Elon Musk's 'one-word' reply on post saying Donald Trump does no want to destroy Elon's companies
Donald Trump
recently publicly denied any intention of destroying Elon Musk's companies to remove their significant
government subsidies
. Now the tech billionaire has responded to Trump's statement. Elon Musk's one-word reply 'Phew' was posted on X (formerly known as Twitter). The post Musk responded to reads, 'BREAKING: President Trump has said he will not 'destroy Elon Musk's companies'. The replay from
Elon Musk
came just hours after Donald Trump shared a post on Truth Social. Trump state that he wants all the US companies to thrive because their good performance is better for the country.
Read Donald Trump's post on Elon Musk
'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so! I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!' Wrote Trump in his post on Truth Social.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk reacts to Donald Trump's post
Initially reacting to Donald Trump's post Elon Musk said that the subsidies he is talking about does not exist. Musk further added
SpaceX
won the contracts by doing a better job at a lesser price.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep
ResMed
Buy Now
Undo
'The 'subsidies' he's talking about simply do not exist.DJT has already removed or put an expiry date on all sustainable energy support while leaving massive oil & gas subsidies untouched. SpaceX won the NASA contracts by doing a better job for less money. Moving those contracts to other aerospace companies would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much,' said Musk in a post on X.
Shortly after a post referenced President Trump's assurance that he wouldn't harm Elon Musk's companies, Musk responded with a single word: 'Phew.'
Tesla CEO Elon Musk opposed Trump's 'One, Big Beautiful Bill'
Donald Trump's statement addresses ongoing speculation fueled by a public spat with Musk. The 'problems' between the pair reportedly began with Musk's opposition to a major spending bill – 'One, Big Beautiful Bill' – pushed forward by the President. The dispute intensified when the Tesla CEO brought up Trump's past association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In June, Trump had threatened to cut some of Musk's government contracts as their disagreement over the 'Big Beautiful Bill' deepened and their relationship visibly soured. This marked a shift, as Musk had previously chaired the president's Department of Government Efficiency and had contributed millions to Trump's re-election campaign.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
"I don't know anything about it": Trump on US imports of Russian chemicals and fertilizers
Donald Trump claimed ignorance about US imports of Russian chemicals and fertilizers. This followed India's assertion that the US continues to import these items. Trump also threatened to raise tariffs on India for buying Russian oil. India strongly rejected this, citing its energy security needs. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) stated that he had no knowlegde that the United States imports Russian Chemicals and fertilizers. The rebutall came after India claimed that US continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry,fertilisers, as well as asked by the about US Imports of Russian chemicals and fertilizers during a press conference at the White House, Trump said, "I don't know anything about it. We will have to check."ANI has reached out to the presidents press team and awaits for a comment came a day after the US President announced that the United States would "substantially raise" tariffs on India over its purchase of Russian oil."India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!" Trump had said in a post on Truth Social on US President's statement was strongly rejected by India, with the Ministry of External Affairs calling the targeting of India "unjustified and unreasonable."In a detailed response, India said its imports from Russia were based on market needs and energy security, especially after Western nations diverted traditional supplies to Europe following the Ukraine conflict."In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability. India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion," the statement government also pointed to continued trade between Russia and both the United States and the European Union."Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers, as well as chemicals. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," the statement said," the MEA statement's also noted that the EU's bilateral trade with Russia in 2024 reached Euro 67.5 billion in goods, along with 16.5 million tonnes of LNG, more than its own trade volume with said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interests and economic security.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Ex-DOGE worker ‘beaten mercilessly' in Washington, Trump threatens Fed takeover; Musk reacts
Two 15-year-olds have been arrested in Washington, D.C., in connection with the attempted carjacking and assault of Edward Coristine, an important figure in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), fueling calls from President Donald Trump for 'federal control over the capital'. Coristine, known by the nickname 'Big Balls,' was one of the most recognisable members of Trump's DOGE, an initiative aimed at reducing federal bureaucracy. Coristine was assaulted around 3 a.m. Sunday in the city's Logan Circle neighbourhood by a group of teenagers attempting to carjack him and a woman whom police identified as his significant other, according to authorities, as reported by the Associated Press. The victim, Edward Coristine, nicknamed 'Big Balls,' was among the most visible figures of Trump's DOGE. The Metropolitan Police Department said the group approached the couple's car and made a comment about taking it. 