referred to real-life cases such as that of Kyle Clifford, the crossbow killer who watched misogynistic content before he murdered Louise Hunt, his ex-girlfriend, her mother and her sister.
This type of violence against women 'isn't new', the Prime Minister said. 'It's pernicious and persistent. But what Adolescence shows is that it's now taken on a different form, or different characteristics.'
He said the online world and social media means 'ideology' can be 'pumped directly into the minds of our children'.
The show shines a light on issues that people do not know how to respond to, he said.
Sir Keir added that there may not be a single response or 'policy lever to be pulled' to adequately address the issue.
'It's actually much bigger than that, almost a cultural issue, the devastating effect of misogyny on our society.'
There is also a sense that there is no 'safe space' for children where they can access content at home or outside it, Sir Keir said.
'And I do think there is a sense of isolation going on here, and therefore we can't deal with these challenges just with the old tools that we have. I don't think there's a simple solution.'
Thorne said he hopes a solution can be found to the issues raised by the series.
'It's about other people ... being given the opportunity to have conversations they haven't had before, and that they should have had, that might lead to policy change and things being made better for our young people,' he told Sky News after the meeting.
It comes as a survey suggested three quarters of parents are concerned about what their children are consuming online, with 87 per cent saying they are not confident they know what content they are viewing.
The exclusive snapshot survey of 622 British parents of five to 16-year-olds by Ipsos for the PA news agency showed 65 per cent said their child has a screen with access to the internet in their bedroom.
The proportion rose to 78 per cent for parents with a child aged between 11 and 16.
Most parents (about 80 per cent) said they think children should be at least 11 years old before getting a smartphone for their own personal use, and over half (54 per cent) said they would support a complete ban on smartphones in schools.
Thorne recently rejected accusations of 'race-swapping' in the series.
Social media posts amplified by Elon Musk suggested the story, which features a white actor, is based on Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer.
The series is not based on a true story and is 'making a point about masculinity' and not race, Thorne told the News Agents podcast.
'It's absurd to say that [knife crime] is only committed by black boys. It's absurd. It's not true. And history shows a lot of cases of kids from all races committing these crimes,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
28 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Students accepted on UK degree courses reaches record high
A total of 439,180 applicants have gained a place at university or college – up 3.1% on the same point last year, according to data published by the university admissions service. Ucas said it is the highest number of placed students on results day on record. Overall, 82% of UK 18-year-old applicants awaiting a decision on results day secured their first choice – which was the same proportion as last year. For 18-year-olds in the UK, 255,130 applicants have been accepted onto a university or college course – up 4.7% on last year, which is a record high. The number of international students who have been accepted on to undergraduate courses has risen by 2.9% – from 51,170 last year to 52,640. Accepted applicants from China (12,380) are up 13% compared with last year. The figures come as universities have been warning of financial pressures because of uncertainty about the recruitment of overseas students as well as years of frozen tuition fees for domestic students. University leaders have suggested the Government's plans for immigration could deter international students from coming to the UK and exacerbate the financial challenges faced by British universities. Under the immigration white paper proposals, graduate visas will be reduced to 18 months and a new levy on income that universities generate from international students could be introduced. Education minister Baroness Jacqui Smith of Malvern said the complete picture on international student demand will not be known 'for some time' as many are postgraduates who do not apply through Ucas. She told the PA news agency: 'We've been clear, whether or not it's whilst thinking about the immigration white paper, or the welcome we provide to students, that we will always continue to welcome the very brightest and best to come to this country to study in our universities. 'Whilst we're pleased for students to take advantage of world-leading higher education institutions, we're not prepared for them to take advantage of our immigration system.' When asked whether she believes a university could go bust this academic year because of financial pressures, Baroness Smith told PA: 'I think we're taking the action necessary to safeguard our higher education institutions.' She said: 'Were we to face a situation where a university got into trouble, our top priority would be how we protect students and it's sensible to plan for that. 'That doesn't mean that I think that that is imminently going to happen.' Speaking on A-level results day, the education minister added: 'We've always been clear that the priority in the case of any university, for whatever reason, closing down would be the ongoing support of the students.' Baroness Smith said she expected universities to have 'plans to protect students' in the event of any course closures and for the Office for Students (OfS) to 'keep a close eye' on it. Ucas data also showed regional disparities remain in university access, with the gap between north-east England and London the highest on record. Overall, 24.9% of 18-year-olds from north-east England secured a university place on results day, compared with 43.4% of 18-year-olds from London. The gap is now 18.5 percentage points, up from 17.3 percentage points last year and 11.9 percentage points in 2019. Jo Saxton, chief executive of Ucas, told PA: 'The North East is the only region in England that has seen a decrease in participation today. 'That is just incredibly stark.' The Ucas figures released on Thursday also show that the subjects with the largest percentage increases in placed students this year are engineering and technology, mathematical sciences and law. Dr Saxton said: 'I think Ucas applicants have always been savvy and think about what is going to give them the best outcomes.' She added: 'This year's students were just thirteen when the pandemic hit, and their secondary schooling was turned upside down. 'It's great to see these applicants securing a university place in record numbers, seeking more education and investing in their futures. 'I am equally delighted to see how universities across the country have responded to their ambition. 'For any student who didn't quite get the grades they were hoping for, or even those still yet to apply, there are plenty of options in clearing with around 27,000 available courses. 'Ucas experts are also available on the phones, on social media and on the Ucas website, to help all those deciding on the next step that's right for them.'
