Liberal men want a leg up? How about a boot back to the 18th century where they belong
Worse than nuclear. Worse than work-from-home. These, at least, were policies devised after deliberation (I think) and collaboration (I hope). That's how it's supposed to happen in modern, successful political parties.
But on Tuesday night, something totally unscripted blew up.
There was yet another virtual meeting, this time with the NSW Liberal Women's Council, to figure out how to save the NSW branch of the Liberal Party, in trouble because it failed to nominate folks for local council elections in 2024. Any folks at all.
Anyhow, it was Peter Dutton's idea to mount a federal takeover in order to review the NSW branch (seriously, he should have looked a little closer to home).
Doing most of the talking was ex-Victorian treasurer Alan Stockdale. He and his co-conspirator former Victorian senator Richard Alston sat themselves in front of a portrait of the Liberal Party's founding father.
Guess they thought Robert Menzies would give them gravitas. The hilariously unkind SMH journalist Alex Smith who broke the story described them as having a combined age of 164.
Anyhow, Stockdale said something along the lines of ... women are now "sufficiently assertive" in the Liberal Party that it is probably time to start giving blokes a leg up.
Hahahahahaha. Also, aargghh.
But these blokes, accompanied by their silent partner, Peta Seaton, want an extension of the term of their review. If I were Sussan Ley, I'd send them back to where they came from. The 18th century.
Now it's clear to even the most casual reader of my columns that my politics in no way align with the Liberal Party.
But I have written many a column supporting women in the Liberal Party because in every instance, women deserve the same opportunities as those offered to men.
And for some unfathomable reason, the Liberal Party doesn't treat women in the same way as it treats men.
Which, in some ways, is good for the rest of us. Unless it starts to accept women as equal participants, it is unlikely it will ever again get much traction in a country where women hold up (more than) half the sky. Among women, this comment by Stockdale further trashes the Liberal brand.
As one woman, a longtime member of the Liberal Party, told me on Wednesday night after news of the "leg up" incident had broken: "It is both aggravating and tiresome at the same time. I want to scream, and also just walk away as so many have before me."
She says: "I'm not the least bit surprised by what's described in the article. These blokes are dinosaurs. And while the offensive comments were by Stockdale, not Alston, they could just have easily been Alston."
Misogynist men in the Liberal Party are apparently interchangeable. And it is baked in. Let me tell you the story of a woman who'd been chief of staff in a Liberal member's office. After the birth of her kid, her former boss suggested she work as an electoral officer, on about one-third of her previous salary. He said, to her face: "But it's a second income."
Jesus fellas. This is not how it works anymore. When women work, they need the money as much as they need the work. It's not disposable. It's indispensable.
Another Liberal woman tells me she offered to help with the review of the Liberal Party after the election loss in 2022. Hilariously, she tells me that when she called to throw herself into the mix for membership of the review, she explained she had insight into why the teals were stealing Liberal seats.
"Let's face it, most of my friends are teal voters and I'm somewhat partial to them myself," she laughs. But the bloke she talked to basically dismissed her.
He said to her: "If you have any feedback, send an email to the Vic state director."
"I couldn't even reply, I was so pissed off at being dismissed and yet again not seriously considered."
Let me take you back to 2021. It was already clear then, a year out from the 2022 federal election, that the Coalition was on the nose with women. Three separate polling organisations revealed a sharp shift of women away from the government: Essential, Resolve Monitor, NewsPoll.
And why? For once, all women could agree. The way that former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins, allegedly raped in Parliament House, was treated by those in the then Coalition government was appalling. If this was how the government treated one of its own, how would it treat others?
As former Liberal MP Julia Banks, in her tell-some memoir Power Play: Breaking Through Bias, Barriers and Boys' Clubs, put it, "The painful experience for this woman was compounded by the Morrison government's incompetence, mismanagement and lack of accountability and humanity."
Higgins, miraculously, has survived that mayhem and has now landed a gig with the lovely Hannah Moreno at Third Hemisphere. But not everyone survives. Higgins barely did.
