Starbucks increases office attendance to four days a week, rolling back WFH even further
CEO Brian Niccol announced the new in-office policy this week, which will affect staff in the US and Canada.
From October, the company's three-day in-office requirement will increase to a minimum of four days, with common days being Monday to Thursday.
This applies to Starbucks' Seattle and Toronto Support Centres, along with the North America regional offices.
'We'll share more details before October, including our plans to ensure everyone has an assigned dedicated desk,' Mr Niccol said.
He also noted the company wants leaders and people managers to be 'physically present with their teams'.
So, on top of the increased office days, all Support Centre 'people leaders' currently working from other areas will be required to relocate to Seattle or Toronto within 12 months.
This does not apply to 'individual contributors', but the CEO noted that hiring for future roles and lateral moves will require partners to be either Seattle or Toronto based.
Mr Niccol noted that not every employee would agree with this approach and that an updated in-office culture 'may not work for everyone'.
For those that feel this way, the company will be offering cash payments for people who wish to leave.
'If you decide you want to leave Starbucks for any reason, we respect that,' the CEO said.
'To support those who decide to 'opt out', we're offering a one-time voluntary exit program with a cash payment for partners who make this choice.'
Mr Niccol said the company is re-establishing its 'in-office culture' because they believe everyone does their 'best work' when they are together, such as sharing ideas, solving problems and, in general, moving 'much faster'.
'Being in person also helps us build and strengthen our culture. As we work to turn the business around, all these things matter more than ever,' he said.
Employees were informed that the company understood there were circumstances in which they may need to leave the office early for personal reasons, but the 'default' should be working in person in a Starbucks office.
Starbucks has become the latest major company to turn their backs on previous flexible working policies and push ahead with increasingly strict return to office mandates.
Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, Tabcorp, AT&T and Dell are just a few of the companies that have ordered staff back into the office.
However, the cracks have started to show, with employees less than impressed with how some of these RTO mandates are going.
A report from Business Insider published last month suggested that Dell was dealing with multiple issues, three months into ordering people back into the office full time.
Dell staff told the publication that enforcement varies between managers, with some employees saying they were in eight hours a day, while others seemingly coming into the office to show their face and leaving soon after.
This has reportedly been causing a lot of 'in-office politics'.
Last month, a leaked internal memo from JPMorgan showed morale had taken a hit in the wake of the RTO mandate.
A yearly employee survey showed the company's health and wellbeing scores had dropped, with leaders attributing this to the return to office.
'We know return full-time to the office has been an adjustment and one that not everyone agrees with, but we continue to believe in-person is how we do our best work and how we foster connections and mobility opportunities,' the memo stated.
Elsewhere, there have also been complaints of companies introducing RTO mandates but actually not having the capacity for everyone to come back.
Several workers at AT&T told Business Insider that there was a shortage of available desks and the parking lots had become overcrowded.
There were also claims of increasingly long wait times for elevators, leading to the company posting signs with 'motivational quotes' encouraging staff to use the stairs.
So, why do some companies, both overseas and here in Australia, keep pushing to increase office attendance despite many employees preferring a remote or flexible hybrid approach?
Well, according to Employment Hero CEO, Ben Thompson, it is a mix of old habits and good intentions.
'There of course are many genuine cases where working from home is not possible and many industries where face-to-face is a must,' he said.
'But ultimately, trying to retrofit an outdated structure on modern work is holding many businesses back.'
He pointed out that many leaders genuinely believe that being physically present is the only way to create a highly effective and collaborate team.
In many cases, changing long held mindsets and values of leadership is a significant challenge.
'Where the private office, towering view or city parking space may have formerly been markers of success, leaders need to redefine what this success looks like and the example they are setting for their teams,' he said.
'When the leaders show up, others will follow. But imagine how this could be better done online, with the right tools, to create a sense of unity and commitment remotely.'
Mr Thompson also noted that the cost of leases could be a key driver for some of these businesses to focus on office attendance, but claimed if these funds were reinvested into setting up teams for remote work, it could be 'game changing'.
