
Millennials ‘spill the beans', while Gen Z ‘spills the tea', study says
While millennials like to 'spill the beans', Gen Z will ask you to 'spill the tea', a new study on the evolution of English phrases suggests.
Popular English idioms are evolving as they pass from one generation to the next, according to the British Council.
In its report on 100 phrases which show how the English language is changing, the British Council said that while classic idioms such as 'kill two birds with one stone' remain widely used, newer phrases are gaining momentum – and the top expressions vary between older generations, millennials and Gen Z.
'Spill the beans' was first recorded in 1919, the report said, but saw a surge in the 1990s.
Similar phrase 'spill the tea' – meaning to share gossip – grew in popularity from 2017 thanks to social media, the British Council said.
This latest study shows how much English is shaped by people around the world and how it continues to grow and adapt
According to the study, expressions such as 'step up to the plate', 'bad-mouthing' and 'below the belt' are frequently used among older generations but could be falling out of fashion as they rarely appear in comments on YouTube or Twitch – sites which have younger demographics.
One phrase that is a major green flag is 'red flag/green flag', as it appears in the top 20 list for usage for all three generation groups, the British Council study showed.
Typically used when referring to relationships and potential partners, the phrase 'red flag' indicates problems, while 'green flag' signals something positive, or a positive trait.
Analysing the frequency and emergence of idioms, proverbs, and phrases, we uncover not only the impact of historical events but also how the digital era shapes the language we use today
The research, led by computational linguistics expert Dr Barbara McGillivray and natural language processing specialist Iacopo Ghinassi, analysed millions of online documents to track when expressions emerge and how their use changes, from 'breaking the ice' to 'ate and left no crumbs' (meaning to do something perfectly).
After creating a list of 100 expressions – including idioms, phrases, and proverbs – from a wide range of sources including the Oxford English Dictionary, academic literature, newspapers and online platforms, the British Council analysed online comments from different platforms to see how different generations use the phrases.
'It is what it is', 'bucket list' and 'Yolo' (you only live once) rank highly across the generations, the study found.
Originating in 1949, 'it is what it is' had a steep rise in use after the Covid-19 pandemic.
The British Council said the phrase 'bucket list', meaning a list of things to do before you die, was 'practically unheard of' until 2007, when comedy-adventure film The Bucket List was released.
It is thought to have come from another idiom: 'to kick the bucket'.
This collection offers a unique perspective on how English, as both a living and historical entity, continues to adapt and reflect the changing world
Some phrases might even skip a generation, the report said, as idioms such as 'throw in the towel' and 'joie de vivre' are common among older generations and Gen Z, but used less often by millennials.
This could show that some idioms are being revived or reinvented among younger speakers, the British Council said.
Dr McGillivray said: 'Working on this collection, we had the chance to explore the deep historical roots of English expressions while applying modern computational techniques to trace their evolution.
'Analysing the frequency and emergence of idioms, proverbs, and phrases, we uncover not only the impact of historical events but also how the digital era shapes the language we use today.
'This collection offers a unique perspective on how English, as both a living and historical entity, continues to adapt and reflect the changing world.'
'No cap', meaning no lie or I'm serious, was the most popular of the 100 phrases for Gen Z.
First used in 2011, the slang term comes from African American English where 'cap' means exaggeration or falsehood and is used across the generations, the study found, but most prominently by Gen Z.
'The powers that be' was among the most popular idioms used by millennials and older generations, but it was hardly used by Gen Z, the report said, showing that the younger generation are 'more noticeably phasing out traditional or established phrases' than other generations.
Mark Walker, director of English and exams at the British Council, said: 'This latest study into the evolution of English explores the phrases we use to express shared ideas and experiences – it shows how much English is shaped by people around the world and how it continues to grow and adapt.
'By celebrating the richness of our language, we're not just looking at its past, but also at the future of English.