But the Liberals did not survive their rejection by women, not in 2022 and not in 2025. And they won't recover if they don't change.
READ MORE:
Which, sure, I am chill about. Who wants a party which says we can't work from home? Who wants a party which says nuclear power is the way forward? Hey babes, by the time you get back into power, in say, 2040, the renewables war will have been won. Please put your reactors back in your pants.
My advice to you is this. You can't wait for the Stockdales and the Alstons to die. Blokes with plenty of money can afford the kind of healthcare which will keep them alive and kicking for years ahead. But the problem is they are not capable of changing.
In the meantime, the Liberal Party itself may die. Want it to change? Sign yourselves up to Hilma's Network. Its founder, Charlotte Mortlock, launched a petition calling on the party to establish gender quotas. And push for them.
That's what helped the Labor Party change. If the Liberals ever want to be in power again, they need to change too.
Oh dear. Oh dear. Oh dear. This is the language I reserve for polite company. And that polite phrase is probably being muttered in the homes of many a Liberal this week as news of the latest party faux pas filters through.
Worse than nuclear. Worse than work-from-home. These, at least, were policies devised after deliberation (I think) and collaboration (I hope). That's how it's supposed to happen in modern, successful political parties.
But on Tuesday night, something totally unscripted blew up.
There was yet another virtual meeting, this time with the NSW Liberal Women's Council, to figure out how to save the NSW branch of the Liberal Party, in trouble because it failed to nominate folks for local council elections in 2024. Any folks at all.
Anyhow, it was Peter Dutton's idea to mount a federal takeover in order to review the NSW branch (seriously, he should have looked a little closer to home).
Doing most of the talking was ex-Victorian treasurer Alan Stockdale. He and his co-conspirator former Victorian senator Richard Alston sat themselves in front of a portrait of the Liberal Party's founding father.
Guess they thought Robert Menzies would give them gravitas. The hilariously unkind SMH journalist Alex Smith who broke the story described them as having a combined age of 164.
Anyhow, Stockdale said something along the lines of ... women are now "sufficiently assertive" in the Liberal Party that it is probably time to start giving blokes a leg up.
Hahahahahaha. Also, aargghh.
But these blokes, accompanied by their silent partner, Peta Seaton, want an extension of the term of their review. If I were Sussan Ley, I'd send them back to where they came from. The 18th century.
Now it's clear to even the most casual reader of my columns that my politics in no way align with the Liberal Party.
But I have written many a column supporting women in the Liberal Party because in every instance, women deserve the same opportunities as those offered to men.
And for some unfathomable reason, the Liberal Party doesn't treat women in the same way as it treats men.
Which, in some ways, is good for the rest of us. Unless it starts to accept women as equal participants, it is unlikely it will ever again get much traction in a country where women hold up (more than) half the sky. Among women, this comment by Stockdale further trashes the Liberal brand.
As one woman, a longtime member of the Liberal Party, told me on Wednesday night after news of the "leg up" incident had broken: "It is both aggravating and tiresome at the same time. I want to scream, and also just walk away as so many have before me."
She says: "I'm not the least bit surprised by what's described in the article. These blokes are dinosaurs. And while the offensive comments were by Stockdale, not Alston, they could just have easily been Alston."
Misogynist men in the Liberal Party are apparently interchangeable. And it is baked in. Let me tell you the story of a woman who'd been chief of staff in a Liberal member's office. After the birth of her kid, her former boss suggested she work as an electoral officer, on about one-third of her previous salary. He said, to her face: "But it's a second income."
Jesus fellas. This is not how it works anymore. When women work, they need the money as much as they need the work. It's not disposable. It's indispensable.
Another Liberal woman tells me she offered to help with the review of the Liberal Party after the election loss in 2022. Hilariously, she tells me that when she called to throw herself into the mix for membership of the review, she explained she had insight into why the teals were stealing Liberal seats.
"Let's face it, most of my friends are teal voters and I'm somewhat partial to them myself," she laughs. But the bloke she talked to basically dismissed her.
