Over 770 Palestinians killed at the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's aid distribution sites
Most of those killed (at least 1,597) were civilians shot by the Israeli Defense Forces while seeking aid in or around distribution sites, according to data compiled by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), an international non-profit that tracks global violence.
The 'Other/Contested Claims' section in the graphic above also includes civilian deaths. However, the exact circumstances of these killings remain disputed, as the claims have been denied or refuted by the alleged perpetrators. Some of these incidents involved Israeli-backed groups rather than the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) directly, according to data compiled from news reports.
Also Read: Stop the slaughter: On Trump, Israel and the Gaza war
Since May 26, aid-related killings have occurred almost daily. The violence peaked in the third week of June, with June 17 recording the highest single-day toll — 97 people.
One in four Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid since May 26
Between May 26 and July 18, the ACLED data shows that 4,157 Palestinians were killed in Gaza. Of these, approximately 1,005 — about 25% — were civilians shot by the IDF while seeking aid or near aid distribution centers.
However, ACLED also records numerous incidents where civilians came under direct IDF fire, but the number of casualties could not be confirmed.
In comparison, data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) reports that 4,489 Palestinians were killed between May 28 and July 16 alone, bringing the total number of Palestinian deaths since October 7, 2023, to 58,573.
Thameen Al-Kheetan, spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, on June 24 condemned the inhumane conditions faced by Palestinians and held both the GHF and Israel responsible. 'We are seeing scenes of chaos around the food distribution points of the 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' and the few UN humanitarian convoys,' says Mr. Al-Kheetan.
'Israel's militarised humanitarian assistance mechanism is in contradiction with international standards on aid distribution', he adds.
Aid distribution: Over 750 of 1,129 killed were in and around GHF aid centres
Currently, aid is distributed across Gaza through two distinct channels: one facilitated by United Nations agencies, international aid organizations, and local authorities using pre-existing modes of distribution; the other through distribution sites set up by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
Regarding the first channel — comprising the UN and various international aid agencies — Israeli authorities have imposed severe restrictions, rejecting or obstructing the majority of aid delivery requests. Between March 18 and July 15, of the 1,124 humanitarian missions or requests submitted, 633 (56.4%) were either denied (543) or withdrawn (90). Only about one-third (33%) of the missions were successfully carried out without interference from Israeli authorities.
In a briefing, the World Food Programme's (WFP) Deputy Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, Carl Skau, stated that WFP teams are often stuck spending between 15 to 20 hours straight at checkpoints, fuel supplies and spare parts for vehicles are insufficient, and while there is enough food at the borders to feed the entire population for about two months, incoming supplies are not 'enough to turn the tide of hunger.'
The GHF began its aid distribution on May 26, 2025, operating across four sites in Gaza. Three of these sites were in Israeli-militarised zones in the southern region of the strip - on the northern boundary of the 'Morag corridor', and one site is near Wadi Gaza, along the Salah al-Din highway, as shown in the map below.
The area surrounding the aid distribution site near Wadi Gaza also soon came under the control of Israeli forces. As of July 23, UNOCHA reported that approximately 87.8% of the Gaza Strip is within the Israeli-militarised zone, under displacement (or evacuation) orders by the IDF, or where these overlap, as shown in the map below.
As of July 16, one of the sites (also called 'SDS1', shown above) has been closed by the GHF.
At least 771 Palestinians seeking aid have been killed in and around GHF's aid distribution centers between May 26 and July 18. Of these, 708 were reportedly killed by the Israeli Defense Forces. The number of people killed in and around GHF centers on a daily basis is shown below in red and gray.
As shown below, 68% of those killed while seeking aid died in or around GHF distribution centres.
There were at least 13 additional incidents of the IDF opening fire on civilians and injuring several while they were seeking aid or being in the vicinity of aid distribution centers. In four of these cases, casualty figures remain unknown.
Israel-backed armed groups and the anatomy of contested claims
The data presented is collated by checking local and international news reports. When it comes to the killings over aid, the 'Others/contested claims' silo in the graphics above is essentially a mixture of the following scenarios:
Armed Palestinian gang members or militia looting aid trucks and opening fire on civilians.
Hamas or Hamas-affiliated units or forces (like the Sahm Unit) executing or engaging in a clash with armed gangs/clans/militias over looting of aid and theft. In some of these incidents the latter were accused of collaborating with Israel.