Moving forward, he said the modern workplace is at a 'pivotal juncture', and is being influenced by both global and local trends.
'From a first-principles standpoint, the future of work hinges on meeting human needs, leveraging technology, and optimising economics, with AI emerging as a game-changer,' he said.
'There is an increasing case building for sustained hybrid and remote models that will be difficult for companies to ignore.'
So, while Mr Thompson believes we may continue to see a short term pull towards the office, he expects the remote working to rise in the long term.
'Humans value autonomy and balance. Combine that with maturing remote collaboration tech and AI capability, many millions of people globally are about to 'come online' with internet access and a growing playbook for building real social connections outside the office – and I think it's clear we will see remote work prosper,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Pay us what you owe us': America divided by WNBA T-shirt stunt
WNBA stars have sparked widespread divide by wearing T-shirts with 'pay us what you owe us' emblazed on the front. The blunt message was delivered during warm ups ahead of the WNBA All Star Game on Sunday amid ongoing collective bargaining agreement negotiations between the players and the league. With a late October deadline looming, the players' stance is clear … they want a bigger piece of the pie. It's not the first time WNBA players have demanded more pay, with the talking point rearing its head every year. The latest act however comes off the back of the league agreeing to an 11-year, $AUD3.38 billion TV rights deal with Disney, Amazon Prime Video and NBCUniversal that will come into play from 2026. The WNBA is booming with TV ratings (up 23%), ticket sales (up 26%) and attendance (13%) all surging halfway through the season, according to NPR. But the simple act of wearing a T-shirts demanding to be paid more sparked widespread divide with many believing the players are deserving of greater pay, while countless others pointed to the league's struggling finances which have seen the WNBA never make a profit. What is the WNBA's revenue? That's the big talking point behind all of the ongoing CBA negotiations, the WNBA players are chasing a large share of the league's revenue. Under the current CBA, the players split 9.3 per cent of league revenue. A figure far lesser than the NBA which sees players split between 49 and 51 per cent. The league currently operates off a revenue of $200m, but as is often pointed out when these discussions come to the table … the WNBA has yet to turn a profit since its inception in 1996. The NBA owns nearly 60 per cent of the league with team owners investing millions every year to the WNBA. Despite the recent uptick, the 2024 WNBA season saw the league lose $40 million. The new TV rights deal will inject $200m annually into the league, compared to the current deal which injects roughly $45m per season. With that deal set to come into play from 2026 onwards, WNBA players could soon see their salaries rise and the league turn a profit for the first time. What is the difference in WNBA and NBA salaries? According to Sports Illustrated, WNBA salaries roughly range from a minimum of $USD66,000 to a super maximum contract of around $USD250,000. Despite being the face of the league, Caitlin Clark remains on a rookie contract which will see her earn $78,000 in 2025. Compare those figures to the NBA and the difference is eye-watering. The average NBA salary for the 2024-25 season was projected to be $11,910,649, according to SI. The minimum salary came in at $1,157,153 while the highest-paid player, Stephen Curry, earned a staggering $55.7 million. America divided by players calling for more pay You can almost guarantee that anytime a WNBA player speaks out about wanting to be paid more, social media will be flooded with vitriol It kicked into overdrive on Sunday as images of the players wearing the shirts began to spread across the internet. End Wokeness wrote on X: 'The WNBA loses $50 million every year and has NEVER generated a profit. You deserve $0.00.' Jake Crain added: 'There is no league as tone deaf as the WNBA. 'Pay us what you owe us' shirts when you have to be subsidised is wild.' Fox Sports Radio host Aaron Torres wrote: 'There is no group of more delusional people on planet Earth, than WNBA players.' Of course not everyone was on the side of the corporation with a plethora of fans backing the players in chasing what they're worth. WTH News wrote: 'They're not asking for NBA bags, just their damn slice of the pie. Talent's on the court, money's on the table — time to match the energy. You don't build a league on players and leave them crumbs.' NBA and WNBA beat reporter Andrew Dukowitz wrote: 'The league is built on players, they deserve to get a bigger slice of the pie for the work they all have put in, and as the revenue grows, they should as well. The WNBA players are not asking to be paid dollar for dollar what the NBA players make, from what I understand they just want a fair share of the revenue.' Barstool Sports' Dave Portnoy took his outrage even further, savaging people who don't believe the WNBA players don't deserve a bigger slice. 