How Singapore's economic architect Goh Keng Swee shaped its state-linked giants
Singapore's founding leaders. In this excerpt, author Aaron Low spotlights Goh Keng Swee – widely remembered as Singapore's first finance minister and economic architect – whose lesser-known role as one of the country's most influential businessmen saw him create a network of state-linked firms that helped define Brand Singapore.
Advertisement
Entrepreneurs start businesses for many reasons. Some do it because of the firm belief that they can change the world around them, like Jeff Bezos, who foresaw how the internet would transform the way people bought books. Others are problem solvers such as Jack Ma, who created Alibaba to empower small Chinese firms and compete in the new digital economy. Then there are those like Microsoft's Bill Gates and Paul Allen, who turn their expertise into ventures and look to profit from their innate skills.
But Goh was different. He believed in business as a means to an end, one that was for the greater good. Influenced by Adam Smith, the father of modern economics, Goh endorsed the idea that the invisible hand of business can produce goods and services efficiently, create jobs, and benefit the economy as a whole. But to do so, capitalism had to be tempered and guided wisely to avoid its excesses.
There was another, more pressing, motivation: a deep desire to sustain Singapore's fragile independence and keep the idea of a nation alive. His form of capitalism, as his former protégé and top civil servant Philip Yeo said, was tinged with a large dose of socialism.
Goh Keng Swee in 1948. He would go on to become Singapore's first finance minister and later the country's deputy prime minister. Photo: Handout
'He runs the company efficiently and properly, borrows money and hires people. He is no different from a businessman. But the key difference is that Dr Goh is a state capitalist. The businessman makes profit for himself; Dr Goh did it for the public good,' said Yeo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Over half of Hong Kong residents plan to work past 65 due to retirement savings shortfall
More than half of Hong Kong residents do not plan to retire at the typical retirement age of 65, with many feeling that they cannot reach the average HK$5 million (US$637,000) savings target necessary for a comfortable post-work life, according to the T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Retirement Survey released on Thursday. About 52 per cent of respondents indicated they would not retire at age 65. Among them, about 80 per cent preferred not to retire at all or opted instead for a 'micro-retirement', which involves taking a break for several months to a few years before returning to work. The survey, the first of its kind by the US financial firm, polled 600 Hong Kong residents over the age of 30 in May. 'Financial pressure is certainly one factor, especially in a high-cost city like Hong Kong,' said Shen Wenting, global investment solutions strategist and portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price, which manages US$1.56 trillion in assets. About 60 per cent of respondents had a retirement savings target between HK$2 million and HK$10 million, with the average being HK$5 million, considered enough for them to feel secure in completely stopping work. For those considering a micro-retirement, the average savings target was HK$2 million. The average retirement savings target of 60 per cent of the respondents was HK$5 million. Photo: Nora Tam However, one-third of respondents felt they could not achieve their goals, and 40 per cent reported not having any retirement savings target at all. This may explain why 62 per cent cited the need to maintain an income as their reason for not retiring at age 65.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Forget long-term leases. Here's how Hong Kong can reinvent retail
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Hong Kong's business environment is undergoing a profound transformation. Once defined by its buzzy street life and guaranteed foot traffic, the city now faces a new reality shaped by digital disruption and altered consumer behaviour. Given the convenience of online shopping and the quality of customer service on the mainland , foot traffic to physical retail and dining outlets in Hong Kong has declined. The city must come up with new business models. For businesses to remain viable, flexibility and innovation must become the new norm. The traditional reliance on long-term leases and static storefronts is proving unsustainable. The Hong Kong government can play a pivotal role in converting retail spaces in high-traffic areas into dynamic zones for rotating pop-up stores. Such a set-up would allow brands to test products, respond to seasonal trends and engage consumers without the burden of a permanent commitment. To support this shift, the government might consider offering incentives to landlords – such as tax breaks, streamlined licences for short-term tenants or co-investment in infrastructure upgrades. Landlords, in turn, can curate clusters of complementary businesses – such as wellness, fashion and tech – to create synergy and attract diverse consumers.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What US tariffs mean for Malaysian businesses and workers
When the US tariffs finally landed on July 31, the 19 per cent rate came as some relief in Malaysia . But in the days since, Malaysia's government, businesses and confused public are still unpacking the fine print in a deal that gives US companies wide open access to their home market – while restricting its own giant economy to Malaysian exports. The tariff rate puts Malaysia on equal footing with Indonesia Thailand and the Philippines , and slightly better off than Vietnam 's 20 per cent. At face value, that means Malaysia retains a comparative advantage over its Southeast Asian peers with its higher base of performance in mature industries, including the semiconductor sector. But it is still a slap in the face for a country which sent a record 198.7 billion ringgit (US$47 billion) in shipments to the US last year. Export businesses are bracing for plummeting demand from US clients as prices are likely to soar when the tariffs take effect from August 7. The deal also raises questions as to whether Malaysia gave up too much, especially with its pledge to spend US$240 billion on US products and investments over the next decade. While it is still early days – finer details of the deal will be known after Malaysia and the US officially sign a trade agreement later this year – many are already preparing for the worst. Here's what we know … and some of what we do not. 1. Who will hurt the most?