He said to her: "If you have any feedback, send an email to the Vic state director."
"I couldn't even reply, I was so pissed off at being dismissed and yet again not seriously considered."
Let me take you back to 2021. It was already clear then, a year out from the 2022 federal election, that the Coalition was on the nose with women. Three separate polling organisations revealed a sharp shift of women away from the government: Essential, Resolve Monitor, NewsPoll.
And why? For once, all women could agree. The way that former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins, allegedly raped in Parliament House, was treated by those in the then Coalition government was appalling. If this was how the government treated one of its own, how would it treat others?
As former Liberal MP Julia Banks, in her tell-some memoir Power Play: Breaking Through Bias, Barriers and Boys' Clubs, put it, "The painful experience for this woman was compounded by the Morrison government's incompetence, mismanagement and lack of accountability and humanity."
Higgins, miraculously, has survived that mayhem and has now landed a gig with the lovely Hannah Moreno at Third Hemisphere. But not everyone survives. Higgins barely did.
But the Liberals did not survive their rejection by women, not in 2022 and not in 2025. And they won't recover if they don't change.
READ MORE:
Which, sure, I am chill about. Who wants a party which says we can't work from home? Who wants a party which says nuclear power is the way forward? Hey babes, by the time you get back into power, in say, 2040, the renewables war will have been won. Please put your reactors back in your pants.
My advice to you is this. You can't wait for the Stockdales and the Alstons to die. Blokes with plenty of money can afford the kind of healthcare which will keep them alive and kicking for years ahead. But the problem is they are not capable of changing.
In the meantime, the Liberal Party itself may die. Want it to change? Sign yourselves up to Hilma's Network. Its founder, Charlotte Mortlock, launched a petition calling on the party to establish gender quotas. And push for them.
That's what helped the Labor Party change. If the Liberals ever want to be in power again, they need to change too.
Oh dear. Oh dear. Oh dear. This is the language I reserve for polite company. And that polite phrase is probably being muttered in the homes of many a Liberal this week as news of the latest party faux pas filters through.
Worse than nuclear. Worse than work-from-home. These, at least, were policies devised after deliberation (I think) and collaboration (I hope). That's how it's supposed to happen in modern, successful political parties.
But on Tuesday night, something totally unscripted blew up.
There was yet another virtual meeting, this time with the NSW Liberal Women's Council, to figure out how to save the NSW branch of the Liberal Party, in trouble because it failed to nominate folks for local council elections in 2024. Any folks at all.
Anyhow, it was Peter Dutton's idea to mount a federal takeover in order to review the NSW branch (seriously, he should have looked a little closer to home).
Doing most of the talking was ex-Victorian treasurer Alan Stockdale. He and his co-conspirator former Victorian senator Richard Alston sat themselves in front of a portrait of the Liberal Party's founding father.
Guess they thought Robert Menzies would give them gravitas. The hilariously unkind SMH journalist Alex Smith who broke the story described them as having a combined age of 164.
Anyhow, Stockdale said something along the lines of ... women are now "sufficiently assertive" in the Liberal Party that it is probably time to start giving blokes a leg up.
Hahahahahaha. Also, aargghh.
But these blokes, accompanied by their silent partner, Peta Seaton, want an extension of the term of their review. If I were Sussan Ley, I'd send them back to where they came from. The 18th century.
Now it's clear to even the most casual reader of my columns that my politics in no way align with the Liberal Party.
But I have written many a column supporting women in the Liberal Party because in every instance, women deserve the same opportunities as those offered to men.
And for some unfathomable reason, the Liberal Party doesn't treat women in the same way as it treats men.
Which, in some ways, is good for the rest of us. Unless it starts to accept women as equal participants, it is unlikely it will ever again get much traction in a country where women hold up (more than) half the sky. Among women, this comment by Stockdale further trashes the Liberal brand.
As one woman, a longtime member of the Liberal Party, told me on Wednesday night after news of the "leg up" incident had broken: "It is both aggravating and tiresome at the same time. I want to scream, and also just walk away as so many have before me."