'I don't know how anybody in the world with a brain, and maybe my brain is just bigger than most, can rationally say women don't deserve more money at this point,' Portnoy said in a video posted to social media. 'Franchise values are exploding. Ticket sales, merch, TV rights all exploding. The players have an opt out in their CBA. Of course they took it. It's all about leverage in re-negotiations and for the 1st time in history of the league players have power. 'The players make virtually nothing while the entire league explodes. Of course they deserve more money.' What will it mean if no agreement is reached? With the first round of talks going almost nowhere, the threat of a potential player lockout remains real. The players union has said it's preparing for a work stoppage when the current CBA expires Oct. 31. WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert said she has 'confidence' a deal can be struck before the Halloween deadline, but also said she's 'not going to put an exact date on it. 'We're in a good place and we're going back and forth,' she said. If no agreement is reached, the players will effectively not turn up to work until a deal is struck which could then have an impact on the upcoming expansion drafts in December. Free agency, which usually starts in late January, and potentially the April draft would also be on hold as long as a deal remains unfinalised.

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Astronomer CEO Andy Byron resigns after Coldplay concert saga
Tech CEO Andy Byron has resigned after being caught in an embrace with his company's chief people officer at a Coldplay concert. "Andy Byron has tendered his resignation, and the Board of Directors has accepted," Astronomer said in a statement. "Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met." Astronomer says it will begin searching for its next chief executive as the company's co-founder and chief product officer, Pete DeJoy, serves as interim CEO.

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
How Youtuber Louis Rossmann's beef with an Australian PlayStation repair whiz revealed a shocking past
As YouTuber Louis Rossmann watched his latest video upload, he felt sure he had made the right decision. He knew his investigation into a mysterious and controversial Australian businessman would spark furious interest in his online tech circles, although he never could have predicted how dramatically it would take off. "The videos that do well here are the ones where I am kicking a bully in the shins," the larger-than-life New Yorker says of his YouTube channel, which today has more than 2.2 million subscribers. There has been no shortage of bullies to kick: from tech giant Apple charging huge sums for repairs that Rossmann could do for nothing, to the maker of a $400 baby monitor that started charging a subscription fee for features that had previously been free. For Rossmann, the motive is simple: "You should own what you bought and paid for. A manufacturer shouldn't be able to take that away." So, it caught his attention when Jessa Jones, a friend in the tech-repair community, contacted him last year about an Australian company that had banned her from using its software that she had paid for up front. Emails laid out a bizarre customer service interaction between Jones and Better Way Electronics, which makes software to help diagnose problems with broken PlayStation consoles. The company's owner — who went by "Louie" — boasted online that his software was used in 18,000 PlayStation consoles each week around the world. That is because it could do something amazing: it could read secret error codes PlayStation's manufacturer, Sony, had programmed into every console, and tell the user what had malfunctioned. "We can use our traditional tools of looking for physical damage. But often these motherboards will have no physical sign of damage whatsoever," says Jones, who owns a tech-repair shop in New York. Essentially, Better Way Electronics's software could save Jones's customers from having to buy a new PlayStation. Jones paid about $300 to buy a licence for the software, which at first worked perfectly. "It was maybe two weeks later, after we were like, 'Oh, this is gonna be so great,' that we started to have problems," she says. Better Way Electronics's owner, Louie, fired off an email as a warning: Jones would be banned from the software she just bought if she kept running it "in a modified state". She had no idea what he meant, and told him she had only used it as advertised — to fix PlayStations. But Louie was unmoved, pointing