‘Megaflash' lightning bolt travelled over 800 kilometres, setting a new record, study says
Tyler Ory
, CNN
Megaflashes are rare - with fewer than one percent of thunderstorms producing them. (File photo)
Photo:
Unsplash/ Rahul Viswanath
Lightning is a familiar sight in stormy skies, but a new report has revealed just how far some bolts can travel - in one case, more than 500 miles (800 km).
That astonishing bolt sparked to life in eastern Texas and stretched all the way to Kansas City, Missouri, travelling 515 miles (828 km) in seconds.
It struck during a thunderstorm in October 2017, but the bolt's exact distance was finally verified in the study, published Thursday in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
"We call it megaflash lightning and we're just now figuring out the mechanics of how and why it occurs," said Randy Cerveny, one of the study's authors and a professor of geographical sciences at Arizona State University.
Researchers discovered the record-breaking megaflash while re-evaluating satellite data with new computational methods. The data from the satellites also provided much greater detail than previous observations, letting scientists determine individual megaflashes in these past storms.
"Flashes at this extreme scale always existed, and are now becoming identifiable as our detection capabilities and data processing methods improve," the paper says.
It's helping scientists and forecasters better understand what lightning is capable of and the dangers it poses.
All lightning is an electric discharge - much like a static shock, just on a larger scale.
Inside a thunderstorm, ice and water particles collide and exchange electrons, creating a buildup of electric charge. Lightning occurs when that charge becomes too strong for the atmosphere to hold onto and discharges it in the form of a bolt either through the cloud or down to the ground.
Most lightning stays within 10 miles (16 km) of the storm where it originated. When it travels more than 60 miles (96 km), it's considered a megaflash.
Michael Peterson, the report's lead author and a senior scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology's Severe Storms Research Center, said megaflashes tend to form in the weaker, outer parts of a storm system - not the intense core most people associate with lightning - and often after the storm has moved on.
The record-breaking 2017 flash followed that same pattern, creeping through the broad cloud layers that trailed a cold front across the southern Plains. Flat, sheet-like clouds stretching from Texas to Kansas City formed a shallow layer that could easily conduct electricity - creating ideal conditions for lightning to travel horizontally for hundreds of miles (km).
As the megaflash travels through the clouds, it can shoot off multiple ground-striking bolts.
"You might have an entire thunderstorm's worth of lightning, cloud to ground strokes, in one flash," Peterson noted.
Megaflashes are rare: Fewer than 1 percent of thunderstorms produce them, according to satellite data analysed by Peterson in the study. The storms that do are also generally long-lived and massive, covering thousands of square miles.
That expansiveness is key, Peterson said, and is likely "the primary driver" of megaflashes, as smaller storms can't support as much horizontal travel.
"But the thing is that we don't actually know exactly what sets of conditions actually allow these flashes to occur at these scales," Peterson added.
The 2017 megaflash may be the longest ever verified, now beating out a bolt of 477 miles (767 km) in April 2020, but scientists don't expect it to hold that title for long.
"Oh, we'll find more," Cerveny said. "We are still in the process of evaluating data."
The satellite-based lightning mappers that made this discovery possible have only been operation for about 10 years - a short window in climate science terms - and there's a lot more data to analyse.
The tools used to track extreme events like the Texas-to-Missouri bolt are opening new frontiers in lightning research, said Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist with the National Lightning Safety Council who was not involved in the study.
"What I'm looking forward to is seeing how does the location of where lightning occurs change?" Vagasky said.
"It is going to be really useful from having all of these datasets, ground-based or satellite- based, to help us really understand what is going on with lightning and thunderstorms."
While megaflashes are rare, their risks are very real.
Peterson said they represent a kind of worst-case lightning scenario: Powerful discharges capable of sparking wildfires or causing damage far from a storm's core.
"You don't see where they come from. You only see where they strike," Peterson said.
"The extent of the hazard and then the fact that it's unexpected both contribute to why it's important to understand for public safety."
Many lightning injuries happen because people underestimate how far a bolt can actually travel from a storm and how long the danger can linger.
Cerveny, too, emphasized the importance of correcting the misconception that lightning can strike "out of the blue."
"These megaflashes really point out one of the severe problems that is associated with thunderstorms," said Cerveny. "A lightning flash can start in a thunderstorm very far away, and travel, as we've just shown, 500 miles (800 km) before it ends."
- CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
NASA to fast-track plan to put nuclear reactor on the Moon by 2030
By Audrey Courty A nuclear reactor would be useful for long-term stays on the Moon. Photo: 123RF Analysis - US Transport Secretary Sean Duffy has announced the US wants to be the first nation to put a nuclear reactor on the Moon after an internal directive showed he ordered the space agency NASA to fast-track the plan. "We're going to bring nuclear fission to the lunar surface to power our base," Duffy wrote on social media X on Thursday, local time. "If you lead in space, you lead on Earth." A directive written by Duffy - first reported by Politico and seen by Agence France Presse (AFP) - demands that NASA build a nuclear reactor that could be used to generate power on the Moon within five years. It is the first major policy change by Duffy since President Donald Trump appointed him as acting head of the space agency, and it comes just three months after China and Russia announced they were considering a joint effort to also put a nuclear power station on the Moon. But what would a nuclear reactor help achieve? And what is driving this new space race? Here's what to know. Nuclear reactors are the heart of a nuclear power plant. They create electricity by producing a carefully controlled nuclear chain reaction. Over the years, NASA has funded multiple nuclear reactor research projects. Photo: ABC Four Corners: Ryan Sheridan According to the New York Times , Duffy's directive calls for the agency to solicit proposals from commercial companies for a reactor that could generate 100 kilowatts of power and would be ready for launch in late 2029. That's enough electricity to power between 50 and 100 Australian households at once. As extraordinary as it sounds, this idea to use nuclear energy in space is not new. Since 2000, NASA has been investing in nuclear reactor research, including in 2022, when it awarded three US$5 million contracts to develop initial designs for the Moon. But those designs were smaller, producing 40 kilowatts, and were for demonstration purposes to show nuclear power "is a safe, clean, reliable option," NASA said at the time. A nuclear reactor would be useful for long-term stays on the Moon, as the Trump administration looks to revitalise space exploration. One lunar day lasts four weeks on Earth, with two weeks of continual sunshine followed by two weeks of cold darkness. This cycle makes it difficult for a spacecraft or a Moon base to survive with just solar panels and batteries. Having a source of power independent of the Sun would be key to a sustained human presence on the lunar surface for at least 10 years, NASA has previously said. In the internal directive, Duffy also cites China and Russia's plans to put a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s. "The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first," he writes, according to AFP. Artemis is a reference to NASA's Moon exploration program, which aims to send four astronauts to the lunar surface in 2026 to establish a lasting presence near the south pole. Further, Duffy notes it would pave the way for Mars exploration efforts. "To properly advance this critical technology to be able to support a future lunar economy, high-power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly," he reportedly says. Amid renewed competition for space dominance - more than 50 years after the Cold War spurred the first man to walk on the Moon - it is worth noting that a 1967 UN agreement says no nation can own the Moon. Duffy's comments about the potential for another country to declare a "keep-out zone" on its surface appear to be referring to an agreement called the Artemis Accords. In 2020, seven nations initially signed the agreement to establish principles on how countries should cooperate on the Moon. Since then, 49 more have done so, including Australia, but China is noticeably absent from the list. These principles include so-called "safety zones" to be established around operations and assets that countries build on the Moon to prevent interference. The race to the Moon is driven by scientific knowledge and technological advances, as well as the prospect of accessing valuable resources. In a 2015 article published on its website, NASA explains why it plans to mine the Moon and how the "lunar gold rush" could work. Citing data from geological surveys, the space agency says the Moon contains three crucial elements: water, helium and rare earth metals. The water reserves frozen inside shadowed craters could be used for drinking, and could even be converted into rocket fuel to support future missions to Mars, according to NASA. The agency says helium would support developments in the energy sector, like nuclear fusion. As for rare earth metals, it says they would boost the supplies needed for emerging technologies, like smartphones, computers and medical equipment. China has also tapped the Moon's potential and made giant leaps in space exploration and technology in recent years. It has built a space station that is manned by taikonauts, landed a rover on Mars, and became the first nation to touch down on the far side of the Moon. China, too, wants to set up a lunar base and send people to Mars, adding a layer of political rivalry to the race. - ABC
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Annoying people might be ageing you
Many of us have people in our social group who bring us down. Some of us feel hassled by people we know and love. A recent study from New York University has shown that negative social ties could potentially add as much as 2.5 months to your biological age. Science writer David Robson joins Jim to talk about the research. Photo: 123RF