Rhyl Journal
30 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Starmer and Zelensky ‘agree strong resolve' for peace ahead of Trump-Putin talks
The two leaders expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, as they met on Wednesday, a Downing Street statement said. In a separate statement, Mr Zelensky said there had been discussions about the security guarantees required to make any deal 'truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killing'. The Prime Minister hosted the Ukrainian president for a private breakfast in No 10 on Thursday as Europe braces for the face-to-face meeting between the US president and his Russian counterpart in Alaska on Friday. European leaders are hopeful about the potential for a ceasefire after a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday, during which he reportedly told them his goal for the summit was to secure a ceasefire. But concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after the US leader suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'. Ukraine has already rejected any proposal that would compromise its borders. In a readout of the morning meeting between Sir Keir and Mr Zelensky, a Downing Street spokesman said: 'They had a private breakfast, where they discussed yesterday's meetings. 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' On Wednesday, Sir Keir co-chaired a virtual meeting of the 'coalition of the willing' – a European-led effort to send a peacekeeping force to Ukraine to monitor any deal – where he said there was a 'viable' chance of a truce. Downing Street repeated that language on Thursday, with the caveat that it would require the Russian president to take 'action to prove he is serious about peace'. '(Sir Keir and Mr Zelensky) agreed to stay in close touch in the coming days,' the readout said. The Ukrainian president, who was warmly embraced by the Prime Minister, with a red carpet rolled out for his arrival in Downing Street, said the meeting had been 'good' and 'productive'. But he urged the UK to join PURL- Nato's Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List initiative, to provide weapons to Kyiv. 'It is important that, within the framework of the coalition of the willing, we should all be able to achieve effective formats for security cooperation,' he said. 'We also discussed the continuation of support programs for our army and our defense industry. Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength. 'Keir and I also talked about such mechanisms for weapons supplies as the PURL programme, and I urged the UK to join.' It comes as The Times newspaper reported that Britain was planning to scale back its plans for a military peacekeeping force in Ukraine. UK military chiefs are now said to be involving air reassurance over western Ukraine, training support to the Ukrainian military and the clearance of mines from the Black Sea. The Government has been contacted for comment. Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said. 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' Sir Keir told allies on Wednesday. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Keir Starmer and the Ukraine summit: a pivot point for Labour policy too
The aim of Thursday's Downing Street meeting between Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelenskyy could not have been clearer. It was to send a strong visual political message to President Trump on the eve of his Alaska talks with Vladimir Putin. Neither the prime minister nor Ukraine's president spoke publicly. The Ukraine leader was greeted with a hug and a handshake. The two men then talked in private by a vase of sunflowers, Ukraine's national flower. So much is at stake in Ukraine and so great is the urgency that European leaders have moved fast and determinedly this week – not something one can often say. The aim is to remind Mr Trump that Europe stands with Ukraine against Russia. The solidarity has been well choreographed – and tightly scripted. No leader has said anything that might provoke Mr Trump. Whether the US president will take any notice, let alone serious notice, is something else. That will only become clear in and after Alaska. Whatever the outcome, this is a pivotal moment not just for Europe but for Sir Keir's foreign policy approach – and his domestic policies too. In the year and more since he became prime minister, Sir Keir has been faced with huge global challenges in Ukraine, the Middle East, and in relations with the United States. These have occupied an enormous amount of his focus. They have been issues which play to his strengths. But, judging by the opinion polls, it has not impressed the public. The Alaska summit will shed some light on whether this effort has been worth it in terms of Ukraine's independence and the threat from Russia. But it will also be pivotal because the government is currently being so heavily stress-tested at home on major issues ranging from the economy to migration and the welfare state. Foreign and domestic policy may once have been conveniently – if not wholly – separable problems. In the interconnected, technologically driven world of today, the two things are umbilically connected. In his national security strategy, published in June, Sir Keir acknowledged this. He called ours 'an era of radical uncertainty'. It must, he said, be navigated with 'agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest'. This meant, he continued, that foreign policy must answer to 'the concerns of working people'. Wars drive up their bills. Cyber-attacks undermine their public services. Criminals smuggle illegal migrants across borders. Higher living standards must therefore become a national security goal. The need, he concluded, is 'to bring foreign and domestic policy together'. This may sound sensible. The problem is that it has not been done, let alone with political agility. Policies do not become unified just because someone, even the prime minister, decrees that they should be. A government has to choose how best to unify them. This is where Sir Keir is currently failing. When he says the overriding European security need is to invest in collective defence, he is right. But the current consequence for the working people whose interests Sir Keir places at the centre of his strategy is that their bills are higher and their welfare and spending programmes are reined in to help pay for it. This either-or approach is proving disastrous. It has prepared a path for Reform UK's closed-door, Britain-first promises. This has to change. Sir Keir needs to start changing either-or into its alternative – and prioritise both defence and higher living standards.