to his terms and conditions, which stated he could revoke access at any time, even without providing a reason. The pair went around in circles, Jones assuring him she wasn't trying to pirate anything and suggesting the problem must be at his end, and Louie not having a bar of it, until things got heated on both sides. Their interaction ended with Jones being banned from using the software. From: Jessa Jones Date: Apr 23, 2024 Subject: Re: BwE To: Louie If you had bothered to consult an attorney rather than simply invent nonsensical "terms and conditions" you would recognize that the ones that you've published are meaningless. Even if they weren't meaningless, any school kid could tell you that can't "change" them from day to day. The meaningless terms and conditions you have today are NOT the same as the meaningless ones you had published at the time I purchased the service. From: Louie Date: Apr 22, 2024 Subject: Re: BwE To: Jessa Jones Your use of sophistry is very apparent. Why bother speaking of hypotheticals as a means to what? Make me go oh boy I shouldn't ban somebody for breaking my terms and conditions. I could have been rich from American business! I feel you don't understand me and my business goals. Anyways thanks for your prolix response. If only you replied to my other email and kept it between us. Then you wouldn't have been banned again. Hypotheticals eh. Louie (MInfoTech, BBus, BCom) But Jones soon saw she was not the only one having problems; other people were saying online they were getting banned without cause, and without a refund. "He routinely began banning people who had paid him, and that is really unacceptable," she says. "I felt compelled to make sure that the repair community recognised that this guy is extremely likely to take your money and then rescind your access to the thing that you paid him for." So, she reached out to an old friend, Louis Rossmann. Jessa Jones was not the only person who had contacted Rossmann about Better Way Electronics. "He was abusing people who are my colleagues, my friends," Rossmann says. "People that I know and work with on a regular basis will message me and say, 'I was banned from using this. He took my $3-600 and he is not giving it back.' I think that's wrong." In April 2024, Rossmann decided to use his platform to give Better Way Electronics a rap on the knuckles. As far as YouTube smackdowns go, it was a fairly tame video. In it, Rossmann laid out some complaints about how the company was treating its customers, stepping through the emails Jones had shared with him. He ended it, though, with a flourish: a promise to throw serious money behind any programmer who was up for making a free, open-source version of Better Way Electronics's software. "He made software that made it very, very simple for you to figure out what is wrong with the [PlayStation] console," Rossmann says. "And this meant that it was worth it for people to put up with this horrible behaviour." Louie from Better Way Electronics hit back strongly against Rossmann's video. He said Jessa Jones had been warned that her computer was pinging one of the security systems he had embedded in his software, which would alert him if there was any risk someone might pirate his work. "Louie, personally, is extremely suspicious of pirating his code reader, and I can understand that," Jones says. But she had repeatedly told him she was not trying to pirate his software, and also that she thought one of his security systems, called Digital Rights Management (DRM), was invasive and beyond the norm. Other people were saying the same thing, pointing out that Louie's DRM system could identify if you were running competitors' software. Some voiced concerns about the risk of malware or spyware if you did as Louie suggested on his website and turned off your anti-virus to run his software. Louie shrugged this off, posting online that the people raising those concerns were just trolls who were mad he charged money for his software. "There is no actual proof that I hack my customers, spy on my customers, breach any laws, or even go outside my own terms and conditions," he wrote on the Better Way Electronics website. "The fact that nobody has proven otherwise really speaks to the troll nature of the entire topic." Months passed, and beyond a little online sparring between Louie and some other tech repairers, the beef seemed destined to fizzle out. That was, until Louis Rossmann received an email from YouTube. The email explained that someone had filed a complaint against the video he had posted about Better Way Electronics, claiming that sharing Jessa Jones's emails was a privacy violation. He was sure the complaint had come from Louie — Jones hadn't complained — and for Rossmann, this meant war. "One of the worst things you can do on this platform is try to get somebody else's video removed because you don't like what they said," he explains. For