She says: "I'm not the least bit surprised by what's described in the article. These blokes are dinosaurs. And while the offensive comments were by Stockdale, not Alston, they could just have easily been Alston."
Misogynist men in the Liberal Party are apparently interchangeable. And it is baked in. Let me tell you the story of a woman who'd been chief of staff in a Liberal member's office. After the birth of her kid, her former boss suggested she work as an electoral officer, on about one-third of her previous salary. He said, to her face: "But it's a second income."
Jesus fellas. This is not how it works anymore. When women work, they need the money as much as they need the work. It's not disposable. It's indispensable.
Another Liberal woman tells me she offered to help with the review of the Liberal Party after the election loss in 2022. Hilariously, she tells me that when she called to throw herself into the mix for membership of the review, she explained she had insight into why the teals were stealing Liberal seats.
"Let's face it, most of my friends are teal voters and I'm somewhat partial to them myself," she laughs. But the bloke she talked to basically dismissed her.
He said to her: "If you have any feedback, send an email to the Vic state director."
"I couldn't even reply, I was so pissed off at being dismissed and yet again not seriously considered."
Let me take you back to 2021. It was already clear then, a year out from the 2022 federal election, that the Coalition was on the nose with women. Three separate polling organisations revealed a sharp shift of women away from the government: Essential, Resolve Monitor, NewsPoll.
And why? For once, all women could agree. The way that former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins, allegedly raped in Parliament House, was treated by those in the then Coalition government was appalling. If this was how the government treated one of its own, how would it treat others?
As former Liberal MP Julia Banks, in her tell-some memoir Power Play: Breaking Through Bias, Barriers and Boys' Clubs, put it, "The painful experience for this woman was compounded by the Morrison government's incompetence, mismanagement and lack of accountability and humanity."
Higgins, miraculously, has survived that mayhem and has now landed a gig with the lovely Hannah Moreno at Third Hemisphere. But not everyone survives. Higgins barely did.
But the Liberals did not survive their rejection by women, not in 2022 and not in 2025. And they won't recover if they don't change.
READ MORE:
Which, sure, I am chill about. Who wants a party which says we can't work from home? Who wants a party which says nuclear power is the way forward? Hey babes, by the time you get back into power, in say, 2040, the renewables war will have been won. Please put your reactors back in your pants.
My advice to you is this. You can't wait for the Stockdales and the Alstons to die. Blokes with plenty of money can afford the kind of healthcare which will keep them alive and kicking for years ahead. But the problem is they are not capable of changing.
In the meantime, the Liberal Party itself may die. Want it to change? Sign yourselves up to Hilma's Network. Its founder, Charlotte Mortlock, launched a petition calling on the party to establish gender quotas. And push for them.
That's what helped the Labor Party change. If the Liberals ever want to be in power again, they need to change too.
Oh dear. Oh dear. Oh dear. This is the language I reserve for polite company. And that polite phrase is probably being muttered in the homes of many a Liberal this week as news of the latest party faux pas filters through.
Worse than nuclear. Worse than work-from-home. These, at least, were policies devised after deliberation (I think) and collaboration (I hope). That's how it's supposed to happen in modern, successful political parties.
But on Tuesday night, something totally unscripted blew up.
There was yet another virtual meeting, this time with the NSW Liberal Women's Council, to figure out how to save the NSW branch of the Liberal Party, in trouble because it failed to nominate folks for local council elections in 2024. Any folks at all.
Anyhow, it was Peter Dutton's idea to mount a federal takeover in order to review the NSW branch (seriously, he should have looked a little closer to home).
Doing most of the talking was ex-Victorian treasurer Alan Stockdale. He and his co-conspirator former Victorian senator Richard Alston sat themselves in front of a portrait of the Liberal Party's founding father.
Guess they thought Robert Menzies would give them gravitas. The hilariously unkind SMH journalist Alex Smith who broke the story described them as having a combined age of 164.