'Whether for work, study, travel, relationships, or lifelong learning, as the global lingua franca, English is one of the key ways that people connect and engage across cultures.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
17 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Junior Cycle English short story question sparks criticism from teachers
English teachers have criticised the inclusion of an 'unwise and unfair' short story question that appeared on this year's Junior Cycle exam paper this week. Many students reported their surprise at the question on the higher-level paper, which asked students to outline how a setting has a vital influence oin a short story they studied. The Irish National Organisation for Teachers of English (INOTE) said it 'noted with dismay' the question exclusively on short stories. Students will have encountered short stories during their three-year study, and the study of short stories is required by the English specification, it added. 'However, practically in the classroom, short stories are rarely studied in the deep analytical way required of the exam paper.' Short stories are often read for enjoyment or as "stepping stones" to studying longer fiction texts, rather than for detailed narrative analysis, INOTE added. "Additionally, and sensibly, most students would instead have concentrated on their two studied novels, their studied Shakespeare play, their studied film and the array of poems they would have prepared for the exam." It would have been much fairer to pose a question about how the setting was used in a short story or a novel read by students, it added. "Narrowing the focus to short stories exclusively will have disadvantaged a significant number of students, something we absolutely reject as useful in a Junior Cycle exam." INOTE said it has felt disappointed every year with some of the questions asked in the Junior Cycle English exam, which are "either much too narrow in focus or much too ambitious in scope to allow meaningful student engagement." "Our students deserve the time and opportunity to showcase their learning rather than being punished by an exam that sometimes seems, whether intentionally or not, designed to catch them out," it added. A spokesman for the State Examinations Commission (SEC) it has been assured the exam, including the short story question, was "fully within the scope of the specification and in keeping with the aims, objectives and learning outcomes for Junior Cycle English." He added that commentary and correspondence on the examinations from students, parents, teachers, professional bodies, and other interested parties is a normal part of the examination process. "Such observations regarding test instruments are an intrinsic part of the feedback that we would expect to receive in any year. All observations received in relation to a subject are reviewed by the Chief Examiner in the context of preparing the marking scheme for that subject." The marking scheme will be published, as will the marking schemes in all other subjects, after the issue of the Junior Cycle results, he added. Read More 41646145[/readmore[


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
‘One Paper at a Time' - My leaving cert journey so far
English Paper 1 was the first hurdle, and thankfully, it played to my strengths. I used my background as a rugby player to answer Question B: a pre-match captain's talk. Drawing from real-life experience made the words flow easily. For the composition, I chose to write a speech debating the motion 'Truth has become a valueless currency in today's world'. The word 'valueless' threw me at first – I had to pause and really think it through – but I stuck with it, and I'm glad I did. I felt confident coming out of the exam. That first wave of relief walking out of the hall was unmatched. That confidence carried me into home economics, but this time, things were tougher. The food commodity question focused on cheese, which was not the topic I had hoped for. Like many others, I was banking on proteins, but we got lipids. I pushed through and answered every question, drawing on all the preparation we had done over the years. That night, I was absolutely shattered. I was mentally drained but full of hope. I woke up the next morning at 6am to study for English Paper 2 – the paper I had been dreading most. It felt like the real test, the one that could make or break me. My nerves were sky-high. I walked into the hall physically shaking, heart racing, palms sweaty. I whispered a quiet prayer and hoped for a fair paper. Like many others, I was hoping for Patrick Kavanagh, Gerard Manley Hopkins or Eavan Boland to appear in the poetry section. When I opened the paper and saw both Kavanagh and Boland, I was spoiled for choice. In the end, I went with Boland, a poet whose work I had really connected with throughout the year. The cultural context question on power and control suited me perfectly for the comparative section. Then came King Lear and a question on victims, which was right up my alley. The three hours and 20 minutes disappeared. I walked out of that exam hall with a grin from ear to ear. The hard work had paid off.


RTÉ News
2 days ago
- RTÉ News
Leaving Cert Reaction: English Paper 1 & Paper 2 reviewed
For the Leaving Cert class of 2025 one of the big ones is out of the way - fare thee well English! While there is no need to dwell on things, we are here to help you review the exams with experts sharing their thoughts on Leaving Cert English Paper 1 and Paper 2. Plus, you can download the exam papers for Higher and Ordinary Level below: Leaving Cert English Paper 1 - Higher Leaving Cert English Paper 1 - Ordinary Liam Dingle, English teacher at the Institute of Education takes us through Paper 1. Press play up top to watch the video and read on for more. Key points The paper reflected the world beyond the exam hall and the experiences of modern students. The layout and range of questions was consistent with recent papers. Liam says: "Hopefully, students will leave the exam hall with a sense of satisfaction. There were no artificial barriers or curveballs to startle students facing the rest of their exams. The paper advocated for optimism and the fight of the underdog; hopefully they will have taken that message to heart." Study Hub regular Clodagh Havel casts an eye over Paper 2 in the video above. She describes it as "a testing paper, not necessarily an arduous one but nevertheless students will feel a lot more pushed to react and grapple with the exam than they did yesterday." Her key points "Duality" seems to have been a hidden theme throughout. Some unusual vocabulary will have caused some to pause or feel disconcerted in their approach. Clodagh says: "Many will leave the exam hall feeling that it was a long slog, particularly in comparison to the much more amenable Paper 1. Yet underneath the sometimes excessively worded questions, there was something for everyone. Students who allowed themselves the composure to peel away the layers of the onion will find themselves tired but satisfied."