YouTubers, strikes against their account can result in their accounts being punished — such as not being able to post videos for a week or two — or even being banned from the platform entirely. "This channel has started to help me cement a movement," Rossmann says. "By filing these types of false strikes against it, you are risking everything that I've spent 15 years working for … If you're gonna do that to me, I'm looking into you and you would better be very, very perfectly clean." Although Louie from Better Way Electronics had been on the repair scene for a while, no one knew much about him. He didn't show his face in his YouTube repair tutorials, and only went by his first name. So, Rossmann decided to look into him, kicking off a collective investigation with his followers all around the world, scouring the internet for clues. The first thing they found was that Better Way Electronics's website wasn't registered to a "Louie"; it was registered to someone with what seemed to be a woman's name. Rossmann says his first thought was that this might prove useful to get refunds for everyone who was banned. "I'll use the, 'Hey man, I see you're a tax evader. I could report you, maybe you could stop screwing people?'" he says. Rossmann and his followers kept digging, eventually tracing Louie to an Australian Business Number (ABN), registered to a Louie Tahiri. Curiously, the ABN record showed that until July last year, Tahiri had used another name — Luan Tahiraj. When Rossmann searched for Luan Tahiraj, he was stunned. News articles revealed that in 2013, Tahiraj had been jailed in Australia for offences against two girls, aged 13 and 14. In total, he served an eight-year sentence, with parole after four. Court records show that Tahiraj sent the 13-year-old a file while chatting to her on MSN Messenger. He promised he would help her get more friends on MySpace, but it was, in fact, a remote administration tool (RAT). Using the RAT, Tahiraj took over the girl's computer and threatened to destroy it and hack her social media if she didn't perform certain sexual acts for him. He then recorded these acts via her webcam and shared the video online. This case was one of the first successful prosecutions of someone for using this technology in a crime of this kind, says Glen McEwen, a retired Australian Federal Police commander who was manager of cybercrime at the time of Tahiraj's prosecution. The video of the 13-year-old was found by an AFP officer, who was undercover in a popular hacker forum. It was posted there with an eerie comment: "I'm Rofles, I destroy lives … I make a girl cry … Epic win?" The officer traced this post back to Luan Tahiraj. But the tech-savvy then-19-year-old denied any involvement. He instead claimed he was hacked by an online rival he said was called "Digerati". His denial prompted a years-long investigation by the AFP, as its technical teams had to forensically dismantle Tahiraj's claim that he, too, was a victim. "Oh, he did it. There's no doubt," says McEwen. "In these cases in the virtual world, the first line of defence will be the old defence of 'the dog ate my homework', to say 'I was hacked'." McEwen says the AFP found evidence that Tahiraj had hacked 133 people using the RAT technology. "They prosecuted on two matters, but there were many more out there that they did not prosecute, because it's about the quality of cases that you bring to court," he says. There is no suggestion that these other people were underage. "But it shows that the appetite didn't stop at two," McEwen says. "It went far broader than that." In the wake of this revelation, Louis Rossmann kept searching for evidence to confirm that this man was definitely Louie from Better Way Electronics. There were little crumbs scattered across the internet: the ABN was cancelled at the same time Luan Tahiraj went to prison, back in 2013, and was only reactivated in 2022, after his sentence ended. The Better Way Electronics website came online around the time that Tahiraj would have been released on parole. The two men appeared to have gone to the same Australian university, and both studied cybersecurity. "The more I dug into this, the more you realise that it's exactly the same person," Rossmann says. Further investigations by Background Briefing confirm that Luan Tahiraj was running Better Way Electronics from a home in Australia within the past two years. Photos unearthed from Better Way Electronics's website that show its owner's workspace exactly match an office pictured in real estate photos of a property where Tahiraj was known to reside while the business was operating. In the real estate photos, a Better Way Electronics sticker is also clearly visible on a laptop. Louis Rossmann found himself with a decision to make: should he share what he had found with his 2.2 million YouTube followers? Ultimately, he decided that Better Way Electronics's owner had already been given a