Anyhow, Stockdale said something along the lines of ... women are now "sufficiently assertive" in the Liberal Party that it is probably time to start giving blokes a leg up.
Hahahahahaha. Also, aargghh.
But these blokes, accompanied by their silent partner, Peta Seaton, want an extension of the term of their review. If I were Sussan Ley, I'd send them back to where they came from. The 18th century.
Now it's clear to even the most casual reader of my columns that my politics in no way align with the Liberal Party.
But I have written many a column supporting women in the Liberal Party because in every instance, women deserve the same opportunities as those offered to men.
And for some unfathomable reason, the Liberal Party doesn't treat women in the same way as it treats men.
Which, in some ways, is good for the rest of us. Unless it starts to accept women as equal participants, it is unlikely it will ever again get much traction in a country where women hold up (more than) half the sky. Among women, this comment by Stockdale further trashes the Liberal brand.
As one woman, a longtime member of the Liberal Party, told me on Wednesday night after news of the "leg up" incident had broken: "It is both aggravating and tiresome at the same time. I want to scream, and also just walk away as so many have before me."
She says: "I'm not the least bit surprised by what's described in the article. These blokes are dinosaurs. And while the offensive comments were by Stockdale, not Alston, they could just have easily been Alston."
Misogynist men in the Liberal Party are apparently interchangeable. And it is baked in. Let me tell you the story of a woman who'd been chief of staff in a Liberal member's office. After the birth of her kid, her former boss suggested she work as an electoral officer, on about one-third of her previous salary. He said, to her face: "But it's a second income."
Jesus fellas. This is not how it works anymore. When women work, they need the money as much as they need the work. It's not disposable. It's indispensable.
Another Liberal woman tells me she offered to help with the review of the Liberal Party after the election loss in 2022. Hilariously, she tells me that when she called to throw herself into the mix for membership of the review, she explained she had insight into why the teals were stealing Liberal seats.
"Let's face it, most of my friends are teal voters and I'm somewhat partial to them myself," she laughs. But the bloke she talked to basically dismissed her.
He said to her: "If you have any feedback, send an email to the Vic state director."
"I couldn't even reply, I was so pissed off at being dismissed and yet again not seriously considered."
Let me take you back to 2021. It was already clear then, a year out from the 2022 federal election, that the Coalition was on the nose with women. Three separate polling organisations revealed a sharp shift of women away from the government: Essential, Resolve Monitor, NewsPoll.
And why? For once, all women could agree. The way that former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins, allegedly raped in Parliament House, was treated by those in the then Coalition government was appalling. If this was how the government treated one of its own, how would it treat others?
As former Liberal MP Julia Banks, in her tell-some memoir Power Play: Breaking Through Bias, Barriers and Boys' Clubs, put it, "The painful experience for this woman was compounded by the Morrison government's incompetence, mismanagement and lack of accountability and humanity."
Higgins, miraculously, has survived that mayhem and has now landed a gig with the lovely Hannah Moreno at Third Hemisphere. But not everyone survives. Higgins barely did.
But the Liberals did not survive their rejection by women, not in 2022 and not in 2025. And they won't recover if they don't change.
READ MORE:
Which, sure, I am chill about. Who wants a party which says we can't work from home? Who wants a party which says nuclear power is the way forward? Hey babes, by the time you get back into power, in say, 2040, the renewables war will have been won. Please put your reactors back in your pants.
My advice to you is this. You can't wait for the Stockdales and the Alstons to die. Blokes with plenty of money can afford the kind of healthcare which will keep them alive and kicking for years ahead. But the problem is they are not capable of changing.
In the meantime, the Liberal Party itself may die. Want it to change? Sign yourselves up to Hilma's Network. Its founder, Charlotte Mortlock, launched a petition calling on the party to establish gender quotas. And push for them.