'Coristine pushed the woman into the vehicle for safety and turned to confront the group. At least several of the teens then attacked him,' police said, until officers patrolling nearby intervened. As officers moved toward the group, the teens fled on foot, according to a report by AP. Two 15-year-olds from Maryland were arrested on charges of unarmed carjacking, police said. The attack gave new fuel to long-standing Republican efforts to challenge Washington's autonomy, with Trump threatening to bypass local authority and impose direct federal control over the city. In a social media post and remarks at the White House on Tuesday, the president described crime in Washington as 'out of control'. "If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Billionaire Elon Musk said in a post on X, 'A few days ago, a gang of about a dozen young men tried to assault a woman in her car at night in DC. A Doge team member saw what was happening, ran to defend her and was severely beaten to the point of concussion, but he saved her. It is time to federalize DC.' The District of Columbia has long been a symbolic flashpoint in debates over crime and governance, with its lack of statehood making it especially susceptible to federal oversight. Republican leaders have often used incidents of violence to depict the city as an example of crime under Democratic leadership, despite city officials pointing out that overall violent crime has dropped by more than 25% compared to the same time last year. A Doge team member saw what was happening, ran to defend her and was severely beaten to the point of concussion. Still, local officials have acknowledged in recent years that youth crime, particularly carjackings, remains a serious concern. Just last year, a 14-year-old was charged with killing a Lyft driver in a botched carjacking, and a significant portion of carjacking arrests in Washington involve juveniles. If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City. The Metropolitan Police Department said its investigation into the attack on Coristine remains active, and additional suspects are still being sought.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Navigating US markets split personalities: McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida, - During an extraordinary few days when the worlds of U.S. politics, policy, economics and company earnings collided, the divergences that run through the country's equity and bond markets have come into sharp relief. For the bond market, the split separates short-dated Treasuries that price off the Fed's policy rate and longer maturities that are more sensitive to U.S. debt and deficit concerns. And for the benchmark S&P 500, that line is between the 'Magnificent Seven', along with a few other tech and artificial intelligence-focused megacaps, and everyone else. These types of divides have always existed to some extent, but they have become more apparent this year given the historic concentration on Wall Street and rapid deterioration in the U.S. fiscal outlook. The dramatic moves in U.S. assets over the last few days serve as a microcosm of these deeper divergences. The split in the bond market burst open on Friday. Triggered by surprisingly weak jobs figures and President Trump's shock decision to fire a senior official in the agency responsible for collecting the data, the two-year Treasury yield plunged 25 basis points and the 2s/30s yield curve steepened by 20 basis points. These were the biggest moves in one year and two and a half years, respectively. The slump in yields, especially at the short end of the curve, indicates that investors' supposed concerns about fiscal indiscipline quickly evaporate as soon as growth-sapping cracks in the labor market appear. So much for the bond vigilantes. Tellingly, there was no pullback on Monday. Indeed, Treasury prices climbed even higher, pushing the two-year yield as low as 3.66%, its nadir since May. Long-dated yields have declined too, but not as aggressively, resulting in Friday's dramatic steepening of the 2s/30s curve to levels that, with the exception of April's brief tariff tantrum, haven't been seen for more than three years. Investors may wince at the size of the federal debt and the Treasury's funding needs but still want to load up on two-year bonds when they think rate cuts are coming. This parallel thinking isn't new, but the stark difference in the narratives driving the front and back ends of the curve is notable. The U.S. equity market concentration story is familiar to everyone by now, but the last few days underscore how jaw-dropping - and seemingly entrenched - it is. Blockbuster earnings reports from 'Mag 7' constituents Meta, Microsoft and Apple juiced another wave of outperformance in Big Tech stocks, reviving debate about concentration risk, bubbles and the long-term benefits of AI. By some measures, a few Big Tech firms now account for as much as 40% of the total U.S. stock market cap. Tech is more expensive relative to the broader S&P 500 index than ever, even compared to the dotcom bubble, according to Bank of America. Wall Street's average valuations and earnings growth are therefore increasingly being driven by Big Tech. Strip out the top 10 firms, and the rump S&P 490 has barely registered any earnings growth in the last three years, according to SocGen's Andrew Lapthorne. Again, there are multiple narratives at work here. It may be true that overseas investors want to reduce their U.S. equity exposure, but don't want to miss out on the Big Tech boom. So even if foreign investors start shedding some U.S. assets – and that's debatable – they aren't apt to be jettisoning the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft. This is a delicate juncture for investors. Wall Street is at record highs, but concentration risk has also rarely been higher. The outlook for long-dated bonds is worrying given current fiscal and inflation dynamics, yet the short end looks much more attractive, though even that is complicated by the economic and unique political pressures bearing down on the Fed. The divergences in U.S. markets may narrow, gradually or suddenly, or they may continue unabated for some time. Without a crystal ball, it's tough to know exactly what the catalyst for mean reversion would be. One thing is likely guaranteed though: in this environment, it will pay to be nimble. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
