logo
Everyday Australians offer explanations for the Coalition's electoral wipe-out

Everyday Australians offer explanations for the Coalition's electoral wipe-out

Across the country, voters sent a clear message about who they wanted in Canberra.
But what exactly drove so many to turn their back on the Coalition?
Labor will return to Parliament House with a firm grip on power, representing seats many never would have expected to fall from the Coalition's clutches just years ago.
Nationwide, blue seats turned red, from the most northerly electorate of Leichardt in Queensland, south to Tasmania's bellwethers, Bass and Braddon.
In the cities, Liberals lost both marginal and long-held electorates, the likes of Deakin and Menzies in Melbourne, Petrie and Bonner in Brisbane, and Hughes in Sydney's south-west.
Meanwhile, Independents maintained their hold of blue-ribbon seats across the country.
Australians had much to contemplate when they cast their ballots after years of economic pain, and an increasingly challenging global landscape promising further uncertainty.
Why did so many reject Peter Dutton's Coalition?
Was it an unlikeable captain, poor policy offerings, a blundering campaign, culture wars debates, or anti-Trump headwinds?
The ABC has spoken to voters from these shifting seats across the country, and listened to their fears, fury and frustration with the parties and the political system.
Their stories provide an insight into exactly what brought Mr Dutton and the Liberals undone.
David Thompson and Debra Kruse changed their voting preferences this election.
(
ABC News: Jessica Moran
)
'Laughable portfolio of policies', say Tasmanians
The northern Tasmanian seat of Bass, which takes in Launceston and surrounding areas, is known for being marginal and often swings with the government of the day.
It is considered more Liberal-leaning than some other Tasmanian electorates, alongside nearby Braddon.
Residents in Bass did not hold back when they offered their views on the Coalition's campaign.
"I've never seen such a laughable portfolio of policies … worst portfolio anybody's ever brought in Australia," said swinging voter and IT consultant David Thompson.
"
I mean, the nuclear thing was just uneconomic, unproven … it just didn't resonate at all.
"
He felt the policy offerings from the Coalition were "shambolic" and many "thought bubbles" that were back tracked within days.
Lawyer Debra Kruse said she had changed her voting preferences this election.
The pressing issue on her mind was the environment and future quality of life for her three children and five grandchildren.
"We have grandchildren who will never be able to buy a house unless they get lots of help … I just didn't see anything from the Coalition that would help," she said.
Peter Dwyer was not surprised by Labor's landslide national win.
(
ABC News: Jessica Moran
)
Another Bass resident, Peter Dwyer, said while he did not vote for Labor he was not surprised by the swing away from the Liberal Party locally and nationally.
While he mostly backs the Coalition, he was not supportive of their nuclear energy policy, describing it as a "60s thing" that "we've left behind".
He feels the Liberal party has swayed too far to the right.
"I'm probably fairly typical of most Australians; we just look at elections today and just go, not another one,"
he said.
Mr Dwyer felt Peter Dutton had admiration for US President Donald Trump, which bothered him.
"I think the Coalition were very, very unwise to sort of align themselves to a large degree with [President Trump] … he's proving himself more and more to be a financial instability globally."
This sentiment was echoed by Mr Thompson, who said, "nobody wanted the craziness that is 'the Donald' in Australia".
Mr Dutton had been accused of inciting Trumpian rhetoric language and ideas, while also appointing Jacinta Nampijinpa Price as Shadow Minister for Government Efficiency.
The role echoed the one the US president created for controversial tech billionaire Elon Musk, but both Mr Dutton and Ms Price rejected the similarities.
A recent poll from the Lowy Institute found two thirds of Australians had little or no trust in the US, a historic low in the poll's almost two-decade history.
In other parts of the country, voters pointed to the national and personal issues that influenced their votes.
Deakin resident Cathy voted for Labor to protect the NDIS.
(
ABC News: Jesse Thompson
)
Fears for the future in city suburbs
Many Liberals are reckoning with the colossal losses across the major cities, with long-held suburban seats changing hands.
The Liberal Party's Keith Wolahan, who looks to have lost his Melbourne seat of Menzies, said his party "has an issue with people in urban Australia".
