9-year-old girl bit by shark while snorkeling in Florida, family says
A 9-year-old girl is recovering after being bitten by a shark in the waters off Boca Grande, Florida, officials and her family said.
The girl was swimming in the ocean with other family members around noon local time on June 11 when a shark bit her, Boca Grande Fire Chief C.W. Blosser said in a social media video.
Emergency personnel responded to the scene, and she was airlifted to a local hospital, Blosser said.
"The person was in the water at the time the bite occurred with other family members," he said. "They were able to get her out of the water and get her up on actually to the road."
Blosser said the girl is the first swimmer bitten by a shark in the area in two decades. In 2024, there were 14 unprovoked shark bites in Florida, the most of any state, according to the Florida Museum of Natural History.
"These occurrences are limited, but there always is a potential," Blosser said. "I don't think it's a cause for alarm at this point."
Family members identified the girl who was bitten by a shark off Boca Grande as 9-year-old Leah Lendel, according to Gulf Coast News and WBBH.
The girl's mother, Nadia Lendel, wrote in a story on Instagram, where she has over 90,000 followers, that Leah was undergoing surgery.
"Please keep our family in your prayers," the Instagram story reads. "Leah got bit by a shark today while snorkeling."
According to a GoFundMe raising funds for Leah's medical expenses, the young girl was bitten on the hand while playing in the water with her siblings.
"She is now stable and going through surgery - fighting hard for her road to recovery," the GoFundMe says.
The fundraising page also said Leah's family does not currently have medical insurance, and they expect "the journey ahead will be long and full of physical and emotional healing."
USA TODAY contacted Nadia Lendel for comment on June 12 but has not received a response.
Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at melina.khan@usatoday.com.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 9-year-old girl survives shark attack in Florida
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘The Boys' star Erin Moriarty reveals Graves' disease diagnosis, urges fans to go get checked: ‘I felt the light coming back on'
Erin Moriarty has been diagnosed with Graves' disease. The 30-year-old actress, who plays Annie January/Starlight on Prime Video's The Boys, opened up about her recent diagnosis in a June 12 Instagram post. Moriarty, prior to receiving her diagnosis, merely attributed her symptoms to 'stress and fatigue.' 'Autoimmune disease manifests differently in everybody/every body,' she wrote. 'Your experience will be different from mine. My experience will be different from yours. Perhaps greatly, perhaps minutely. One thing I can say: If I hadn't chalked it all up to stress and fatigue, I would've caught this sooner.' Moriarty said she was made aware of her condition a month ago. 'A month ago, I was diagnosed with Graves' disease,' she wrote. 'Within 24 hours of beginning treatment, I felt the light coming back on. It's been increasing in strength ever since. If yours is dimming, even slightly, go get checked. Don't 'suck it up' and transcend suffering; you deserve to be comfy. S***'s hard enough as is.' Graves' disease is an autoimmune disease that affects your thyroid gland. The gland causes the body to make too much thyroid hormone, which can cause a condition known as hyperthyroidism. Anyone at any age can be diagnosed with Graves' disease, though it is most commonly seen in women over the age of 20. Moriarty has been starring on The Boys since its debut in 2019. The fifth and final season of the eight-time Primetime Emmy-nominated series is set for 2026. Before playing a superhero, the New York native landed roles on Jessica Jones, True Detective and Red Widow. She previously appeared in the 2013 film The Kings of Summer, and will next be seen in the forthcoming horror film True Haunting. Star Wars star Daisy Ridley revealed her own Graves' disease diagnosis in the August 2024 issue of Women's Health. Like Moriarty, the British actress initially disregarded her symptoms as the effects of playing a 'really stressful role.' 'We all read the stats about women being undiagnosed or underdiagnosed and sort of coming to terms with saying, 'I really, actually don't feel good' and not going, 'I'm fine, I'm fine, I'm fine, I'm fine.' It's just normalized to not feel good,' she said.
Refinery29
4 hours ago
- Refinery29
Why Can't Sunscreen Brands Be Honest About White Casts?