The IDF striking civilians and either refuting the claim or claiming that the latter were associated with Hamas.
Over the course of 21 months, the IDF has claimed to have killed Hamas members on numerous occasions (whether aid-related or not), and there have been several news reports stating that civilians were also brutally targeted in such instances.
Apart from what is shown in the graphic above, there were incidents where the IDF claims to have fired 'warning shots,' but people were killed.
2.1 million Palestinians in Gaza face acute food insecurity
On July 23, 2025, a day after the head of Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City announced that 21 children had died across the Gaza Strip due to malnutrition and starvation, 111 aid organisations and human rights groups warned that mass starvation is spreading in Gaza. Repeated forced displacements through evacuation orders and destruction of local food production mechanisms has crippled the population and economy.
After more than 21 months of relentless bloodshed that has claimed the lives of over 59,000 Palestinians, the people of Gaza are grappling with escalating shortages of food, clean water, medical supplies, and other basic necessities.
A report released by UNOCHA on Wednesday (July 23, 2025), states that with the 2.1-million-strong population of Palestinians in Gaza facing a high level of acute food insecurity, one million (10 lakh) or half of them are facing 'emergency levels of food insecurity. And over 470,000 (4.7 lakh) people are facing 'catastrophic' levels of food insecurity. But in Gaza, Palestinians are not safe even while seeking the aid essential for their survival.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump envoy's visit will be 'important', Moscow says
Synopsis Amidst escalating tensions, Donald Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, is slated for crucial talks in Moscow as a deadline looms for Russia to de-escalate the Ukraine conflict or face new sanctions. Trump has deployed nuclear submarines to the region, prompting caution from Russia, while Ukraine intensifies drone attacks, including one on Sochi, signaling a worsening conflict despite ongoing prisoner exchange talks. ANI US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff The Kremlin said Monday it was anticipating "important" talks with Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, later this week, ahead of the US president's looming deadline to impose fresh sanctions on Moscow if it does not make progress towards a peace deal with confirmed Sunday that special envoy Steve Witkoff will visit Russia, likely on "Wednesday or Thursday", where he is expected to meet President Vladimir to reporters, Trump also said that two nuclear submarines he deployed following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev were now "in the region".Trump has not said whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US in its first comments on the deployment, urged "caution". The nuclear saber-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump at the end of next week for Russia to take steps towards ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new Republican leader said Witkoff would visit "I think next week, Wednesday or Thursday".Russian President Vladimir Putin has already met Witkoff multiple times in Moscow, before Trump's efforts to mend ties with the Kremlin came to a grinding reporters asked what Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Trump replied: "Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed."The Kremlin said another meeting with Putin was possible and that it considered talks with Witkoff to be "important, substantial and helpful".On the submarines, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation. And we believe that everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric."- 'Secondary tariffs' -Trump has previously threatened that new measures could mean "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international the pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its onslaught against its pro-Western who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year invasion were "unchanged"."We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries," Putin told reporters. But he added that "the conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same".Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, a demand Kyiv has called also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join launched a drone attack Sunday which sparked a fire at an oil depot in Sochi, the host city of the 2014 Winter Olympics. Kyiv has said it will intensify its air strikes against Russia in response to an increase in Russian attacks on its territory in recent weeks, which have killed dozens of Ministry of Defence said on Monday its air defences intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight. One person was killed by Russian shelling in the southern Kherson region, Ukrainian military authorities said in a Telegram post early President Volodymyr Zelensky also said Sunday that the two sides were preparing a prisoner exchange that would see 1,200 Ukrainian troops return home, following talks with Russia in Istanbul in began his second term with his own rosy predictions that the war in Ukraine -- raging since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022 -- would soon recent weeks, Trump has increasingly voiced frustration with Putin over Moscow's unrelenting offensive.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
"India Left With No Friends": Farooq Abdullah On US Imposing 25% Tariffs