In the neighbouring electorate of Deakin, Coalition front-bencher Michael Sukkar lost his seat to Labor's Matt Greg.
The electorate had become increasingly marginal, with Mr Sukkar securing it by only 0.2 per cent of the vote in 2022, and a redistribution shrinking the margin even further.
Prior to this, the seat had only been held by a Labor member three times since 1972.
"I just feel like Labor is more compassionate to ordinary, working class people like me," said Cathy, a local Deakin resident.
She hoped the Labor government would provide more support to renters and protect the National Disability Insurance Scheme — which her daughter accesses.
One of Labor's less expected gains of this election was the south-western electorate of Hughes, where voters appeared concerned for the future.
The electorate takes in parts of Liverpool, Campbelltown and the Shire, and has been held by Liberal MPs since 1996.
Here, residents told the ABC their biggest concerns were for future generations.
"I'm not struggling but I feel sorry for the younger people … I am happy Peter Dutton lost his seat," one man told the ABC.
Another woman, who didn't give her name, said she had deep concerns for the country, but is "not really happy" about Anthony Albanese's re-election.
"The young ones can't afford to buy a home anymore, everything is just too expensive … the younger generation are going to be our future," she said.
"
We just needed someone to give us better direction with things … I don't know if Albanese is the right person for the next three years.
"
Thomas Paff (right) says he had a lot to contemplate at this year's federal election.
(
ABC News: Emma Siossian
)
Regional voters looking for change
In regional areas, some locals said housing, social and cost-of-living policies ultimately determined their vote.
Thomas Paff lives in the beachside town of Coffs Harbour on the New South Wales Mid-North Coast, with his wife and newborn baby.
The 28-year-old said he and his wife had a lot to contemplate at this national poll.
They live in the regional electorate of Cowper, which became a closely-watched contest where the Nationals were threatened by a local independent.
Ultimately, the incumbent Pat Conaghan beat Caz Heise, maintaining the long tradition of National representation in the electorate.
Mr Paff said he took more time to consider his political choice this election after having his first child, and was happy with Labor's win at a national level.
He and his wife were convinced to change their usual voting preferences due to what they saw as Labor's "family-friendly" policies.
"There were a few things about childcare that my wife and I thought were appropriate to us," he said.
"This isn't the way we normally vote, but this time with the newborn, we thought we should look at different policies, and that's why we chose Labor,"
he said.
"We are happy with the result, we get a few days of childcare, and there was a 20 per cent HECS debt reduction [pledge], and my wife and I both have a HECS debt, so that was good as well."
He said the big dream for the young couple was "to get into the housing market soon".
Cairns local Kurt McDonald was looking for housing solutions.
(
ABC News: Christopher Testa
)
Regional centres have felt the pinch of rising house prices in recent years, and in the far-northern electorate of Leichhardt, voters said it was a key issue for many.
"Ultimately, I think everyone wants to own their house one day," said Leichhardt local Kurt McDonald.
The 30-year-old lives in Cairns, the heart of the electorate, a major regional centre, a popular tourist spot and a destination for cashed-up, city-based sea-changers.
"Places in Cairns, over the last couple of years, have doubled in rents, housing values have doubled [it feels like]," Mr McDonald said.
Labor had been eyeing off Leichhardt, hoping to steal it from retiring Liberal Warren Entsch, and managed to secure it with a more than 10 per cent swing.
Mr McDonald believes the Liberals failed to prove they had long-term solutions for the pressing economic problems many locals faced.
"The Liberal party didn't really seem like they knew which way to go depending on the day," he said.
"
It jumped from culture wars one day, to cost of living the next, so it was quite difficult to be taken in by that sort of approach.
"
Voters across the country made it clear they found multiple reasons not to back Coalition candidates.
From foreign relations and campaign rhetoric to housing and energy policies.
The Liberal and National parties now have the difficult job of trying to build a new strategy to gain support of those in the cities, seaside and everywhere else across the vast nation.
They have three years to try and regain their lost base.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?
Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?