Welcome to Sun Blocked, Refinery29's global call to action to wake up to the serious dangers of tanning. No lectures or shaming, we promise. Instead, our goal is to arm you with the facts you need to protect your skin to the best of your ability, because there's no such thing as safe sun. When cosmetic scientist Dr. Julian Sass first tested Tower 28's new SOS FaceGuard SPF 30 Sunscreen on camera, his disappointment was obvious. Despite the 'no white cast' claim prominently displayed on the PR packaging, the sunscreen left a visible gray tinge on his skin. 'Marketing this as a no white cast sunscreen in 2025? It just makes me feel so undervalued as a consumer,' Dr. Sass said in the clip. 'What frustrates me is that some Black girl is gonna see the advertising about this product and think, Oh my god, they said it had no white cast. And then they're going to end up looking like this.' Dr. Sass's video, now at 54.3K views and climbing, sparked further debate after he highlighted that the marketing materials showed people applying too little sunscreen — a misleading move that compromises both transparency and safety. Tower 28 founder Amy Liu responded on Instagram, acknowledging they 'missed the mark' despite extensive testing. As a result, Liu promised to remove the 'no white cast' and 'universal tint' claims, standardize their testing process, and develop a new version of the sunscreen for deeper skin tones. This was welcome news to Tower 28 fans, but the brand isn't alone in making contested 'no white cast' statements. In addition to Dr. Sass, other skincare experts and beauty content creators have increasingly called out claims of invisibility that don't match reality. ' Entire groups of people are excluded from sun protection options because brands don't think it's profitable to include us. Cosmetic chemist Milan Scott ' Dija Ayodele, an esthetician and founder of the Black Skin Directory, recently tried Merit's The Uniform Tinted Mineral Sunscreen, which left her looking 'dull and gray' despite the brand's ' zero white cast ' promise. 'When I first received the press release, I asked to see evidence of the product on Black skin,' Ayodele tells Refinery29. She says the PR company sent her a video of a Black employee using the product, along with information about the brand's formulation process and challenges. Ayodele accepted the PR package based on this response. 'But if I'd bought that sunscreen, I would be quite cross,' she continues. Adding, 'While it's not the worst I've seen, it didn't meet my expectation of not having a white cast.' 'It's misleading to use those exact three words: zero white cast.' Beyond Tower 28 and Merit, brands like CeraVe and SkinCeuticals have also been called out for using terms like 'no white cast' and 'transparent' — claims that some content creators are now challenging. For consumers of color, these misleading claims are not just disappointing, they're exclusionary. So why, when the beauty industry operates under such strict regulations, do countless sunscreens still fail to deliver on their promises? Why do some sunscreens have a white cast? AJ Addae, chief executive officer and chemist of SULA Labs — which tests skincare for brands developing products for melanin-rich consumers — explains that when it comes to mineral sunscreens, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only allows cosmetic chemists to use two UV filters: titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. Both are white pigments. Addae notes that at the concentrations needed to achieve a broad-spectrum SPF of 30 or higher, it's difficult — if not impossible — to create a mineral sunscreen that doesn't reflect visible, white light. As such, Dr. Sass explains that currently, a truly invisible mineral sunscreen doesn't exist on skincare shelves. So why are brands that use these filters so sure of their invisibility claims? Cosmetic Chemist Milan Scott says, 'What they really mean is that it's invisible on lighter skin tones.' She adds, 'When I see 'invisible' claims on a mineral sunscreen that is very clearly not invisible on people that look like me, it makes me wonder who [the brand] tested it on — and who approved these claims.' ' I think that brands need to do diversity and inclusivity authentically and be brave enough to say, 'This product isn't right for everybody because it creates a white cast. However, we do have other products within our offering that are suitable.' Dija Ayodele, esthetician and founder of the Black Skin Directory ' Dr. Sass explains that when brands make this claim, they typically conduct internal tests on individuals with lighter skin tones and often apply much less than the recommended amount needed to achieve the advertised level of protection. 