year to change how he was acting. "He had banned somebody from using his software because he didn't like Egyptians, and this person was Egyptian. He had told somebody that you must be huffing too many lead fumes," Rossmann says. "This was a regular, ongoing thing." So, he decided to hit publish. But as he watched the video upload, he got an unexpected email. It was from Louie, from Better Way Electronics, saying he was closing the business and promising to un-ban people who had already purchased the software. Rossman suspects Louie got wind from online chatter that the video was coming. "I don't know what he was hoping for," Rossmann says. "Maybe he was hoping that I would just say, 'OK, I'm not gonna upload this'?" But something the judge had said during Tahiraj's 2013 criminal case was lodged in Rossmann's mind. "The judge in that particular case said in the court documents that he did not show remorse or contrition, that he thought he was clever in what he was doing," Rossmann says. "I've hired people that have criminal records. I believe in people's ability to start fresh and start over, and I'm not going to judge you based on everything you did before. "But I do believe … you have to say, 'I'm sorry. I'm sorry I did this. Here's what I did that is wrong.' It doesn't seem like he ever did that. He never even said, 'I'm sorry for what I did to my customers.'" Pretty soon, Rossmann's video about Better Way Electronics had over a million views and was still climbing. Other YouTubers started jumping on the train, making their own videos about the investigation, propelling its reach far beyond the tech-repair world. Chat about Better Way Electronics lit up on Discord, Reddit, X and even Facebook. Online, Louie never responded to the claim that he was Luan Tahiraj, but he did refute that he was mistreating customers or spying on them. He promised to release an independent analysis of his software. But then, he wiped himself from the internet — social media, GitHub, YouTube, all gone. The only thing that remained of his website was a landing page, claiming there was a police investigation into an attack on his servers. Queensland Police could not confirm or deny this, citing privacy reasons. After weeks of trying to get in touch with Tahiraj and get his side, the ABC received an anonymous email — a complaint about an attempt to speak with him in person. The email, clearly from Tahiraj, said he had chosen not to respond to calls, texts, emails and a letter from Background Briefing requesting comment. He confirmed in the email that he ran the business anonymously, citing personal safety concerns. He also wrote that he had been the victim of an online harassment campaign and doxxing. Seeing her customer service complaint spiral into an internet feud that reached millions, Jessa Jones was shocked that Louie had treated users like her so poorly. "I was incredulous that someone that had a pretty dark past — that I'm sure they would love to put behind them and never mention again — has just inexplicably just shot themselves in the foot like this," she says. "This software was helping people fix PlayStations that they had bought and paid for, that they would not have been able to otherwise repair. Like, that's such a great thing to do with your life. And he just blew it up, for no reason." For his part, Louis Rossmann denies that his videos about Better Way Electronics involved doxxing. He says any information he shared was all publicly available, including the number provided on the company's website for customer service enquiries. The internet, he remarks, has a knack for finding things people want forgotten or ignored. "The internet is good at policing these things when there's incentive, and there's definitely a lot of incentive when somebody treats people like this," he says. Rossmann does admit that Luan Tahiraj was a potent example of how manufacturers can act in an abusive way, an almost "perfect villain" for his cause. There's a hint of frustration, though, when he speaks about the response to his videos on Better Way Electronics, how the personal feud distracted from the bigger issue he cares about. "At the end of the day … forget about him. I care about the general issue," he says. "I want as many people as humanly possible to understand what we do here, which is we are trying to push back against the idea that you don't own what you bought and paid for." Rossmann now wants to shift all the focus that has come his way from this beef back towards the systemic issues he's been fighting against for years. To that end, he's started a new non-profit, advocating for the right to own the tech you have bought, and has also launched a new website, Consumer Rights Wiki, where anyone can log when manufacturers mistreat customers. "Just planting a seed, or turning on a light bulb in people's heads to the fact that this is happening to them," he says. "That's the win for me."