American freed by Taliban reunited with wife, former cellmate, in US
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - George Glezmann, an American detained in Afghanistan for more than two years before being released by the Taliban, arrived in the United States on Friday, where he reunited with his wife and was greeted by a welcoming party that included his former cellmate.
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said Ryan Corbett, another former prisoner of the Taliban who had been held in the same cell as Glezmann, was at Joint Base Andrews, outside Washington, to greet Glezmann.
"After a brief ceremony, George and (his wife) Aleksandra flew to another location in the United States to rest and recover," Bruce told a regular State Department news briefing.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement on Thursday confirming the release of Glezmann, who was detained in 2022 while visiting Kabul as a tourist.
A source told Reuters he left Afghanistan aboard a Qatari aircraft on Thursday evening bound for Qatar, following direct talks between U.S. hostage envoy Adam Boehler and Taliban officials in Kabul.
Bruce said the U.S. is grateful for the support of the government of Qatar in bringing Glezmann home. She said the United Arab Emirates also played a role in facilitating the initial discussions.
In a statement, the Taliban called Glezmann's release a "goodwill gesture" reflecting its willingness to engage with the United States "on the basis of mutual respect and interests."
Bruce said the United States remains "deeply concerned" about the well-being of Mahmood Habibi and other Americans still believed to be in custody in Afghanistan.
Thursday's meeting in Kabul marked the highest-level direct U.S.-Taliban talks since President Donald Trump came to power in January.
Boehler met with the Taliban administration's foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Afghan foreign ministry said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's assault on universities is a war on thinking
President Trump's assault on liberal ideals in the world's greatest institutions of learning reveals a vacuous anti-intellectual conservatism. His strategy speaks to his MAGA supporters culturally and politically in pushing back against what he calls the 'radical' or 'woke' left. In doing so, he threatens the academic freedoms underpinning the strengths of liberal arts, science and intellectual achievement in America. It is important for me to state upfront that I have built a career defending markets and innovation, and providing evidence against discriminatory preferences rooted in beliefs that benefit one cultural group over the greater good of many. The birth of the modern world lies in a simple idea: Virtue is acquired and not bestowed as fortune to people of rank. This was not easy for conservative people of rank to digest, and fierce battles were fought along the way against institutions supporting colonialism, aristocracy, patriarchy, sexism and homophobia. Acquisition of virtue underscores Machiavelli's advice to a prince in the 15th century questioning class privilege. The notion of virtue was once only available to conservative white men who were propertied and often aristocratic. Being of leisure, they were at liberty to think with a free mind. This was the foundation of the liberal arts in the 17th century. Concerted struggle brought new groups to universities — men from middle and working classes in the 19th century, women in the early 20th century and minorities in the late 20th. However, it was their virtue that elevated the ranks of American academics and their students, leading to great scientific discoveries and human achievement. At the mundane level, their struggles were difficult. Women and minorities in academia faced —and continue to face — sexism, homophobia and racism. Court records on these issues laid out page to page would extend from Maine to California and beyond. For any one case someone might find of a minority being favored, one can find a hundred others who faced discrimination. Many of them were immigrants. Over one-third of the Nobel laureates in economics, chemistry, medicine and physics are immigrants to the U.S. There are nearly 400,000 immigrant professors in the country. American tech leadership, whether in Silicon Valley or in its engineering schools, rests on the hard work (dare I say, Protestant ethic) of immigrants. Given the rampant discrimination that immigrants, women and minorities have faced in higher education, Trump's claim that white Christians are being discriminated against is laughable, manipulative and political. In equating liberal arts with 'radical communism' and other such nonsense, Trump pulls off a masterful deceit. But his lies will never make American great again. Most knowledge is built on principles of science and refinements based on successive waves of evidence. But science is neither easy nor linear in its progress. Galileo, Newton and Darwin debunked extant religious beliefs about the centricity of the Earth and human beings. But the path was convoluted. For example, Darwin's ideas also encouraged beliefs about women and racial minorities being inferior. These ideas eventually lost out, but we kept the best of Darwin. Science is and will always be biased, but its ideas win through evidence and debate, not sanctions or prohibitions on free speech. Trump would have cut off Darwin's science funding, deported Newton and put Galileo on trial for heresy. Paranoid politicians like Trump cannot recognize that science is not about who votes in elections. The Western world has survived such political assaults in the past. Most of us now believe that the Earth is relatively round and that homo sapiens are descended from apes. Since Socrates, ideas have won through the strength of their innovation and debate, to make us see things we had not seen before, or to make the world a better place. Trump, who claims to be supporting abstract ideals such as merit, brings a poisoned chalice to the nation's thinkers. He sanctions us with punitive measures, cuts off our funding, drowns us in lawsuits and floods the academy with his meddlesome government coercions. Debating ideas using evidence or upholding free speech are not Trump's strengths. Bullying and suing people for money are. Trump's actions are those that the world of knowledge has fought from the time of Socrates to that of McCarthyism. One of my German colleagues often tells me that the mistake we make is in assuming that Nazis were dumb. It breaks a professor's heart to see intellectually gifted people such as Ted Cruz (Princeton, Harvard Law School) JD Vance (Ohio State, Yale Law School) or Josh Hawley (Stanford, Yale Law School) lay aside their intellectual capital for the illiberal purposes of undermining our knowledge producers. Liberal arts, science and ideas in general will always threaten those in power. The Trump administration's legal mumbo-jumbo — about Title VI and antisemitism investigations that it employs to shut down knowledge production — has been rightly called out as a war on liberalism, but it is more fundamentally a war on intellectual pursuit. Regulating our universities into safe spaces for MAGA-type conservatism will not make American academia great again. Punishing the gifted to make the vindictive better off is not the same as robbing the rich to pay the poor, as it leaves everyone worse off. This Western liberalism-loving libertarian professor provides the following grades to Trump: A+ for serving hemlock, F- for virtue.