'Sunscreen is tested at 2 mg per square centimeter of skin, which comes out to about 1/4 teaspoon for just the face and about 1/2 teaspoon if you include the ears and neck,' he says — the optimum amount to protect your skin. Esthetician and skincare expert Alicia Lartey — whose Instagram series Sunscreen or SunSCREAM puts the invisibility claims of SPFs to the test — agrees that clinical trials and SPF testing often lack the diversity they should. Frustratingly, Scott notes that there's no requirement for brands to test on a wide range of skin tones before making such claims. How do brands get away with claiming their sunscreens leave no white cast? Surprisingly, Addae notes that, unlike the term 'water resistance,' which requires standardized testing, there are no regulations around the term 'white cast.' The same applies to the word 'invisible,' says Scott. If a brand deems its sunscreen traceless based on its testing, it can label it as such, even if that's not true for darker skin tones. You're right to be outraged — and so are the experts: 'It's a marketing loophole that a lot of us in the industry side-eye hard,' says Scott. Ayodele has a hunch as to why: 'Brands are doing this because they want to be seen as inclusive at all costs,' she believes. 'They don't want the backlash of [people] saying that they're not inclusive. But if these brands tested their mineral sunscreens [on a more diverse range of people], they'd know whether they were invisible or not.' That said, it's important to acknowledge the limits of science, says Ayodele. 'Yes, of course, we want diversity and for brands to be inclusive, but by nature, the mineral filters titanium dioxide and zinc oxide aren't inclusive,' she says. 'That's not a problem because not everything is going to be,' she adds. 'Unless further scientific techniques are brought in to make these white mineral ingredients invisible, that's just where we're at.' Still, Scott emphasizes the need for more transparency and testing across shade ranges. Ayodele's advice to brands is simple: honesty is the best policy: 'I think that brands need to do diversity and inclusivity authentically and be brave enough to say, 'This product isn't right for everybody because it creates a white cast. However, we do have other products within our offering that are suitable',' she says. ' Frustratingly, Scott notes that there's no requirement for brands to test on a wide range of skin tones before making such claims ' TikTok would have you believe that mineral sunscreens are the gold standard. Ayodele acknowledges they have benefits — especially for sensitive skin and conditions like rosacea, melasma, or pigmentation — but stresses that more inclusive options exist. Chemical sunscreens, which use UV filters like avobenzone or oxybenzone, are suitable for everyone. Still, they've come under scrutiny, with some convinced that chemical filters are toxic while mineral ones are safe. This simply isn't true, says Scott: 'This fear drives people toward mineral sunscreens, even though many of them leave a visible cast on deeper skin tones and make sunscreens less accessible for folks who already deal with health disparities,' she says. Scott doesn't mince her words: 'This is what medical racism looks like in real time,' she continues. 'It's when fear-based marketing pushes mineral sunscreens as the safer option, even though those same formulas leave people with darker skin out of the conversation entirely.' So who's to blame? The experts point to the 'clean beauty' movement. 'Clean beauty has been an axe to scientific innovation,' says Lartey. 'Newsflash — everything is a chemical,' she adds, even water. In reality, chemical sunscreens are often more cosmetically elegant than mineral ones, making them a better option for people with darker skin tones seeking to avoid a white cast. R29 favorites include Glossier Invisible Shield SPF50, $32, The Ordinary UV Filters SPF45, $19, and Dr. Jart+ Every Sun Day™ Invisible Korean Sunscreen Stick SPF 40, $30, to name just a few. Does a truly invisible mineral sunscreen actually exist? For those who prefer mineral sunscreens, is a truly invisible option even possible? Scott believes it is. 'For a mineral sunscreen to be invisible on all skin tones, it takes advanced formulation with nano-sized mineral filters,' she explains — a process that's both expensive and time-consuming for brands. She adds that tinted mineral sunscreens offer another solution, but only a few brands, like Wyn Beauty, are getting it right. 'That's because too many companies still don't see the financial value in creating that many [products] to be truly inclusive for darker skin tones,' she says. And that's a real problem: 'Entire groups of people are excluded from sun protection options because brands don't think it's profitable to include us,' says Scott, who sees it as a public health issue. Ultimately, Lartey believes that brands can easily avoid messy situations like Tower 28's simply by testing products on a wide variety of skin tones — and actually using the correct amount. 'Beyond that, hire a diverse staff, listen to your diverse staff, and make sure there are diverse staff in senior roles,' urges Lartey. 'It's not that hard.'