RNZ News
7 days ago
- RNZ News
‘Megaflash' lightning bolt travelled over 800 kilometres, setting a new record, study says
By Tyler Ory , CNN Megaflashes are rare - with fewer than one percent of thunderstorms producing them. (File photo) Photo: Unsplash/ Rahul Viswanath Lightning is a familiar sight in stormy skies, but a new report has revealed just how far some bolts can travel - in one case, more than 500 miles (800 km). That astonishing bolt sparked to life in eastern Texas and stretched all the way to Kansas City, Missouri, travelling 515 miles (828 km) in seconds. It struck during a thunderstorm in October 2017, but the bolt's exact distance was finally verified in the study, published Thursday in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. "We call it megaflash lightning and we're just now figuring out the mechanics of how and why it occurs," said Randy Cerveny, one of the study's authors and a professor of geographical sciences at Arizona State University. Researchers discovered the record-breaking megaflash while re-evaluating satellite data with new computational methods. The data from the satellites also provided much greater detail than previous observations, letting scientists determine individual megaflashes in these past storms. "Flashes at this extreme scale always existed, and are now becoming identifiable as our detection capabilities and data processing methods improve," the paper says. It's helping scientists and forecasters better understand what lightning is capable of and the dangers it poses. All lightning is an electric discharge - much like a static shock, just on a larger scale. Inside a thunderstorm, ice and water particles collide and exchange electrons, creating a buildup of electric charge. Lightning occurs when that charge becomes too strong for the atmosphere to hold onto and discharges it in the form of a bolt either through the cloud or down to the ground. Most lightning stays within 10 miles (16 km) of the storm where it originated. When it travels more than 60 miles (96 km), it's considered a megaflash. Michael Peterson, the report's lead author and a senior scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology's Severe Storms Research Center, said megaflashes tend to form in the weaker, outer parts of a storm system - not the intense core most people associate with lightning - and often after the storm has moved on. The record-breaking 2017 flash followed that same pattern, creeping through the broad cloud layers that trailed a cold front across the southern Plains. Flat, sheet-like clouds stretching from Texas to Kansas City formed a shallow layer that could easily conduct electricity - creating ideal conditions for lightning to travel horizontally for hundreds of miles (km). As the megaflash travels through the clouds, it can shoot off multiple ground-striking bolts. "You might have an entire thunderstorm's worth of lightning, cloud to ground strokes, in one flash," Peterson noted. Megaflashes are rare: Fewer than 1 percent of thunderstorms produce them, according to satellite data analysed by Peterson in the study. The storms that do are also generally long-lived and massive, covering thousands of square miles. That expansiveness is key, Peterson said, and is likely "the primary driver" of megaflashes, as smaller storms can't support as much horizontal travel. "But the thing is that we don't actually know exactly what sets of conditions actually allow these flashes to occur at these scales," Peterson added. The 2017 megaflash may be the longest ever verified, now beating out a bolt of 477 miles (767 km) in April 2020, but scientists don't expect it to hold that title for long. "Oh, we'll find more," Cerveny said. "We are still in the process of evaluating data." The satellite-based lightning mappers that made this discovery possible have only been operation for about 10 years - a short window in climate science terms - and there's a lot more data to analyse. The tools used to track extreme events like the Texas-to-Missouri bolt are opening new frontiers in lightning research, said Chris Vagasky, a meteorologist with the National Lightning Safety Council who was not involved in the study. "What I'm looking forward to is seeing how does the location of where lightning occurs change?" Vagasky said. "It is going to be really useful from having all of these datasets, ground-based or satellite- based, to help us really understand what is going on with lightning and thunderstorms." While megaflashes are rare, their risks are very real. Peterson said they represent a kind of worst-case lightning scenario: Powerful discharges capable of sparking wildfires or causing damage far from a storm's core. "You don't see where they come from. You only see where they strike," Peterson said. "The extent of the hazard and then the fact that it's unexpected both contribute to why it's important to understand for public safety." Many lightning injuries happen because people underestimate how far a bolt can actually travel from a storm and how long the danger can linger. Cerveny, too, emphasized the importance of correcting the misconception that lightning can strike "out of the blue." "These megaflashes really point out one of the severe problems that is associated with thunderstorms," said Cerveny. "A lightning flash can start in a thunderstorm very far away, and travel, as we've just shown, 500 miles (800 km) before it ends." - CNN