That's what helped the Labor Party change. If the Liberals ever want to be in power again, they need to change too.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Hoping for an Israel free from Netanyahu
More important issues Re enshrining ″the right″ to work from home for two days a week. One would have thought that the premier would have enough on her plate with huge debt, tobacco wars, the construction industry being infiltrated by organised crime, youth crime, shortcomings in the child-minding industry etc than worry about increasing the demands of workers over their employers. The ability to work from home is something that many workers would like and, indeed, one that many have. However, employers are trying to run their businesses efficiently. I am sure that if working from home enabled the business to maintain or improve productivity, then an employer would be happy to allow it. Enshrining it in legislation, though? Really? Victorian employers already are faced with considerable costs in this state. They don't really need another requirement to have over their heads which could easily result in arguments over what is ″practical″. Victorian employers don't need another unnecessary piece of legislation to make them wonder whether they would be better off in another state. Shaun Quinn, Yarrawonga Free transport too Retail assistants, cleaners, gardeners, receptionists and essential service, transport and factory workers are just the tip of the iceberg of workers who cannot ″reasonably″ work from home. Perhaps I am jumping the gun and there will be provision for the ″unreasonable' to be given two days of free public transport, a fuel subsidy or something similar? Barb Kingston, Mt Waverley Reducing productivity The premier's latest offering to the Victorian workforce shows she has little understanding of small businesses employing 10 persons or fewer that make up 97 per cent of all businesses in Australia. They operate as teams where every employee is needed every day at the workplace for the business to run effectively, and they do not have the flexibility to have an employee or two working from home on days that suit them. This proposal merely divides the workforce in two, with those businesses large or flexible enough to be able to allow employees to work from home against those unable to do this. While it may suit employees of larger enterprises, it will increase the pressures and concerns on small businesses already struggling to survive. Hardly a move to encourage increased productivity. Peter Norman, Glen Iris Right to demonstrate Your correspondent (Letters, ″Democracy Park″, 3/8) suggests establishing a park somewhere in metropolitan Melbourne to be the only legal place for demonstrations. A nice idea. After all, protests, like children, should be neither seen nor heard. The idea is not consistent with our democratic traditions. A little thought reminds us of how many demonstrations have been a force for good, and even better if governments had listened more often. Aboriginal protests in Melbourne in the 1950s; the protests that saved a section of the old inner rail loop as the romantically named ″Linear Park″; Vietnam moratorium marches; anti-freeway protests; anti-Iraq war marches; demonstrations for women's safety; the current protests against the slaughter in Gaza – the list goes on. Our problem is not protests; it is that protests are too often needed before our leaders find some moral courage. James McDougall, Fitzroy North Ongoing trauma The Garma Festival this week has shone a spotlight on our dismal attempts to close the gaping disadvantage experienced by our First Nations people. Do our leaders actually understand the term ″generational trauma″, or is it just a buzz word for them? If we steal a generation of children from the nurture of their family unit and bring them up in institutions where they are exposed to abuse in varying degrees, they will grow up ill equipped to raise their own children, who in turn will pass this trauma to their children. Punishing the children of these affected adults is an ineffective way to handle this problem. Governments need to properly fund services that support young families and help them to raise children who are educated and can live satisfying, meaningful lives. Jan Downing, Hawthorn East NAPLAN hysteria As a recently retired teacher, I certainly don't miss the annual NAPLAN hysteria. With an increasingly complex job, heavy with administrivia, and an expanding curriculum including a non-evidence-based obsession with standardised testing, coupled with a wide range a challenging student behavioural issues, it is becoming extremely difficult to attract and retain teachers. However, one thing remains constant – that all the input into how to improve outcomes for students comes from a range of consultants, pop-up ″experts″, academics and politicians, rarely from the group charged with their learning: the teachers themselves. Craig Jory, Albury Cost of medicine Re Letters, ″Doctor Shortage″ 2/8. It is obscene that people living in small communities expect the same level of health services as those who live in big cities. Unfortunately for country folk, it