ABC News

time27 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is expected to go to the state's governor on Tuesday to seek a snap election, just 15 months after the last state election. Parliament will sit today to debate and pass a budget supply bill to ensure public servants can get paid during and after an election campaign. After that, Mr Rockliff intends to ask to dissolve parliament, with July 19 the earliest date an election can be held. It comes after the lower house passed Labor's no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff on Thursday, citing the bungled rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania vessels, the state's poor budget position and previous suggestions to privatise state-owned companies. He did not speak to the media on Monday, instead taking part in an icy water slide fundraiser for a motor neurone disease charity. An election could have been avoided if the Liberals chose a new leader who would then need to get the confidence of the lower house, but cabinet minister Felix Ellis said Mr Rockliff has the support of the Liberal partyroom. "He is a man of experience, strength and compassion who has served our community for decades. "We back him in wholeheartedly." The two major parties continue to blame each other for the political impasse. Labor leader Dean Winter says the premier was to blame for losing the confidence of the lower house, while Mr Rockliff says Mr Winter is a "wrecker" . The Tasmanian Greens have called on Labor to attempt to form minority government with their support rather than go to an election, but Mr Winter has rejected this. Mr Winter said the party will not be making big spending promises if an election is called. "This will not be a spendathon from Labor," he said. "Our state cannot afford it. Labor has confirmed it will support the supply bill through parliament. It's likely to be the only parliamentary business of the day. There could be another lengthy debate however, as members can make speeches on the bill. The Legislative Council has also been recalled for the day to pass the supply bill, and members will have briefings while they wait for the supply bill to be approved by the lower house. The Tasmanian Industrial Commission last week determined that the state's politicians will get a 22 per cent pay rise on July 1, but both the Liberals and Labor say they will block this. A disallowance motion would be required to stop the pay rise. However, the government says this can occur when parliament returns after an election, with the pay increase on hold until then. Tasmania is the only state or territory that does not have its own political donation disclosure scheme, but one is set to start on July 1, potentially halfway through the election campaign. It would require all political donations above $1,000 to be publicly disclosed. The donations must be declared to the Electoral Commission within seven days, and then published seven days later, meaning donations won't start being published until one or two weeks into July. Independent upper house MLC Meg Webb called on the government to either bring the system forward to today, or ensure it starts on July 1. Mr Rockliff confirmed on Sunday that the disclosure system will start on July 1. The new laws also include public funding for campaigns, at $6 per vote once 4 per cent of the vote is achieved. Parties can apply for half of its anticipated funding up-front, based on its result at the previous state election. It's unclear whether this aspect of the bill will be in operation if an election is called. An election would also delay several pieces of legislation and the work of multiple parliamentary committees. The government intended to have its Macquarie Point stadium enabling legislation debated and passed in the lower house this month, and then the upper house in the first week of July. This will need to wait until after the election, and is subject to the new numbers in the lower house. Currently, both the Liberals and Labor have a combined 24 seats out of 35 to pass the stadium bill, but 10 out of 11 crossbenchers are opposed. The numbers in the Legislative Council will remain the same, with three independents required for the stadium bill to pass. A bill to allow for the rezoning of University of Tasmania land above Churchill Avenue in Sandy Bay will also be delayed, having already passed the lower house. A parliamentary committee examining the implementation of recommendations from the commission of inquiry into child sexual abuse in institutional settings will be paused. So, too, will a committee that is examining how the previous election was carried out. That committee will likely need to add a second election onto its workload.

Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG
Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG

West Australian

time32 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG

California Attorney General Rob Bonta says the state's sovereignty has been "trampled" by US President Donald Trump when he ordered National Guard troops to the immigration protests in Los Angeles. Bonta spoke on Monday as he announced plans to sue Trump's administration. He said the state will seek a court order declaring that Trump's use of the Guard was unlawful and ask for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Bonta said the suit will be filed later on Monday. Earlier, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he planned to file a lawsuit against Trump. "Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the governor of that state is illegal and immoral," Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC on Sunday. The streets of the sprawling city of four million people were quiet on Monday morning but the smell of smoke hung in the air downtown, one day after crowds blocked off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The law enforcement presence was heavy, with police cars blocking the street in front of the federal detention facility that was a focus of the protests. While much of the city was spared from any violence, clashes swept through several downtown blocks and a handful of other places. It could take days to clear the debris from burned cars and to clean off or paint over graffiti sprayed on City Hall and other buildings near the detention facility. Sunday was the third and most intense day of demonstrations against Trump's immigration crackdown in the region, as the arrival of about 300 Guard troops spurred anger and fear among many residents. US officials said about 1000 National Guard members were in the city under federal orders by midday on Monday. The full 2000 members authorised by the president were expected to be on the ground by the end of the day. Many protesters dispersed as evening fell and police declared an unlawful assembly, a precursor to officers moving in and arresting those who refuse to leave. Some of those who stayed threw objects at police from behind a makeshift barrier. Others hurled chunks of concrete, rocks, electric scooters and fireworks at California Highway Patrol officers and their vehicles parked on the closed southbound 101 Freeway. Officers ran under an overpass to take cover at one point. Trump said on Monday that the city would have been "completely obliterated" if he had not deployed the Guard. Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, the president accused Newsom and the city's mayor, Karen Bass, of lying by saying Guard troops were not necessary. The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown detention centre where protesters concentrated. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were "overwhelmed" by the remaining protesters. He said they included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble. Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend. One was detained on Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers.

Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG
Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG

Perth Now

time34 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Trump trampled sovereignty on Guard: California AG

California Attorney General Rob Bonta says the state's sovereignty has been "trampled" by US President Donald Trump when he ordered National Guard troops to the immigration protests in Los Angeles. Bonta spoke on Monday as he announced plans to sue Trump's administration. He said the state will seek a court order declaring that Trump's use of the Guard was unlawful and ask for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Bonta said the suit will be filed later on Monday. Earlier, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he planned to file a lawsuit against Trump. "Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the governor of that state is illegal and immoral," Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC on Sunday. The streets of the sprawling city of four million people were quiet on Monday morning but the smell of smoke hung in the air downtown, one day after crowds blocked off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The law enforcement presence was heavy, with police cars blocking the street in front of the federal detention facility that was a focus of the protests. While much of the city was spared from any violence, clashes swept through several downtown blocks and a handful of other places. It could take days to clear the debris from burned cars and to clean off or paint over graffiti sprayed on City Hall and other buildings near the detention facility. Sunday was the third and most intense day of demonstrations against Trump's immigration crackdown in the region, as the arrival of about 300 Guard troops spurred anger and fear among many residents. US officials said about 1000 National Guard members were in the city under federal orders by midday on Monday. The full 2000 members authorised by the president were expected to be on the ground by the end of the day. Many protesters dispersed as evening fell and police declared an unlawful assembly, a precursor to officers moving in and arresting those who refuse to leave. Some of those who stayed threw objects at police from behind a makeshift barrier. Others hurled chunks of concrete, rocks, electric scooters and fireworks at California Highway Patrol officers and their vehicles parked on the closed southbound 101 Freeway. Officers ran under an overpass to take cover at one point. Trump said on Monday that the city would have been "completely obliterated" if he had not deployed the Guard. Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, the president accused Newsom and the city's mayor, Karen Bass, of lying by saying Guard troops were not necessary. The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown detention centre where protesters concentrated. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were "overwhelmed" by the remaining protesters. He said they included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble. Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend. One was detained on Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store