Srinagar: After US President Donald Trump announced 25 percent tariffs on India, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister and National Conference (NC) chief Farooq Abdullah on Monday expressed concerns over India being left with "no friends", claiming that Trump has grown closer to Pakistan. He said that India has tried to show that it is stronger than its neighbouring countries instead of reflecting that these nations ought to be together to deal with issues of an economic nature. "We have no friends left, even our neighbours are not our friends. What we have tried to do is to show that we are stronger than they are, rather than thinking that all of us have to be together. That's why Indira Gandhi created SAARC, which aimed to bring all nations closer to us. It was meant to think about the economic issues and how to sort them out," Mr Abdullah told ANI. "Suddenly, Trump has become much more friendly with Pakistan. They want us not to take Russian oil. Yet they have promised Pakistan they will send crude (oil) to them and refine it, leading to their prices of petrol and diesel to come down. Already, China is behind them," he added. Mr Abdullah said that the nation suffers due to the problem between Trump and PM Narendra Modi. He added that the 25 per cent tariffs imposed on India were causing the value of the rupee to fall, which is affecting everyone. "It is a problem between the two leaders - Trump and Modi. They are both strong leaders, and that is why they don't want to bow down to each other. The nation suffers in that. We have a 25 per cent tariff on our goods going to America, plus an additional penalty. In the process, the rupee is falling and the dollar is rising. This is affecting everyone," Mr Abdullah argued. Trump had earlier said that Washington is continuing trade negotiations with India. Asked if the US remains open to negotiating with India on the tariff front, Trump stated, "We're talking to them now. We'll see what happens. Again, India was the highest or just about the highest tariff nation in the world, one of the highest, 100 points, 150 points or percentages. So India was one of the highest in the world. They had 175 per cent and higher than that." After announcing a 25 per cent tariff and penalties for purchasing Russian oil, he emphasised that India is one of the countries imposing high tariffs on the US. He made the comments during a press conference at the White House, held to mark the signing of a Congressional bill. Earlier, Trump made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world." Trump said.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
What Harvard's $500 million rejection means for the future of higher education in the US
Harvard's $500 million settlement rejection could make a huge change in the American education system. In a dramatic standoff with the Trump administration, Harvard University has rejected a $500 million federal settlement offer, choosing legal resistance over compliance. The move is more than a high-profile rebuke; it's a watershed moment for the future of higher education in the United States, with ripple effects likely to touch every major university, student, and research institution across the country. A clash over more than funding The proposed deal wasn't just financial support. It came with strings attached: compliance with political directives involving diversity initiatives, admissions policies, and increased federal oversight. Many institutions, facing immense pressure, accepted similar deals. But Harvard took a different path, insisting that academic freedom and institutional autonomy are not up for negotiation. By turning down the $500 million offer, Harvard is betting on the courts and public opinion to defend its values. The university has already secured preliminary injunctions allowing limited research funding to resume, but the long-term outcome remains uncertain. Why Harvard's stand matters Harvard's decision sets a precedent that could shape how other institutions respond to political pressure in the years to come. 1. Strengthening legal resistance Rather than settling, Harvard has chosen to fight. This legal path could establish protections for universities that resist government overreach tied to federal grants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo If the courts uphold Harvard's stance, it could insulate campuses from future political interference. 2. Sending a message to peers Other top universities that accepted settlements are now under scrutiny. Harvard's high-profile defiance may embolden students, faculty, and trustees across the country to resist similar pressures and challenge deals they see as compromising academic integrity. 3. Reframing public debate Harvard has turned a behind-closed-doors negotiation into a public battle over the soul of higher education. The resulting media coverage, campus protests, and political commentary have reignited national conversations about who controls America's universities—and at what cost. The cost of defiance Choosing principle over funding has immediate consequences. Research projects remain stalled, hiring freezes are in place, and international students face visa uncertainty. Some faculty have warned of long-term damage to academic competitiveness if the standoff continues. Moreover, universities nationwide are feeling the aftershocks. Fearing similar action, many are reviewing their diversity and admissions programs, even in the absence of direct federal threats. Broader implications for students and scholars Harvard's decision affects more than just elite academia. It could redefine how students, both domestic and international, experience US education. For international students, the case raises concerns about the stability of visa pathways and the political conditions tied to enrolment. For American students, it calls into question how much autonomy their institutions will have in shaping educational content, campus policies, and student life. A turning point for academic freedom At its core, Harvard's refusal to settle is a stand for the principle that universities should be governed by academic leaders and not shaped by political directives from Washington. Whether that principle holds will depend on the outcome of court battles and continued public scrutiny. But regardless of the legal result, this moment marks a turning point. It's a reminder that higher education is not just about degrees and research—it's about values, governance, and the future of democratic institutions. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