can't be the same due to cost effectiveness. Health services in the country that might be accessed a few times a week or fortnight are not going to provide 24-hour, seven-day, fully staffed amenities. I recently read about a gentleman who lives in Bega who complained that he had to travel to Canberra for an MRI as this couldn't be done in his region. If that MRI machine is only used once a month, it is not financially viable – unless he'd like to buy one for the Bega Valley. Jen Gladstones, North Carlton Algae link There is a strong link, in my opinion, between the terrible algae bloom problems in South Australia and the extremely high level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that is causing the seas to become much hotter. Algae bloom thrives on excessive heat, and the practice of burning fossil fuels by large corporations to create energy continues to release massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It seems obvious to me that the stand-out prime cause of the algae problem is the burning by large corporations of fossil fuels to create energy. Brian Measday, Kingswood, SA Sports bias In one of the great comebacks of the millennium in Aussie sport, the Vixens came from fourth place after scraping in to the finals to defeat the red-hot favourites in the Netball Super League grand final. It was a win for the ages, reminiscent of the Western Bulldogs winning the 2016 AFL premiership. Both memorable grand finals were played within a short walking distance of each other, at the MCG and Rod Laver Arena, to maximum capacity crowds in Australia's most popular male and female team sports. And yet, while the AFL grand final was televised free to air nationwide, as no doubt will be the AFLW grand final in 2025, our Super League netball champions were relegated to pay TV. This prevented so many struggling families and pensioners who cannot afford pay TV or cannot easily access a viewing site from watching the most important game of the year. It also reflects the media's biased attitude towards our premier female team sport. All genuine sports fans should be ashamed of the discrimination against the champion athletes of netball that is so painfully evident in parts of our male-dominated sporting community. John Bell, Heidelberg Heights ABC failure Shame on the ABC for not providing any live coverage of the Super Netball grand final. Despite being the leading female sport in participation, attendances, and TV ratings by some margin, one of its many digital channels could not be spared. Female versions of AFL, NRL, cricket and soccer all manage to be covered, perhaps because they are just that, female versions of male-dominated sports. The ABC prides itself on standing for gender equality, but when it comes to netball, by far the biggest female sport in the country, it fails miserably. Peter Heffernan, Balaclava AND ANOTHER THING Jacinta Allan As a retired small business owner, I'd bet the premier wouldn't last a month if it was her own money at risk. Bruce Severns, Toorak I read Jacinta Allan is ensuring her employees continue to vote for her at the next election by allowing them to stay at home two days a week. Peter Gustavsen, Brighton While Jacinta Allan worries about the traffic, Victorians protest mass murder. Hans Paas, Castlemaine It's ironic that our Premier appears more enthusiastic about locking up pro-Palestine protesters than violent, machete-wielding criminals. Angela Szalla, Donvale Furthermore Since 2015, taxpayers have spent more than $13 million managing the lead issue in Broken Hill' 3/8). Surely, this is the responsibility of the mining companies who have caused the problem, not taxpayers. Belinda Burke, Hawthorn l think a ban on over 50s using social media should be the group targeted. James Lane, Hampton East It is heartening to learn that Australia's superannuated politicians turned AUKUS consultants are motivated by the 'national interest'. Bernd Rieve, Brighton How come they don't have someone like Snoop Dogg at the Logies? Craig Tucker, Newport I'm surprised Trump wasn't nominated for a Logie. He's been ″strutting his stuff‴ on the world stage for months. Still, maybe an Oscar is waiting in the wings. Myra Fisher, Brighton East
West Australian
8 hours ago
- West Australian
Sussan Ley calls on ‘outstanding' WA women to put hands up for Liberal preselection as party faces rebuild
The West Australian exclusive Sussan Ley calls on 'outstanding' WA women to put hands up for Liberal preselection as party faces rebuild
AU Financial Review
9 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Victoria's WFH guarantee ‘just can't happen': legal experts
The Allan Labor government's promise to legislate work-from-home rights for the private sector marks a state's biggest incursion into federal workplace regulation in decades but is highly unlikely to be enforceable, multiple legal experts warn. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced her government would legislate a right for public and private sector employees to work from home for at least two days a week ahead of the November 2026 state election and is considering using state anti-discrimination laws to do so.