Atlantic
23 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The U.S.-Russia Summit Is Already a Win for Putin
In Ukraine, the battle lines long ago calcified into a stalemate, with Russian invaders moving forward incrementally and occasionally getting pushed back. In the diplomatic sphere, however, the territory is shifting fast. When Donald Trump meets Russia's Vladimir Putin today in Anchorage, Alaska, the summit will be the latest in a series of concessions by the American president. Trump's affection for Putin has waned—'I got along well with Putin,' he said this week, conspicuously adopting the past tense—as his frustration with the ongoing war waxes. Yet by inviting Putin to meet, he's allowing Russia to further protract the conflict. During the 2024 presidential election, Trump vowed that he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours—or even before taking office. After those targets were far in the rearview, with no resolution in sight, he more than promised vague important developments in his trademark two-week increments. More recently, on July 28, he issued Putin a deadline of '10 or 12 days' to cease hostilities, and the following day, he narrowed that down: 10 days, or by August 8. On the day that the ultimatum ran out, Trump announced he'd meet Putin in person, despite no end to the violence. For the Russian autocrat, this is a win in itself. Putin is a global pariah facing an international warrant for his arrest, but the U.S. is welcoming him to American soil for the first time since 2015. (The U.S. has never had much respect for international justice structures, but the Trump administration is particularly dismissive of them.) Without stopping his aggression against Ukraine, and despite blowing through a series of deadlines, he gets a photo op with Trump. Putin today praised what he called ' quite energetic and sincere efforts ' toward peace by his American counterpart, which is more than anyone can say for Putin himself. What's in it for the president? As my colleagues Vivian Salama, Michael Scherer, and Jonathan Lemire reported last weekend, Trump has grand dreams of a legacy as a peacemaker—perhaps even one with a Nobel Prize. This gives Trump some reason for patience with Putin. But the expectations for this summit keep getting lowered. Initially, the White House allowed suggestions of a tentative peace deal—or at least a genuine cease-fire—to spread in the media. Now the White House says that Trump will be in Alaska for a ' listening exercise, with Trump saying, 'All I want to do is set the table for the next meeting.' He acknowledged this week that the U.S. doesn't have many levers to pull to stop the killings of Ukrainian civilians. 'I've had a lot of good conversations with him,' Trump said, referring to Putin. 'Then I go home and I see that a rocket hit a nursing home, or a rocket hit an apartment building and people are laying dead in the street.' It was a notable acknowledgement of limitations from a leader who prefers bluster, but Trump does often respond to images he sees on the news. Earlier this week, Trump suggested that he might push a deal that ends the conflict by swapping territory between the countries. This would be a sweetheart deal for Putin, who would acquire legal control of large swaths of rich Ukrainian land he has already seized illegally by force. The idea received an angry response from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is not invited to the Alaska meeting—itself another win for Putin (though Trump has floated the possibility of Zelensky joining him and Putin in Alaska later). European leaders, who have sought to ease Trump toward their position of support for Kyiv, spoke with him earlier this week, and they said afterward that Trump would not offer any such deal. But Trump still has little love lost with Zelensky. The men have improved their relationship since Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance berated Zelensky in the Oval Office early this year, but Trump's interest in Ukraine is purely instrumental—a way to earn plaudits for peace—just as it was when he tried to get Zelensky to assist his 2020 reelection campaign by opening an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden. Trump, meanwhile, has been embarrassingly acquiescent to Putin in past conversations. During a March 2018 phone call, he congratulated Putin on his victory in an election almost universally viewed as illegitimate, despite an all-caps reminder atop his briefing sheet that warned, ' DO NOT CONGRATULATE.' This was just a teaser for a meeting four months later in Helsinki, during which Trump accepted Putin's claim that Russia hadn't interfered in the 2016 election, and indicated that he trusted Putin over the U.S. intelligence community's consensus view. Today, Trump is meeting with Putin one-on-one, without aides who might help keep him on track. Trump's posture in Anchorage will go some way toward revealing how serious and durable his disaffection with Putin is. But it won't end the war, and it may not even offer much progress toward a resolution. On Wednesday, Trump warned that there would be 'very severe consequences' if Russia didn't stop the war, but he declined to outline them: 'I don't have to say.' That's unlikely to rattle Putin, who knows how to call a bluff. But at least it doesn't give him another specific deadline to mock.