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Viral Trend Says You Should Put SPF in Your Hair—Experts Agree
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Most people are familiar with the importance of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) for skin health, and many of us have incorporated daily sunscreen use into our routines. But when it comes to our hair and scalp, sun protection is often overlooked. That's beginning to change, thanks to a growing wave of social media influencers and dermatology experts sounding the alarm on the risks of UV exposure to the head—and how to prevent them. The Rise of Hair SPF on Social Media Hair-specific SPF products, including scalp sprays, mists, and powders, are becoming increasingly popular to promote on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Influencers such as Iris Smit (@irisjadesmit), 30, founder of The Quick Flix, have taken to social media to urge followers to ditch traditional sunscreen for specially formulated hair mists. "Suncare has always been a non-negotiable in my personal routine and that philosophy extends beyond just skin," Smit told Newsweek. "What many people don't realize is that your hair and scalp are just as vulnerable to sun damage. UV rays can break down the hair's protein structure, causing it to become dry, brittle, and more prone to breakage." She added that "sun exposure also accelerates color fading, stripping vibrancy and shine while leaving hair looking dull or brassy, especially if it's dyed." Why Your Scalp Needs Protection Too Alexia Donovan, director of client services at Barber Surgeons Guild, explained that protecting the scalp is about more than just aesthetics—it's a matter of health. "First and foremost we want to prevent skin cancer of the scalp," she said. "Our patients with thinning hair have less of a hair barrier and are more prone to this. The more scalp you can see, the more important it is to use SPF." Donovan added that UV damage can also cause inflammation, break down proteins in the hair, and weaken hair follicles—ultimately worsening issues like hair thinning and breakage. Dr. Rayva Khanna, M.D., of Georgetown University Medical Center, echoed those concerns. She noted that chronic UV exposure on the scalp, particularly in areas affected by androgenetic alopecia, can lead to serious conditions such as photoaging, actinic keratoses, and even non-melanoma skin cancers. "For the hair shaft, UVB radiation induces structural and chemical changes—oxidizing cystine, degrading proteins, and disrupting the cuticle," she said. This results in "dullness, fragility, increased breakage, and fading color," all signs of oxidative damage not only to visible strands but also to developing fibers within follicles. A stock image a woman wearing a hat on the beach. A stock image a woman wearing a hat on the beach. Ridofranz/iStock / Getty Images Plus Hair Isn't Enough of a Shield Biochemist and certified cosmetologist-aesthetician Valerie Aparovich from OnSkin emphasized that while hair does offer some UV protection, it's far from sufficient—particularly for people with fine, light, or thinning hair. "Although hair can act as a natural barrier for scalp protection to some extent, it doesn't provide full coverage," she told Newsweek. "UV-induced DNA damage can lead to the development of cancers on the scalp, while ultraviolet rays can also compromise normal functioning of hair follicles and sebaceous glands." This disruption can lead to dryness, thinning, and breakage. Research on UV damage to the hair shaft itself is still evolving. Aparovich cited a 2006 study that found the shaft may not require the same level of protection as the skin. However, she recommended UV-filtered products to protect both hair and scalp during intense sun exposure. Khanna added that UV exposure at the follicle level can impair hair growth by reducing keratinocyte proliferation and inducing cell death, which may push follicles into early rest phases. This supports growing evidence that sun damage could worsen pattern hair loss. What Products Actually Work? So what's the best way to protect your hair and scalp from the sun? Experts agree that a multi-pronged approach is best. Physical barriers such as wide-brimmed hats and scarves are considered the gold standard. "My mind always goes to golfers with sunburned heads. Wear a hat," said Donovan. Sprays and powders formulated specifically for scalp use are the next best option. "Sprays with specific scalp applicators and powders are easier to apply than creams," she noted. Powder-based mineral sunscreens, in particular, are easy to reapply and don't weigh hair down. Aparovich advised choosing lightweight sprays for hair and non-toxic creams for scalp application. She warned against using sunscreens that contain ingredients like oxybenzone, homosalate, and octinoxate—common UV filters linked to endocrine disruption. How Much and How Often? Just like with skin, timing and reapplication are key. "You want to look for water-resistant formulas to withstand sweat and swimming," said Donovan. Apply them 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapply every two hours. Aparovich explained that sprays should be misted from root to tip and distributed evenly with a comb. Creams should be massaged along part lines using about one to two teaspoons for full scalp coverage. Busting Common Myths One of the biggest misconceptions is that people with darker or thicker hair don't need SPF. But a 2023 study involving women with various hair colors found that dark hair actually absorbed more UV radiation across all wavelengths, potentially making it more susceptible to damage. And cloudy days don't mean you're safe. "Even a hat doesn't always offer 100 percent protection, as UV rays can reach the scalp and hair indirectly through reflection," said Aparovich. Khanna said many patients wrongly assume their scalp is naturally protected by hair. "It is incredibly important to protect the scalp from the sun given the direct sun exposure to the head," she said. Not only is hair not a perfect shield, but it can also hide dangerous moles, delaying early detection of skin cancer. Do you have any viral videos or pictures that you want to share? We want to see the best ones! Send them in to life@ and they could appear on our site.