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Not welcome here': Staten Island activist arrested after confronting NYC mayoral candidate
Activist Scott Lo Baido was arrested outside New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's anti-Trump event on Staten Island on Wednesday. A viral social media video revealed that Lo Baido told Mamdani, "This is my f---ing island, you are not welcome here," as he was physically held back while approaching the candidate after the event at Istanbul Bay Authentic Mediterranean Restaurant on Staten Island. Lo Baido shouted profanities at Mamdani, telling the candidate that he hates Jews, cops and America. The protester, who shouted into a megaphone during the opening remarks of Mamdani's event, was later arrested by the New York Police Department (NYPD). In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital on Friday morning, Lo Baido confirmed his arrest and said, "I suggest that somebody in every single borough every time this man shows his face to do what I did the other day." Lo Baido told his followers on X that he received three summonses upon arrest for sound without permit, disorderly conduct and foul language. "Go back to where you came from. We don't want you on Staten Island," a protester wearing a "Trump girl" T-shirt and holding an American flag shouted at the 33-year-old self-described socialist as he exited the backdoor of the restaurant. Inside the event, as Mamdani kicked off his third anti-Trump event of the week, protesters outside the restaurant drowned out the introductory speeches with their cowbells, sirens and megaphones. Despite the heat in the crowded restaurant and his detractors outside, Mamdani maintained a smile throughout the event and told reporters, "It saddens me to hear language of being told to go back to where I came from, and yet, it is not surprising because it is so much of what characterizes President Trump's politics." Mamdani was hosting his third "Five Boroughs Against Trump" event of the week on Wednesday, reaffirming his commitment to protecting New Yorkers from Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration if he's elected mayor of New York City this November. "I will not let it dissuade me from continuing to come to Staten Island, from continuing to speak to New Yorkers, no matter where they live, no matter what politics they have," Mamdani said in response to the protesters. "Because I know that just as there are Republicans who feel that way, there are others who are sincere in their questions." Several protesters outside the restaurant told Fox News Digital that they planned to vote for Curtis Sliwa, CEO of the Guardian Angels, this November. "He's the only one that could save our city," Ed, a Staten Islander carrying a large American flag, said. Ed told Fox News Digital that he wanted to give Mamdani "a little surprise party" and let the socialist candidate know that his values do not represent those of Staten Island. "This is Trump country," said Manny, another protester and Wall Street retiree who said Mamdani's policies are "anti-Wall Street." Trump won Staten Island by 30 points in the 2024 presidential election, according to The New York Times' data. Meanwhile, in neighboring Brooklyn, former Vice President Kamala Harris carried the borough by 44 points. Tommy Banks, a native Staten Islander, said his message to Mamdani on Wednesday was simple. "Get out of town." "He wants to make everything free. He can't afford that. He's a socialist. He don't live that. We're not socialist," Banks said. Banks agreed with the other protesters outside the restaurant, telling Fox News Digital that "nobody else" could be mayor but Sliwa. "He's a true New Yorker. He's been fighting for New York all his life. Give him a chance to get in there," Banks said. Another protester, Liz, shouted, "Mamdani's a commie!" as the Democratic nominee departed in his SUV. Liz said she doesn't like Mamdani because "he's not a Democrat, he's a communist." She said Mamdani is trying to tempt New Yorkers with campaign promises like free childcare, free bus fare and government-run grocery stores, but Liz said it would be a "disaster" if he became mayor. When Mamdani declared victory in the Democratic primary, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent, called Mamdani a "snake-oil salesman" who would "say and do anything to get elected." Trump has often criticized Mamdani and his policies, calling him a "100% communist lunatic." Staten Islanders who spoke to Fox News Digital outside Mamdani's anti-Trump event on Wednesday seemed to agree with those sentiments, calling him a "commie" and criticizing his policies, which include freezing the rent, raising corporate taxes and increasing the minimum wage. However, Shahana Masum, who sported a "Zohran for Staten Island" sticker on her purse and attended the event, told Fox News Digital that Mamdani is the person who is representing "me and my community." Masum said she has also been told to go back to her country. To that, she said, "You didn't go back to your country, and I came here with dignity and with my visa, so don't tell me to leave."
